Ischemic StrokeCARE-AFNCT06954610
Cardiac Assessment for Recurrent Stroke Risk Evaluation in Atrial Fibrillation
An observational study of Ischemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting up to 10% of the elderly. Ischemic stroke is the main complication of AF and cardioembolism is one of the leading causes of ischemic stroke, accounting for approximately one third of cases. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation, Cerebrovascular Disorders
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 4 Nov 2025to 30 Jun 2028
- How long will I take part?
- 12 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation that are admitted to the stroke center of the Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland. Atrial fibrillation may be known prior to the index stroke or newly diagnosed and patients may be anticoagulated or not.
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Written informed consent (by patient, next of kin or legally authorised representative)
- Permanent, persistent, or paroxysmal AF previously known or diagnosed during the index hospitalisation
- Acute (≤7 days), symptomatic ischemic stroke
Who cannot join
- Life expectancy <1 year according to the opinion of the investigator
- Patient is unlikely to attend follow-up visits
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Inselspital Bern
Bern, 3010
Auer Elias
About this study
Official title: CARE-AF: Cardiac Assessment for Recurrent Stroke Risk Evaluation in Atrial Fibrillation
Background
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting up to 10% of the elderly. Ischemic stroke is the main complication of AF and cardioembolism is one of the leading causes of ischemic stroke, accounting for approximately one third of cases. Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) is a cornerstone in stroke prevention in patients with AF. According to randomized controlled trials of direct oral anticoagulants, a residual risk of ischemic stroke of 1-2% per year for so-called "breakthrough stroke" remains, despite adequate intake of OAC. The majority (>70%) of these breakthrough strokes are cardioembolic in nature and only a minority are related to medication issues (e.g. non-compliance) or other, non-AF related etiologies. Stroke recurrence risk after such a breakthrough stroke markedly increases to 8-9% per year indicating a particularly high-risk situation. Why OAC fails in certain patients, but not in others remains as poorly understood, as does the reason why the subsequent risk of stroke is so high.
Read more
Current risk stratification tools, such as the widely used CHA2DS2-VA(Sc)-score, fail to predict stroke risk in such a high-risk cohort, as they were intended to guide the initiation of OAC in low to moderate risk patients. In light of new therapeutic strategies currently being investigated, such as percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with breakthrough strokes (ELAPSE - NCT05976685) or in AF-patients deemed high-risk (LAAOS IV - NCT05963698), improved risk stratification and characterization of high-risk AF patients is highly warranted.
Several clinical factors, such as those reflected in the CHA2DS2-VA(Sc)-score, and especially a high AF-burden are associated with increased risk of cardioembolic stroke. Several cardiac serum biomarkers are thought to be surrogates not only of cardiac function, but also of cardioembolic risk. Reflecting ventricular and atrial wall tension, myocardial injury, oxidative stress and thrombogenicity, elevated NT-proBNP, MR-proANP, high-sensitive Troponin T and D-Dimers have all been associated with cardioembolic stroke in different AF and non-AF populations. As the main location of thrombus formation, the left atrium (LA) and more specifically its appendage (LAA) are of particular interest in the pathogenesis of cardioembolism. Pronounced LA-enlargement, compared to a normal-sized LA, correlates with an increased risk of cardioembolism in AF-patients. As over 80% of thrombi form within the LAA, several LAA-characteristics, such as slower LAA-flow velocity and larger LAA-orifice area have also been demonstrated to be associated with higher stroke risk. Although there is data on each one of these factors, they have only been investigated in low to moderate risk populations, such as AF-patients without prior stroke, OAC-naïve patients, or even within the general population as a whole. Their role in high-risk AF-patients and in breakthrough stroke is unknown.
Hypothesis
The investigators hypothesize that specific clinical factors, serum cardiac biomarkers and markers of LA- and LAA-morphology and function are associated with breakthrough stroke / OAC-failure and may improve risk stratification.
Methods
CARE-AF is a single-center, prospective cohort study conducted at the Stroke Center of the Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland. Patients with an index ischemic stroke and AF (breakthrough and non-breakthrough cases) will be enrolled. The investigators will collect clinical data, serum cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic indices of the LA and LAA. All patients will receive standardized annual follow-ups until the end of the study, defined as 12 months after the inclusion of the last participant. The primary endpoint is ischemic stroke or systemic embolism during follow-up. First, in a cross-sectional design, the study will assess the association between serum cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic indices among patients with breakthrough vs. non-breakthrough stroke as index event, applying multivariate regression models. Second, the investigators will perform a longitudinal analysis assessing the association between the variables mentioned above and breakthrough stroke as index event with the primary endpoint, using multivariate Cox regression models. The study aims to enroll a minimum of 500 patients, which provides sufficient power to detect a clinically meaningful adjusted hazard ratio for recurrent stroke of 1.5 with 80% power at an alpha level of 5%.
Conclusion
The results of this project will enhance understanding of the role of specific clinical factors, cardiac serum biomarkers and echocardiographic indices in the residual risk of stroke in patients with AF on anticoagulation therapy. They may improve current risk stratification and have the potential to help guide therapeutic decisions in high-risk situations considering evolving therapeutic possibilities.
- Conditions
- Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Vascular Diseases
- Being tested
- No intervention
- Keywords
- Ischemic stroke, Direct oral anticoagulation, Anticoagulation, Breakthrough stroke, Risk stratification, Atrial fibrillation, Anticoagulant therapy, Direct oral anticoagulant
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Vascular Diseases, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Heart Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
No interventionOther
No intervention
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Composite of recurrent ischemic stroke or systemic embolism
- Ischemic stroke defined as new neurological symptoms lasting >24h and/or evidence of new ischemic lesions in neuroimaging (CT and/or MRI)
- Systemic embolism, defined as an abrupt vascular insufficiency associated with radiological evidence of arterial occlusion of an extremity or internal organ, in absence of any other, more-likely etiology (e.g. trauma)
- Will be assessed through structured telephone visits at every follow-up visit
Measured: Assessed in first follow-up visit at 12 months (+/- 30 days) after enrolment. Subsequent assessments/visits will be every 12 months and at the end of study (if last visit has taken place >90days prior). Minimal Follow up per patient is 12 months.
Secondary outcomes (5)
All-cause death
Death of all cause
- Will be assessed through structured telephone visits at every follow-up visit
Measured: Assessed in first follow-up visit at 12 months (+/- 30 days) after enrolment. Subsequent assessments/visits will be every 12 months and at the end of study (if last visit has taken place >90days prior). Minimal Follow up per patient is 12 months.
MACE (major adverse cardial events), defined as a composite outcome of myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), systemic embolism and cardiovascular death
- Myocardial infarction, defined according to the 4th Universal Definition of MI as a combination of acute myocardial injury (changes in cardiac biomarkers) and evidence of acute myocardial ischemia derived from the clinical presentation, electrocardiographic changes, or the results of myocardial or coronary artery imaging.25
- Transient ischemic attack, defined as a transient episode of neurologic dysfunction caused by focal ischemia (brain, spinal cord or retina) not fulfilling stroke-criteria
- Intracranial haemorrhage, defined as intracranial haemorrhage (intraparenchymal, subarachnoid, sub-/epidural) not due to trauma
- Cardiovascular death, resulting from cardio-/cerebrovascular causes (e.g. myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac or unwitnessed death, stroke etc.
- Will be assessed through structured telephone visits at every follow-up visit
Measured: Assessed in first follow-up visit at 12 months (+/- 30 days) after enrolment. Subsequent assessments/visits will be every 12 months and at the end of study (if last visit has taken place >90days prior). Minimal Follow up per patient is 12 months.
Episodes of symptomatic AF
Defined as symptoms attributable to AF that led to change in medication (initiation and/or change of rhythm and/or rate control medication), AF-ablation and / or electro-conversion.
- Will be assessed through structured telephone visits at every follow-up visit
Measured: Assessed in first follow-up visit at 12 months (+/- 30 days) after enrolment. Subsequent assessments/visits will be every 12 months and at the end of study (if last visit has taken place >90days prior). Minimal Follow up per patient is 12 months.
Functional outcome: modified Rankin Scale
Functional outcome measured using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death)
- Will be assessed through structured telephone visits at every follow-up visit
Measured: Assessed in first follow-up visit at 12 months (+/- 30 days) after enrolment. Subsequent assessments/visits will be every 12 months and at the end of study (if last visit has taken place >90days prior). Minimal Follow up per patient is 12 months.
Functional outcome: Quality of life
Functional outcome measured as subjective quality of life with EQ5D-Score (EuroQol-5 dimensions score)
- Assesses overall quality of life with a score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
- Assesses 5 dimensions of daily live, each ranging from 0 (no problem) to 5 (severe problem): Mobility, Self-Care, Activities of daily life, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression
- Will be assessed through structured telephone visits at every follow-up visit
Measured: Assessed in first follow-up visit at 12 months (+/- 30 days) after enrolment. Subsequent assessments/visits will be every 12 months and at the end of study (if last visit has taken place >90days prior). Minimal Follow up per patient is 12 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2025
- Study start4 Nov 2025
- Primary completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ischemic StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 12 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David Seiffge, Prof. MD, Principal investigator, Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06954610
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STD0007325
- Acronym
- CARE-AF
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CARE-AF: Cardiac Assessment for Recurrent Stroke Risk Evaluation in Atrial Fibrillation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06954610
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CARE-AF / STD0007325
- Conditions
- Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Vascular Diseases
- Keywords
- Ischemic stroke, Direct oral anticoagulation, Anticoagulation, Breakthrough stroke, Risk stratification, Atrial fibrillation, Anticoagulant therapy, Direct oral anticoagulant
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting up to 10% of the elderly. Ischemic stroke is the main complication of AF and cardioembolism is one of the leading causes of ischemic stroke, accounting for approximately one third of cases. Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) is a cornerstone in stroke prevention in patients with AF. According to randomized controlled trials of direct oral anticoagulants, a residual risk of ischemic stroke of 1-2% per year for so-called "breakthrough stroke" remains, despite adequate intake of OAC. The majority (>70%) of these breakthrough strokes are cardioembolic in nature and only a minority are related to medication issues (e.g. non-compliance) or other, non-AF related etiologies. Stroke recurrence risk after such a breakthrough stroke markedly increases to 8-9% per year indicating a particularly high-risk situation. Why OAC fails in certain patients, but not in others remains as poorly understood, as does the reason why the subsequent risk of stroke is so high.
Current risk stratification tools, such as the widely used CHA2DS2-VA(Sc)-score, fail to predict stroke risk in such a high-risk cohort, as they were intended to guide the initiation of OAC in low to moderate risk patients. In light of new therapeutic strategies currently being investigated, such as percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with breakthrough strokes (ELAPSE - NCT05976685) or in AF-patients deemed high-risk (LAAOS IV - NCT05963698), improved risk stratification and characterization of high-risk AF patients is highly warranted.
Several clinical factors, such as those reflected in the CHA2DS2-VA(Sc)-score, and especially a high AF-burden are associated with increased risk of cardioembolic stroke. Several cardiac serum biomarkers are thought to be surrogates not only of cardiac function, but also of cardioembolic risk. Reflecting ventricular and atrial wall tension, myocardial injury, oxidative stress and thrombogenicity, elevated NT-proBNP, MR-proANP, high-sensitive Troponin T and D-Dimers have all been associated with cardioembolic stroke in different AF and non-AF populations. As the main location of thrombus formation, the left atrium (LA) and more specifically its appendage (LAA) are of particular interest in the pathogenesis of cardioembolism. Pronounced LA-enlargement, compared to a normal-sized LA, correlates with an increased risk of cardioembolism in AF-patients. As over 80% of thrombi form within the LAA, several LAA-characteristics, such as slower LAA-flow velocity and larger LAA-orifice area have also been demonstrated to be associated with higher stroke risk. Although there is data on each one of these factors, they have only been investigated in low to moderate risk populations, such as AF-patients without prior stroke, OAC-naïve patients, or even within the general population as a whole. Their role in high-risk AF-patients and in breakthrough stroke is unknown.
Hypothesis
The investigators hypothesize that specific clinical factors, serum cardiac biomarkers and markers of LA- and LAA-morphology and function are associated with breakthrough stroke / OAC-failure and may improve risk stratification.
Methods
CARE-AF is a single-center, prospective cohort study conducted at the Stroke Center of the Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland. Patients with an index ischemic stroke and AF (breakthrough and non-breakthrough cases) will be enrolled. The investigators will collect clinical data, serum cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic indices of the LA and LAA. All patients will receive standardized annual follow-ups until the end of the study, defined as 12 months after the inclusion of the last participant. The primary endpoint is ischemic stroke or systemic embolism during follow-up. First, in a cross-sectional design, the study will assess the association between serum cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic indices among patients with breakthrough vs. non-breakthrough stroke as index event, applying multivariate regression models. Second, the investigators will perform a longitudinal analysis assessing the association between the variables mentioned above and breakthrough stroke as index event with the primary endpoint, using multivariate Cox regression models. The study aims to enroll a minimum of 500 patients, which provides sufficient power to detect a clinically meaningful adjusted hazard ratio for recurrent stroke of 1.5 with 80% power at an alpha level of 5%.
Conclusion
The results of this project will enhance understanding of the role of specific clinical factors, cardiac serum biomarkers and echocardiographic indices in the residual risk of stroke in patients with AF on anticoagulation therapy. They may improve current risk stratification and have the potential to help guide therapeutic decisions in high-risk situations considering evolving therapeutic possibilities.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 12 Months
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation that are admitted to the stroke center of the Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland. Atrial fibrillation may be known prior to the index stroke or newly diagnosed and patients may be anticoagulated or not.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Written informed consent (by patient, next of kin or legally authorised representative)
- Permanent, persistent, or paroxysmal AF previously known or diagnosed during the index hospitalisation
- Acute (≤7 days), symptomatic ischemic stroke
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Life expectancy <1 year according to the opinion of the investigator
- Patient is unlikely to attend follow-up visits
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| No interventionNo intervention | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Composite of recurrent ischemic stroke or systemic embolism
Time frame: Assessed in first follow-up visit at 12 months (+/- 30 days) after enrolment. Subsequent assessments/visits will be every 12 months and at the end of study (if last visit has taken place >90days prior). Minimal Follow up per patient is 12 months.
* Ischemic stroke defined as new neurological symptoms lasting >24h and/or evidence of new ischemic lesions in neuroimaging (CT and/or MRI) * Systemic embolism, defined as an abrupt vascular insufficiency associated with radiological evidence of arterial occlusion of an extremity or internal organ, in absence of any other, more-likely etiology (e.g. trauma) * Will be assessed through structured telephone visits at every follow-up visit
5 secondary outcomes
All-cause death
Time frame: Assessed in first follow-up visit at 12 months (+/- 30 days) after enrolment. Subsequent assessments/visits will be every 12 months and at the end of study (if last visit has taken place >90days prior). Minimal Follow up per patient is 12 months.
MACE (major adverse cardial events), defined as a composite outcome of myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), systemic embolism and cardiovascular death
Time frame: Assessed in first follow-up visit at 12 months (+/- 30 days) after enrolment. Subsequent assessments/visits will be every 12 months and at the end of study (if last visit has taken place >90days prior). Minimal Follow up per patient is 12 months.
Episodes of symptomatic AF
Time frame: Assessed in first follow-up visit at 12 months (+/- 30 days) after enrolment. Subsequent assessments/visits will be every 12 months and at the end of study (if last visit has taken place >90days prior). Minimal Follow up per patient is 12 months.
Functional outcome: modified Rankin Scale
Time frame: Assessed in first follow-up visit at 12 months (+/- 30 days) after enrolment. Subsequent assessments/visits will be every 12 months and at the end of study (if last visit has taken place >90days prior). Minimal Follow up per patient is 12 months.
Functional outcome: Quality of life
Time frame: Assessed in first follow-up visit at 12 months (+/- 30 days) after enrolment. Subsequent assessments/visits will be every 12 months and at the end of study (if last visit has taken place >90days prior). Minimal Follow up per patient is 12 months.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Active, not recruiting
Improving Visual Field Deficits With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation
Visual Field Defect, Peripheral, Stroke
Recruiting
Biomarkers of Paired VNS
Stroke, Ischemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
David Seiffge, Prof. MD principal investigator
Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Ischemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact David Seiffge, Prof. MD (+41316640509, david.seiffge@insel.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Composite of recurrent ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (time frame: Assessed in first follow-up visit at 12 months (+/- 30 days) after enrolment. Subsequent assessments/visits will be every 12 months and at the end of study (if last visit has taken place >90days prior). Minimal Follow up per patient is 12 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2025.