AzTrials
AzTrials

Double Lumen Tube IntubationNCT07014345

Double-Lumen Tube Intubation in the Lateral Position Versus the Supine Position on First-Attempt Success Rate

A study testing DLT placement performed in lateral position in people with Double Lumen Tube Intubation, run by xiangming fang at 1 site in China.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to find out the first success rate of double lumen intubation in the lateral position in thoracic surgery, it will also find out the safety of double lumen tube intubation in the lateral position. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Double Lumen Tube Intubation
What is being tested?
DLT placement performed in lateral position
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Dec 2022to 30 Nov 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • need for DLT intubation with elective unilateral thoracoscopic surgery
  • age 18-65 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade of I or II
  • no serious cardiopulmonary disease

Who cannot join

  • aged <18 years or >65 years
  • body mass index >30 kg/m2
  • cognitive dysfunction and inability to assume the required body position
  • previous cervical vertebrae and expected difficult airway (e.g., Mallampati airway grade of III, IV, or higher, maximum mouth opening <3 finger widths, nail-chin distance <6 cm)
  • admission to the intensive care unit after surgery and without follow-up

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • China

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Double-Lumen Tube Intubation in the Lateral Position Versus the Supine Position on First-Attempt Success Rate Among Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center Trial

The aim of this clinical trial is to find out the first success rate of double lumen intubation in the lateral position in thoracic surgery, it will also find out the safety of double lumen tube intubation in the lateral position. The trial aims to answer the following key questions

Does intubation in lateral position improve the first-time success rate of double-lumen intubation compared with in the supine position? What medical problems can participants experience during double lumen tube intubation in the lateral position? The researchers will compare double lumen intubation in the lateral position vs supine position to see if the position is effective in the success rate of double lumen intubation.

Read more

Participants will

Use the supine or lateral position during intubation

Being tested
DLT placement performed in lateral position
Keywords
Double-lumen tube, lateral position intubation, first-attempt success rate, thoracic surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DLT placement performed in lateral positionProcedure or surgery

    In the lateral position group, patients were positioned laterally (as required for surgery) before anesthesia induction. After anesthesia induction, Double lumen tube placement was performed while the patient remained in the lateral position.

Study groups in NCT07014345
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DLT placement performed in lateral positionExperimentalIn the lateral position group, patients were positioned laterally (as required for surgery) before anesthesia induction. After anesthesia induction, Double lumen tube placement was performed while the patient remained in the lateral position.
Receives: Procedure: DLT placement performed in lateral position
DLT placement performed in supine positionNo interventionA double-lumen tube is typically carried out with the patient in the supine position, which is a standard procedure in thoracic surgery.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Successful First-Pass Intubation

    The primary outcome was the success rate of the first DLT intubation attempt.

    Measured: Periprocedural

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. No. of intubation attempts

    Number of patients who were successfully intubated on any attempt

    Measured: Periprocedural

  2. Intubation time

    Defined as from the time when the laryngoscope passed between the patient's lips until the use of a fiberoptic bronchoscope to confirm the correct positioning of the DLT.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  3. Interval before surgery

    Defined as the time interval between the admission of patients in the operating room and the start of surgery.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  4. p-Peak

    peak inspiratory pressure(p-Peak) during mask ventilation, total-lung ventilation(TLV) and one-lung ventilation(OLV)

    Measured: Periprocedural

  5. Flexible bronchoscope usage

    the frequency of use of flexible bronchoscope

    Measured: Periprocedural

  6. the incidence of DLT malposition

    the incidence of DLT malposition observed by flexible bronchoscope (DLT malposition was defined as movement >1.0 cm to correct the DLT position)

    Measured: Periprocedural

  7. early intubation-related complications

    early intubation-related complications (dental injury; hypoxemia; laryngospasm; bronchospasm; airway trauma; arrhythmia, including the salve of ventricular premature beats, ventricular fibrillation, and ventricular tachycardia; oral mucosal injury; and esophageal intubation)

    Measured: Periprocedural

  8. postoperative complications

    postoperative complications (sore throat, GRBAS scale, upper-arm discomfort, and nerve injury)

    Measured: Periprocedural

  9. satisfaction scores.

    0 points: dissatisfied, 1 point: satisfied, 2 points: very satisfied.

    Measured: Periprocedural

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jun 2025
  2. Study start1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2023 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Similar studies have been conducted

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07014345
Sponsor's protocol ID
Intubation
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
22 May 2025
Last updated
14 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Publications

  • Kim H, Seol T, Han SH, Kim H, Hwang JY. A bench study on the prevention of lung-to-lung aspiration with double-lumen endobronchial tubes and bronchial blockers. Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):187. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50792-z.

    PubMed 38167877
  • Campos JH. Lung isolation techniques for patients with difficult airway. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Feb;23(1):12-7. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328331e8a7.

    PubMed 19752725
  • Brodsky JB. Lung separation and the difficult airway. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Dec;103 Suppl 1:i66-75. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep262.

    PubMed 20007992
  • Yang M, Kim JA, Ahn HJ, Choi JW, Kim DK, Cho EA. Double-lumen tube tracheal intubation using a rigid video-stylet: a randomized controlled comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Dec;111(6):990-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet281. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

    PubMed 23975566
  • Saji H, Okada M, Tsuboi M, Nakajima R, Suzuki K, Aokage K, Aoki T, Okami J, Yoshino I, Ito H, Okumura N, Yamaguchi M, Ikeda N, Wakabayashi M, Nakamura K, Fukuda H, Nakamura S, Mitsudomi T, Watanabe SI, Asamura H; West Japan Oncology Group and Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022 Apr 23;399(10335):1607-1617. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02333-3.

    PubMed 35461558

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing DLT placement performed in lateral position in people with Double Lumen Tube Intubation, run by xiangming fang at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Successful First-Pass Intubation (time frame: Periprocedural). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07014345, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in