Prostate CancerNCT06964412
The Use of Artificial Intelligence Generated Contours in Radiation Planning of the Prostate Brachytherapy
A study testing Artificial-intelligence (AI) in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is investigating how AI can help doctors outline the prostate on an ultrasound image to make a custom radiation plan during a specialized type of radiation treatment for prostate cancer called brachytherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Artificial-intelligence (AI)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 3 Feb 2026to 30 May 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age and older
- Deemed suitable candidates for whole gland HDR prostate brachytherapy under general anesthesia as a monotherapy, boost or salvage treatment.
Who cannot join
- Prior permanent seed LDR brachytherapy implant
- Prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)
- Presence or insertion of a rectal spacer
- Focal HDR brachytherapy treatment i.e. not whole prostate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Randomized Study of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Generated Contours in Ultrasound-based Prostate HDR Brachytherapy
This study is investigating how AI can help doctors outline the prostate on an ultrasound image to make a custom radiation plan during a specialized type of radiation treatment for prostate cancer called brachytherapy.
Read the detailed description
This is a Phase II prospective study evaluating the standard U-net, a deep learning AI algorithm for auto-contouring of the prostate during HDR prostate brachytherapy with the needles in place by new learners. Contouring will be done on TRUS. The study will be conducted with a randomized design. Each patient will be assigned to a new learner and then randomized to manual versus AI-assisted contouring. The randomization will be stratified by new learner type: resident versus fellow/new attending. The hypothesis is that AI-assisted learner contours will have improved Dice coefficients with respect to clinically approved contours compared with manual learner contours. All brachytherapy contours will undergo review by the treating radiation oncologist who is the experienced clinician for clinical approval prior to patient treatment. The experienced clinician will be blinded to the randomization.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Artificial-intelligence (AI)
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Artificial-intelligence (AI)Other
Utilizing the addition of artificial intelligence during prostate contouring.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MANUALLY GENERATED CONTOURS IN ULTRASOUND-BASED PROSTATE HDR BRACHYTHERAP | No intervention | Manual prostate contouring by a learner (resident or fellow/new attending) performing prostate HDR brachytherapy. |
| AI GENERATED CONTOURS IN ULTRASOUND-BASED PROSTATE HDR BRACHYTHERAPY | Experimental | AI-assisted (U-net algorithm) prostate contouring by a learner (resident or fellow/new attending) performing prostate HDR brachytherapy. Receives: Other: Artificial-intelligence (AI) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinically approved contour vs. Manual and AI assisted contours
Dice coefficient [0: no match, 1: complete match] between the final clinically approved brachytherapy prostate contours versus the manual and AI-assisted contours provided by the new learner.
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (4)
Contouring time
Contouring time-to-completion needed to generate and edit manual vs AI-assisted contours for a new learner.
Measured: 1 day
Impression of AI or manual contours by new learner
Subjective impressions/perception of AI or manual contours by the new learner based on survey responses.
Measured: 1 day
Impression of AI or manual contours by experienced clinician
Subjective impressions/perception of AI or manual contours by the experienced clinician based on survey responses.
Measured: 1 day
Clinician contours vs. Trus images with and without needles
Dice coefficients of expert clinician contours between TRUS images with implanted needles and TRUS images after removal of bottom needle rows.
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 May 2025
- Study start3 Feb 2026
- Primary completion30 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Brigham and Women's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Martin T. King, MD, PhD, Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Investigators
- Martin King, MD, PHD, Principal investigator, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute / Brigham Women's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06964412
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 25-116
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 1 May 2025
- Last updated
- 29 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Morton G, McGuffin M, Chung HT, Tseng CL, Helou J, Ravi A, Cheung P, Szumacher E, Liu S, Chu W, Zhang L, Mamedov A, Loblaw A. Prostate high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer: Efficacy results from a randomized phase II clinical trial of one fraction of 19 Gy or two fractions of 13.5 Gy. Radiother Oncol. 2020 May;146:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
PubMed 32146259Crook J, Marban M, Batchelar D. HDR Prostate Brachytherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan;30(1):49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.08.003.
PubMed 31727300Chen CP, Weinberg V, Shinohara K, Roach M 3rd, Nash M, Gottschalk A, Chang AJ, Hsu IC. Salvage HDR brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after previous definitive radiation therapy: 5-year outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jun 1;86(2):324-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.027. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
PubMed 23474112Valle LF, Lehrer EJ, Markovic D, Elashoff D, Levin-Epstein R, Karnes RJ, Reiter RE, Rettig M, Calais J, Nickols NG, Dess RT, Spratt DE, Steinberg ML, Nguyen PL, Davis BJ, Zaorsky NG, Kishan AU. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Local Salvage Therapies After Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer (MASTER). Eur Urol. 2021 Sep;80(3):280-292. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
PubMed 33309278Lavoie-Gagnon H, Martin AG, Poulin E, Archambault L, Pilote L, Foster W, Vigneault E, Carignan D, Lacroix F. Advantages of TRUS-based delineation for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy planning. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2022 Feb;14(1):1-6. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2022.113544. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
PubMed 35233228Podgorsak AR, Venkatesulu BP, Abuhamad M, Harkenrider MM, Solanki AA, Roeske JC, Kang H. Dosimetric and workflow impact of synthetic-MRI use in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2023 Sep-Oct;22(5):686-696. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
PubMed 37316376King MT, Kehayias CE, Chaunzwa T, Rosen DB, Mahal AR, Wallburn TD, Milligan MG, Dyer MA, Nguyen PL, Orio PF, Harris TC, Buzurovic I, Guthier CV. Observer preference of artificial intelligence-generated versus clinical prostate contours for ultrasound-based high dose rate brachytherapy. Med Phys. 2023 Oct;50(10):5935-5943. doi: 10.1002/mp.16716. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
PubMed 37665729Sullivan GM, Artino AR Jr. Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec;5(4):541-2. doi: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18. No abstract available.
PubMed 24454995
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Randomized Study of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Generated Contours in Ultrasound-based Prostate HDR Brachytherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06964412
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 25-116
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is investigating how AI can help doctors outline the prostate on an ultrasound image to make a custom radiation plan during a specialized type of radiation treatment for prostate cancer called brachytherapy.
Detailed description
This is a Phase II prospective study evaluating the standard U-net, a deep learning AI algorithm for auto-contouring of the prostate during HDR prostate brachytherapy with the needles in place by new learners. Contouring will be done on TRUS. The study will be conducted with a randomized design. Each patient will be assigned to a new learner and then randomized to manual versus AI-assisted contouring. The randomization will be stratified by new learner type: resident versus fellow/new attending. The hypothesis is that AI-assisted learner contours will have improved Dice coefficients with respect to clinically approved contours compared with manual learner contours. All brachytherapy contours will undergo review by the treating radiation oncologist who is the experienced clinician for clinical approval prior to patient treatment. The experienced clinician will be blinded to the randomization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MANUALLY GENERATED CONTOURS IN ULTRASOUND-BASED PROSTATE HDR BRACHYTHERAP | No intervention | –Manual prostate contouring by a learner (resident or fellow/new attending) performing prostate HDR brachytherapy. |
| AI GENERATED CONTOURS IN ULTRASOUND-BASED PROSTATE HDR BRACHYTHERAPY | Experimental | Other: Artificial-intelligence (AI)AI-assisted (U-net algorithm) prostate contouring by a learner (resident or fellow/new attending) performing prostate HDR brachytherapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 18 years of age and older
- Deemed suitable candidates for whole gland HDR prostate brachytherapy under general anesthesia as a monotherapy, boost or salvage treatment.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Prior permanent seed LDR brachytherapy implant
- Prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)
- Presence or insertion of a rectal spacer
- Focal HDR brachytherapy treatment i.e. not whole prostate
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial-intelligence (AI)Utilizing the addition of artificial intelligence during prostate contouring. | Other | AI GENERATED CONTOURS IN ULTRASOUND-BASED PROSTATE HDR BRACHYTHERAPY |
Primary outcome
Clinically approved contour vs. Manual and AI assisted contours
Time frame: 1 day
Dice coefficient [0: no match, 1: complete match] between the final clinically approved brachytherapy prostate contours versus the manual and AI-assisted contours provided by the new learner.
4 secondary outcomes
Contouring time
Time frame: 1 day
Impression of AI or manual contours by new learner
Time frame: 1 day
Impression of AI or manual contours by experienced clinician
Time frame: 1 day
Clinician contours vs. Trus images with and without needles
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 32146259Morton G, McGuffin M, Chung HT, Tseng CL, Helou J, Ravi A, Cheung P, Szumacher E, Liu S, Chu W, Zhang L, Mamedov A, Loblaw A. Prostate high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer: Efficacy results from a randomized phase II clinical trial of one fraction of 19 Gy or two fractions of 13.5 Gy. Radiother Oncol. 2020 May;146:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
- Background: PubMed 31727300Crook J, Marban M, Batchelar D. HDR Prostate Brachytherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan;30(1):49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.08.003.
- Background: PubMed 23474112Chen CP, Weinberg V, Shinohara K, Roach M 3rd, Nash M, Gottschalk A, Chang AJ, Hsu IC. Salvage HDR brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after previous definitive radiation therapy: 5-year outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jun 1;86(2):324-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.027. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
- Background: PubMed 33309278Valle LF, Lehrer EJ, Markovic D, Elashoff D, Levin-Epstein R, Karnes RJ, Reiter RE, Rettig M, Calais J, Nickols NG, Dess RT, Spratt DE, Steinberg ML, Nguyen PL, Davis BJ, Zaorsky NG, Kishan AU. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Local Salvage Therapies After Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer (MASTER). Eur Urol. 2021 Sep;80(3):280-292. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
- Background: PubMed 35233228Lavoie-Gagnon H, Martin AG, Poulin E, Archambault L, Pilote L, Foster W, Vigneault E, Carignan D, Lacroix F. Advantages of TRUS-based delineation for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy planning. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2022 Feb;14(1):1-6. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2022.113544. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
- Background: PubMed 37316376Podgorsak AR, Venkatesulu BP, Abuhamad M, Harkenrider MM, Solanki AA, Roeske JC, Kang H. Dosimetric and workflow impact of synthetic-MRI use in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2023 Sep-Oct;22(5):686-696. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 37665729King MT, Kehayias CE, Chaunzwa T, Rosen DB, Mahal AR, Wallburn TD, Milligan MG, Dyer MA, Nguyen PL, Orio PF, Harris TC, Buzurovic I, Guthier CV. Observer preference of artificial intelligence-generated versus clinical prostate contours for ultrasound-based high dose rate brachytherapy. Med Phys. 2023 Oct;50(10):5935-5943. doi: 10.1002/mp.16716. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
- Background: PubMed 24454995Sullivan GM, Artino AR Jr. Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec;5(4):541-2. doi: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18. No abstract available.
- American Cancer Society key statistics for prostate cancer.Link provided by the sponsor.
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Martin King, MD, PHD principal investigator
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute / Brigham Women's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Artificial-intelligence (AI) in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinically approved contour vs. Manual and AI assisted contours (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06964412, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2026.