Solid TumorsPhase 2NCT06926751
Telpegfilgrastim vs Filgrastim for Secondary Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Pediatric Solid Tumors
A Phase 2 study testing Telpegfilgrastim Injection and filgrastim in people with Solid Tumors and Children, run by Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Telpegfilgrastim (a PEGylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, PEG-rhG-CSF) compared to Filgrastim (short-acting rhG-CSF) in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in children and adolescents aged 6-24 years… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 24 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Solid Tumors, Children, Adolescent
- What is being tested?
- Telpegfilgrastim Injection and filgrastim
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 132 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 12 Jun 2025to 1 Sep 2027
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 24 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed malignant solid tumor requiring high-intensity chemotherapy, with ≥2 remaining chemotherapy cycles, and either:
- Previous febrile neutropenia(FN) or dose-limiting neutropenia in the prior chemotherapy cycle without prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF);
- Previous FN or dose-limiting neutropenia in the prior chemotherapy cycle despite prophylactic G-CSF.
- Age ≥6 to ≤24 years.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≤1.
- Normal bone marrow hematopoietic function: hemoglobin ≥75 g/L, white blood cell count ≥3.0×10^9/L, platelets ≥80×10^9/L, and neutrophils ≥1.5×10^9/L.
- Anticipated survival ≥8 months.
- Willing to participate, with written informed consent signed by the patient or legal guardian.
Who cannot join
- Bone marrow involvement at screening.
- Uncontrolled localized or systemic infection.
- Known hypersensitivity to Telpegfilgrastim, recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(rhG-CSF), or other pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF) agents.
- Concurrent participation in any other investigational drug or device trial.
- Severe organ dysfunction: total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase(ALT), or aspartate transaminase(AST) >2.5 × upper limit of normal(ULN) (or >5 × ULN in patients with liver metastases), serum creatinine >5 × ULN.
- Severe psychiatric disorders affecting informed consent provision or adverse event assessment.
- Any condition deemed by the investigator to compromise patient safety or interfere with study outcomes, including risks from the investigational product or confounding adverse event evaluation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Beijing
Sidan Li, +86-010-87788559, lisidan2006@126.com
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study of Telpegfilgrastim Versus Filgrastim for Secondary Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Children and Adolescents With Solid Tumors Receiving High-Intensity Chemotherapy Regimens
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Telpegfilgrastim (a PEGylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, PEG-rhG-CSF) compared to Filgrastim (short-acting rhG-CSF) in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in children and adolescents aged 6-24 years with malignant solid tumors receiving high-intensity chemotherapy regimens. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does Tuopefilgrastim reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in the first chemotherapy cycle (Cx+1) compared to Filgrastim?
- How do the two treatments compare in terms of duration and severity of neutropenia, chemotherapy delays/dose reductions, antibiotic use, and bone pain incidence? Researchers will compare the Telpegfilgrastim group (3:1 ratio, 99 participants) with the Filgrastim group (33 participants) to determine if Telpegfilgrastim demonstrates superior efficacy and safety.
Read more
Participants will:
- Receive subcutaneous injections of either Telpegfilgrastim (33 μg/kg, single dose) or Filgrastim (5 μg/kg/day, multiple doses) 24 hours after each chemotherapy cycle.
- Undergo blood tests, physical exams, and temperature monitoring during follow-up visits.
- Be assessed for bone pain severity using age-appropriate scales (FLACC or Wong-Baker).
- Complete two chemotherapy cycles with close safety and efficacy monitoring.
Read the detailed description
This multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of Telpegfilgrastim, a novel 40kD Y-branched PEGylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF), compared to Filgrastim (short-acting rhG-CSF) in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) among pediatric and adolescent patients (aged 6-24 years) with malignant solid tumors receiving high-intensity chemotherapy. The study employs a two-phase adaptive design: Phase 1 involves 20 participants (15 in the Telpegfilgrastim arm, 5 in the Filgrastim arm) to assess preliminary pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety, including drug half-life (71.7 ± 23 hours for Telpegfilgrastim vs. 3.5-4 hours for Filgrastim) and neutrophil recovery dynamics, with potential dose adjustments before progressing to Phase 2. The full trial enrolls 132 participants randomized 3:1 (99 vs. 33), stratified by age subgroups (6-12, 13-18, 19-24 years) to account for developmental variations in drug metabolism. Telpegfilgrastim is administered as a single subcutaneous injection (33 μg/kg, max 2 mg) 24 hours post-chemotherapy, leveraging its prolonged activity from Y-shaped PEGylation, while Filgrastim requires daily injections (5 μg/kg/day) until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovers to ≥10.0×10⁹/L. Concomitant use of other myelostimulatory agents (e.g., GM-CSF, trilaciclib) is prohibited to isolate treatment effects.
Neutrophil monitoring includes ANC measurements at baseline and days 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 21 (±1 day) post-chemotherapy using standardized hematology analyzers. Febrile neutropenia (FN) is strictly defined as ANC <0.5×10⁹/L (Grade 4) or ANC 0.5-<1.0×10⁹/L (Grade 3) with anticipated decline to <0.5×10⁹/L within 48 hours, accompanied by axillary temperature ≥37.7°C sustained for ≥1 hour. Bone pain, a key safety focus, is assessed using age-specific tools: the FLACC scale (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability; 0-10) for children <8 years and the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (0-10) for older participants. Exploratory analyses evaluate bone metabolism through serial serum osteocalcin (osteoblast activity marker) and RANKL/OPG ratio (osteoclast regulation) measurements at baseline, day 7, and day 21, with optional bone marrow aspirates to assess hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilization efficiency.
Data management utilizes a validated electronic data capture (EDC) system with real-time entry and automated queries for anomalies, complemented by source data verification (SDV) for ≥20% of cases, prioritizing primary endpoints and serious adverse events (SAEs). Sample size (132 participants) is calculated based on prior pediatric FN incidence rates (45% PEG-rhG-CSF vs. 75% rhG-CSF), with α=0.05, 80% power, and 20% attrition. Statistical analyses employ the Full Analysis Set (FAS, intent-to-treat) and Per-Protocol Set (PPS), using ANOVA or nonparametric tests for continuous variables (e.g., ANC recovery time) and Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests for categorical outcomes (e.g., FN incidence), adjusted for age, tumor type, and chemotherapy regimen. Safety analyses include all participants receiving ≥1 dose (Safety Set), with SAEs reported per ICH-GCP and China NMPA guidelines, monitored by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB).
Ethical compliance is ensured through institutional review board (IRB) approvals at all 16 participating centers, emphasizing informed consent/assent for adolescents, anonymized biological sample storage (≤5 years post-trial), and voluntary withdrawal rights. The trial's innovation lies in its focus on pediatric PK/PD profiling, addressing faster drug clearance in children, and evaluating long-term skeletal safety via bone metabolism biomarkers-critical for growing populations. By comparing next-generation PEG-rhG-CSF with conventional rhG-CSF, this study aims to refine global supportive care guidelines for pediatric oncology, balancing efficacy and safety in high-intensity chemotherapy settings.
- Conditions
- Solid Tumors, Children, Adolescent, Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia
- Being tested
- Telpegfilgrastim Injection, filgrastim
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Telpegfilgrastim InjectionDrug
Also called Y-branched pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor, YPEG-G-CSF, Peijin
subcutaneous injections of Telpegfilgrastim (33 μg/kg, single dose) 24 hours after each chemotherapy cycle
filgrastimDrug
Also called Recombinant Human Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor, rhG-CSF, Topneuter
subcutaneous injections of Filgrastim (5 μg/kg/day, multiple doses) 24 hours after each chemotherapy cycle
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Telpegfilgrastim | Experimental | Receive subcutaneous injections of Telpegfilgrastim (33 μg/kg, single dose) 24 hours after each chemotherapy cycle Receives: Drug: Telpegfilgrastim Injection |
| Filgrastim | Active comparator | Receive subcutaneous injections of Filgrastim (5 μg/kg/day, multiple doses) 24 hours after each chemotherapy cycle Receives: Drug: filgrastim |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of febrile neutropenia in Cycle 1
Incidence of febrile neutropenia in Cycle 1 (i.e., the first chemotherapy cycle post-enrollment)
Measured: 21-28 days
Secondary outcomes (7)
Incidence of grade 3 neutropenia during Cycles 1-2
Incidence of grade 3 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count<1.0×10^9/L) during Cycles 1-2
Measured: 42-56 days
Time to recovery of grade 3 neutropenia during Cycles 1-2
Time to recovery of grade 3 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count<1.0×10^9/L) during Cycles 1-2
Measured: 42-56 days
Time to recovery of grade 4 neutropenia during Cycles 1-2
Time to recovery of grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <0.5×10^9/L) during Cycles 1-2
Measured: 42-56 days
Incidence of grade 4 neutropenia during Cycles 1-2
Incidence of grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <0.5×10^9/L) during Cycles 1-2
Measured: 42-56 days
Incidence of febrile neutropenia during Cycle 2
Incidence of febrile neutropenia during Cycle 2 (i.e., the second chemotherapy cycle post-enrollment)
Measured: 21-28 days
Proportion of patients with chemotherapy delay or dose reduction in subsequent cycles due to neutropenia during Cycles 1-2
Proportion of patients with chemotherapy delay or dose reduction in subsequent cycles due to neutropenia during Cycles 1-2
Measured: 42-56 days
Proportion of patients receiving antibiotic treatment and experiencing infections during Cycles 1-2
Proportion of patients receiving antibiotic treatment and experiencing infections during Cycles 1-2
Measured: 42-56 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2025
- Study start12 Jun 2025
- Primary completion1 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Sep 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Solid TumorsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. It plans to enroll 132 children and adolescent patients with malignant solid tumors receiving high-density chemotherapy regimens. Patients will be randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive Telpegfilgrastim or filgrastim for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN), with observation of efficacy and safety in both groups. Patient data from all centers will be collected through an Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system. The trial employs a stratified randomization method based on subjects' age (6-12 years, 13-18 years, and 19-24 years). After signing the informed consent form, each subject will be assigned a unique screening number for identification throughout the study period.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, SIDAN LI, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
- Investigators
- Sidan Li, Principal investigator, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06926751
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PJ-B-241113
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 7 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study of Telpegfilgrastim Versus Filgrastim for Secondary Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Children and Adolescents With Solid Tumors Receiving High-Intensity Chemotherapy Regimens
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06926751
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PJ-B-241113
- Conditions
- Solid Tumors, Children, Adolescent, Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Telpegfilgrastim (a PEGylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, PEG-rhG-CSF) compared to Filgrastim (short-acting rhG-CSF) in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in children and adolescents aged 6-24 years with malignant solid tumors receiving high-intensity chemotherapy regimens. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does Tuopefilgrastim reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in the first chemotherapy cycle (Cx+1) compared to Filgrastim?
- How do the two treatments compare in terms of duration and severity of neutropenia, chemotherapy delays/dose reductions, antibiotic use, and bone pain incidence? Researchers will compare the Telpegfilgrastim group (3:1 ratio, 99 participants) with the Filgrastim group (33 participants) to determine if Telpegfilgrastim demonstrates superior efficacy and safety.
Participants will:
- Receive subcutaneous injections of either Telpegfilgrastim (33 μg/kg, single dose) or Filgrastim (5 μg/kg/day, multiple doses) 24 hours after each chemotherapy cycle.
- Undergo blood tests, physical exams, and temperature monitoring during follow-up visits.
- Be assessed for bone pain severity using age-appropriate scales (FLACC or Wong-Baker).
- Complete two chemotherapy cycles with close safety and efficacy monitoring.
Detailed description
This multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of Telpegfilgrastim, a novel 40kD Y-branched PEGylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF), compared to Filgrastim (short-acting rhG-CSF) in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) among pediatric and adolescent patients (aged 6-24 years) with malignant solid tumors receiving high-intensity chemotherapy. The study employs a two-phase adaptive design: Phase 1 involves 20 participants (15 in the Telpegfilgrastim arm, 5 in the Filgrastim arm) to assess preliminary pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety, including drug half-life (71.7 ± 23 hours for Telpegfilgrastim vs. 3.5-4 hours for Filgrastim) and neutrophil recovery dynamics, with potential dose adjustments before progressing to Phase 2. The full trial enrolls 132 participants randomized 3:1 (99 vs. 33), stratified by age subgroups (6-12, 13-18, 19-24 years) to account for developmental variations in drug metabolism. Telpegfilgrastim is administered as a single subcutaneous injection (33 μg/kg, max 2 mg) 24 hours post-chemotherapy, leveraging its prolonged activity from Y-shaped PEGylation, while Filgrastim requires daily injections (5 μg/kg/day) until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovers to ≥10.0×10⁹/L. Concomitant use of other myelostimulatory agents (e.g., GM-CSF, trilaciclib) is prohibited to isolate treatment effects.
Neutrophil monitoring includes ANC measurements at baseline and days 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 21 (±1 day) post-chemotherapy using standardized hematology analyzers. Febrile neutropenia (FN) is strictly defined as ANC <0.5×10⁹/L (Grade 4) or ANC 0.5-<1.0×10⁹/L (Grade 3) with anticipated decline to <0.5×10⁹/L within 48 hours, accompanied by axillary temperature ≥37.7°C sustained for ≥1 hour. Bone pain, a key safety focus, is assessed using age-specific tools: the FLACC scale (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability; 0-10) for children <8 years and the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (0-10) for older participants. Exploratory analyses evaluate bone metabolism through serial serum osteocalcin (osteoblast activity marker) and RANKL/OPG ratio (osteoclast regulation) measurements at baseline, day 7, and day 21, with optional bone marrow aspirates to assess hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilization efficiency.
Data management utilizes a validated electronic data capture (EDC) system with real-time entry and automated queries for anomalies, complemented by source data verification (SDV) for ≥20% of cases, prioritizing primary endpoints and serious adverse events (SAEs). Sample size (132 participants) is calculated based on prior pediatric FN incidence rates (45% PEG-rhG-CSF vs. 75% rhG-CSF), with α=0.05, 80% power, and 20% attrition. Statistical analyses employ the Full Analysis Set (FAS, intent-to-treat) and Per-Protocol Set (PPS), using ANOVA or nonparametric tests for continuous variables (e.g., ANC recovery time) and Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests for categorical outcomes (e.g., FN incidence), adjusted for age, tumor type, and chemotherapy regimen. Safety analyses include all participants receiving ≥1 dose (Safety Set), with SAEs reported per ICH-GCP and China NMPA guidelines, monitored by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB).
Ethical compliance is ensured through institutional review board (IRB) approvals at all 16 participating centers, emphasizing informed consent/assent for adolescents, anonymized biological sample storage (≤5 years post-trial), and voluntary withdrawal rights. The trial's innovation lies in its focus on pediatric PK/PD profiling, addressing faster drug clearance in children, and evaluating long-term skeletal safety via bone metabolism biomarkers-critical for growing populations. By comparing next-generation PEG-rhG-CSF with conventional rhG-CSF, this study aims to refine global supportive care guidelines for pediatric oncology, balancing efficacy and safety in high-intensity chemotherapy settings.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. It plans to enroll 132 children and adolescent patients with malignant solid tumors receiving high-density chemotherapy regimens. Patients will be randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive Telpegfilgrastim or filgrastim for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN), with observation of efficacy and safety in both groups. Patient data from all centers will be collected through an Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system. The trial employs a stratified randomization method based on subjects' age (6-12 years, 13-18 years, and 19-24 years). After signing the informed consent form, each subject will be assigned a unique screening number for identification throughout the study period.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Telpegfilgrastim | Experimental | Drug: Telpegfilgrastim InjectionReceive subcutaneous injections of Telpegfilgrastim (33 μg/kg, single dose) 24 hours after each chemotherapy cycle |
| Filgrastim | Active comparator | Drug: filgrastimReceive subcutaneous injections of Filgrastim (5 μg/kg/day, multiple doses) 24 hours after each chemotherapy cycle |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 24 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed malignant solid tumor requiring high-intensity chemotherapy, with ≥2 remaining chemotherapy cycles, and either:
- Age ≥6 to ≤24 years.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≤1.
- Normal bone marrow hematopoietic function: hemoglobin ≥75 g/L, white blood cell count ≥3.0×10^9/L, platelets ≥80×10^9/L, and neutrophils ≥1.5×10^9/L.
- Anticipated survival ≥8 months.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Bone marrow involvement at screening.
- Uncontrolled localized or systemic infection.
- Known hypersensitivity to Telpegfilgrastim, recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(rhG-CSF), or other pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF) agents.
- Concurrent participation in any other investigational drug or device trial.
- Severe organ dysfunction: total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase(ALT), or aspartate transaminase(AST) >2.5 × upper limit of normal(ULN) (or >5 × ULN in patients with liver metastases), serum creatinine >5 × ULN.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Telpegfilgrastim InjectionAlso: Y-branched pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor, YPEG-G-CSF, Peijinsubcutaneous injections of Telpegfilgrastim (33 μg/kg, single dose) 24 hours after each chemotherapy cycle | Drug | Telpegfilgrastim |
| filgrastimAlso: Recombinant Human Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor, rhG-CSF, Topneutersubcutaneous injections of Filgrastim (5 μg/kg/day, multiple doses) 24 hours after each chemotherapy cycle | Drug | Filgrastim |
Primary outcome
Incidence of febrile neutropenia in Cycle 1
Time frame: 21-28 days
Incidence of febrile neutropenia in Cycle 1 (i.e., the first chemotherapy cycle post-enrollment)
7 secondary outcomes
Incidence of grade 3 neutropenia during Cycles 1-2
Time frame: 42-56 days
Time to recovery of grade 3 neutropenia during Cycles 1-2
Time frame: 42-56 days
Time to recovery of grade 4 neutropenia during Cycles 1-2
Time frame: 42-56 days
Incidence of grade 4 neutropenia during Cycles 1-2
Time frame: 42-56 days
Incidence of febrile neutropenia during Cycle 2
Time frame: 21-28 days
Proportion of patients with chemotherapy delay or dose reduction in subsequent cycles due to neutropenia during Cycles 1-2
Time frame: 42-56 days
Proportion of patients receiving antibiotic treatment and experiencing infections during Cycles 1-2
Time frame: 42-56 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Solid Tumors
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ABSK043 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor
Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Safety and Efficacy Extension Study of Pertuzumab in Patients With Solid Tumors Previously Enrolled in a Hoffmann-La Roche-Sponsored Pertuzumab Clinical Trial
Solid Tumors
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-12 Genetically Engineered Myeloid Cells in Participants With Relapsed, Refractory Solid Tumors
Relapsed Solid Tumor Malignancies, Refractory Solid Tumor Malignancies
RecruitingObservational study
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicity Risk Prediction in Solid Tumors
Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Sidan Li principal investigator
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Telpegfilgrastim Injection and filgrastim in people with Solid Tumors and Children, run by Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sidan Li (+86-0316-5917421, lisidan2006@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of febrile neutropenia in Cycle 1 (time frame: 21-28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2026.