AzTrials
AzTrials

Knee ArthropathyNCT06969222

l Investigation of Robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) With Skywalker and Evolution Medial Pivot Knee (eMP Knee)

A study testing Robotic TKA and Conventional TKA in people with Knee Arthropathy and Arthroplasty Complications, run by Orthopaedic Department of General University Hospital of Laria at 1 site in Greece.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective trial that attempts to develop evidence on the safety and performance of RA-TKA (Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty) with Skywalker and eMP (Evolution Medial Pivot) knee. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 95 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Robotic TKA and Conventional TKA
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
122 participants
Where
1 siteGreece
Study dates
5 Sep 2023to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 95 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • >= 18 Years Male or Female
  • With noninflammatory degenerative joint disease, inflammatory joint disease, functional deformity
  • The subject has signed the Ethical Board approved Informed Consent Form specific to this study prior to enrollment
  • Must be independent, ambulatory, and can comply with all post-operative evaluations and visits.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects with poor compliance, unable to complete the trial according to the requirements or for other reasons or considered not to be suitable for inclusion by investigators.
  • Concurrent participation in any other total hip or knee replacement studies.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Theofilos Karachalios, MD, PhD, Professor contact

+302413501199

kar@med.uth.gr

Georgios Komnos, MD, PhD contact

+302413501199

gekomnos@hotmail.com

Greece1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University Hospital of Larisa

    Larissa, Thessaly, 41334

    Theofilos Karachalios, MD,PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Greece

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Clinical Investigation of Robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) With Skywalker and Evolution Medial Pivot Knee (eMP Knee)

This is a prospective trial that attempts to develop evidence on the safety and performance of RA-TKA (Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty) with Skywalker and eMP (Evolution Medial Pivot) knee. Moreover to evaluate performance of eMP patients with Skywalker (in comparison to eMP with conventional instrumentations and non-MP TKAs)

Read the detailed description

The included patients will be those who meet study inclusion and exclusion criteria (IEC) to receive RA-TKA with Skywalker and eMP knees. This cohort will include learning curve cases from each surgeon. The learning curve cases will be determined based on the assessment of parameters such as surgical time etc.

Patients who have received eMP knees with conventional instrumentations or non-MP TKAs (retrospective)

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. >= 18 Years Male or Female
  2. With noninflammatory degenerative joint disease, inflammatory joint disease, functional deformity
  3. The subject has signed the Ethical Board approved Informed Consent Form specific to this study prior to enrollment
  4. Must be independent, ambulatory, and can comply with all post-operative evaluations and visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with poor compliance, unable to complete the trial according to the requirements or for other reasons or considered not to be suitable for inclusion by investigators.
  2. Concurrent participation in any other total hip or knee replacement studies.

Study Objectives: Evaluate Safety and Performance of RA-TKA with Skywalker and eMP knee and address research questions include but not limited to:

  1. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Skywalker with eMP knee
  2. Learning Curve of adopting Skywalker with eMP knees
  3. Postop function recovery in eMP patients with Skywalker
  4. Safety of eMP knee with Skywalker based on intra-op and postop complications
  5. (Enhanced) Kinematics of eMP with Skywalker compared to manual and other non MP TKA

Study Endpoints Primary Effectiveness Endpoints

  • FJS and OKS at 12 months
  • Kinematics from RSA at min 6 months

Primary Safety Endpoint

  • Revisions / surgical interventions including MUA on the index knee due to any reasons
  • Serious Adverse Events that require hospitalization

Secondary Endpoint

  • Accuracy based on planned vs actual size and alignment parameters
  • FJS at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
  • OKS at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
  • ROM from KSS at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
  • Learning Curve based on surgical time
Being tested
Robotic TKA, Conventional TKA
Keywords
knee arthroplasty, Skywalker robotic System, evolution medial pivot implant

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Robotic TKAProcedure or surgery

    Total knee replacement of arthritic knees either with robotic-assisted Skywalker device

  • Conventional TKAProcedure or surgery

    Total knee replacement of arthritic knees performed manually

Study groups in NCT06969222
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Robotic-assisted Skywalker device - Evolution Medial PivotActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Robotic TKA
Conventional total knee arthroplasty with manual instruments - device - Evolution Medial PivotActive comparatorNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary Effectiveness Endpoints with outcome scores Primary Effectiveness Endpoints

    KOOS score(Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) with a 0-100 scale measured at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months

    Measured: 2 years after intervention

  2. Primary Effectiveness Endpoints with outcome scores Primary Effectiveness Endpoints

    FJS (Forgotten Joint Score) with a scale 0 to 48 score measured at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

    Measured: 2 years after intervention

  3. Primary Effectiveness Endpoints with outcome scores Primary Effectiveness Endpoints

    VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale) with a 0-10 scale measured at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months

    Measured: 2 years after intervention

  4. Primary Effectiveness Endpoints with outcome scores Primary Effectiveness Endpoints

    OKS score(Oxford Knee Score) with a 0-100 scale measured at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months

    Measured: 2 years after intervention

  5. Primary safety endpoints

    Revisions / surgical interventions including MUA on the index knee due to any reason. Severe adverse effects

    Measured: 1 year after intervention

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Accuracy of implantation measured in degrees of correction

    Accuracy based on planned vs actual size and alignment parameters

    Measured: 1 year after intervention

  2. Learning curve

    Learning curve based on surgical time

    Measured: 1 year after intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 May 2025
  2. Study start5 Sep 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
prospective randomized trial with 122 patients divided into two groups One operated with robotic-assisted arthroplasty and other operated with conventional total knee arthroplasty
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
122 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06969222
Sponsor's protocol ID
50377/24-11-22
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
2 Oct 2023
Last updated
13 May 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Karachalios T, Varitimidis S, Bargiotas K, Hantes M, Roidis N, Malizos KN. An 11- to 15-year clinical outcome study of the Advance Medial Pivot total knee arthroplasty: pivot knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2016 Aug;98-B(8):1050-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B8.36208.

    PubMed 27482016
  • St Mart JP, Goh EL. The current state of robotics in total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Apr 1;6(4):270-279. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200052. eCollection 2021 Apr.

    PubMed 34040804
  • Siddiqi A, Horan T, Molloy RM, Bloomfield MR, Patel PD, Piuzzi NS. A clinical review of robotic navigation in total knee arthroplasty: historical systems to modern design. EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Apr 1;6(4):252-269. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200071. eCollection 2021 Apr.

    PubMed 34040803

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Robotic TKA and Conventional TKA in people with Knee Arthropathy and Arthroplasty Complications, run by Orthopaedic Department of General University Hospital of Laria at 1 site in Greece.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Theofilos Karachalios, MD, PhD, Professor (+302413501199, kar@med.uth.gr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary Effectiveness Endpoints with outcome scores Primary Effectiveness Endpoints (time frame: 2 years after intervention). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06969222, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in