FibromyalgiaNCT06956456
Supervised and Home Training in Fibromyalgia
A study testing Supervised Multicomponent Training Protocol and Non-Supervised Home-Based Multicomponent Training Protocol in people with Fibromyalgia, run by University of Bari Aldo Moro at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of supervised multicomponent training (MCT) on physiological parameters, physical fitness, mental well-being, and quality of life in subjects with a history of Fibromyalgia, compared to a non-supervised home-based MCT protocol and a waitlist control… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Fibromyalgia
- What is being tested?
- Supervised Multicomponent Training Protocol and Non-Supervised Home-Based Multicomponent Training Protocol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 3 Mar 2025to 30 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women/Men
- Diagnosis of fibromyalgia
- Age between 18 and 75 years at the time of initial treatment;
- Signature of a written informed consent form (or their legally recognized representatives must sign) indicating that the patient understood the purpose and procedures required for the study and is willing to participate in the study;
- Sedentary lifestyle (subjects who have not followed WHO guidelines for aerobic and resistance exercise in the past 3 months);
- Positive medical specialist assessment of noncompetitive physical activity practice
Who cannot join
- Expected absence for more than one week during the intervention period
- Absence of a medical certificate of suitability for non-competitive sports
- Severe musculoskeletal or joint disorders with significant mobility limitations
- Uncontrolled hypertension or untreated heart disease;
- Pshychiatric disorders;
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of a 12-week Supervised or Home-based Multicomponent Training Program on Psychological, and Physical Variables in Fibromyalgia Patients
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of supervised multicomponent training (MCT) on physiological parameters, physical fitness, mental well-being, and quality of life in subjects with a history of Fibromyalgia, compared to a non-supervised home-based MCT protocol and a waitlist control group (WLCG). The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does supervised MCT or non-supervised home-based MCT protocol improve physiological parameters, physical fitness, mental well-being, and overall quality of life compared to a waitlist control group (WLCG)? Does supervised MCT provide superior physiological an psychological improvements compared to a non-supervised home-based MCT protocol?
Read more
Researchers will compare:
supervised MCT (a combination of aerobic, mobility, and resistance training exercises) and non-supervised home-based MCT protocol to see if these interventions improve fitness, health, psychological and quality of life outcomes compared to WLCG (participants not engaging in structured physical activity during the study), and if there will be significant differences between supervised MCT and non-supervised home-based MCT protocol.
Participants will:
Complete assessments of anthropometric, physical fitness, and psychological parameters at baseline (T0) and after 12 weeks (T1).
Be randomly assigned to one of three groups.
Engage in a 12-week of non-supervised home-based MCT protocol or structured MCT program supervised by exercise professionals, including:
Warm-up sessions (10 minutes, low-intensity walking). Main sessions (40 minutes): aerobic, mobility, resistance (MCT), only-aerobic (AT) exercises.
Cool-down sessions (10 minutes): breathing and stretching exercises.
This study will provide insights into the efficacy of tailored physical activity interventions for Fibromyalgic patients.
- Conditions
- Fibromyalgia
- Being tested
- Supervised Multicomponent Training Protocol, Non-Supervised Home-Based Multicomponent Training Protocol
- Keywords
- mental and physical well-being, anxiety-depressive symptoms, fisical fitness
- Medical subject headings
- Fibromyalgia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Supervised Multicomponent Training ProtocolOther
Supervised Multicomponent Training Protocol
Each session consists of:
Warm-up (10 minutes): Low-intensity walking (Borg scale 10-11) to increase heart rate, improve blood flow, and prepare joints.
Main phase (40 minutes):
Aerobic exercises: Controlled jumping jacks, step-ups, alternating knee lifts, lateral steps, and leg lifts.
Mobility exercises: Thoracic extensions, cat-to-cows, overhead stretching with a stick, and hip internal rotations (1-3 sets, 30-60 seconds per exercise).
Resistance training: Gradual progression of 8 exercises targeting major muscle groups, such as squats, bicep curls, shoulder presses, and rows (1-3 sets, 10-15 reps, RPE 13-15).
Cool-down (10 minutes): Breathing exercises and stretching (1-3 sets, 10-30 seconds per stretch).
Non-Supervised Home-Based Multicomponent Training ProtocolOther
Participant will receive a personalized exercise plan tailored to their fitness level.
Each session consists of:
Warm-up (10 minutes): Low-intensity walking (Borg scale 10-11) to increase heart rate, improve blood flow, and prepare joints.
Main phase (40 minutes):
Aerobic exercises: Controlled jumping jacks, step-ups, alternating knee lifts, lateral steps, and leg lifts.
Mobility exercises: Thoracic extensions, cat-to-cows, overhead stretching with a stick, and hip internal rotations (1-3 sets, 30-60 seconds per exercise).
Resistance training: Gradual progression of 8 exercises targeting major muscle groups, such as squats, bicep curls, shoulder presses, and rows (1-3 sets, 10-15 reps, RPE 13-15).
Cool-down (10 minutes): Breathing exercises and stretching (1-3 sets, 10-30 seconds per stretch).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Supervised Multicomponent Training (SMCT) | Experimental | subjects assigned to the SMCT group will perform a supervised training protocol defined multicomponent training, which includes aerobic, resistance and flexibility components. Receives: Other: Supervised Multicomponent Training Protocol |
| Non-Supervised Home-Based Multicomponent Training (NSMCT) | Experimental | subjects assigned to the NSMCT group will perform a non-supervised home-based training protocol defined multicomponent training, which includes aerobic, resistance and flexibility components. Receives: Other: Non-Supervised Home-Based Multicomponent Training Protocol |
| Waiting List Control Group (WLCG) | No intervention | Subjects assigned to the WLCG group will not engage in any structured physical activity throughout the intervention period, continuing with their usual lifestyle, and will be placed on a waiting list, ensuring their participation in adapted physical activity at the end of the 12-week intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in lower body strength
30-s chair stand (30CST) test: Sit-to-stand from a chair during 30 seconds (measured in seconds)
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in functional mobility
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test (measured in seconds)
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in Handrigp Strength
Handgrip Strength (HGS) test: muscle strength measured with manual dynamometers (Kgf)
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in aerobic capacity
2-Minute Step Test (TMST): march in place for 2 minutes, lifting their knees to a height halfway between the iliac crest and the patella.The number of full knee lifts (repetitions) completed in 2 minutes is recorded.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in lower body flexibility
Chair Sit-and-Reach Test: measures lower body flexibility (hamstrings and lower back) in centimeters (cm). It involves sitting on a chair, extending one leg, and reaching toward the toes to assess mobility. The measurement is taken by recording the distance between the fingertips and the toes. Positive score (+): Fingertips go past the toes.Zero score (0): Fingertips touch the toes. Negative score (-): Fingertips fall short of the toes.
A ruler or tape measure is used to record the exact distance.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in upper body flexibility
Back Scratch Test: measures upper body flexibility, particularly shoulder mobility, in centimeters (cm). It involves reaching one hand over the shoulder and the other behind the back to touch or overlap fingers.
Positive score (+): Fingers overlap (measured as the overlap distance). Zero score (0): Fingers just touch. Negative score (-): Fingers do not touch (measured as the gap distance).
A ruler or tape measure is used to record the exact distance.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in psychological parameters (depression)
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI): measures depression severity using a numerical score. It consists of 21 items, each rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3) based on symptom severity.
Total score range: 0 to 63 (higher scores indicate more severe depression).
Interpretation:
0-13: Minimal depression 14-19: Mild depression 20-28: Moderate depression 29-63: Severe depression
The final score is obtained by summing the responses.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in psychological parameters (anxiety).
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y): measures anxiety levels using a numerical score. It consists of 20 items assessing temporary (state) anxiety on a 4-point scale (1 = not at all to 4 = very much so).
Total score range: 20 to 80 (higher scores indicate greater anxiety).
Interpretation:
20-37: Low anxiety 38-44: Moderate anxiety 45-80: High anxiety
The final score is obtained by summing the responses.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in psychological parameters (enjoyment).
he Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) is a self-report questionnaire used to measure an individual's enjoyment of physical activity. It assesses positive and negative feelings related to exercise to evaluate motivation and adherence potential.
It include 18 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale (from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree). Some items are reverse-scored. After adjusting reverse-scored items, all scores are summed to give a total score ranging from 18 to 126, with higher scores indicating greater enjoyment of physical activity.
A higher total score suggests a more positive emotional response to exercise, which is often linked to better adherence and motivation.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in psychological parameters (fear of movement).
The TSK is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess fear of movement or re-injury due to physical activity, commonly used in patients with chronic pain.
Scoring and Interpretation:
The standard TSK has 17 items, each rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree). Some items are reverse-scored. The total score ranges from 17 to 68, with higher scores indicating greater fear of movement. Scores above 37 often suggest clinically significant kinesiophobia.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in psychological parameters (anticipated pain).
The PCS is a 13-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess exaggerated negative thoughts and feelings related to actual or anticipated pain. It evaluates three components: rumination, magnification, and helplessness.
Scoring and Interpretation:
Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all to 4 = all the time), yielding a total score from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater levels of pain catastrophizing, which are associated with increased pain perception, emotional distress, and poorer treatment outcomes.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in psychological parameters (alexithymia).
The TAS-20 is a 20-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess alexithymia, a difficulty in identifying and describing emotions. It measures three dimensions: difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing feelings, and externally oriented thinking.
Scoring and Interpretation:
Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). After reverse-scoring appropriate items, the total score ranges from 20 to 100.
- 51: Non-alexithymic
52-60: Possible alexithymia
- 61: Alexithymic Higher scores indicate greater difficulty with emotional awareness and expression.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in physical activity levels.
The GPAQ is a tool developed by the WHO to assess physical activity levels across three domains: work, transport, and leisure. It captures frequency, duration, and intensity of activity, as well as sedentary behavior.
Scoring and Interpretation:
Responses are converted into MET-minutes/week (Metabolic Equivalent Tasks) for each domain. Total physical activity is classified into low, moderate, or high levels based on WHO guidelines. Higher MET scores indicate greater physical activity engagement.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in psychological parameters (pain severity).
The BPI is a self-report tool used to assess pain severity and the impact of pain on daily functioning. It evaluates both the intensity of pain and how it interferes with aspects of life such as mood, walking, work, and sleep.
Scoring and Interpretation:
Pain severity and interference are each rated on 0-10 scales. Scores are averaged separately for severity and interference:
Severity: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain.
Interference: 0 = no interference, 10 = complete interference. Higher scores indicate more severe pain and greater disruption to daily life.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in psychological parameters (pain intensity).
The NRS is a simple, self-reported tool where individuals rate their current pain intensity on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Scoring and Interpretation:
Patients select a number that best represents their pain level.
0: No pain
1-3: Mild pain
4-6: Moderate pain
7-10: Severe pain It's commonly used to monitor pain over time or in response to treatment.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in psychological parameters (fatigue).
The MAF is a self-report tool designed to assess fatigue across multiple dimensions, including severity, distress, impact on daily activities, and timing, over the past week.
Scoring and Interpretation:
The MAF includes 16 items, with most rated on a 10-point scale. It yields a Global Fatigue Index (GFI) ranging from 1 to 50, where higher scores indicate greater fatigue. The GFI provides a comprehensive view of how fatigue affects quality of life.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in psychological parameters (sleep quality).
The MOS Sleep Scale consists of 12 items assessing sleep quality, disturbances, and patterns, using a 5-point Likert scale. The scores are summed to produce subscale scores for sleep disturbance, sleep adequacy, and sleep problems. Higher scores on the disturbance subscale indicate greater sleep difficulties, while higher scores on the adequacy subscale suggest better sleep quality. Scores are interpreted based on the overall sleep impact, with higher scores reflecting poorer sleep quality.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in psychological parameters (psychophysical well-being).
The SF-36 consists of 36 items assessing eight health domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health. Responses are scored on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. Domain scores are then combined to create a Physical Component Summary (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS), which provide an overall measure of physical and mental well-being.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in psychological parameters (fibromyalgia impact).
The FIQ consists of 21 items, assessing the impact of fibromyalgia on physical functioning, work, pain, fatigue, and sleep. Responses are rated on a scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting a greater impact of fibromyalgia on the individual's daily life and well-being.
Measured: 12-weeks
Cahnge in upper body strength
The Arm Curl Test measures upper body strength and endurance, typically performed by having participants repeatedly curl a weighted dumbbell (5 pounds for women, 8 pounds for men) for as many repetitions as possible in 30 seconds.
Scoring and Interpretation: The score is the total number of successful curls completed within 30 seconds. A higher number of curls indicates better upper body strength and endurance. Scores are interpreted based on age and gender norms, with higher scores reflecting better physical fitness.
Measured: 12-weeks
Change in body mass index
BMI is calculated by dividing a person's weight in kilograms by their height in meters squared (kg/m²).
Underweight: BMI < 18.5
Normal weight: BMI 18.5-24.9
Overweight: BMI 25-29.9
Obesity: BMI ≥ 30
A higher BMI typically indicates an increased risk for health issues related to weight, while a lower BMI may signal malnutrition or underweight.
Measured: 12-weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2025
- Study start3 Mar 2025
- Primary completion31 Mar 2025
- Study completion30 Jun 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for FibromyalgiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Bari Aldo Moro
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Luca Poli, University of Bari Aldo Moro
- Investigators
- Luca Poli, Dr., Principal investigator, University of Bari Aldo Moro
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06956456
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 7595
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 24 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 3 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of a 12-week Supervised or Home-based Multicomponent Training Program on Psychological, and Physical Variables in Fibromyalgia Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06956456
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 7595
- Conditions
- Fibromyalgia
- Keywords
- mental and physical well-being, anxiety-depressive symptoms, fisical fitness
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Bari Aldo MoroUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of supervised multicomponent training (MCT) on physiological parameters, physical fitness, mental well-being, and quality of life in subjects with a history of Fibromyalgia, compared to a non-supervised home-based MCT protocol and a waitlist control group (WLCG). The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does supervised MCT or non-supervised home-based MCT protocol improve physiological parameters, physical fitness, mental well-being, and overall quality of life compared to a waitlist control group (WLCG)? Does supervised MCT provide superior physiological an psychological improvements compared to a non-supervised home-based MCT protocol?
Researchers will compare:
supervised MCT (a combination of aerobic, mobility, and resistance training exercises) and non-supervised home-based MCT protocol to see if these interventions improve fitness, health, psychological and quality of life outcomes compared to WLCG (participants not engaging in structured physical activity during the study), and if there will be significant differences between supervised MCT and non-supervised home-based MCT protocol.
Participants will:
Complete assessments of anthropometric, physical fitness, and psychological parameters at baseline (T0) and after 12 weeks (T1).
Be randomly assigned to one of three groups.
Engage in a 12-week of non-supervised home-based MCT protocol or structured MCT program supervised by exercise professionals, including:
Warm-up sessions (10 minutes, low-intensity walking). Main sessions (40 minutes): aerobic, mobility, resistance (MCT), only-aerobic (AT) exercises.
Cool-down sessions (10 minutes): breathing and stretching exercises.
This study will provide insights into the efficacy of tailored physical activity interventions for Fibromyalgic patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Supervised Multicomponent Training (SMCT) | Experimental | Other: Supervised Multicomponent Training Protocolsubjects assigned to the SMCT group will perform a supervised training protocol defined multicomponent training, which includes aerobic, resistance and flexibility components. |
| Non-Supervised Home-Based Multicomponent Training (NSMCT) | Experimental | Other: Non-Supervised Home-Based Multicomponent Training Protocolsubjects assigned to the NSMCT group will perform a non-supervised home-based training protocol defined multicomponent training, which includes aerobic, resistance and flexibility components. |
| Waiting List Control Group (WLCG) | No intervention | –Subjects assigned to the WLCG group will not engage in any structured physical activity throughout the intervention period, continuing with their usual lifestyle, and will be placed on a waiting list, ensuring their participation in adapted physical activity at the end of the 12-week intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Women/Men
- Diagnosis of fibromyalgia
- Age between 18 and 75 years at the time of initial treatment;
- Signature of a written informed consent form (or their legally recognized representatives must sign) indicating that the patient understood the purpose and procedures required for the study and is willing to participate in the study;
- Sedentary lifestyle (subjects who have not followed WHO guidelines for aerobic and resistance exercise in the past 3 months);
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Expected absence for more than one week during the intervention period
- Absence of a medical certificate of suitability for non-competitive sports
- Severe musculoskeletal or joint disorders with significant mobility limitations
- Uncontrolled hypertension or untreated heart disease;
- Pshychiatric disorders;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Supervised Multicomponent Training ProtocolSupervised Multicomponent Training Protocol Each session consists of: Warm-up (10 minutes): Low-intensity walking (Borg scale 10-11) to increase heart rate, improve blood flow, and prepare joints. Main phase (40 minutes): Aerobic exercises: Controlled jumping jacks, step-ups, alternating knee lifts, lateral steps, and leg lifts. Mobility exercises: Thoracic extensions, cat-to-cows, overhead stretching with a stick, and hip internal rotations (1-3 sets, 30-60 seconds per exercise). Resistance training: Gradual progression of 8 exercises targeting major muscle groups, such as squats, bicep curls, shoulder presses, and rows (1-3 sets, 10-15 reps, RPE 13-15). Cool-down (10 minutes): Breathing exercises and stretching (1-3 sets, 10-30 seconds per stretch). | Other | Supervised Multicomponent Training (SMCT) |
| Non-Supervised Home-Based Multicomponent Training ProtocolParticipant will receive a personalized exercise plan tailored to their fitness level. Each session consists of: Warm-up (10 minutes): Low-intensity walking (Borg scale 10-11) to increase heart rate, improve blood flow, and prepare joints. Main phase (40 minutes): Aerobic exercises: Controlled jumping jacks, step-ups, alternating knee lifts, lateral steps, and leg lifts. Mobility exercises: Thoracic extensions, cat-to-cows, overhead stretching with a stick, and hip internal rotations (1-3 sets, 30-60 seconds per exercise). Resistance training: Gradual progression of 8 exercises targeting major muscle groups, such as squats, bicep curls, shoulder presses, and rows (1-3 sets, 10-15 reps, RPE 13-15). Cool-down (10 minutes): Breathing exercises and stretching (1-3 sets, 10-30 seconds per stretch). | Other | Non-Supervised Home-Based Multicomponent Training (NSMCT) |
Primary outcome
Change in lower body strength
Time frame: 12-weeks
30-s chair stand (30CST) test: Sit-to-stand from a chair during 30 seconds (measured in seconds)
Change in functional mobility
Time frame: 12-weeks
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test (measured in seconds)
Change in Handrigp Strength
Time frame: 12-weeks
Handgrip Strength (HGS) test: muscle strength measured with manual dynamometers (Kgf)
Change in aerobic capacity
Time frame: 12-weeks
2-Minute Step Test (TMST): march in place for 2 minutes, lifting their knees to a height halfway between the iliac crest and the patella.The number of full knee lifts (repetitions) completed in 2 minutes is recorded.
Change in lower body flexibility
Time frame: 12-weeks
Chair Sit-and-Reach Test: measures lower body flexibility (hamstrings and lower back) in centimeters (cm). It involves sitting on a chair, extending one leg, and reaching toward the toes to assess mobility. The measurement is taken by recording the distance between the fingertips and the toes. Positive score (+): Fingertips go past the toes.Zero score (0): Fingertips touch the toes. Negative score (-): Fingertips fall short of the toes. A ruler or tape measure is used to record the exact distance.
Change in upper body flexibility
Time frame: 12-weeks
Back Scratch Test: measures upper body flexibility, particularly shoulder mobility, in centimeters (cm). It involves reaching one hand over the shoulder and the other behind the back to touch or overlap fingers. Positive score (+): Fingers overlap (measured as the overlap distance). Zero score (0): Fingers just touch. Negative score (-): Fingers do not touch (measured as the gap distance). A ruler or tape measure is used to record the exact distance.
Change in psychological parameters (depression)
Time frame: 12-weeks
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI): measures depression severity using a numerical score. It consists of 21 items, each rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3) based on symptom severity. Total score range: 0 to 63 (higher scores indicate more severe depression). Interpretation: 0-13: Minimal depression 14-19: Mild depression 20-28: Moderate depression 29-63: Severe depression The final score is obtained by summing the responses.
Change in psychological parameters (anxiety).
Time frame: 12-weeks
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y): measures anxiety levels using a numerical score. It consists of 20 items assessing temporary (state) anxiety on a 4-point scale (1 = not at all to 4 = very much so). Total score range: 20 to 80 (higher scores indicate greater anxiety). Interpretation: 20-37: Low anxiety 38-44: Moderate anxiety 45-80: High anxiety The final score is obtained by summing the responses.
Change in psychological parameters (enjoyment).
Time frame: 12-weeks
he Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) is a self-report questionnaire used to measure an individual's enjoyment of physical activity. It assesses positive and negative feelings related to exercise to evaluate motivation and adherence potential. It include 18 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale (from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree). Some items are reverse-scored. After adjusting reverse-scored items, all scores are summed to give a total score ranging from 18 to 126, with higher scores indicating greater enjoyment of physical activity. A higher total score suggests a more positive emotional response to exercise, which is often linked to better adherence and motivation.
Change in psychological parameters (fear of movement).
Time frame: 12-weeks
The TSK is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess fear of movement or re-injury due to physical activity, commonly used in patients with chronic pain. Scoring and Interpretation: The standard TSK has 17 items, each rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree). Some items are reverse-scored. The total score ranges from 17 to 68, with higher scores indicating greater fear of movement. Scores above 37 often suggest clinically significant kinesiophobia.
Change in psychological parameters (anticipated pain).
Time frame: 12-weeks
The PCS is a 13-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess exaggerated negative thoughts and feelings related to actual or anticipated pain. It evaluates three components: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Scoring and Interpretation: Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all to 4 = all the time), yielding a total score from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater levels of pain catastrophizing, which are associated with increased pain perception, emotional distress, and poorer treatment outcomes.
Change in psychological parameters (alexithymia).
Time frame: 12-weeks
The TAS-20 is a 20-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess alexithymia, a difficulty in identifying and describing emotions. It measures three dimensions: difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing feelings, and externally oriented thinking. Scoring and Interpretation: Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). After reverse-scoring appropriate items, the total score ranges from 20 to 100. * 51: Non-alexithymic 52-60: Possible alexithymia * 61: Alexithymic Higher scores indicate greater difficulty with emotional awareness and expression.
Change in physical activity levels.
Time frame: 12-weeks
The GPAQ is a tool developed by the WHO to assess physical activity levels across three domains: work, transport, and leisure. It captures frequency, duration, and intensity of activity, as well as sedentary behavior. Scoring and Interpretation: Responses are converted into MET-minutes/week (Metabolic Equivalent Tasks) for each domain. Total physical activity is classified into low, moderate, or high levels based on WHO guidelines. Higher MET scores indicate greater physical activity engagement.
Change in psychological parameters (pain severity).
Time frame: 12-weeks
The BPI is a self-report tool used to assess pain severity and the impact of pain on daily functioning. It evaluates both the intensity of pain and how it interferes with aspects of life such as mood, walking, work, and sleep. Scoring and Interpretation: Pain severity and interference are each rated on 0-10 scales. Scores are averaged separately for severity and interference: Severity: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain. Interference: 0 = no interference, 10 = complete interference. Higher scores indicate more severe pain and greater disruption to daily life.
Change in psychological parameters (pain intensity).
Time frame: 12-weeks
The NRS is a simple, self-reported tool where individuals rate their current pain intensity on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scoring and Interpretation: Patients select a number that best represents their pain level. 0: No pain 1-3: Mild pain 4-6: Moderate pain 7-10: Severe pain It's commonly used to monitor pain over time or in response to treatment.
Change in psychological parameters (fatigue).
Time frame: 12-weeks
The MAF is a self-report tool designed to assess fatigue across multiple dimensions, including severity, distress, impact on daily activities, and timing, over the past week. Scoring and Interpretation: The MAF includes 16 items, with most rated on a 10-point scale. It yields a Global Fatigue Index (GFI) ranging from 1 to 50, where higher scores indicate greater fatigue. The GFI provides a comprehensive view of how fatigue affects quality of life.
Change in psychological parameters (sleep quality).
Time frame: 12-weeks
The MOS Sleep Scale consists of 12 items assessing sleep quality, disturbances, and patterns, using a 5-point Likert scale. The scores are summed to produce subscale scores for sleep disturbance, sleep adequacy, and sleep problems. Higher scores on the disturbance subscale indicate greater sleep difficulties, while higher scores on the adequacy subscale suggest better sleep quality. Scores are interpreted based on the overall sleep impact, with higher scores reflecting poorer sleep quality.
Change in psychological parameters (psychophysical well-being).
Time frame: 12-weeks
The SF-36 consists of 36 items assessing eight health domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health. Responses are scored on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. Domain scores are then combined to create a Physical Component Summary (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS), which provide an overall measure of physical and mental well-being.
Change in psychological parameters (fibromyalgia impact).
Time frame: 12-weeks
The FIQ consists of 21 items, assessing the impact of fibromyalgia on physical functioning, work, pain, fatigue, and sleep. Responses are rated on a scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting a greater impact of fibromyalgia on the individual's daily life and well-being.
Cahnge in upper body strength
Time frame: 12-weeks
The Arm Curl Test measures upper body strength and endurance, typically performed by having participants repeatedly curl a weighted dumbbell (5 pounds for women, 8 pounds for men) for as many repetitions as possible in 30 seconds. Scoring and Interpretation: The score is the total number of successful curls completed within 30 seconds. A higher number of curls indicates better upper body strength and endurance. Scores are interpreted based on age and gender norms, with higher scores reflecting better physical fitness.
Change in body mass index
Time frame: 12-weeks
BMI is calculated by dividing a person's weight in kilograms by their height in meters squared (kg/m²). Underweight: BMI < 18.5 Normal weight: BMI 18.5-24.9 Overweight: BMI 25-29.9 Obesity: BMI ≥ 30 A higher BMI typically indicates an increased risk for health issues related to weight, while a lower BMI may signal malnutrition or underweight.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jul 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Fibromyalgia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validity, Reliability, and Clinical Correlates of Immersive Virtual Reality Adaptation of the Five Times Sit-to-stand Test and Timed up and go Tests in Women With Fibromyalgia Syndrome
Fibromyalgia Syndrome
Active, not recruiting
Comparing Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Muscle Energy Technique for Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Women
Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Daily Cognitive Failures and Medication Adherence in Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia
Not yet recruiting
Toward Biomarker-Guided Fibromyalgia Treatment With Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Fibromyalgia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Agreement Between CSI and IASP Pain Classification in Chronic Cervical Myofascial Pain
Myofascial Pain Syndrome - Neck
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luca Poli, Dr. principal investigator
University of Bari Aldo Moro
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Supervised Multicomponent Training Protocol and Non-Supervised Home-Based Multicomponent Training Protocol in people with Fibromyalgia, run by University of Bari Aldo Moro at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in lower body strength (time frame: 12-weeks). The study lists 21 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2025.