Digital Tools to Engage and Activate Patients During Hospitalization

Patient activation, defined as having the knowledge, skills, and confidence to manage one's health condition, allows patients to better manage their medical symptoms and conditions, engage in activities that benefit their health, be involved in shared decision-making, and navigate the health care system. In the hospital, patient activation is often low. As a result, patients may receive suboptimal care during and after hospitalization. Digital tools such as patient portals have shown some promise to increase patient activation, but few studies have been conducted in the inpatient setting or have shown equivocal results due to low digital literacy.

The broad, long-term objectives of this work are to develop patient-facing digital tools, and assist patients with using them, in the hospital setting to increase patient activation and improve quality of care. The specific aims are: 1) Design and develop two sets of digital tools, passive and active, to better engage patients and their caregivers while in the hospital; 2) Pilot implementation of the two digital interventions on general medicine; and 3) Evaluate the effect of passive and active digital tools and digital navigators on patient activation, knowledge, and self-efficacy, patient behavior, patient experience, and equity.

During the R21 phase of the study, digital tools, built on top of the existing patient portal, will be developed and iteratively refined using user-centered design principles, with extensive input from patients, caregivers, and providers. Passive tools will provide additional information not available in our current patient portal, such as a dynamic organizational chart of each patient's care team. Active tools will provide customized answers to commonly asked questions and encourage patients to participate in their care, e.g., to ask their own questions during rounds and to keep (and share) a journal of their symptoms, function, and mood. A digital navigator will be recruited and trained to assist patients with the tools. Feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and usability will be evaluated using mixed methods, and a final implementation plan will be created. During the subsequent R33 phase, outcomes will be evaluated in a three-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial: usual care, passive tools only, or passive and active tools. Outcomes will include patient activation, patient experience, and downstream behaviors such as filling discharge prescriptions and keeping follow-up appointments. Mixed methods will be used to evaluate the reliability, validity, and usability of the tools and their impact on clinicians. An implementation guide will be created to facilitate widespread adoption and sustainability based on an evaluation of barriers and facilitators of implementation. Study findings will be disseminated to a variety of stakeholders to further the impact of this project on future care delivery.