Nutrition KnowledgeNCT06903403
Comparing Front-of-package Nutrient Labels
A study testing Front-of-package label in people with Nutrition Knowledge and Perceptions, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to compare front-of-package labels to a no-label control and to one another: 1.) FDA's Nutrition Info with %DV, 2.) Nutrition Info with red "high", 3.) FDA's High In, 4.) multiple High In labels-one for each nutrient and 5.) a no-label control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nutrition Knowledge, Perceptions, Dietary Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Front-of-package label
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15,582 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2025to 25 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Equal or greater than 18 years of age
- English-speaking
- U.S. residents
Who cannot join
- Failing the attention check question
- Completing the survey in less than one-third of the median completion time (median time calculated when 90% of responses are collected and will be based on the median time of completed questionnaires)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of California, Davis
Davis, California, 95616
About this study
The goal of this study is to compare front-of-package labels to a no-label control and to one another: 1.) FDA's Nutrition Info with %DV, 2.) Nutrition Info with red "high", 3.) FDA's High In, 4.) multiple High In labels-one for each nutrient and 5.) a no-label control. Primary outcomes include 1.) correct identification of foods and beverages with the healthiest and least healthy overall nutrient profiles, 2.) perceived healthfulness of products low in two nutrients of concern, and 3.) correct identification of foods and beverages as high in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars.
Read the detailed description
The overall goal of this online randomized controlled trial is to compare the performance of FDA's Nutrition Info %DV front-of-package label (FOPL) to a no-label control and other FOPL designs, including the Nutrition Info label without the %DV and with red color for "high in" nutrients, the FDA's High In label, and multiple black box High In labels-one for each nutrient.
The primary outcomes are: 1.) correct identification of foods and beverages with the healthiest and least healthy overall nutrient profiles, 2.) perceived healthfulness of products low in two nutrients of concern, and 3.) correct identification of foods and beverages as high in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars. Secondary outcomes include: 1.) noticing the nutrition label, 2.) recalling the label's content, 3.) reported use of label when selecting food items, 4.) perceived healthfulness of i.) products not high in any nutrients of concern and ii.) products with different nutrient levels for each nutrient of concern, 5.) selection of a food item high in at least one nutrient of concern for themselves, 6.) selection of a food item high in at least one nutrient of concern for their youngest child (at least 2 years old), 7.) perceived message effectiveness of label for discouraging consumption of foods high in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars, 8.) time spent on identifying healthiest and least healthy overall nutrient profiles, and 9.) time spent on identifying foods and beverages as high in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars.
Repeated dichotomous outcomes (e.g., correct selection of healthiest profile, correct selection of least healthy profile, correct identification of product high in nutrients of concern) will be analyzed in mixed effects Poisson regression with robust standard errors. Single dichotomous outcomes (e.g., noticing, use of label, selection of at least one item high in one nutrient of concern) will be analyzed in Poisson regression with robust standard errors. Results will report proportions in each condition and absolute (i.e., percentage point) and relative differences (i.e., probability ratios). Continuous outcomes (e.g., perceived healthfulness, time spent) will be used in linear regression. All regression models will regress the outcome on an indicator for experimental condition. results will report averages by condition and average differential effects between conditions. Analyses will use a two-sided critical alpha of 0.05 to conduct all statistical tests. All confidence intervals presented will be 95% and two-sided. Given the preliminary nature of this study, which is comparing novel FOPLs for the first time, no p-value adjustments for multiple comparisons are planned.
In moderation analyses using interaction terms and stratified models, effect modification of label design on the primary outcomes will be examined by participant nutrition literacy, education, grocery shopping frequency, having children, and type of device used to take the survey.
Additionally, differences in all outcomes between each of the 5 unique conditions will be examined. The modeling approach may be modified if assumptions are not met.
A soft launch of approximately 500 completed surveys will be conducted to verify that the online survey is functioning as intended and to detect any programming errors. There may be another soft launch if any corrections are needed. If the target sample size is not achieved by April 30th, 2025, the data collected thus far will be used in preliminary analysis to provide public comments. The analytic sample will include participants with complete data on the primary outcomes.
- Conditions
- Nutrition Knowledge, Perceptions, Dietary Behavior
- Being tested
- Front-of-package label
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Front-of-package labelOther
Participants will see packaged food and beverage items displayed with labels as specified by their assigned group
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| No-label Control | No intervention | Participants will see packaged food and beverage items with no front-of-package labels (other than any posted by the manufacturer). |
| Nutrition Info Percent Daily Value | Experimental | Participants will see packaged food and beverage items displaying front-of-package labels that list "high", "medium", or "low" for saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars. "High" is defined as 20% or more of the Daily Value per serving, "medium" as 6-19%, and "low" as 5% or less. The label will also list the percent Daily Value for each nutrient per serving. The label will have a white background and black text. Receives: Other: Front-of-package label |
| Nutrition Info with Red "High" | Experimental | Participants will see packaged food and beverage items displaying front-of-package labels that list "high", "medium", or "low" for saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars. "High" is defined as 20% or more of the Daily Value per serving, "medium" as 6-19%, and "low" as 5% or less. The label will have a white background and black text, except for the word "high," which will be in white font and highlighted red. Receives: Other: Front-of-package label |
| Plain High In | Experimental | Participants will see packaged food and beverage items displaying front-of-package labels that say, "High In [nutrient]" (nutrients: saturated fat, sodium, and/or added sugars) if the item contains 20% or more of the Daily Value per serving for each nutrient. The label will have a white background and black text. If the item is not high in 1 or 2 of the nutrients, the nutrient(s) will not be on the label. If the item is not high in any of the 3 nutrients, the product will not display this label. Receives: Other: Front-of-package label |
| Multiple Black Box High In | Experimental | Participants will see packaged food and beverage items displaying front-of-package labels that say, "High In [nutrient]" (nutrients: saturated fat, sodium, and/or added sugars) if the item contains 20% or more of the Daily Value per serving for each nutrient. Each nutrient will have it's own label, a black box with white text. If the item is not high in a nutrient, it will not display the black box label for that nutrient. If the item is not high in any of the 3 nutrients, the product will not display any labels. Receives: Other: Front-of-package label |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Correct identification of healthiest profile
Participants will view 4 series of 3 products on the same screen, with each product having a nutrient profile. They will be instructed, "Choose the food [beverage] that has the healthiest overall nutrient profile. Consider saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars." Outcome for each series will be dichotomized (1 = correct, 0 = incorrect), and the multiple outcomes will be used in mixed effects Poisson regression with robust standard errors.
Measured: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Correct identification of least healthy profile
Participants will view approximately 4 series of 3 products side-by-side, showing different nutrient profiles. They will be asked "Choose the food [or beverage] with the least healthy overall nutrient profile. Consider saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars." Outcome for each series will be dichotomized (1 = correct, 0 = incorrect) and the multiple outcomes will be used in mixed effects Poisson regression with robust standard errors.
Measured: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Correct identification of "high" nutrients
Participants will view 5 foods and indicate whether each food is high in each of saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars. A "correct" response is identifying a high-in product as high in the corresponding nutrient and identifying a not high-in product as not high in the corresponding nutrient; otherwise the response is "incorrect". The 15 (3 nutrients across 5 products) dichotomous responses will be analyzed in a mixed model, accounting for within subject correlation.
Measured: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Perceived healthfulness of items low in two nutrients of concern
Participants will provide a healthfulness score (response scale from 1-7 ranging from very unhealthy to very healthy) for 4 different products. The score for each product will be used as a continuous outcome in linear regression models.
Measured: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Secondary outcomes (9)
Noticing the label
After a hypothetical shopping task (the first of two shopping tasks), participants will be asked if they noticed any nutrition labels on the food. Analysis will include using the dichotomous outcome of noticing in Poisson regression with robust standard errors.
Measured: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Recalling the label's content
If participants answer "yes" to noticing a nutrition label, they will be asked, "What information was on the label? Select all that apply." Response options will include calories, fiber, saturated fat, sodium, added sugars, cholesterol, protein, calcium, vitamin D, and "none of these". The percent of options correctly selected or not selected will be used in linear regression.
Measured: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Reported use of label
After a hypothetical shopping task (the first of two shopping tasks), if a participant responds "yes" to noticing a label, they will be asked if they used the label when selecting their item. Outcome will be dichotomized and analyzed in Poisson regression.
Measured: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Perceived healthfulness of (i) items not high in any nutrient of concern and (ii) items with different nutrient levels for each nutrient of concern
Participants will provide a healthfulness score (response scale from 1-7) for 5 different products. The score for each product will be used as a continuous outcome in linear regression models.
Measured: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Selection of a product high in a nutrient of concern for themselves
In the second of two shopping tasks, participants will select a food they would purchase for themselves from hypothetical grocery store shelves. The dichotomous outcome is selection of an item that is high in at least one nutrient of concern (compared to not selecting an item high in at least one nutrient of concern), analyzed in Poisson regression with robust SE to directly estimate probability ratios.
Measured: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Selection of a product high in a nutrient of concern for their child
Participants will select a food they would purchase for their youngest child (at least 2 years old) from hypothetical grocery store shelves. The dichotomous outcome is selection of an item that is high in at least one nutrient of concern (compared to not selecting an item high in at least one nutrient of concern), analyzed in Poisson regression with robust SE to directly estimate probability ratios.
Measured: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Perceived message effectiveness
Participants not in the control group will view their assigned label in isolation (i.e., not on a product) and will be asked "How much does this label discourage you from wanting to purchase foods or beverages that are high in saturated fat, sodium, or added sugars?" Response options will range from not at all (1) to a great deal (5). The responses will be treated as a continuous outcome in linear regression.
Measured: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Time spent on identifying healthiest and least healthy overall nutrient profiles
Timer features will be used in the survey to measure the time spent on the primary outcome of identifying healthiest and least healthy overall nutrient profiles. The time (in seconds) will be used as a continuous outcome in linear regression. The top and bottom 2% will be considered outliers and excluded.
Measured: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Time spent on identifying foods and beverages as high in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars.
Timer features will be used in the survey to measure the time spent on the primary outcome of identifying foods and beverages as high in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars. The time (in seconds) will be used as a continuous outcome in linear regression. The top and bottom 2% will be considered outliers and excluded.
Measured: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Mar 2025
- Study start1 Apr 2025
- Primary completion25 Apr 2025
- Study completion25 Apr 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nutrition KnowledgeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 15,582 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Davis
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jennifer Falbe, University of California, Davis
- Investigators
- Jennifer Falbe, Principal investigator, University of California, Davis
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06903403
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2295549
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lemmon B, Grummon AH, Marquez A, Soederberg Miller LM, Au LE, Brown SD, Wang A, Powell LM, Falbe J. Efficacy of front-of-package nutrient labels designed for mandatory implementation in the USA: an online randomised controlled trial. Lancet Public Health. 2026 Apr;11(4):e221-e232. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(26)00027-7.
PubMed 41887825
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing Front-of-package Nutrient Labels
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06903403
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2295549
- Conditions
- Nutrition Knowledge, Perceptions, Dietary Behavior
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15,582 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, DavisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Apr 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to compare front-of-package labels to a no-label control and to one another: 1.) FDA's Nutrition Info with %DV, 2.) Nutrition Info with red "high", 3.) FDA's High In, 4.) multiple High In labels-one for each nutrient and 5.) a no-label control. Primary outcomes include 1.) correct identification of foods and beverages with the healthiest and least healthy overall nutrient profiles, 2.) perceived healthfulness of products low in two nutrients of concern, and 3.) correct identification of foods and beverages as high in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars.
Detailed description
The overall goal of this online randomized controlled trial is to compare the performance of FDA's Nutrition Info %DV front-of-package label (FOPL) to a no-label control and other FOPL designs, including the Nutrition Info label without the %DV and with red color for "high in" nutrients, the FDA's High In label, and multiple black box High In labels-one for each nutrient.
The primary outcomes are: 1.) correct identification of foods and beverages with the healthiest and least healthy overall nutrient profiles, 2.) perceived healthfulness of products low in two nutrients of concern, and 3.) correct identification of foods and beverages as high in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars. Secondary outcomes include: 1.) noticing the nutrition label, 2.) recalling the label's content, 3.) reported use of label when selecting food items, 4.) perceived healthfulness of i.) products not high in any nutrients of concern and ii.) products with different nutrient levels for each nutrient of concern, 5.) selection of a food item high in at least one nutrient of concern for themselves, 6.) selection of a food item high in at least one nutrient of concern for their youngest child (at least 2 years old), 7.) perceived message effectiveness of label for discouraging consumption of foods high in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars, 8.) time spent on identifying healthiest and least healthy overall nutrient profiles, and 9.) time spent on identifying foods and beverages as high in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars.
Repeated dichotomous outcomes (e.g., correct selection of healthiest profile, correct selection of least healthy profile, correct identification of product high in nutrients of concern) will be analyzed in mixed effects Poisson regression with robust standard errors. Single dichotomous outcomes (e.g., noticing, use of label, selection of at least one item high in one nutrient of concern) will be analyzed in Poisson regression with robust standard errors. Results will report proportions in each condition and absolute (i.e., percentage point) and relative differences (i.e., probability ratios). Continuous outcomes (e.g., perceived healthfulness, time spent) will be used in linear regression. All regression models will regress the outcome on an indicator for experimental condition. results will report averages by condition and average differential effects between conditions. Analyses will use a two-sided critical alpha of 0.05 to conduct all statistical tests. All confidence intervals presented will be 95% and two-sided. Given the preliminary nature of this study, which is comparing novel FOPLs for the first time, no p-value adjustments for multiple comparisons are planned.
In moderation analyses using interaction terms and stratified models, effect modification of label design on the primary outcomes will be examined by participant nutrition literacy, education, grocery shopping frequency, having children, and type of device used to take the survey.
Additionally, differences in all outcomes between each of the 5 unique conditions will be examined. The modeling approach may be modified if assumptions are not met.
A soft launch of approximately 500 completed surveys will be conducted to verify that the online survey is functioning as intended and to detect any programming errors. There may be another soft launch if any corrections are needed. If the target sample size is not achieved by April 30th, 2025, the data collected thus far will be used in preliminary analysis to provide public comments. The analytic sample will include participants with complete data on the primary outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| No-label Control | No intervention | –Participants will see packaged food and beverage items with no front-of-package labels (other than any posted by the manufacturer). |
| Nutrition Info Percent Daily Value | Experimental | Other: Front-of-package labelParticipants will see packaged food and beverage items displaying front-of-package labels that list "high", "medium", or "low" for saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars. "High" is defined as 20% or more of the Daily Value per serving, "medium" as 6-19%, and "low" as 5% or less. The label will also list the percent Daily Value for each nutrient per serving. The label will have a white background and black text. |
| Nutrition Info with Red "High" | Experimental | Other: Front-of-package labelParticipants will see packaged food and beverage items displaying front-of-package labels that list "high", "medium", or "low" for saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars. "High" is defined as 20% or more of the Daily Value per serving, "medium" as 6-19%, and "low" as 5% or less. The label will have a white background and black text, except for the word "high," which will be in white font and highlighted red. |
| Plain High In | Experimental | Other: Front-of-package labelParticipants will see packaged food and beverage items displaying front-of-package labels that say, "High In [nutrient]" (nutrients: saturated fat, sodium, and/or added sugars) if the item contains 20% or more of the Daily Value per serving for each nutrient. The label will have a white background and black text. If the item is not high in 1 or 2 of the nutrients, the nutrient(s) will not be on the label. If the item is not high in any of the 3 nutrients, the product will not display this label. |
| Multiple Black Box High In | Experimental | Other: Front-of-package labelParticipants will see packaged food and beverage items displaying front-of-package labels that say, "High In [nutrient]" (nutrients: saturated fat, sodium, and/or added sugars) if the item contains 20% or more of the Daily Value per serving for each nutrient. Each nutrient will have it's own label, a black box with white text. If the item is not high in a nutrient, it will not display the black box label for that nutrient. If the item is not high in any of the 3 nutrients, the product will not display any labels. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Equal or greater than 18 years of age
- English-speaking
- U.S. residents
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Failing the attention check question
- Completing the survey in less than one-third of the median completion time (median time calculated when 90% of responses are collected and will be based on the median time of completed questionnaires)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Front-of-package labelParticipants will see packaged food and beverage items displayed with labels as specified by their assigned group | Other | Multiple Black Box High In, Nutrition Info Percent Daily Value, Nutrition Info with Red "High", Plain High In |
Primary outcome
Correct identification of healthiest profile
Time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Participants will view 4 series of 3 products on the same screen, with each product having a nutrient profile. They will be instructed, "Choose the food [beverage] that has the healthiest overall nutrient profile. Consider saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars." Outcome for each series will be dichotomized (1 = correct, 0 = incorrect), and the multiple outcomes will be used in mixed effects Poisson regression with robust standard errors.
Correct identification of least healthy profile
Time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Participants will view approximately 4 series of 3 products side-by-side, showing different nutrient profiles. They will be asked "Choose the food [or beverage] with the least healthy overall nutrient profile. Consider saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars." Outcome for each series will be dichotomized (1 = correct, 0 = incorrect) and the multiple outcomes will be used in mixed effects Poisson regression with robust standard errors.
Correct identification of "high" nutrients
Time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Participants will view 5 foods and indicate whether each food is high in each of saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars. A "correct" response is identifying a high-in product as high in the corresponding nutrient and identifying a not high-in product as not high in the corresponding nutrient; otherwise the response is "incorrect". The 15 (3 nutrients across 5 products) dichotomous responses will be analyzed in a mixed model, accounting for within subject correlation.
Perceived healthfulness of items low in two nutrients of concern
Time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Participants will provide a healthfulness score (response scale from 1-7 ranging from very unhealthy to very healthy) for 4 different products. The score for each product will be used as a continuous outcome in linear regression models.
9 secondary outcomes
Noticing the label
Time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Recalling the label's content
Time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Reported use of label
Time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Perceived healthfulness of (i) items not high in any nutrient of concern and (ii) items with different nutrient levels for each nutrient of concern
Time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Selection of a product high in a nutrient of concern for themselves
Time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Selection of a product high in a nutrient of concern for their child
Time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Perceived message effectiveness
Time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Time spent on identifying healthiest and least healthy overall nutrient profiles
Time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Time spent on identifying foods and beverages as high in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars.
Time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41887825Lemmon B, Grummon AH, Marquez A, Soederberg Miller LM, Au LE, Brown SD, Wang A, Powell LM, Falbe J. Efficacy of front-of-package nutrient labels designed for mandatory implementation in the USA: an online randomised controlled trial. Lancet Public Health. 2026 Apr;11(4):e221-e232. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(26)00027-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nutrition Knowledge
Not yet recruiting
Health Care Professionals Diet App Study
Nutrition Education
Recruiting
Climate-Responsive Nutrition, WASH, and Heat Counselling for Maternal and Child Health in Sindh, Pakistan
Maternal Nutrition, Child Nutrition
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Self-Reported Hydration and Nutrition Habits and Knowledge Among Frontline Workers in Manufacturing Facilities
Hydration, Nutrition
Not yet recruiting
Added-Sugars Warning Label PSAs
Dietary Behaviour, Nutrition Knowledge
Not yet recruiting
A School-Based Nutrition and Fitness Program: Operation ToneUp
Exercise, Nutrition Knowledge
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennifer Falbe principal investigator
University of California, Davis
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Front-of-package label in people with Nutrition Knowledge and Perceptions, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Correct identification of healthiest profile (time frame: Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06903403, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2025.