AzTrials
AzTrials

Suspected Malignant Lung NeoplasmFLATNCT06946498

First Local Anaesthesia Thoracoscopy for Pleural Effusion Diagnosis.

A study testing Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy and Pleuroscopy with Rigid Thoracoscope and Forceps biopsies in people with Suspected Malignant Lung Neoplasm and Pleural Effusion, run by National and Kapodistrian University of Athens at 1 site in Greece.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Non randomized study with two groups. The study group includes patients with suspected malignant pleural effusion, in whom the investigation of pleural effusion begins directly with pleural biopsy by Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy (LAT). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
What is being tested?
Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy and Pleuroscopy with Rigid Thoracoscope and Forceps biopsies
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteGreece
Study dates
23 May 2023to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Undiagnosed pleural effusion with the character of a lymphocytic exudate

Who cannot join

  • Empyema
  • Transudate pleural effusion.
  • Central airway obstruction by tumor.
  • Existence of extensive adhesions that do not allow the development of iatrogenic pneumothorax and the safe entry of the thoracoscope.
  • Uncontrollable cough.
  • Acute respiratory failure and/or Hypercapnia.
  • Performance Status: 5

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Nektarios ANAGNOSTOPOULOS, Ass. professor contact

+306946869480

aris.anag@yahoo.gr

Michail Kon/nos Tsatsis, MD, MSc, PhDc contact

+306979234105

tsatsis.mihail@gmail.com

Greece1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Sotiria General Hospital of Thoracic Diseases

    Athens, Attica, 11527

    Nektratios Anagnostopoulos, Ass. Professor, +306946869480, aris.anag@yahoo.gr

    Michail Kon/nos Tsatsis, MD, MSc, PhD(c)

    Recruiting

Other trials in Greece

About this study

Official title: Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy as a First Line Approach in the Diagnosis of Suspected Malignant Pleural Effusion: FLAT Trial.

Non randomized study with two groups. The study group includes patients with suspected malignant pleural effusion, in whom the investigation of pleural effusion begins directly with pleural biopsy by Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy (LAT).

The Control Group includes patients who come to the same hospital and are treated with the Standard of Care (SOC) strategies were used. Efficacy of LAT, Sensitivity, Hospitalization, time to diagnosis and general safety and comfort of the groups' subjects will be assessed.

Read the detailed description

Diagnostic approach of patients with with unexplained lymphocytic exudate is the main subject of the study. Minimally invasive techniques (single entry thoracoscopy with local anesthesia -LAT) have been developed for the definitive biopsy of the parietal pleura, with which, in addition to the diagnosis, a therapeutic pleurodesis can be performed at the same time. Usually, diagnostic LAT is performed only after 3 negative pleural fluid cytological tests have been performed, thus delaying the diagnostic access and treatment of the patient.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the conventional diagnostic approach used in daily clinical practice (3 consecutive punctures of pleural effusion with cytological examination and in case of insufficient diagnosis pleural biopsy, either LAT or VATS depending on the clinical assessment of the patient) with the simplest immediate performance of LAT as soon as a pleural effusion suspected of malignancy is detected. Thus two subject groups will be compared. The first (LAT Group) will undergo Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy as the first line option for the diagnosis of the suspected MPE. The control group will undergo the standard of care recommended guidelines for the diagnosis of MPE.

Being tested
Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy, Pleuroscopy with Rigid Thoracoscope and Forceps biopsies
Keywords
Malignant Pleural Effusion, Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy, Medical Thoracoscopy, Lung cancer, Mesothelioma, Lymphocytic Exudate
Medical subject headings
Pleural Effusion, Pleural Effusion, Malignant, Mesothelioma, Malignant, Lung Neoplasms, Mesothelioma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Local Anesthesia ThoracoscopyProcedure or surgery

    The patient is placed in a lateral decubitus, with the affected hemithorax upwards. Ensuring a venous line and full monitoring of vital functions. Mild sedation is given and a dose of Ceftriaxone is given 30 minutes before. Local anesthesia is injected in layers, starting from the skin and working up to the intercostal muscles, intercostal nerve, and periosteum of the rib.

    Development of pneumothorax is done using a 16-gauge Boutin needle. 15 spontaneous breaths are sufficient to create a pneumothorax, and entry of rigid thoracoscope into the hemithorax through a 11-13 mm Trocar. Multiple biopsies from the parietal pleura are taken and pleurodesis is made according to operator judgment. A chest drain 20-22 G is placed and sutured.

    A chest X-ray is performed 2-8 hours later after the patient is transferred to the ward. Chest drain is removed after 24h if fluid production is <250ml and lung re-expansion.

  • Pleuroscopy with Rigid Thoracoscope and Forceps biopsiesDevice

    A video thoracoscope with an external light source, outer diameter 10 mm (Karl Storz), is inserted into the pleural cavity through a uniportal incision (1 - 1.5 cm) and complete inspection of the pleural cavity is performed. Parietal pleural biopsies are taken with a rigid 40 mm forceps (Karl Storz).

Study groups in NCT06946498
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LAT GroupExperimentalThe study group includes patients in whom the investigation of pleural effusion begins directly with pleural biopsy by Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy (LAT) under conscious sedation. In these patients, imaging with chest CT and/or thoracic ultrasound has been performed and lymphocytic exudate is confirmed in fluid aspiration.
Receives: Procedure: Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy; Device: Pleuroscopy with Rigid Thoracoscope and Forceps biopsies
Control GroupNo interventionThe Control Group includes patients admitted with undiagnosed pleural lymphocytic exudate, who undergo Standard of Care (SOC) diagnostic strategies according to BTS guideline including among others, 3 samples for cytological examination (40-60 ml each), chest tube drainage, microbiological and immunological studies. If the diagnosis is not established and there is still indication for pleural biopsy patients are referred either for surgical biopsy or LAT.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Diagnosis

    Time to diagnosis is defined as the period between the first thoracentesis ,showing a lymphocytic exudate, of a newly discovered pleural effusion in a patient without prior signs of pleural disease to the time of multi-disciplinary team final diagnosis involving a pathology report of biopsy samples.

    Measured: From enrollment to final diagnosis of MDT, assesed up to 12 months

  2. Hospitalization time

    The time from the patient's admission in the hospital with diagnosis of unexplained lymphocytic pleural effusion until discharge with or without final diagnosis.

    Measured: From enrollment to hospital discharge, assesed up to 3 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Patient's discomfort/pain

    A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures the intensity of pain the patient feels after the intervention (Medical Thoracoscopy vs Surgical Biopsy). A horizontal line ranging from 0 to 10, (0=No pain, 10=Extreme pain), is used. The patient is examined every day, until his discharge and is asked to mark on the line his respective level of discomfort/pain.

    Measured: Day 1: immediately post-procedure. Day 2: 24hours post-procedure. Day 3 up to Day of tube removal: Every 24 hours. Time frame ends on removal of chest tube or patient dishcarge, assesment up to 2 weeks

  2. Complications

    We compare the rate of post interventional complications across the two groups (Surgical biopsy vs LAT)

    Measured: Day 1: immediately post-procedure. Day 2: 24hours post-procedure. Day 3 up to Day of tube removal: Every 24 hours. Time frame ends on removal of chest tube or patient dishcarge, assesment up to 3 months.

  3. Rate of Non Specific Pleuritis

    We aim to asses wheter the rate of positive pleural biopsies for non specific pleuritis differed significantly between Surgical biopsy group and LAT group.

    Measured: Assesment up to 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Apr 2025
  2. Study start23 May 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06946498
Sponsor's protocol ID
FLAT1STIPNKUA
Acronym
FLAT
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
10 Apr 2025
Last updated
27 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: This is a preliminary study design and for confidentiality rationales in order to protect the novelty of diagnostic strategies implemented in this research .

Publications

  • Ferguson J, Tsim S, Kelly C, Alexander L, Shad S, Neilly M, Tate M, Zahra B, Saleh M, Cowell G, Banks E, Grundy S, Corcoran J, Downer N, Stanton A, Evison M, Rahman NM, Maskell N, Blyth KG. Staging by Thoracoscopy in potentially radically treatable Lung Cancer associated with Minimal Pleural Effusion (STRATIFY): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, observational study. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 Nov 23;10(1):e001771. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001771.

    PubMed 37996118
  • Wan YY, Zhai CC, Lin XS, Yao ZH, Liu QH, Zhu L, Li DZ, Li XL, Wang N, Lin DJ. Safety and complications of medical thoracoscopy in the management of pleural diseases. BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Jul 10;19(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0888-5.

    PubMed 31291926
  • Shaikh F, Lentz RJ, Feller-Kopman D, Maldonado F. Medical thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of pleural disease: a guide for the clinician. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020 Oct;14(10):987-1000. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2020.1788940. Epub 2020 Jul 12.

    PubMed 32588676
  • Gong L, Huang G, Huang Y, Liu D, Tang X. Medical Thoracoscopy for the Management of Exudative Pleural Effusion: A Retrospective Study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Dec 4;13:2845-2855. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S287758. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 33324122
  • Murthy V, Bessich JL. Medical thoracoscopy and its evolving role in the diagnosis and treatment of pleural disease. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Sep;9(Suppl 10):S1011-S1021. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.37.

    PubMed 29214061
  • Xu LL, Yang Y, Wang Z, Wang XJ, Tong ZH, Shi HZ. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: diagnostic value of medical thoracoscopy and long-term prognostic analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0619-3.

    PubMed 29615010
  • Li D, Jackson K, Panchal R, Aujayeb A. Local Anaesthetic Thoracoscopy for Pleural Effusion-A Narrative Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Oct 9;10(10):1978. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101978.

    PubMed 36292425
  • Arnold DT, De Fonseka D, Perry S, Morley A, Harvey JE, Medford A, Brett M, Maskell NA. Investigating unilateral pleural effusions: the role of cytology. Eur Respir J. 2018 Nov 8;52(5):1801254. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01254-2018. Print 2018 Nov.

    PubMed 30262573
  • Kiani A, Abedini A, Karimi M, Samadi K, Sheikhy K, Farzanegan B, Pour Abdollah M, Jamaati H, Jabardarjani HR, Masjedi MR. Diagnostic Yield of Medical Thoracoscopy in Undiagnosed Pleural Effusion. Tanaffos. 2015;14(4):227-31.

    PubMed 27114723
  • Wu YB, Xu LL, Wang XJ, Wang Z, Zhang J, Tong ZH, Shi HZ. Diagnostic value of medical thoracoscopy in malignant pleural effusion. BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Aug 4;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0451-1.

    PubMed 28778184
  • Kassirian S, Hinton SN, Cuninghame S, Chaudhary R, Iansavitchene A, Amjadi K, Dhaliwal I, Zeman-Pocrnich C, Mitchell MA. Diagnostic sensitivity of pleural fluid cytology in malignant pleural effusions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2023 Jan;78(1):32-40. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217959. Epub 2022 Feb 2.

    PubMed 35110369
  • Tsim S, Paterson S, Cartwright D, Fong CJ, Alexander L, Kelly C, Holme J, Evison M, Blyth KG. Baseline predictors of negative and incomplete pleural cytology in patients with suspected pleural malignancy - Data supporting 'Direct to LAT' in selected groups. Lung Cancer. 2019 Jul;133:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 16.

    PubMed 31200818

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in