AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical Spondylotic MyelopathyNCT06941649

Efficacy of Two Approaches in Cervical Single-door Laminoplasty for Spinal Canal Enlargement

A study testing Expansive open-door laminoplasty via intermuscular space approach and cervical single-door laminoplasty via the conventional approach in people with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy, run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if cervical single-door laminoplasty via the intermuscular space approach can better prevent axial symptom while reaching equal neurological outcome than the conventional approach in adults patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
What is being tested?
Expansive open-door laminoplasty via intermuscular space approach and cervical single-door laminoplasty via the conventional approach
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
376 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Apr 2025to 31 Dec 2035
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >18
  • Patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy meeting surgery indications.
  • Sign informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Poor general condition, can not tolerate surgery
  • Patients with long course of disease, degenerative spinal cord, atrophy of limb muscles, and severe joint dysfunction
  • The cervical spine has obvious segmental instability, especially in the case of injury or lesion of the anterior structure, which has not been healed
  • History of cervical spine surgery
  • Combined with obvious cervical kyphosis
  • Combined with cervical fracture, dislocation, etc
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Combined with cervical spinal infection, arthritis and other pathological changes
  • Combined with tumors of cervical spine or spinal cord.
  • Mental retardation or other causes of limited behavioral ability

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Cervical Single-door Laminoplasty Via the Intermuscular Space Approach and the Conventional Approach: A Multicenter, Prospective Controlled Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if cervical single-door laminoplasty via the intermuscular space approach can better prevent axial symptom while reaching equal neurological outcome than the conventional approach in adults patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can cervical single-door laminoplasty via the intermuscular space approach better prevent axial symptom than the conventional approach?
  • Can cervical single-door laminoplasty via the intermuscular space approach reach the neurological outcome not second to the conventional approach? If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare the intermuscular space approach and the conventional approach of cervical single-door laminoplasty to see if the intermuscular space approach better prevent axial symptom.
Read more

Participants will:

  • Received cervical single-door laminoplasty via the intermuscular space approach or the conventional approach once meet the indication.
  • Visit the clinic 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after the surgery.
  • Keep a diary of their symptoms and other unexpected conditions.
Being tested
Expansive open-door laminoplasty via intermuscular space approach, cervical single-door laminoplasty via the conventional approach

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Expansive open-door laminoplasty via intermuscular space approachProcedure or surgery

    The cervical laminoplasty via intermuscular space approach will apply bilateral blunt dissection to create the operative space between capital semispinalis muscle and cervical semispinalis muscle

  • cervical single-door laminoplasty via the conventional approachProcedure or surgery

    The cervical laminoplasty via the conventional approach will apply median dissection of the cervical spinous ligament and seperate muscles to expose the whole lamina of cervical vertebrae.

Study groups in NCT06941649
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Via the intermuscular spaceExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Expansive open-door laminoplasty via intermuscular space approach
ControlSham comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: cervical single-door laminoplasty via the conventional approach

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score

    Evaluate neurological function in 4 dimension with a total of 18 points:

    1. Upper limb motor dysfunction(5 points) B. Lower limb motor dysfunction(7 points) C. Sensory dysfunction(3 points) D. Sphincter dysfunction(3 points)

    Measured: 2 years after operation

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score

    Evaluate neurological function in 4 dimension with a total of 18 points:

    1. Upper limb motor dysfunction(5 points) B. Lower limb motor dysfunction(7 points) C. Sensory dysfunction(3 points) D. Sphincter dysfunction(3 points)

    Measured: Before surgery and 1week, 1month, 3months, 6months, 1year after surgery

  2. Cervical Visual Analogue Scale Score

    According to the severity of patient's neck pain, on a scale of 1-10, let patients themselves choose one score.

    0 means no pain and 10 means extreme pain.

    Measured: Before surgery; 1week, 1month, 3months, 6months, 1year and 2 years after surgery

  3. Zeng's axial symptom scale

    Based on the impact on work and life, and objective examination of neck paraspinal muscles and trapezius for spasms and tenderness, divided into 4 grades:

    • "Excellent": No abnormal sensations in the neck, no tenderness or muscle spasms;
    • "Good": Mild symptoms after fatigue or cold exposure, but quick recovery, no significant impact on daily work and life, no tenderness or mild spasms in neck muscles, no need for painkillers;
    • "Fair": Symptoms often appear <100 days/year, daily work and life are somewhat affected, mild tenderness or spasms in neck muscles, need for painkillers with good effect;
    • "Poor": Symptoms frequent (>100 days/year), significantly affecting daily work and life, obvious tenderness or spasms in neck muscles, need for painkillers with poor effect.

    Those rated as excellent and good are considered to have no axial symptoms, while those rated as fair and poor are considered to have axial symptoms, and the incidence is calculated.

    Measured: Before surgery; 1week, 1month, 3months, 6months, 1year and 2 years after surgery

  4. Hosono axial symptom scale

    According to patients' axial symptom and which treatment can alleviate it:

    Severe (regular need for analgesics or local injections), Moderate (regular need for physical therapy or compression), or Mild (no need for treatment). Severe and moderate are defined as having axial symptoms, while mild is defined as having no axial symptoms.

    Measured: Before surgery; 1week, 1month, 3months, 6months, 1year and 2 years after surgery

  5. Cervical 11-point Numerical Rating Scale

    Based on neck symptoms, ask the patient to rate their condition on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no symptoms and 10 indicates severe symptoms

    Measured: Before surgery; 1week, 1month, 3months, 6months, 1year and 2 years after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Apr 2025
  2. Study start15 Apr 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2035 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2035 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
376 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06941649
Sponsor's protocol ID
SYSKY-2025-099-01
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
19 Mar 2025
Last updated
24 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Expansive open-door laminoplasty via intermuscular space approach and cervical single-door laminoplasty via the conventional approach in people with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy, run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (time frame: 2 years after operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in