Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)NCT06949150
Combined Coronary CT Angiography and CT Perfusion in Coronary Artery Disease (CoroFusion)
An observational study of Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), run by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides high-resolution imaging of coronary artery disease (CAD), revealing stenosis, plaque characteristics, and hemodynamic markers like CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), axial plaque stress (APS), and wall shear stress (WSS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)
- What is being tested?
- coronary angiography and Medical therapy
- How many people
- 2,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2025to 31 Dec 2034
- How long will I take part?
- 5 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with an indication for CTP
Who may be able to join
- Patients with an indication for CTP. Qualified patients who have signed a written informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%;
- Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction within 3 months or previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery;
- Planned coronary artery bypass graft surgery after diagnostic angiography;
- Poor quality of CTA/CTP or other reasons by core lab that are unsuitable for plaque, physiological or fat analysis;
- Contraindications for CT perfusion or coronary angiography;
- Coexisting conditions such as pregnancy, cancer, severe valvular heart disease, or liver/kidney dysfunction;
- Other diseases with a life expectancy of less than one year;
- Inability to sign informed consent or, in the researcher's judgment, poor compliance, making it unlikely the patient can complete the study as required.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200030
Wei Gao, PHD, 13661959824, gao.wei1@zs-hospital.sh.cn
About this study
Official title: Combined Coronary CT Angiography and CT Perfusion in Coronary Artery Disease: Integrating Plaque Morphology, Hemodynamics, and Perfusion for Precision Management
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides high-resolution imaging of coronary artery disease (CAD), revealing stenosis, plaque characteristics, and hemodynamic markers like CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), axial plaque stress (APS), and wall shear stress (WSS). However, CTA alone has limitations in evaluating the functional significance of lesions, especially in cases with borderline stenosis, severe calcification, or coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). CT myocardial perfusion (CTP) complements CTA by directly assessing myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Despite its promise, integrating CTA and CTP for comprehensive CAD assessment remains a challenge.
Key gaps include the lack of long-term evidence on combined CTA/CTP findings, particularly in incorporating plaque markers with perfusion deficits. Standardizing ischemic thresholds and validating automated CTP analysis tools remain ongoing challenges. CTP also improves specificity in cases where CTA may overestimate ischemic burden and detects microvascular dysfunction, especially in patients with ischemia and no obstructive CAD (INOCA). Quantitative parameters like MBF have been linked to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but issues with protocol variability and cost-effectiveness persist.
This study, a real-world, single-center observational cohort, evaluates the clinical utility of integrated CTA/CTP imaging in CAD management. It will assess diagnostic synergy, impact on clinical decisions, and prognostic value in predicting 5-year MACE. AI-driven imaging analysis will quantify plaque features and myocardial perfusion defects, integrating multimodal parameters to generate individualized ischemia risk scores. The goal is to refine non-invasive diagnostic pathways and improve CAD management strategies.
Read the detailed description
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) has transformed the non-invasive assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) by providing high-resolution visualization of coronary stenosis, plaque characteristics, and emerging hemodynamic parameters such as CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), axial plaque stress (APS), and wall shear stress (WSS). Adverse plaque features, including low-attenuation plaque, napkin-ring sign, positive remodeling, and spotty calcification, have been associated with increased ischemic risk and adverse cardiovascular events. However, CTA alone has inherent limitations in evaluating the functional significance of coronary lesions, particularly in cases of borderline stenosis, diffuse atherosclerosis, severe calcification, and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). CT myocardial perfusion (CTP) serves as a functional complement to CTA by directly assessing myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), and time-to-peak (TTP), thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification in CAD. Despite promising results from previous trials, significant gaps remain in integrating CTA and CTP for comprehensive CAD assessment.
One of the critical gaps is the limited evidence regarding the long-term prognostic implications of combined CTA/CTP findings, particularly when incorporating plaque vulnerability markers (e.g., lipid-rich necrotic core, pericoronary fat attenuation index) with perfusion deficits. Additionally, the quantification of CTP perfusion defects remains an area of active investigation, with ongoing challenges in standardizing ischemic thresholds, optimizing dynamic versus static protocols, and validating automated analysis tools across diverse populations. Furthermore, insufficient data exist on how an integrated anatomical-functional approach influences clinical decision-making, including revascularization strategies, medical therapy optimization, and long-term outcomes in high-risk subgroups such as patients with diabetes, CMD, in-stent restenosis, and severe coronary calcification.
CTP provides unique diagnostic advantages by improving specificity in cases where CTA may overestimate ischemic burden, particularly in moderate stenoses without hemodynamic significance. Moreover, CTP has proven valuable in detecting microvascular dysfunction by identifying impaired MPR in patients with ischemia and no obstructive CAD (INOCA), a population often misclassified by CTA alone. Quantitative perfusion parameters, such as MBF thresholds (<180 mL/100mL/min), have been independently associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). However, unresolved issues persist, including protocol variability, limited real-world validation of automated perfusion analysis tools, and unclear cost-effectiveness in routine clinical workflows.
This study is a real-world, single-center observational cohort study designed to evaluate the clinical utility of integrated CTA/CTP imaging in CAD management. All treatment decisions will be made jointly by cardiologists and patients based on imaging results and clinical considerations. Patients may undergo medical therapy alone, invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when necessary, or additional non-invasive testing such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for further functional assessment. Our research team will prospectively track the full clinical trajectory of these patients, ensuring comprehensive data collection on diagnostic pathways, therapeutic interventions, and long-term outcomes. At appropriate time points, patients will be stratified into relevant subgroups for detailed analysis.
The primary objectives of this study are threefold: (1) to evaluate the diagnostic synergy of combining CTA-derived stenosis severity, plaque morphology, and hemodynamic markers with CTP-derived ischemic parameters against invasive reference standards such as FFR and coronary flow reserve (CFR); (2) to assess the impact of CTA/CTP-guided strategies on clinical decision-making, including revascularization rates, medical therapy adjustments, and lifestyle interventions; and (3) to determine the prognostic value of combined imaging biomarkers in predicting 5-year MACE, with a focus on sex-specific and diabetes-specific thresholds for ischemia detection.
In addition, this study will perform subgroup analyses to stratify outcomes in high-risk populations, including patients with diabetes and CMD, post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cohorts with in-stent restenosis or peri-stent plaque progression, and individuals with severe coronary calcification (Agatston score >400), where CTA interpretation remains challenging. Methodologically, the study will incorporate AI-driven imaging analysis for both CTA and CTP. Advanced deep learning algorithms will be used to automatically quantify CTA plaque features, including lipid core volume, fibrous cap thickness, and pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation, improving risk stratification beyond conventional stenosis-based assessments. AI-based CTP analysis will enable automated segmentation and quantification of myocardial perfusion defects, standardizing ischemia thresholds and reducing interobserver variability. Furthermore, machine learning models will integrate multimodal imaging parameters-stenosis severity, plaque vulnerability markers, hemodynamic stress metrics (APS, WSS), and perfusion indices-to generate individualized ischemia risk scores, aiding in personalized treatment decision-making. Advanced hemodynamic modeling using finite element analysis will be employed for CT-FFR and APS computation, validated against invasive pressure wire measurements.
By addressing existing limitations in CAD imaging, this study aims to establish standardized criteria for interpreting combined CTA/CTP findings, provide robust evidence for CTP-guided risk stratification in understudied populations, define the cost-benefit profile of multimodal imaging, and generate a large-scale imaging registry to support future research in precision cardiovascular medicine. The findings from this study are expected to refine non-invasive diagnostic pathways and contribute to the development of personalized, evidence-based strategies for CAD management.
- Conditions
- Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)
- Being tested
- coronary angiography, Medical therapy
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, CT angiography, CT perfusion
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
coronary angiographyDiagnostic test
Invasive coronary angiography (ICA), with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), or fractional flow reserve (FFR).
Medical therapyOther
Patients do not undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA), recieving medical treatment, lifestyle intervention or further test
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative group | Patients do not undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and receive medical treatment, lifestyle interventions, or additional tests instead. Receives: Other: Medical therapy | |
| ICA group | Patients undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA), with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), or fractional flow reserve (FFR). Receives: Diagnostic Test: coronary angiography |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Composite endpoint including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for unstable angina, and unplanned coronary revascularization.
Measured: From enrollment to the follow-up of 5 year
Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined CTA/CTP vs. Invasive FFR/CFR
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detecting hemodynamically significant lesions (FFR ≤0.80 or CFR <2.0 or stenosis >90%).
Measured: 30 days
Agreement Between CT-FFR and CTP Perfusion Metrics
Correlation between CT-FFR values and CTP-derived myocardial blood flow (MBF) or perfusion defect size.
Measured: 30 days
Predictive Power of Combined Imaging Biomarkers for MACE
Hazard ratios (HRs) for MACE associated with:High-risk plaque (≥2 adverse features: low-attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, napkin-ring sign, spotty calcification). Perfusion deficit (MBF <150 mL/100mL/min or MPR <1.8). Combined high-risk plaque + perfusion deficit.
Measured: From enrollment to the follow-up of 5 year
Prognostic Utility of Peri-Coronary Fat Attenuation Index (FAI)
Association between elevated FAI (>-70 HU) around stenotic lesions and MACE, adjusted for plaque burden and CTP parameters.
Measured: From enrollment to the follow-up of 5 year
Secondary outcomes (4)
Association Between Perfusion Recovery and Symptom Relief
Percentage of patients with ≥50% reduction in angina episodes linked to normalized MBF (≥200 mL/100mL/min) or MPR (≥2.2) on follow-up CTP.
Measured: From enrollment to the follow-up of 1 year
Dynamic Perfusion Changes in Microvascular Dysfunction
Differences in stress/rest MBF ratios between patients with vs. without coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), validated by invasive coronary flow reserve (CFR <2.0).
Measured: 30 days
Sex-Specific Differences in Perfusion-Plaque Relationships
Stratified analysis of plaque-perfusion correlations in women (e.g., higher prevalence of CMD) vs. men.
Measured: 30 days
Impact of Severe Calcification on CTP Diagnostic Accuracy
Sensitivity/specificity of CTP for detecting ischemia in lesions with Agatston score >400, compared to invasive FFR.
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Apr 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2025
- Primary completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2034 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Shanghai Zhongshan HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 5 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06949150
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ZS-CoroFusion
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 9 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Combined Coronary CT Angiography and CT Perfusion in Coronary Artery Disease: Integrating Plaque Morphology, Hemodynamics, and Perfusion for Precision Management
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06949150
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ZS-CoroFusion
- Conditions
- Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, CT angiography, CT perfusion
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Zhongshan HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2034 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides high-resolution imaging of coronary artery disease (CAD), revealing stenosis, plaque characteristics, and hemodynamic markers like CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), axial plaque stress (APS), and wall shear stress (WSS). However, CTA alone has limitations in evaluating the functional significance of lesions, especially in cases with borderline stenosis, severe calcification, or coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). CT myocardial perfusion (CTP) complements CTA by directly assessing myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Despite its promise, integrating CTA and CTP for comprehensive CAD assessment remains a challenge.
Key gaps include the lack of long-term evidence on combined CTA/CTP findings, particularly in incorporating plaque markers with perfusion deficits. Standardizing ischemic thresholds and validating automated CTP analysis tools remain ongoing challenges. CTP also improves specificity in cases where CTA may overestimate ischemic burden and detects microvascular dysfunction, especially in patients with ischemia and no obstructive CAD (INOCA). Quantitative parameters like MBF have been linked to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but issues with protocol variability and cost-effectiveness persist.
This study, a real-world, single-center observational cohort, evaluates the clinical utility of integrated CTA/CTP imaging in CAD management. It will assess diagnostic synergy, impact on clinical decisions, and prognostic value in predicting 5-year MACE. AI-driven imaging analysis will quantify plaque features and myocardial perfusion defects, integrating multimodal parameters to generate individualized ischemia risk scores. The goal is to refine non-invasive diagnostic pathways and improve CAD management strategies.
Detailed description
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) has transformed the non-invasive assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) by providing high-resolution visualization of coronary stenosis, plaque characteristics, and emerging hemodynamic parameters such as CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), axial plaque stress (APS), and wall shear stress (WSS). Adverse plaque features, including low-attenuation plaque, napkin-ring sign, positive remodeling, and spotty calcification, have been associated with increased ischemic risk and adverse cardiovascular events. However, CTA alone has inherent limitations in evaluating the functional significance of coronary lesions, particularly in cases of borderline stenosis, diffuse atherosclerosis, severe calcification, and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). CT myocardial perfusion (CTP) serves as a functional complement to CTA by directly assessing myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), and time-to-peak (TTP), thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification in CAD. Despite promising results from previous trials, significant gaps remain in integrating CTA and CTP for comprehensive CAD assessment.
One of the critical gaps is the limited evidence regarding the long-term prognostic implications of combined CTA/CTP findings, particularly when incorporating plaque vulnerability markers (e.g., lipid-rich necrotic core, pericoronary fat attenuation index) with perfusion deficits. Additionally, the quantification of CTP perfusion defects remains an area of active investigation, with ongoing challenges in standardizing ischemic thresholds, optimizing dynamic versus static protocols, and validating automated analysis tools across diverse populations. Furthermore, insufficient data exist on how an integrated anatomical-functional approach influences clinical decision-making, including revascularization strategies, medical therapy optimization, and long-term outcomes in high-risk subgroups such as patients with diabetes, CMD, in-stent restenosis, and severe coronary calcification.
CTP provides unique diagnostic advantages by improving specificity in cases where CTA may overestimate ischemic burden, particularly in moderate stenoses without hemodynamic significance. Moreover, CTP has proven valuable in detecting microvascular dysfunction by identifying impaired MPR in patients with ischemia and no obstructive CAD (INOCA), a population often misclassified by CTA alone. Quantitative perfusion parameters, such as MBF thresholds (<180 mL/100mL/min), have been independently associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). However, unresolved issues persist, including protocol variability, limited real-world validation of automated perfusion analysis tools, and unclear cost-effectiveness in routine clinical workflows.
This study is a real-world, single-center observational cohort study designed to evaluate the clinical utility of integrated CTA/CTP imaging in CAD management. All treatment decisions will be made jointly by cardiologists and patients based on imaging results and clinical considerations. Patients may undergo medical therapy alone, invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when necessary, or additional non-invasive testing such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for further functional assessment. Our research team will prospectively track the full clinical trajectory of these patients, ensuring comprehensive data collection on diagnostic pathways, therapeutic interventions, and long-term outcomes. At appropriate time points, patients will be stratified into relevant subgroups for detailed analysis.
The primary objectives of this study are threefold: (1) to evaluate the diagnostic synergy of combining CTA-derived stenosis severity, plaque morphology, and hemodynamic markers with CTP-derived ischemic parameters against invasive reference standards such as FFR and coronary flow reserve (CFR); (2) to assess the impact of CTA/CTP-guided strategies on clinical decision-making, including revascularization rates, medical therapy adjustments, and lifestyle interventions; and (3) to determine the prognostic value of combined imaging biomarkers in predicting 5-year MACE, with a focus on sex-specific and diabetes-specific thresholds for ischemia detection.
In addition, this study will perform subgroup analyses to stratify outcomes in high-risk populations, including patients with diabetes and CMD, post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cohorts with in-stent restenosis or peri-stent plaque progression, and individuals with severe coronary calcification (Agatston score >400), where CTA interpretation remains challenging. Methodologically, the study will incorporate AI-driven imaging analysis for both CTA and CTP. Advanced deep learning algorithms will be used to automatically quantify CTA plaque features, including lipid core volume, fibrous cap thickness, and pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation, improving risk stratification beyond conventional stenosis-based assessments. AI-based CTP analysis will enable automated segmentation and quantification of myocardial perfusion defects, standardizing ischemia thresholds and reducing interobserver variability. Furthermore, machine learning models will integrate multimodal imaging parameters-stenosis severity, plaque vulnerability markers, hemodynamic stress metrics (APS, WSS), and perfusion indices-to generate individualized ischemia risk scores, aiding in personalized treatment decision-making. Advanced hemodynamic modeling using finite element analysis will be employed for CT-FFR and APS computation, validated against invasive pressure wire measurements.
By addressing existing limitations in CAD imaging, this study aims to establish standardized criteria for interpreting combined CTA/CTP findings, provide robust evidence for CTP-guided risk stratification in understudied populations, define the cost-benefit profile of multimodal imaging, and generate a large-scale imaging registry to support future research in precision cardiovascular medicine. The findings from this study are expected to refine non-invasive diagnostic pathways and contribute to the development of personalized, evidence-based strategies for CAD management.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 5 Years
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative group | – | Other: Medical therapyPatients do not undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and receive medical treatment, lifestyle interventions, or additional tests instead. |
| ICA group | – | Diagnostic Test: coronary angiographyPatients undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA), with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), or fractional flow reserve (FFR). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with an indication for CTP
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with an indication for CTP. Qualified patients who have signed a written informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%;
- Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction within 3 months or previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery;
- Planned coronary artery bypass graft surgery after diagnostic angiography;
- Poor quality of CTA/CTP or other reasons by core lab that are unsuitable for plaque, physiological or fat analysis;
- Contraindications for CT perfusion or coronary angiography;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| coronary angiographyInvasive coronary angiography (ICA), with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), or fractional flow reserve (FFR). | Diagnostic test | ICA group |
| Medical therapyPatients do not undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA), recieving medical treatment, lifestyle intervention or further test | Other | Conservative group |
Primary outcome
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Time frame: From enrollment to the follow-up of 5 year
Composite endpoint including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for unstable angina, and unplanned coronary revascularization.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined CTA/CTP vs. Invasive FFR/CFR
Time frame: 30 days
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detecting hemodynamically significant lesions (FFR ≤0.80 or CFR <2.0 or stenosis >90%).
Agreement Between CT-FFR and CTP Perfusion Metrics
Time frame: 30 days
Correlation between CT-FFR values and CTP-derived myocardial blood flow (MBF) or perfusion defect size.
Predictive Power of Combined Imaging Biomarkers for MACE
Time frame: From enrollment to the follow-up of 5 year
Hazard ratios (HRs) for MACE associated with:High-risk plaque (≥2 adverse features: low-attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, napkin-ring sign, spotty calcification). Perfusion deficit (MBF <150 mL/100mL/min or MPR <1.8). Combined high-risk plaque + perfusion deficit.
Prognostic Utility of Peri-Coronary Fat Attenuation Index (FAI)
Time frame: From enrollment to the follow-up of 5 year
Association between elevated FAI (>-70 HU) around stenotic lesions and MACE, adjusted for plaque burden and CTP parameters.
4 secondary outcomes
Association Between Perfusion Recovery and Symptom Relief
Time frame: From enrollment to the follow-up of 1 year
Dynamic Perfusion Changes in Microvascular Dysfunction
Time frame: 30 days
Sex-Specific Differences in Perfusion-Plaque Relationships
Time frame: 30 days
Impact of Severe Calcification on CTP Diagnostic Accuracy
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Thiamine Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Coronary Heart Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Anaesthetic Management in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Preoperative Fasting, Pulmonary Aspiration During Anesthetic Induction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), run by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Wei Gao, PHD (+8613661959824, gao.wei1@zs-hospital.sh.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) (time frame: From enrollment to the follow-up of 5 year). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2025.