PolypharmacyEmpaSafeNCT06956820
Empowering Patients to Improve Safety in Polymedication
A study testing Medication Management Center in people with Polypharmacy, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 4 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Rationale: In current clinical practice, polypharmacy and patient empowerment are critical yet often overlooked. Polypharmacy, the chronic use of five or more drugs, poses risks such as adverse drug reactions and decreased medication adherence, especially in elderly and multimorbid patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Polypharmacy
- What is being tested?
- Medication Management Center
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 132 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 27 Jul 2025to 19 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following crite-ria:
- Polypharmacy defined as the use of 5 or more drugs
- Start usage of at least one index drug according to the list in table 3.
- Subject must be ≥ 18 years old
- Subject is able and willing to take part and be followed-up for at least 12 weeks
- Subject is able to donate blood or saliva
- Subject has signed informed consent
A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Pregnancy or lactating
- Life expectancy estimated to be less than three months by treating clinical team
- Unable to consent to the study
- Unwilling to take part
- Subject has no fixed address
- Subject has previously been genotyped for PGx genes
- Subject has no current general practitioner
- Subject is, in the opinion of the Investigator, not suitable to participate in the study
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (MDRD) of less than 15 ml/min per 1,73m2
- Patients with advanced liver failure (stage Child-Pugh C)
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 3 countries.
4 sites in 3 countries
Germany2 sites
Universitatsklinikum Aachen
Aachen, 52074
Universitatsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120
About this study
Official title: Empowering Patients to Improve Safety in Polymedication (EmPaSafe)
Rationale: In current clinical practice, polypharmacy and patient empowerment are critical yet often overlooked. Polypharmacy, the chronic use of five or more drugs, poses risks such as adverse drug reactions and decreased medication adherence, especially in elderly and multimorbid patients. Despite the interconnected nature of drug-drug and drug-gene pro inter-actions, they are considered separately. Ignoring these interactions can be hazardous, yet clinical trials to investigate them are infeasible due to fast-growing complexity, variability among patients, high costs associated with large-scale studies, and ethical and logistical chal-lenges. Consequently, there is a substantial knowledge gap in managing complex medication regimens in real-life scenarios and providing guidelines to enhance patient empowerment and drug safety. The SafePolyMed project aims to develop a patient-centred framework to define, assess and manage drug-drug, drug-gene and drug-drug-gene interactions. This framework, a web-based medication management centre, will support patients in managing their therapy-related health data, enhancing education and empowerment, and improving patient safety.
Objective: To assess the impact of the developed medication management centre on patient empowerment in polypharmacy patients, thereby improving drug safety. Secondary objec-tives are to explore if the tool is able to identify patients at risk for a drug-drug-gene interaction and lower the adverse drug event rate.
Read more
Study design: The study is a proof of concept study conducted at four institutes located in Germany, Greece, Slovenia and The Netherlands. Polypharmacy patients will use the medi-cation management centre (MMC), which provides curated, patient-specific information about drug interactions and PGx. To assess patient empowerment, patients will receive ques-tionnaires during a 12 week follow-up period.
Study population: 120 subjects with polypharmacy (defined as the chronic use of 5 or more drugs) of at least 18 years of age, with a first prescription for one of 10 index drugs. The study will be performed at 4 different sites (Leiden (NL), Patras (GR), Ljubljana (SL), Aachen (DE)) to represent different clinical settings across Europe. Each site will recruit 30 patients.
Intervention: The MMC that provides patient centred information on drug-drug interactions and pharmacogenetics affecting personal polytherapy. The MMC will show a selection of high quality publicly available information such as details on different types of medications, includ-ing their uses, side effects and instructions for use, in the language of the patient. This infor-mation is targeted at an individual patient's medication profile to inform patients to better un-derstand and deal with their personal health information, with regard to drug therapy. Patients in the Netherlands, Slovenia and Greece also will receive their PGx profile to further personal-ise the MMC experience.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is the sense of empowerment and health literacy for participants before and after use of the MMC. Secondary outcomes include an evaluation of the drug-drug-gene interactions and adverse drug events in the study popula-tions compared to matched historical controls.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit, and group relatedness: Patients are exposed to the regular treatment. In addition, patients will receive questionnaires at baseline, two, and twelve weeks regarding the use and experience of the medication management centre, and a close-out interview at week twelve. In addition, 10ml of blood will be collected during a venipuncture for pharmacogenetic analyses.
Benefits include having access to the medication management centre for the duration of the study. Additionally, patients will receive their PGx profile. This can be used to individualize drug treatment, based on the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guidelines.
Overall, minimal risks are expected for subjects as they will receive normal clinical care. In-formation from the MMC will be a curation of existing publicly available data. Any information regarding DDIs and DGIs will be supplemented with a disclaimer that the patient should not adjust their treatment without talking to a healthcare provider.
- Conditions
- Polypharmacy
- Being tested
- Medication Management Center
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Medication Management CenterDevice
The MMC that provides patient centred information on drug-drug interactions and pharmaco-genetics affecting personal polytherapy. The MMC will show a selection of high quality publicly available information such as details on different types of medications, including their uses, side effects and instructions for use, in the language of the patient. This information is targeted at an individual patient's medication profile to inform patients to better understand and deal with their personal health information, with regard to drug therapy. Patients in the Netherlands, Slovenia and Greece also will receive their PGx profile to further personalise the MMC experience.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in participants' health literacy score
Health literacy will be assessed using the Health Literacy Survey European Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47). Total scores range from 0 to 50, where score <26 indicates inadequate, 26-33 problematic, 34-42 adequate health literacy, and 43-50 excellent perceived health literacy. Change in total score between baseline and 12 weeks will be calculated.
Unit of Measure: Mean change in HLS-EU-Q47 total score
Measured: 12 weeks
Qualitative themes regarding empowerment and MMC feasibility
Semi-structured close-out interviews will be conducted to explore participants' experiences related to empowerment and health literacy after using the MMC. Interviews will be transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis.
Unit of Measure: Presence of major qualitative themes identified through thematic coding
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Accuracy of the MMC in identifying patients at risk for drug-drug-gene interactions
MMC performance will be compared to historical control data from the U-PGx cohort for identifying patients at risk for drug-drug-gene interactions.
Unit of Measure: Sensitivity (%), specificity (%), and concordance rate (%) of MMC predictions compared to U-PGx control data
Measured: 12 weeks
Incidence of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following integration of the MMC into healthcare
The number of participants reporting one or more clinically relevant adverse drug reactions (ADRs) will be recorded and compared to matched historical controls from the U-PGx cohort.
ADRs are defined as reactions that are:
- causally related to the drug of inclusion (definite, probable, or possible),
- clinically relevant (CTCAE Grade 2-5), ADRs will be identified via PRO-CTCAE responses and health complaints reported through the MMC's integrated PROMs system.
Unit of Measure:
Incidence rate (%) of patients reporting ≥1 clinically relevant ADR
Measured: 12 weeks
Severity of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following integration of the MMC into healthcare
Severity of ADRs will be assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).
ADRs are defined as reactions that are:
- causally related to the drug of inclusion (definite, probable, or possible),
- clinically relevant (CTCAE Grade 2-5), and
- associated with a drug-genotype interaction (as per DPWG guidelines).
- PRO-CTCAE responses are rated on a 0-4 Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater severity.
Unit of Measure:
Mean PRO-CTCAE severity score (scale 0-4; higher = more severe)
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2025
- Study start27 Jul 2025
- Primary completion19 Jun 2026
- Study completion19 Jun 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PolypharmacyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Leiden University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Leiden University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Ljubljana, RWTH Aachen University, University of Patras, Heidelberg University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, J.J.Swen, Leiden University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06956820
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL87027.058.24
- Acronym
- EmpaSafe
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 2 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Empowering Patients to Improve Safety in Polymedication (EmPaSafe)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06956820
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EmpaSafe / NL87027.058.24
- Conditions
- Polypharmacy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Leiden University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Ljubljana, RWTH Aachen University, University of Patras, Heidelberg University
- Study start
- 27 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Jun 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rationale: In current clinical practice, polypharmacy and patient empowerment are critical yet often overlooked. Polypharmacy, the chronic use of five or more drugs, poses risks such as adverse drug reactions and decreased medication adherence, especially in elderly and multimorbid patients. Despite the interconnected nature of drug-drug and drug-gene pro inter-actions, they are considered separately. Ignoring these interactions can be hazardous, yet clinical trials to investigate them are infeasible due to fast-growing complexity, variability among patients, high costs associated with large-scale studies, and ethical and logistical chal-lenges. Consequently, there is a substantial knowledge gap in managing complex medication regimens in real-life scenarios and providing guidelines to enhance patient empowerment and drug safety. The SafePolyMed project aims to develop a patient-centred framework to define, assess and manage drug-drug, drug-gene and drug-drug-gene interactions. This framework, a web-based medication management centre, will support patients in managing their therapy-related health data, enhancing education and empowerment, and improving patient safety.
Objective: To assess the impact of the developed medication management centre on patient empowerment in polypharmacy patients, thereby improving drug safety. Secondary objec-tives are to explore if the tool is able to identify patients at risk for a drug-drug-gene interaction and lower the adverse drug event rate.
Study design: The study is a proof of concept study conducted at four institutes located in Germany, Greece, Slovenia and The Netherlands. Polypharmacy patients will use the medi-cation management centre (MMC), which provides curated, patient-specific information about drug interactions and PGx. To assess patient empowerment, patients will receive ques-tionnaires during a 12 week follow-up period.
Study population: 120 subjects with polypharmacy (defined as the chronic use of 5 or more drugs) of at least 18 years of age, with a first prescription for one of 10 index drugs. The study will be performed at 4 different sites (Leiden (NL), Patras (GR), Ljubljana (SL), Aachen (DE)) to represent different clinical settings across Europe. Each site will recruit 30 patients.
Intervention: The MMC that provides patient centred information on drug-drug interactions and pharmacogenetics affecting personal polytherapy. The MMC will show a selection of high quality publicly available information such as details on different types of medications, includ-ing their uses, side effects and instructions for use, in the language of the patient. This infor-mation is targeted at an individual patient's medication profile to inform patients to better un-derstand and deal with their personal health information, with regard to drug therapy. Patients in the Netherlands, Slovenia and Greece also will receive their PGx profile to further personal-ise the MMC experience.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is the sense of empowerment and health literacy for participants before and after use of the MMC. Secondary outcomes include an evaluation of the drug-drug-gene interactions and adverse drug events in the study popula-tions compared to matched historical controls.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit, and group relatedness: Patients are exposed to the regular treatment. In addition, patients will receive questionnaires at baseline, two, and twelve weeks regarding the use and experience of the medication management centre, and a close-out interview at week twelve. In addition, 10ml of blood will be collected during a venipuncture for pharmacogenetic analyses.
Benefits include having access to the medication management centre for the duration of the study. Additionally, patients will receive their PGx profile. This can be used to individualize drug treatment, based on the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guidelines.
Overall, minimal risks are expected for subjects as they will receive normal clinical care. In-formation from the MMC will be a curation of existing publicly available data. Any information regarding DDIs and DGIs will be supplemented with a disclaimer that the patient should not adjust their treatment without talking to a healthcare provider.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Medication Management CenterThe MMC that provides patient centred information on drug-drug interactions and pharmaco-genetics affecting personal polytherapy. The MMC will show a selection of high quality publicly available information such as details on different types of medications, including their uses, side effects and instructions for use, in the language of the patient. This information is targeted at an individual patient's medication profile to inform patients to better understand and deal with their personal health information, with regard to drug therapy. Patients in the Netherlands, Slovenia and Greece also will receive their PGx profile to further personalise the MMC experience. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Change in participants' health literacy score
Time frame: 12 weeks
Health literacy will be assessed using the Health Literacy Survey European Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47). Total scores range from 0 to 50, where score <26 indicates inadequate, 26-33 problematic, 34-42 adequate health literacy, and 43-50 excellent perceived health literacy. Change in total score between baseline and 12 weeks will be calculated. Unit of Measure: Mean change in HLS-EU-Q47 total score
Qualitative themes regarding empowerment and MMC feasibility
Time frame: 12 weeks
Semi-structured close-out interviews will be conducted to explore participants' experiences related to empowerment and health literacy after using the MMC. Interviews will be transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Unit of Measure: Presence of major qualitative themes identified through thematic coding
3 secondary outcomes
Accuracy of the MMC in identifying patients at risk for drug-drug-gene interactions
Time frame: 12 weeks
Incidence of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following integration of the MMC into healthcare
Time frame: 12 weeks
Severity of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following integration of the MMC into healthcare
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Sep 2026.
Related trials for Polypharmacy
Active, not recruiting
Improving Medication Management in World Trade Center Responders
Polypharmacy
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Pharmacotherapy Optimization in Polymedicated Lebanese Older Adults in Primary Health Care Centers
Older Adults (65 Years and Older), Polypharmacy (People Under Treatment With 5 or More Drugs)
RecruitingObservational study
IPGx PILOT Whole Genome Sequencing Extension Cohort
Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR), Polypharmacy Patients
Not yet recruiting
A Digital Tool to Help Doctors and Pharmacists Prescribe Medicines More Safely for Older Adults in Oman
Polypharmacy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
THE EFFECTS OF MULTIPLE DRUG USE ON BALANCE, FALL RISK, AND COGNITIVE STATUS
Polypharmacy (Individuals Treated With 4 or More Medications)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
4 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Medication Management Center in people with Polypharmacy, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 4 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Germany, Greece, Slovenia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in participants' health literacy score (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Sep 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.