Depression, AnxietyEarly Phase 1NCT07014852
Integrating Inuit Knowledge Principles in Multi-Level Mental Health Clinical Trials
A Early Phase 1 study testing Traditional Country Foods and Cultural Workshops in people with Depression, Anxiety, run by University of Alberta at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
This study is looking at how eating more country foods affects mental health among Inuit men and women in Arviat, NU. The goal is to evaluate if eating more of these foods helps people feel less depressed or anxious, and whether being part of food-gathering and cultural activities also makes a difference. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Depression, Anxiety
- What is being tested?
- Traditional Country Foods and Cultural Workshops
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 15 Oct 2025to 30 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Inuit
- Able to consent to study participation
- Participating in community wellness programs facilitated by the Aqqiumavvik Wellness Centre within 6 months prior to screening
- Willing to consume country foods provided as part of the intervention
- Willing to engage in individual and group activities, including guided conversations and cultural workshops
- 18-65 years of age
Who cannot join
- Less than 18 years of age
- Greater than 65 years of age
- Unable to consent to study participation
- Mental health conditions requiring immediate clinical intervention
- Known allergies or medical conditions that prevent the consumption of traditional country foods
- Physical or logistical barriers that prevent participation in weekly activities
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
Aqqiumavvik Society
Arviat, Nunavut, X0C 0E0
Aqqiumavvik - Arviat Wellness Society
Arviat, Nunavut, X0C0E0
About this study
This study is looking at how eating more country foods affects mental health among Inuit men and women in Arviat, NU. The goal is to evaluate if eating more of these foods helps people feel less depressed or anxious, and whether being part of food-gathering and cultural activities also makes a difference.
Whether the positive effects last over time, and if getting access to these foods later (instead of right away) still helps people feel better, will also be assessed.
Read the detailed description
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, cultural acceptability, and potential mental health impacts, measured using PHQ-9 as part of a multi-level intervention (MLI) that integrates country foods, community wellness practices, and clinical care.
Specifically, the intervention aims to:
Improve mental health outcomes: Increased access to country foods is hypothesized to reduce depression and anxiety.
Strengthen cultural identity: Community-led wellness activities are expected to enhance cultural identity and community cohesion.
Enhance food sovereignty: Addressing systemic barriers can improve access to country foods and support culturally relevant healthcare.
Promote continuity of care: Integrating culturally grounded interventions into care plans can improve patient outcomes and overall wellness.
Secondary objectives include assessing the role of Elders in transferring cultural knowledge, identifying systemic barriers to accessing country food, and evaluating the integration of IQ principles into clinical systems. Elders are expected to facilitate social cohesion and transfer cultural knowledge, which are vital for community resilience. Policy recommendations will be explored to address systemic barriers, while the intervention's findings will inform clinical care plans to promote culturally relevant healthcare.
Ultimately, this research aims to develop community-based, culturally aligned solutions that promote resilience, improve health outcomes, and support Inuit self-determination. This study aims to create sustainable pathways for wellness and food sovereignty in Inuit communities by addressing historical injustices and systemic inequities.
Research Question(s): This study is guided by the following research questions:
How does increased access to country foods influence individual mental health outcomes, including anxiety, depression, emotional well-being, and resilience? How do community-driven food-gathering activities enhance social cohesion, cultural identity, and collective mental health within Inuit communities? What structural, systemic, and environmental barriers restrict access to Inuit country foods, and what specific policy interventions can effectively address these barriers to promote sustainable food security and mental health improvements? How do land-based and country food wellness programs integrate holistic approaches to address biological, psychological, social, and cultural determinants of mental health? What role do interdisciplinary collaborations and culturally relevant care practices play in improving access to country foods and fostering mental health equity in Inuit communities?
Hypotheses:
Increased access to country foods will improve mental health outcomes, including reduced depression and anxiety.
Community-led wellness activities will strengthen cultural identity, social bonds, and cohesion.
Access to country foods will help address systemic barriers and enhance food sovereignty while supporting culturally relevant healthcare.
Integrating culturally grounded interventions into care plans will improve continuity of care and patient outcomes.
- Conditions
- Depression, Anxiety
- Being tested
- Traditional Country Foods, Cultural Workshops
- Keywords
- Inuit, Country Foods, mental health, depression, anxiety, food sovereignty, cultural identity, community wellness, Indigenous health, Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit (IQ), social cohesion
- Medical subject headings
- Depression, Anxiety Disorders, Psychological Well-Being
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Traditional Country FoodsOther
Participants will receive weekly distributions of traditional foods, including caribou and fish. Guided conversations will explore changes in dietary habits, emotional well-being, and cultural connections
Cultural WorkshopsBehavioural
Weekly workshops led by Elders will focus on traditional country food, food preparation, and sharing practices, enhancing cultural identity and community bonds. Participants will also engage in cultural camps where they will be led by Elders in land based teachings on country food.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate Intervention | Other | Weekly distributions of traditional country foods (caribou, seal, Arctic char), Elder-led workshops on food preparation and cultural practices, and mental health supports through unnikkaaratiginniq and sharing circles for the first 30 days of the trial. Receives: Other: Traditional Country Foods; Behavioral: Cultural Workshops |
| Delayed Intervention | Other | Participating in baseline assessments only (no guided conversations or workshops from Days 1-30). From Days 30-60, the delayed intervention group will receive the same intervention as the immediate intervention group Receives: Other: Traditional Country Foods; Behavioral: Cultural Workshops |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cultural Acceptability of the Intervention- Qualitative Interviews
Qualitative interviews with healthcare providers and community facilitators will explore barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation.
Measured: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Cultural Acceptability of the Intervention- Participant Diaries
Participant diaries will also be used to assess the perceived cultural significance of the intervention.
Measured: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Participant satisfaction and perceived impact on mental health
Data will also be collected through participant diaries, focusing on experiences with country food consumption, the perceived cultural significance of the intervention, and overall satisfaction with the program. REDCap surveys will collect data from participant diaries, allowing for consistent monitoring of cultural experiences and satisfaction over time.
Measured: From enrolment to the end of treatment at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
Mental Health Impacts
Potential mental health impacts will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) tool at baseline. Scoring ranges from 0-27; a higher score indicates worse mental health.
Measured: Baseline (enrolment)
Mental Health Impacts - 4 weeks
Potential mental health impacts will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) tool 4 weeks after enrolment. Scoring ranges from 0-27; a higher score indicates worse mental health
Measured: 4 weeks after enrolment
Mental Health Impacts
Potential mental health impacts will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) tool 8 weeks after enrolment. Scoring ranges from 0-27; a higher score indicates worse mental health.
Measured: 8 weeks after enrolment
Mental Health Impacts
Potential mental health impacts will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) tool 12 weeks after enrolment. Scoring ranges from 0-27; a higher score indicates worse mental health.
Measured: 12 weeks after enrolment
Participant Satisfaction- Participant Diaries
Data will be collected through participant diaries that focus on experiences with country food consumption, the perceived cultural significance of the intervention, and overall satisfaction with the program at baseline.
Measured: Baseline (at enrolment)
Participant Satisfaction- Participant Diaries
Data will be collected through participant diaries that focus on experiences with country food consumption, the perceived cultural significance of the intervention, and overall satisfaction with the program 4 weeks after enrolment
Measured: 4 weeks after enrolment
Participant Satisfaction- Participant Diaries
Data will be collected through participant diaries that focus on experiences with country food consumption, the perceived cultural significance of the intervention, and overall satisfaction with the program 8 weeks after enrolment
Measured: 8 weeks after enrolment
Participant Satisfaction- Participant Diaries
Data will be collected through participant diaries that focus on experiences with country food consumption, the perceived cultural significance of the intervention, and overall satisfaction with the program 12 weeks after enrolment
Measured: 12 weeks after enrolment
Secondary outcomes (8)
Assessment of the Role of Elders in Transferring Cultural Knowledge- Workshops
Assessment of the Role of Elders in Transferring Cultural Knowledge will be evaluated through Elder-led workshops.
Measured: 12 weeks after enrolment
Assessment of the Role of Elders in Transferring Cultural Knowledge- Conversations
Assessment of the Role of Elders in Transferring Cultural Knowledge will be evaluated through guided unikkaaqatiginniq conversations.
Measured: 12 weeks after enrolment
Systemic Barriers to Accessing Country Food- Interviews
Evaluation of systemic barriers to accessing country food will be done via interviews with health care providers who provide care to Inuit within the region.
Measured: 12 weeks after enrolment
Systemic Barriers to Accessing Country Food- Participant Diaries
Evaluation of systemic barriers to accessing country food will be done via qualitative analysis of participant diaries.
Measured: 12 weeks after enrolment
Systemic Barriers to Accessing Country Food- Discussions
Evaluation of systemic barriers to accessing country food will be done via insights from Circle discussions with participants.
Measured: 12 weeks after enrolment
Integration of IQ principles into clinical systems- Participant Diaries
Evaluation of the integration of IQ principles into clinical systems will be done via qualitative analysis of participant diaries. Recommendations will be made to the Government of Nunavut and the Nunavut Health Authority based on this analysis into how IQ principles can be incorporated across the health care and clinical systems.
Measured: Once between 12-24 weeks after enrolment
Integration of IQ principles into clinical systems- Discussions
Evaluation of the integration of IQ principles into clinical systems will be done via insights from Circle discussions with participants. Recommendations will be made to the Government of Nunavut and the Nunavut Health Authority based on this analysis into how IQ principles can be incorporated across the health care and clinical systems.
Measured: Once between 12-24 weeks after enrolment
Integration of IQ principles into clinical systems- Interviews
Evaluation of the integration of IQ principles into clinical systems will be done via interviews with health care providers who provide care to Inuit within the region. Recommendations will be made to the Government of Nunavut and the Nunavut Health Authority based on this analysis into how IQ principles can be incorporated across the health care and clinical systems.
Measured: Once between 12-24 weeks after enrolment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2025
- Study start15 Oct 2025
- Primary completion30 Sep 2026
- Study completion30 Sep 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Depression, AnxietyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AlbertaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aqqiumavvik - Arviat Wellness Society
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Wayne Clark, Ed.D, Principal investigator, University of AlbertaJustin Ezekowitz, MD, Principal investigator, University of Alberta
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07014852
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00149001
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 12 May 2025
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Given the size of the study population, IPD will not be shared.
Publications
Young, T. K. (2012). Health and disease in the Canadian North. University of Toronto Press.
Willows ND. Determinants of healthy eating in Aboriginal peoples in Canada: the current state of knowledge and research gaps. Can J Public Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;96 Suppl 3:S32-6, S36-41. English, French.
PubMed 16042162Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.
Turner, N. J., Ignace, M. B., & Ignace, R. (2013). Traditional ecological knowledge and wisdom of Aboriginal Peoples in British Columbia. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1275-1287.
Tagalik, S. (2011). Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit: The role of Indigenous knowledge in supporting wellness in Inuit communities. National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health. https://www.nccih.ca/docs/context/FS-InuitQaujimajatuqangitWellness-EN.pdf
Austin S. Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous people. J Health Psychol. 2001 May;6(3):358-9. doi: 10.1177/135910530100600310. No abstract available.
PubMed 22049381Santos Dunn, C., Yazzie, M., & Tsosie, R. (2023). Colonial legacies, food sovereignty, and health inequities among Indigenous peoples. Indigenous Policy Journal, 34(1), 1-18.
Rink, E. (2019). Intergenerational trauma and resilience among Indigenous youth: A multi-level intervention model. Journal of Adolescent Health, 65(6), 782-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.07.014
Richmond C, Elliott SJ, Matthews R, Elliott B. The political ecology of health: perceptions of environment, economy, health and well-being among 'Namgis First Nation. Health Place. 2005 Dec;11(4):349-65. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.04.003.
PubMed 15886143Power EM. Conceptualizing food security or aboriginal people in Canada. Can J Public Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;99(2):95-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03405452.
PubMed 18457280Marmot M. Social justice, epidemiology and health inequalities. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;32(7):537-546. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0286-3. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
PubMed 28776115Louis, R. P. (2007). Can you hear us now? Voices from the margin: Using Indigenous methodologies in geographic research. Geographical Research, 45(2), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00443.x
LaLonde, C. E., Richmond, C. A., & McGregor, D. (2023). Food security, cultural continuity, and Indigenous health in Canada: The critical role of community initiatives. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 114(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-022-00669-0
Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto Press.
Kazdin, A. E. (2021). Research design in clinical psychology (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Integrating Inuit Knowledge Principles in Multi-Level Mental Health Clinical Trials
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07014852
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00149001
- Conditions
- Depression, Anxiety
- Keywords
- Inuit, Country Foods, mental health, depression, anxiety, food sovereignty, cultural identity, community wellness
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aqqiumavvik - Arviat Wellness Society
- Study start
- 15 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is looking at how eating more country foods affects mental health among Inuit men and women in Arviat, NU. The goal is to evaluate if eating more of these foods helps people feel less depressed or anxious, and whether being part of food-gathering and cultural activities also makes a difference.
Whether the positive effects last over time, and if getting access to these foods later (instead of right away) still helps people feel better, will also be assessed.
Detailed description
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, cultural acceptability, and potential mental health impacts, measured using PHQ-9 as part of a multi-level intervention (MLI) that integrates country foods, community wellness practices, and clinical care.
Specifically, the intervention aims to:
Improve mental health outcomes: Increased access to country foods is hypothesized to reduce depression and anxiety.
Strengthen cultural identity: Community-led wellness activities are expected to enhance cultural identity and community cohesion.
Enhance food sovereignty: Addressing systemic barriers can improve access to country foods and support culturally relevant healthcare.
Promote continuity of care: Integrating culturally grounded interventions into care plans can improve patient outcomes and overall wellness.
Secondary objectives include assessing the role of Elders in transferring cultural knowledge, identifying systemic barriers to accessing country food, and evaluating the integration of IQ principles into clinical systems. Elders are expected to facilitate social cohesion and transfer cultural knowledge, which are vital for community resilience. Policy recommendations will be explored to address systemic barriers, while the intervention's findings will inform clinical care plans to promote culturally relevant healthcare.
Ultimately, this research aims to develop community-based, culturally aligned solutions that promote resilience, improve health outcomes, and support Inuit self-determination. This study aims to create sustainable pathways for wellness and food sovereignty in Inuit communities by addressing historical injustices and systemic inequities.
Research Question(s): This study is guided by the following research questions:
How does increased access to country foods influence individual mental health outcomes, including anxiety, depression, emotional well-being, and resilience? How do community-driven food-gathering activities enhance social cohesion, cultural identity, and collective mental health within Inuit communities? What structural, systemic, and environmental barriers restrict access to Inuit country foods, and what specific policy interventions can effectively address these barriers to promote sustainable food security and mental health improvements? How do land-based and country food wellness programs integrate holistic approaches to address biological, psychological, social, and cultural determinants of mental health? What role do interdisciplinary collaborations and culturally relevant care practices play in improving access to country foods and fostering mental health equity in Inuit communities?
Hypotheses:
Increased access to country foods will improve mental health outcomes, including reduced depression and anxiety.
Community-led wellness activities will strengthen cultural identity, social bonds, and cohesion.
Access to country foods will help address systemic barriers and enhance food sovereignty while supporting culturally relevant healthcare.
Integrating culturally grounded interventions into care plans will improve continuity of care and patient outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate Intervention | Other | Other: Traditional Country Foods, Behavioral: Cultural WorkshopsWeekly distributions of traditional country foods (caribou, seal, Arctic char), Elder-led workshops on food preparation and cultural practices, and mental health supports through unnikkaaratiginniq and sharing circles for the first 30 days of the trial. |
| Delayed Intervention | Other | Other: Traditional Country Foods, Behavioral: Cultural WorkshopsParticipating in baseline assessments only (no guided conversations or workshops from Days 1-30). From Days 30-60, the delayed intervention group will receive the same intervention as the immediate intervention group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Inuit
- Able to consent to study participation
- Participating in community wellness programs facilitated by the Aqqiumavvik Wellness Centre within 6 months prior to screening
- Willing to consume country foods provided as part of the intervention
- Willing to engage in individual and group activities, including guided conversations and cultural workshops
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Less than 18 years of age
- Greater than 65 years of age
- Unable to consent to study participation
- Mental health conditions requiring immediate clinical intervention
- Known allergies or medical conditions that prevent the consumption of traditional country foods
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional Country FoodsParticipants will receive weekly distributions of traditional foods, including caribou and fish. Guided conversations will explore changes in dietary habits, emotional well-being, and cultural connections | Other | Delayed Intervention, Immediate Intervention |
| Cultural WorkshopsWeekly workshops led by Elders will focus on traditional country food, food preparation, and sharing practices, enhancing cultural identity and community bonds. Participants will also engage in cultural camps where they will be led by Elders in land based teachings on country food. | Behavioural | Delayed Intervention, Immediate Intervention |
Primary outcome
Cultural Acceptability of the Intervention- Qualitative Interviews
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Qualitative interviews with healthcare providers and community facilitators will explore barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation.
Cultural Acceptability of the Intervention- Participant Diaries
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Participant diaries will also be used to assess the perceived cultural significance of the intervention.
Participant satisfaction and perceived impact on mental health
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of treatment at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
Data will also be collected through participant diaries, focusing on experiences with country food consumption, the perceived cultural significance of the intervention, and overall satisfaction with the program. REDCap surveys will collect data from participant diaries, allowing for consistent monitoring of cultural experiences and satisfaction over time.
Mental Health Impacts
Time frame: Baseline (enrolment)
Potential mental health impacts will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) tool at baseline. Scoring ranges from 0-27; a higher score indicates worse mental health.
Mental Health Impacts - 4 weeks
Time frame: 4 weeks after enrolment
Potential mental health impacts will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) tool 4 weeks after enrolment. Scoring ranges from 0-27; a higher score indicates worse mental health
Mental Health Impacts
Time frame: 8 weeks after enrolment
Potential mental health impacts will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) tool 8 weeks after enrolment. Scoring ranges from 0-27; a higher score indicates worse mental health.
Mental Health Impacts
Time frame: 12 weeks after enrolment
Potential mental health impacts will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) tool 12 weeks after enrolment. Scoring ranges from 0-27; a higher score indicates worse mental health.
Participant Satisfaction- Participant Diaries
Time frame: Baseline (at enrolment)
Data will be collected through participant diaries that focus on experiences with country food consumption, the perceived cultural significance of the intervention, and overall satisfaction with the program at baseline.
Participant Satisfaction- Participant Diaries
Time frame: 4 weeks after enrolment
Data will be collected through participant diaries that focus on experiences with country food consumption, the perceived cultural significance of the intervention, and overall satisfaction with the program 4 weeks after enrolment
Participant Satisfaction- Participant Diaries
Time frame: 8 weeks after enrolment
Data will be collected through participant diaries that focus on experiences with country food consumption, the perceived cultural significance of the intervention, and overall satisfaction with the program 8 weeks after enrolment
Participant Satisfaction- Participant Diaries
Time frame: 12 weeks after enrolment
Data will be collected through participant diaries that focus on experiences with country food consumption, the perceived cultural significance of the intervention, and overall satisfaction with the program 12 weeks after enrolment
8 secondary outcomes
Assessment of the Role of Elders in Transferring Cultural Knowledge- Workshops
Time frame: 12 weeks after enrolment
Assessment of the Role of Elders in Transferring Cultural Knowledge- Conversations
Time frame: 12 weeks after enrolment
Systemic Barriers to Accessing Country Food- Interviews
Time frame: 12 weeks after enrolment
Systemic Barriers to Accessing Country Food- Participant Diaries
Time frame: 12 weeks after enrolment
Systemic Barriers to Accessing Country Food- Discussions
Time frame: 12 weeks after enrolment
Integration of IQ principles into clinical systems- Participant Diaries
Time frame: Once between 12-24 weeks after enrolment
Integration of IQ principles into clinical systems- Discussions
Time frame: Once between 12-24 weeks after enrolment
Integration of IQ principles into clinical systems- Interviews
Time frame: Once between 12-24 weeks after enrolment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2026.
- BackgroundYoung, T. K. (2012). Health and disease in the Canadian North. University of Toronto Press.
- Background: PubMed 16042162Willows ND. Determinants of healthy eating in Aboriginal peoples in Canada: the current state of knowledge and research gaps. Can J Public Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;96 Suppl 3:S32-6, S36-41. English, French.
- BackgroundWilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.
- BackgroundTurner, N. J., Ignace, M. B., & Ignace, R. (2013). Traditional ecological knowledge and wisdom of Aboriginal Peoples in British Columbia. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1275-1287.
- BackgroundTagalik, S. (2011). Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit: The role of Indigenous knowledge in supporting wellness in Inuit communities. National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health. https://www.nccih.ca/docs/context/FS-InuitQaujimajatuqangitWellness-EN.pdf
- Background: PubMed 22049381Austin S. Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous people. J Health Psychol. 2001 May;6(3):358-9. doi: 10.1177/135910530100600310. No abstract available.
- BackgroundSantos Dunn, C., Yazzie, M., & Tsosie, R. (2023). Colonial legacies, food sovereignty, and health inequities among Indigenous peoples. Indigenous Policy Journal, 34(1), 1-18.
- BackgroundRink, E. (2019). Intergenerational trauma and resilience among Indigenous youth: A multi-level intervention model. Journal of Adolescent Health, 65(6), 782-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.07.014
- Background: PubMed 15886143Richmond C, Elliott SJ, Matthews R, Elliott B. The political ecology of health: perceptions of environment, economy, health and well-being among 'Namgis First Nation. Health Place. 2005 Dec;11(4):349-65. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.04.003.
- Background: PubMed 18457280Power EM. Conceptualizing food security or aboriginal people in Canada. Can J Public Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;99(2):95-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03405452.
- Background: PubMed 28776115Marmot M. Social justice, epidemiology and health inequalities. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;32(7):537-546. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0286-3. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
- BackgroundLouis, R. P. (2007). Can you hear us now? Voices from the margin: Using Indigenous methodologies in geographic research. Geographical Research, 45(2), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00443.x
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Given the size of the study population, IPD will not be shared.
Related trials for Depression, Anxiety
Recruiting
Unified Protocol in Penitentiary Facilities
Depression Disorders, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Functional Impact of Psychological Symptoms in Patients With Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (SSCD): a National Cross-sectional Study
Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Recruiting
Cultural Adaptation of an Online Parenting Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Depression and Anxiety in Adolescents
Risk of Depression and Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wayne Clark, Ed.D principal investigator
University of Alberta
Justin Ezekowitz, MD principal investigator
University of Alberta
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Traditional Country Foods and Cultural Workshops in people with Depression, Anxiety, run by University of Alberta at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cultural Acceptability of the Intervention- Qualitative Interviews (time frame: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07014852, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2026.