AzTrials
AzTrials

Non Specific Neck PainNCT06936722

McKenzie and ELDOA Comparison in Non-Specific Neck Pain Teachers

A study testing ELDOA + Conventional PT and McKenzie Protocol + Conventional PT in people with Non Specific Neck Pain, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of McKenzie Protocol and ELDOA on severity of pain, on the range of motion and disability level of teachers with Non-Specific neck pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 40 years
Conditions the study is for
Non Specific Neck Pain
What is being tested?
ELDOA + Conventional PT and McKenzie Protocol + Conventional PT
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
24 Apr 2025to 10 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Normal BMI
  • Neck Pain on NPRS (Mild 1-3, Moderate 4-6, Severe 7-10)
  • Working Hour: At least 30 hrs. per week.
  • Teaching Experience: More than 12 months

Who cannot join

  • No Neurological Condition (+ve Spurling Test, +ve Compression test, +ve Distraction Test)
  • No Other Musculoskeletal Condition. (Osteoporosis, Arthritis, TrPs)
  • No Spinal Deformity. (Scoliosis, Forward Head)
  • No Surgery (Spinal Surgery, Fracture)
  • No Cervical Tumor
  • No complaints about Dizziness, Migraine, Cervicogenic headache (+ve Flexion Rotation test)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Yusra Medical and Dental College

    Islamabad, Punjab Province, 46000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Comparison of McKenzie Protocol and ELDOA in Teachers With Non-Specific Neck Pain

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of McKenzie Protocol and ELDOA on severity of pain, on the range of motion and disability level of teachers with Non-Specific neck pain.

Read the detailed description

Neck pain, a common musculoskeletal condition and a common problem of the society, is "a pain originating from musculoskeletal tissue in the region from the Occiput to the First Thoracic Vertebrae". Approximately 2/3 of the population around Globe is affected by Neck Pain as it is the 4th leading cause of disability around the world. Several research has shown prevalence ranging between 14.2% to 71%, with increased frequency in females and middle-aged adults. Risk factors related to neck pain generally constitute trauma or sports related injuries, poor work environment and psychological issues. This common problem can further be categorized based on duration i.e. Acute (for less than 6 weeks), Sub Acute (for less than 3 months) and Chronic (For more than 3 months). Based on severity, it is further sub-divided into 3 categories (Mild, Moderate and Severe). Based on etiology it has 2 types, (Mechanical and Neuropathic) Non-Specific Neck pain (NNP), a broader term used, is a common appearance of Neck Pain elaborated as Pain without any defined cause. It can either be a Mechanical or a Postural complication. Non-Specific Neck pain can be diagnosed from the history of individual along with physical examination. Non-Specific Neck Pain responds to conservative management, but the recent Literature suggests that Exercise therapy is quite effective in treatment of Non-specific Neck Pain (NNP). Techniques include Exercise therapy, Manual therapy, Traction, Electrotherapeutic modalities, Stretching, Massage, Release Techniques (ARTs) which are effective not only for reducing Pain but also for improving Cervical Ranges and functional capacity of Individuals.

Teaching is considered among those Professions where Incidence of Neck pain is at its peak, a recent Literature suggest that Prevalence of Neck pain is 68.9% in teachers. Occupational Complications i.e. Long-standing hours, Faulty postures, Excessive use of electronic devices and Black boards are the major risk factors for teachers in developing Musculoskeletal Conditions, with an incidence of 40% to 95%.

McKenzie Protocol is an interventional approach used in the broader term of Exercise Therapy. A Literature published in International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research by researchers of Cairo University, Egypt showed that McKenzie Protocol is very effective for the treatment of Non-specific Spinal Pain. This technique encourages active patient involvement in decreasing pain which as a result increases the functional abilities of individuals. The Technique of Neck Retraction is very beneficial for increasing Cervical Ranges, improving Posture and relieving Neck pain. McKenzie Protocol is a very effective technique for preventing re-occurrence of Pain.

ELDOA an abbreviation used for a French acronym Elongation Longitudinaux avec Decoaption Osteo-Articulaire is a term described by Guy Voyer in 1979 as an active Traction technique used for stretching of Fascia and increasing Spacing of Spinal joints. Literature backs the claim that ELDOA is an effective technique used to decrease pain and increasing Muscle length. This technique release compression from the Facet joints which in return increase circulation and improves tone that helps in Pain reduction and Range improvement.

Neck Pain frequently affects teachers due to Occupational habits. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study, neck pain is the second leading cause of years lived with disability (YLD) for adults, 50% - 75% of people do not recover from an acute episode and experience recurrent neck pain in the next 1 to 5 years. Approximately 68% of people develop persistent and chronic neck pain. A Meta-analysis focusing on the McKenzie Protocol indicated its efficacy in managing moderate to severe neck pain, relative to mild cases. Various studies have explored the individual effects of McKenzie and ELDOA techniques on Neck pain. However, no one has specifically investigated which protocol is more effective across different severity levels.

Being tested
ELDOA + Conventional PT, McKenzie Protocol + Conventional PT
Keywords
McKenzie Protocol for Neck Pain, ELDOA for Neck Pain, Pain, disability
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ELDOA + Conventional PTOther

    ELDOA, the protocol consists of 4 positions. Each position is maintained for 1 min with constant correction of posture throughout with 2 to 4 min rest within each position. The Exercise was performed in 10 to 25 mins. 4 positions of ELDOA are Decoarctation of C0/C1/C2, Decoarctation of C4/C5, Decoarctation of C5/C6, Decoarctation of C6/C7. All positions are attained in lying.

    Hot pack 2. isometric strengthening exercises (Neck Flexion, Extension and Lateral Flexion) in 3x5 sets with 5 sec hold.

  • McKenzie Protocol + Conventional PTOther

    Extension Dysfunction Retraction Retraction with patient overpressure Retraction with therapist overpressure Retraction with extension Lateral Flexion Dysfunction Lateral flexion: Lateral flexion with patient overpressure Lateral flexion therapist overpressure Rotation Dysfunction Rotation Rotation with patient overpressure Hot pack, isometric strengthening exercises (Neck Flexion, Extension and Lateral Flexion) in 3x5 sets with 5 sec hold Rotation with therapist overpressure

Study groups in NCT06936722
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ELDOA + Conventional PTExperimentalELDOA, the protocol consists of 4 positions. Each position is maintained for 1 min with constant correction of posture throughout with 2 to 4 min rest within each position. The Exercise was performed in 10 to 25 mins. 4 positions of ELDOA are Decoarctation of C0/C1/C2, Decoarctation of C4/C5, Decoarctation of C5/C6, Decoarctation of C6/C7. All positions are attained in lying. Hot pack 2. isometric strengthening exercises (Neck Flexion, Extension and Lateral Flexion) in 3x5 sets with 5 sec hold.
Receives: Other: ELDOA + Conventional PT
McKenzie Protocol + Conventional PTActive comparatorExtension Dysfunction Retraction Retraction with patient overpressure Retraction with therapist overpressure Retraction with extension Lateral Flexion Dysfunction Lateral flexion: Lateral flexion with patient overpressure Lateral flexion therapist overpressure Rotation Dysfunction Rotation Rotation with patient overpressure Hot pack, isometric strengthening exercises (Neck Flexion, Extension and Lateral Flexion) in 3x5 sets with 5 sec hold Rotation with therapist overpressure
Receives: Other: McKenzie Protocol + Conventional PT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Range of motion (Goniometer)

    It is the most common instrument used to measure the range of motion of joints across the whole body. Normal ranges of cervical spine are Flexion approximately 80°, Extension 50°, Lateral bending 45° on either side and Rotation approximately 80°. Its Reliability (ICC = 0.82) and Validity (Correlations 0.97-0.98)

    Measured: 3 weeks

  2. Numeric Pain Rating Scale NPRS

    The NPRS is an eleven-point pain impression scale: the patient rates pain from 0 (no aggravation) to 10 (most exceedingly terrible possible pain). Mild 1-3, Moderate 4-6, Severe 7-10. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), which was used to survey respondents' impression of the degree of pain that they felt. It is an outcome measure that is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults. It is considered a more objective and Numeric version of Visual Analogue Scale.

    Measured: 3 weeks

  3. Neck Disability Index or NDI

    It has sufficient support and usefulness to retain its status as the most used self-report disability measure for neck pain. 0 to 4 = no disability, 5 to 14 = mild, 15 to 24 = moderate, 25 to 34 = severe, above 34 = complete. It has ten sections with each section carrying 5 marks.

    Measured: 3 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Apr 2025
  2. Study start24 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion2 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion10 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06936722
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC/ Umul Baneen 02003
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
14 Apr 2025
Last updated
19 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ELDOA + Conventional PT and McKenzie Protocol + Conventional PT in people with Non Specific Neck Pain, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Range of motion (Goniometer) (time frame: 3 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in