AzTrials
AzTrials

Anterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureNCT06961292

The Clinical Efficacy of Anterolateral Complex Augmentation in Patients With ACL Rupture Combined With Excessive Internal Tibial Rotation Subluxation: A Bidirectional Cohort Study

An observational study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project aims to establish a high-quality, large-scale, single-center bidirectional cohort study to evaluate the postoperative clinical efficacy of ACLR combined with ALC augmentation in a specific high-risk population-patients with ACL rupture exhibiting excessive internal tibial rotation subluxation (EIRTS) on… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
How many people
335 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2024to 31 Dec 2029
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at our institution and fulfilled the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years; Primary unilateral ACL rupture; Preoperative knee MRI completed at our institution; Diagnosis of excessive internal tibial rotation subluxation (EIRTS) based on preoperative MRI measurements (i.e., internal rotation tibial subluxation [IRTS] > 5.8 mm); Patient has been informed of the study details and has provided written informed consent to participate in this cohort study.

Who cannot join

  • Concomitant injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL), lateral collateral ligament (LCL), or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); History of contralateral knee injury; History of patellar dislocation; History of prior knee surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site
  • Peking University Third Hospital

    Beijing, 100191

Other trials in China

About this study

This project aims to establish a high-quality, large-scale, single-center bidirectional cohort study to evaluate the postoperative clinical efficacy of ACLR combined with ALC augmentation in a specific high-risk population-patients with ACL rupture exhibiting excessive internal tibial rotation subluxation (EIRTS) on preoperative MRI. The study population will consist of patients with primary ACL rupture, and high-risk individuals will be identified based on the presence of EIRTS on preoperative knee MRI. The exposure group will undergo ACLR combined with ALC augmentation, while the control group will receive standard ACLR. Observational indicators will include all baseline patient characteristics and postoperative clinical outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common sports injuries in the field of sports medicine and significantly impairs athletic function. Autologous hamstring tendon single-bundle ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is the standard surgical technique for treating ACL rupture. Although most patients can return to sports postoperatively, a subset still experiences graft re-rupture, residual rotational instability of the knee, and other cases of reconstruction failure. Recent studies suggest that concomitant injury to the anterolateral complex (ALC) of the knee may be an important contributing factor. However, there is currently a lack of clinical evidence regarding the diagnosis of ALC injuries and the surgical indications for their treatment. Therefore, whether ALC should be augmented (diagnostic and surgical indications) in addition to routine ACLR, and how it should be augmented (surgical techniques), has become a key focus of current research.

This project aims to establish a high-quality, large-scale, single-center bidirectional cohort study to evaluate the postoperative clinical efficacy of ACLR combined with ALC augmentation in a specific high-risk population-patients with ACL rupture exhibiting excessive internal tibial rotation subluxation (EIRTS) on preoperative MRI. The study population will consist of patients with primary ACL rupture, and high-risk individuals will be identified based on the presence of EIRTS on preoperative knee MRI. The exposure group will undergo ACLR combined with ALC augmentation, while the control group will receive standard ACLR. Observational indicators will include all baseline patient characteristics and postoperative clinical outcomes.

The study includes two follow-up time points: 2 years and 5 years postoperatively. Follow-up will be conducted via outpatient visits and telephone interviews. Based on the follow-up outcomes, multivariate regression models will be used to analyze the association between exposure and clinical outcomes.

This cohort study aims to address treatment strategies for high-risk ACL rupture patients with preoperative EIRTS, thereby improving perioperative management and clinical decision-making in ACL injuries. It will provide important clinical evidence for establishing surgical indications for ALC augmentation and contribute to the development of long-term clinical prediction models for graft failure after ACLR. The findings will support innovation in ACL reconstruction techniques, optimization of perioperative strategies, reduction in postoperative graft failure rates, and improvement in return-to-sport rates. This study holds significant implications for advancing clinical research in the field of sports medicine.

Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament, anterolateral complex, ateral extra-articular tenodesis, internal rotational tibial subluxation, tibiofemoral position, magnetic resonance imaging, bidirectional cohort study
Medical subject headings
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06961292
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control groupPatients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at our institution and met the following criteria: A. Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years; Primary unilateral ACL rupture; Preoperative knee MRI completed at our institution; Diagnosis of excessive internal tibial rotation subluxation (EIRTS) based on preoperative MRI measurements (i.e., internal rotation tibial subluxation [IRTS] > 5.8 mm); Patient has been informed of the study details and has provided written informed consent to participate in this cohort study. B. Exclusion Criteria: Concomitant injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL), lateral collateral ligament (LCL), or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); History of contralateral knee injury; History of patellar dislocation; History of prior knee surgery.
ALC augmentation groupPatients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with anterolateral complex augmentation using lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and met the following criteria: A. Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years; Primary unilateral ACL rupture; Preoperative knee MRI completed at our institution; Diagnosis of excessive internal tibial rotation subluxation (EIRTS) based on preoperative MRI measurements (i.e., internal rotation tibial subluxation [IRTS] > 5.8 mm); Patient has been informed of the study details and has provided written informed consent to participate in this cohort study. B. Exclusion Criteria: Concomitant injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL), lateral collateral ligament (LCL), or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); History of contralateral knee injury; History of patellar dislocation; History of prior knee surgery.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Graft Failure Rate

    Graft failure was identified based on physical examination findings and postoperative MRI scans at the designated follow-up time points.

    Measured: At 2 and 5 years postoperatively

  2. Return to Pivoting Sports: Rate and Time

    The rate and timing of return to pivoting sports were recorded at each follow-up time point.

    Measured: At 2 and 5 years postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

    Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected at each follow-up time point using standardized questionnaires, including the Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS), Tegner Activity Score, modified Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form.

    Measured: At 2 and 5 years postoperatively

  2. Physical Examinations

    Physical examinations were performed at each follow-up visit, including the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-2000 arthrometer assessment.

    Measured: At 2 and 5 years postoperatively

  3. Muscle Strength

    Isokinetic muscle strength testing of the knee extensors and flexors was performed using the Biodex system.

    Measured: At 2 and 5 years postoperatively

  4. MRI Measurements

    Postoperative MRI scans were scheduled for all patients to assess tibiofemoral position, osteoarthritis progression, and ACL graft signal intensity as indicators of graft healing, including anterior tibial subluxation (ATS), internal rotational tibial subluxation (IRTS), cartilage thickness and the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ).

    Measured: At 2 and 5 years postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 May 2025
  2. Study start1 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
335 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06961292
Sponsor's protocol ID
M2024140; M2024141
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
29 Apr 2025
Last updated
7 May 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Graft Failure Rate (time frame: At 2 and 5 years postoperatively). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in