Low Back PainNCT06916533
ENBORTH-TR Intervention for Back/Neck Pain
A study testing ENBORTH-TR Intervention and Client-centred Occupational Therapy Intervention Group in people with Low Back Pain and Neck Pain, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the ENBORTH-TR training programme given in addition to client-centred intervention in individuals with low back and/or neck pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain, Neck Pain
- What is being tested?
- ENBORTH-TR Intervention and Client-centred Occupational Therapy Intervention Group
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 136 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 10 Oct 2024to 5 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- To be at least primary school graduate
- Participating in the study voluntarily
- To be able to read and write Turkish
- At least 24 points from the Mini Mental State Examination
- Having low back and neck pain for 3 months or more
- Being between the ages of 18-65
Who cannot join
- Having a neurological, psychiatric or chronic disease (cancer, etc.) or having any secondary disease that will adversely affect the work
- History of any malignancy or spinal fracture
- Having undergone a surgical procedure for low back and/or neck pain or having undergone any other surgical intervention within the last 6 months
- Not participating regularly in the intervention process
- Participating in another rehabilitation program during the study period
- 7) Diagnosis of pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of ENBORTH-TR Intervention on Pain, Quality of Life, Sleep Quality, Kinesiophobia, Perceived Occupational Performance and Satisfaction in Low Back and/or Neck Pain: A Single Blind Randomised Controlled Study
This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the ENBORTH-TR training programme given in addition to client-centred intervention in individuals with low back and/or neck pain. The current study investigates the effect of ENBORTH-TR on pain, quality of life, sleep quality, kinesiophobia and perceived occupational performance and satisfaction levels. This study was designed according to the CONSORT statement, which provides standardisation in randomised controlled trials. In addition, the study was approved by the scientific research ethics committee of a university. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before the study.
Read the detailed description
This study was planned as a single-blind randomized controlled trial and was conducted using the CONSORT checklist. Participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and signed the written consent form were divided into 2 groups by simple randomization. While the client-centered intervention procedure was applied to both groups within the scope of the study, the ENBORTH-TR intervention procedure was also applied to the intervention group. All intervention procedures in the study were planned with the telerehabilitation method for 3 days a week for 4 weeks and each session was planned to consist of 45-minute sessions. A total of 136 people were included in the study, 69 in the control group and 67 in the intervention group.
Interventions Client-centered intervention procedure
Using the literature, a client-centered intervention procedure for individuals with low back and/or neck pain was developed. This intervention procedure consists of 5 steps. These steps are as follows:
First phase: Setting measurable, realistic and achievable goals to address occupational performance issues
Second phase: Developing and evaluating the pros and cons of possible solutions by brainstorming on the oupations identified by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.
Third stage: Deciding on a solution, making a plan and implementing it. At this stage, adaptations are made to the oupations with problems, a new oupation is chosen and the oupation is prioritized.
Fourth stage Reviewing the results of the client-centered intervention process
Fifth stage: Receiving feedback on the individual's experiences and making changes where necessary.
Client-centered intervention is known as a core component, a historically integrated value and a fundamental element of occupational therapy interventions. It is based on focusing on the individual's values, needs and goals by prioritizing the individuals' own experiences and preferences. Within the scope of the intervention procedure, telerehabilitation method was applied jointly to both groups. In the first evaluations, occupational performance problems were identified according to the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure data. The participants were given a general information about the problem areas and the intervention process and the session contents were planned. In the sessions, it was aimed to step, prioritize, analyze and break down the occupations for low back and/or neck pain, apply specific interventions to the areas of difficulty and adapt the occupation according to individual needs when necessary. Within the framework of a holistic approach, it was aimed to evaluate environmental and psychosocial factors and to identify and support areas that can be intervened.
ENBORTH-TR intervention:
This training program was given to the intervention group in addition to the client-centered intervention. This intervention, which was carried out with the telerehabilitation method, continued for a total of 4 weeks, 3 days a week and 45-minute sessions. The program consists of 5 stages and the content of the training is discussed in detail below. In order to make the program more understandable, the training was carried out with a booklet supported by videos and visuals. The name of the intervention program consists of the initials of the words "Ergoteraphy, Neck, Back, Orthopaedics". This intervention was created by utilizing the literature. The contents of the 5 stages of the intervention are presented below:
Stage 1: Basic Information: Body anatomy, Functions and Pain Mechanisms:
This phase covers sessions 1-3. The main purpose of the sessions is to enable the clients to recognize their bodies and the pain they experience, to gain awareness, to establish a relationship of trust between the therapist and the client and to set goals.
Stage 2: Ergonomics Training and Environmental Arrangements:
In sessions 4-6, clients' living spaces were evaluated and ergonomic adjustments were made for low back and/or neck pain. In addition to these adjustments, joint and energy conservation techniques were taught and information was given about correct movement patterns and body mechanics.
Stage 3: Psychosocial Factors, Sleep and Time Management:
Sessions 7 and 8 focused on psychosocial factors and sleep. Progressive muscle relaxation technique was taught and practiced and sleep diary application was explained. In addition, pre-sleep nutrition and sleep habits were emphasized. Sessions 9 and 10 focused on time management. Time management aims not only to increase productivity, but also to reduce pain, conserve energy and manage stress, thus supporting the individual's participation and quality of life.
Stage 4: Client Feedback At this stage, the extent to which the clients were able to transfer the information learned in the training to daily life was evaluated. At the same time, the training process was also reviewed in general, and areas that were missing or needed to be reinforced were identified. Thus, it was aimed to complete the training in a healthy way
Stage 5: Revisiting Feedback In the last stage, according to the feedback received from the clients, the areas that were not understood or thought to be missing were reconsidered. The training process was completed by answering the questions posed by the clients regarding the training process and the readings.
Statistically analysis Data were analyzed with SPSS version 27.0 statistical software package program. The normality of the data was analyzed by using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Nonparametric tests were used because the data did not show a normal distribution. Differences between groups were analyzed with chi-square test for nominal data. Comparisons between the groups were conducted by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Pre- to post-intervention changes within the groups were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Significance was evaluated at levels of 0.05. Effect size was calculated by using the means and standard deviations of the groups. Effect size benchmarks were determined as <0.30, 0.30-0.80, and >0.80 and considered small, moderate, and strong, respectively.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain, Neck Pain
- Being tested
- ENBORTH-TR Intervention, Client-centred Occupational Therapy Intervention Group
- Keywords
- low back pain, neck pain, quality of life, sleep quality, occupational performance, satisfaction, kinesiophobia
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain, Neck Pain, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Personal Satisfaction, Kinesiophobia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ENBORTH-TR InterventionBehavioural
This intervention program is structured with a multifaceted and holistic approach, starting with the definition of pain and covering topics such as basic body anatomy, functions and pain mechanisms, ergonomics training, environmental regulations, psychosocial factors such as stress, relaxation techniques, sleep and time management.
Client-centred Occupational Therapy Intervention GroupBehavioural
Client-centered occupational therapy intervention consists of 5 stages: (1) Client-centered goal setting, (2) creation of the therapy plan, (3) implementation of interventions, (4) evaluation of results, and (5) obtaining feedback.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Experimental | According to the evaluation results, client-centred occupational therapy intervention was applied to this group. The client-centred occupational therapy intervention is based on the activities that the participants stated in the COPM in the first evaluation and had problems. Receives: Behavioral: Client-centred Occupational Therapy Intervention Group |
| ENBORTH-TR Invertention Group | Experimental | In this study, ENBORTH-TR training programme is applied in addition to person-centred intervention. ENBORTH-TR programme starts from the definition of pain, explains its mechanism, affected muscle groups, and provides awareness training that will improve the quality of life of individuals in pain management such as environmental regulations, relaxation techniques, stress management. Receives: Behavioral: ENBORTH-TR Intervention; Behavioral: Client-centred Occupational Therapy Intervention Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
COPM, which is most frequently used among occupational therapists, is a standardised measurement tool used to determine the individual's activity performance problems and to measure performance satisfaction. In the COPM, which is a semi-structured interview, individuals evaluate their activity preferences with performance and satisfaction scores given by themselves. Individuals are asked about their activity performance problems and concerns about 3 areas including self-care, productivity and leisure time activities. Up to three problems can be identified in each activity area (self-care, productivity, leisure). Performance and satisfaction scores are again determined by the individual between 1 and 10 points.
Measured: 30 minutes
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visual analogue scale was used to assess the pain intensity of the participants. During the assessment, the participants were asked to mark the points where they felt pain during sleep, rest and activity on a 10 cm horizontal line with the left end 0 meaning 'no pain' and the right end 10 meaning 'very severe pain'. Before marking, the individuals were explained in detail what they should do. Then, the distance of the marked points to point 0 was measured and recorded in centimetres
Measured: 5 minutes
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK)
The TSK, which is used in the evaluation of kinesiophobia, is a Likert-type scale consisting of 17 questions. Each question is scored between 1 and 4 points (1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree). The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 17 and the highest score is 68. A high score in the total score of the scale indicates a high level of kinesiophobia.
Measured: 7 minutes
Nottingham Health Profile (NHP)
The NHP used to assess the people's QoL consists of a total of 38 questions. It has 6 subscales and assesses energy, pain, emotional reactions, sleep, social isolation and physical activity. Scoring is done between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a low QoL.
Measured: 10 minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Sleep quality was assessed with the PSQI. The scale consisting of 24 questions in total aims to evaluate the sleep quality of the individual in the last month.PSQI consists of 18 items consisting of 7 components in a 1-month period. These items are scored according to a 4-point Likert scale. PSQI is evaluated over 21 points and a score of 5 and above indicates poor sleep quality.
Measured: 15 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2025
- Study start10 Oct 2024
- Primary completion28 Feb 2025
- Study completion5 Apr 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 136 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Berkan Torpil, PhD, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06916533
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024/209
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 31 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 11 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of ENBORTH-TR Intervention on Pain, Quality of Life, Sleep Quality, Kinesiophobia, Perceived Occupational Performance and Satisfaction in Low Back and/or Neck Pain: A Single Blind Randomised Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06916533
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024/209
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain, Neck Pain
- Keywords
- low back pain, neck pain, quality of life, sleep quality, occupational performance, satisfaction, kinesiophobia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 136 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Apr 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the ENBORTH-TR training programme given in addition to client-centred intervention in individuals with low back and/or neck pain. The current study investigates the effect of ENBORTH-TR on pain, quality of life, sleep quality, kinesiophobia and perceived occupational performance and satisfaction levels. This study was designed according to the CONSORT statement, which provides standardisation in randomised controlled trials. In addition, the study was approved by the scientific research ethics committee of a university. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before the study.
Detailed description
This study was planned as a single-blind randomized controlled trial and was conducted using the CONSORT checklist. Participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and signed the written consent form were divided into 2 groups by simple randomization. While the client-centered intervention procedure was applied to both groups within the scope of the study, the ENBORTH-TR intervention procedure was also applied to the intervention group. All intervention procedures in the study were planned with the telerehabilitation method for 3 days a week for 4 weeks and each session was planned to consist of 45-minute sessions. A total of 136 people were included in the study, 69 in the control group and 67 in the intervention group.
Interventions Client-centered intervention procedure
Using the literature, a client-centered intervention procedure for individuals with low back and/or neck pain was developed. This intervention procedure consists of 5 steps. These steps are as follows:
First phase: Setting measurable, realistic and achievable goals to address occupational performance issues
Second phase: Developing and evaluating the pros and cons of possible solutions by brainstorming on the oupations identified by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.
Third stage: Deciding on a solution, making a plan and implementing it. At this stage, adaptations are made to the oupations with problems, a new oupation is chosen and the oupation is prioritized.
Fourth stage Reviewing the results of the client-centered intervention process
Fifth stage: Receiving feedback on the individual's experiences and making changes where necessary.
Client-centered intervention is known as a core component, a historically integrated value and a fundamental element of occupational therapy interventions. It is based on focusing on the individual's values, needs and goals by prioritizing the individuals' own experiences and preferences. Within the scope of the intervention procedure, telerehabilitation method was applied jointly to both groups. In the first evaluations, occupational performance problems were identified according to the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure data. The participants were given a general information about the problem areas and the intervention process and the session contents were planned. In the sessions, it was aimed to step, prioritize, analyze and break down the occupations for low back and/or neck pain, apply specific interventions to the areas of difficulty and adapt the occupation according to individual needs when necessary. Within the framework of a holistic approach, it was aimed to evaluate environmental and psychosocial factors and to identify and support areas that can be intervened.
ENBORTH-TR intervention:
This training program was given to the intervention group in addition to the client-centered intervention. This intervention, which was carried out with the telerehabilitation method, continued for a total of 4 weeks, 3 days a week and 45-minute sessions. The program consists of 5 stages and the content of the training is discussed in detail below. In order to make the program more understandable, the training was carried out with a booklet supported by videos and visuals. The name of the intervention program consists of the initials of the words "Ergoteraphy, Neck, Back, Orthopaedics". This intervention was created by utilizing the literature. The contents of the 5 stages of the intervention are presented below:
Stage 1: Basic Information: Body anatomy, Functions and Pain Mechanisms:
This phase covers sessions 1-3. The main purpose of the sessions is to enable the clients to recognize their bodies and the pain they experience, to gain awareness, to establish a relationship of trust between the therapist and the client and to set goals.
Stage 2: Ergonomics Training and Environmental Arrangements:
In sessions 4-6, clients' living spaces were evaluated and ergonomic adjustments were made for low back and/or neck pain. In addition to these adjustments, joint and energy conservation techniques were taught and information was given about correct movement patterns and body mechanics.
Stage 3: Psychosocial Factors, Sleep and Time Management:
Sessions 7 and 8 focused on psychosocial factors and sleep. Progressive muscle relaxation technique was taught and practiced and sleep diary application was explained. In addition, pre-sleep nutrition and sleep habits were emphasized. Sessions 9 and 10 focused on time management. Time management aims not only to increase productivity, but also to reduce pain, conserve energy and manage stress, thus supporting the individual's participation and quality of life.
Stage 4: Client Feedback At this stage, the extent to which the clients were able to transfer the information learned in the training to daily life was evaluated. At the same time, the training process was also reviewed in general, and areas that were missing or needed to be reinforced were identified. Thus, it was aimed to complete the training in a healthy way
Stage 5: Revisiting Feedback In the last stage, according to the feedback received from the clients, the areas that were not understood or thought to be missing were reconsidered. The training process was completed by answering the questions posed by the clients regarding the training process and the readings.
Statistically analysis Data were analyzed with SPSS version 27.0 statistical software package program. The normality of the data was analyzed by using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Nonparametric tests were used because the data did not show a normal distribution. Differences between groups were analyzed with chi-square test for nominal data. Comparisons between the groups were conducted by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Pre- to post-intervention changes within the groups were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Significance was evaluated at levels of 0.05. Effect size was calculated by using the means and standard deviations of the groups. Effect size benchmarks were determined as <0.30, 0.30-0.80, and >0.80 and considered small, moderate, and strong, respectively.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Client-centred Occupational Therapy Intervention GroupAccording to the evaluation results, client-centred occupational therapy intervention was applied to this group. The client-centred occupational therapy intervention is based on the activities that the participants stated in the COPM in the first evaluation and had problems. |
| ENBORTH-TR Invertention Group | Experimental | Behavioral: ENBORTH-TR Intervention, Behavioral: Client-centred Occupational Therapy Intervention GroupIn this study, ENBORTH-TR training programme is applied in addition to person-centred intervention. ENBORTH-TR programme starts from the definition of pain, explains its mechanism, affected muscle groups, and provides awareness training that will improve the quality of life of individuals in pain management such as environmental regulations, relaxation techniques, stress management. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- To be at least primary school graduate
- Participating in the study voluntarily
- To be able to read and write Turkish
- At least 24 points from the Mini Mental State Examination
- Having low back and neck pain for 3 months or more
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Having a neurological, psychiatric or chronic disease (cancer, etc.) or having any secondary disease that will adversely affect the work
- History of any malignancy or spinal fracture
- Having undergone a surgical procedure for low back and/or neck pain or having undergone any other surgical intervention within the last 6 months
- Not participating regularly in the intervention process
- Participating in another rehabilitation program during the study period
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ENBORTH-TR InterventionThis intervention program is structured with a multifaceted and holistic approach, starting with the definition of pain and covering topics such as basic body anatomy, functions and pain mechanisms, ergonomics training, environmental regulations, psychosocial factors such as stress, relaxation techniques, sleep and time management. | Behavioural | ENBORTH-TR Invertention Group |
| Client-centred Occupational Therapy Intervention GroupClient-centered occupational therapy intervention consists of 5 stages: (1) Client-centered goal setting, (2) creation of the therapy plan, (3) implementation of interventions, (4) evaluation of results, and (5) obtaining feedback. | Behavioural | Control Group, ENBORTH-TR Invertention Group |
Primary outcome
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time frame: 30 minutes
COPM, which is most frequently used among occupational therapists, is a standardised measurement tool used to determine the individual's activity performance problems and to measure performance satisfaction. In the COPM, which is a semi-structured interview, individuals evaluate their activity preferences with performance and satisfaction scores given by themselves. Individuals are asked about their activity performance problems and concerns about 3 areas including self-care, productivity and leisure time activities. Up to three problems can be identified in each activity area (self-care, productivity, leisure). Performance and satisfaction scores are again determined by the individual between 1 and 10 points.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Visual analogue scale was used to assess the pain intensity of the participants. During the assessment, the participants were asked to mark the points where they felt pain during sleep, rest and activity on a 10 cm horizontal line with the left end 0 meaning 'no pain' and the right end 10 meaning 'very severe pain'. Before marking, the individuals were explained in detail what they should do. Then, the distance of the marked points to point 0 was measured and recorded in centimetres
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Time frame: 7 minutes
The TSK, which is used in the evaluation of kinesiophobia, is a Likert-type scale consisting of 17 questions. Each question is scored between 1 and 4 points (1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree). The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 17 and the highest score is 68. A high score in the total score of the scale indicates a high level of kinesiophobia.
Nottingham Health Profile (NHP)
Time frame: 10 minutes
The NHP used to assess the people's QoL consists of a total of 38 questions. It has 6 subscales and assesses energy, pain, emotional reactions, sleep, social isolation and physical activity. Scoring is done between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a low QoL.
1 secondary outcome
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time frame: 15 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jun 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Virtual Reality Exergames Versus Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low-back Pain, CNSLBP
Recruiting
Trans-arterial Embolization for the Treatment of Facet Pain Due to Facet Arthropathy
Facet Joint Arthropathy, Pain
Not yet recruiting
Radiofrequency and Pelvic Floor-Core Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain in Women With Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Chronic Low Back Pain, Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
Meditation for Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of High-Intensity and Conventional Physical Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Low Back Pain, Radicular Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ENBORTH-TR Intervention and Client-centred Occupational Therapy Intervention Group in people with Low Back Pain and Neck Pain, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) (time frame: 30 minutes). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2025.