AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart FailureNCT07032064

Evaluation of Electrical and Hemodynamic Effects of Different Pacing Strategies in CRT Candidates

A study testing Sequential ventricular pacing at five sites in people with Heart Failure and CRT and/or ICD, run by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Heart failure patients with delayed electrical activation of the heart often benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, traditional CRT using biventricular pacing is not effective in all patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Heart Failure, CRT and/or ICD
What is being tested?
Sequential ventricular pacing at five sites
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
28 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
3 Jun 2024to 20 May 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • NYHA class I to ambulatory IV despite optimized medical therapy for ≥3 months, LVEF ≤35%, and sinus rhythm with LBBB. LBBB was defined as QRS duration ≥130 ms, QS or rS in lead V1, broad/notched R waves in leads I, aVL, V5-V6, and absence of q waves in V5-V6

Who cannot join

  • second- or third-degree AV block, frequent PVCs, moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis, LV thrombus, or significant peripheral vascular disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University

    Shanghai

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Electrical and Hemodynamic Assessment of Pacing Modalities in Patients With Indications for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Heart failure patients with delayed electrical activation of the heart often benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, traditional CRT using biventricular pacing is not effective in all patients. This study aims to evaluate the acute effects of pacing at different sites within the heart's conduction system-including His bundle pacing, deep septal pacing, left ventricular septal pacing, non-selective left bundle branch pacing, and selective left bundle branch pacing.

We will assess how these pacing strategies improve electrical synchrony and heart function by analyzing ECG parameters, such as QRS duration and QRS area, and measuring hemodynamic response using left ventricular pressure changes. The goal is to identify which pacing site provides the best improvement in heart performance. The study includes patients with left bundle branch block or intraventricular conduction delay, reduced heart function (ejection fraction <35%), and prolonged QRS duration (>150 ms).

This research may help improve the effectiveness of pacing therapy in heart failure patients who are not responding well to current CRT methods.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, single-center, crossover study designed to evaluate the acute hemodynamic and electrical effects of pacing at five distinct sites within the conduction system in patients with heart failure and wide QRS complexes. Each participant will undergo temporary pacing at the His bundle, deep septal, left ventricular septal, non-selective left bundle branch, and selective left bundle branch sites.

Pacing sites will be confirmed by fluoroscopic guidance and intracardiac electrogram criteria, including stimulus-to-R' interval and QRS morphology. Hemodynamic response during each pacing mode will be assessed non-invasively using a Finometer device, which continuously measures beat-to-beat blood pressure and provides derived parameters of cardiac function.

The primary objective is to compare the relative hemodynamic benefits and electrical synchrony achieved at each pacing location, with the aim of optimizing lead placement strategies for conduction system pacing in heart failure patients.

Being tested
Sequential ventricular pacing at five sites
Keywords
Cardiac resynchronization therapy;, Cardiac physiologic pacing;, Heart failure, Left bundle branch area pacing, Electrical resynchronization, Hemodynamic assessment
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sequential ventricular pacing at five sitesProcedure or surgery

    This intervention involves sequential temporary pacing at five distinct ventricular sites within the same patient during a single electrophysiological study. The pacing sites include:His bundle pacing (HBP),Deep septal pacing (DSP),Left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP),Non-selective left bundle branch pacing (NS-LBBP),Selective left bundle branch pacing (SLBBP).

    Each pacing modality is tested under identical hemodynamic and electrophysiological conditions using a fixed output and AV delay. Electrical parameters and acute hemodynamic responses are recorded for each site. The study uses a within-subject crossover design, allowing direct intra-individual comparison of different pacing strategies in patients meeting standard CRT indications. No long-term device implantation is involved during this phase of the study.

Study groups in NCT07032064
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Evaluation of five pacing strategies in a Single-Arm CRT candidate cohortExperimentalAll enrolled patients will undergo sequential pacing at five ventricular sites during a single procedure: His bundle pacing (HBP), deep septal pacing (DSP), left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP), non-selective left bundle branch pacing (NS-LBBP), and selective left bundle branch pacing (SLBBP). Each pacing mode will be tested under identical physiological conditions in the same individual, and electrical and hemodynamic parameters will be recorded for comparative analysis. The order of pacing may be randomized or standardized according to protocol.
Receives: Procedure: Sequential ventricular pacing at five sites

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. QRSd

    QRSd was measured from the onset to the end of the QRS complex

    Measured: within 30 minutes per patient

  2. QRSa

    QRSa was computed as the sum of the QRS area across three orthogonal vectorcardiographic leads reconstructed using the Kors transformation matrices

    Measured: within 30 minutes per patient

  3. Hemodynamic Evaluation

    Continuous non-invasive blood pressure was monitored using a Finometer device

    Measured: within 30 minutes per patient

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jun 2025
  2. Study start3 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion20 May 2025
  4. Study completion20 May 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07032064
Sponsor's protocol ID
CPP-Electro-Hemo
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
13 Jun 2025
Last updated
22 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All IPD that underlie results in a publication

Publications

  • Su Y, Yu Z, Xiao Z, Pan L, Lu H, Chen J, Li M, Li X, Arnold AD, Whinnett ZI, Liang Y, Su Y. Evaluation of Acute Electrical and Hemodynamic Improvement During Left Bundle-Branch Area Pacing Modalities for Resynchronization Therapy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2026 Oct 23:e049208. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.126.049208. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42924745

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Sequential ventricular pacing at five sites in people with Heart Failure and CRT and/or ICD, run by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

QRSd (time frame: within 30 minutes per patient). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07032064, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in