RehabilitationNCT07038694
RTSS Adoption Into Physiotherapists Documentation
An observational study of Rehabilitation and Clinical Reasoning, run by King's College London.
Trial summary
The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) is a framework that aims to support clinicians in reasoning and documenting how to deliver rehabilitation. This was explored in a pilot study in 2023 that tested the feasibility of a 6-week teaching programme aiming to support the adoption of the RTSS into… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Rehabilitation, Clinical Reasoning, Medical Record Documenation
- What is being tested?
- Qualitative semi structured interview
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2025to 5 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Physiotherapists will be recruited exclusively from the rehabilitation department of physiotherapy at Guy's and St Thomas' hospital, these are physiotherapists who have attempted to use the RTSS in clinical documentation.
Who may be able to join
- Physiotherapy staff who have attempted adoption of the RTSS documentation integration
- Are actively working in the physiotherapy department setting with in substantive positions
Who cannot join
- Are unable to consent to the study
- Are student physiotherapists or temporary staff
- Are actively working with the PI
- Are unable to conduct the interview in English
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: A New Rehabilitation Language: Understanding Adoption of the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System Into Physiotherapists Documentation
The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) is a framework that aims to support clinicians in reasoning and documenting how to deliver rehabilitation. This was explored in a pilot study in 2023 that tested the feasibility of a 6-week teaching programme aiming to support the adoption of the RTSS into practise of physiotherapists and subsequently measure its effect on clinicians reasoning of treatment. Whilst clinical reasoning scores improved, adoption of the framework remained low. Interviews within this study revealed the difficulty clinicians experienced in transitioning to documenting the RTSS.
Further local work within Guy's \& St Thomas NHS foundation trust (GSTT) resulted in modified integrations of the RTSS into electronic health record systems as well as training, yet adoption still remained limited. With documentation being cited as an influence of RTSS adoption and thus contributing to its clinical benefit, this qualitative study will attempt to make clear what factors facilitate and/or limit RTSS documentation adoption, and how they exert their influence. The findings from this study will inform the design of interventions that will aid future study of benefit of the RTSS on physiotherapy practice.
To achieve these aims, interviews will be conducted virtually via MS Teams, by the lead researcher, with approximately 12-16 volunteering physiotherapists who have attempted to document the RTSS, within the site of GSTT. The interviews will last approximately 1 hour, and will be partially structured in nature to invite in-depth discussion of topic. Analyses of the data will be performed by a team of 3 clinical academics working between GSTT and King's College London with study findings to be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at professional conferences
Read the detailed description
Rehabilitation frameworks, such as the international classification of functioning, disability and health, 1 support the reasoning and identification of what should be targeted by clinicians to achieve desired patient outcomes. However, frameworks supporting the reasoning about how these targets should be treated are scarce. A promising candidate that provides this function is the rehabilitation treatment specification system (RTSS) 2. The RTSS encourages clinicians to hypothesise a claim (a treatment theory) about how they are going to treat an individual patient by identifying treatment components - the tripartite building block of a specified treatment composed of a singular (measurable) treatment target i.e., an aspect of function or disability that is to be changed directly by the ingredient(s), 1 or more (measurable) ingredients i.e., what the clinician does to modify the target, and the mechanism(s) of action (MoA) i.e., the causal chain through which the treatment is known or hypothesised to work (i.e. how the ingredients affect the target) 3. Proponents of the RTSS hypothesised that by facilitating clinicians to explicate their treatment theory, their treatment reasoning would develop 4. We explored this hypothesis in a first-phase pilot study which assessed whether a 6-week multi-modal RTSS teaching programme was feasible and had any effect on a small group of clinicians' clinical reasoning 5. We observed an improvement in self-reported measures of clinical reasoning despite the targeted behaviour (clinical uptake of the RTSS) remaining low. Critically, nested qualitative data revealed the difficulty clinicians experienced in transitioning to documenting the RTSS, citing the need for documenting training and more integrative electronic medical record (EMR) systems. Since the publication of this work, a quality improvement project within Guy's \& St Thomas' NHS foundation trust has seen the design and implementation of an RTSS EMR integration which physiotherapists have attempted to adopt.
Clinicians concur with the concept that documentation practices can enhance clinical reasoning and quality of care 6. They also report documenting as becoming increasingly burdensome, with a need to satisfy evolving legislative, funding and medico-legal purposes 7, 8 resulting in clinicians' time spent documenting becoming similar to time spent providing clinical care 9. As well as navigating the multitude of purposes, clinicians cite a number of personal and environmental factors that contribute to their documenting practices 10. If not considered, these can lead to non-adoption. For example one study concluded that a novel documenting practice for physiotherapists was infeasible due to time requirements, differing personal and interpersonal cultures, disagreements with the EMR structure, and a lack of organisational support and motivation 11. Thus, contextual exploration of the lived experience of physiotherapists attempting to adopt an RTSS EMR integration is imperative to better understand adoption behaviours and inform development of strategies that could enhance adoption.
This is a student project as part of a Masters in Clinical Research (MRes) course. Through critically exploring the experience of clinical physiotherapists attempting to adopt RTSS documentation practices through a framework analysis method, valuable insight will be provided on what and how determinants modulate RTSS documentation adoption, and inform implementation interventions that seek to utilise the RTSS in physiotherapy, and rehabilitation practice.
- The aim of this study is to explore attitudes and perceptions regarding the implementation of the RTSS into documentation practises of physiotherapists working in a hospital setting
- The primary objectives of this study are:
- To explore perceived facilitators to adoption of the RTSS into physiotherapists documentation practice
- To explore perceived barriers to adoption of the RTSS into physiotherapists documentation practices
- To understand how facilitators and barriers exert their influence on physiotherapists behaviours of adopting the RTSS into their documentation practices
- To identify implementation interventions that may support the behaviour of adopting the RTSS into documentation practices
- Being tested
- Qualitative semi structured interview
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Qualitative semi structured interviewOther
60 minute, virtually performed via Microsoft Teams, semi-structured interview
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation physiotherapy RTSS users | Physiotherapists will be recruited exclusively from the rehabilitation department of physiotherapy at Guy's and St Thomas' hospital,. Purposive, maximum variation sampling will be used to sample physiotherapists who have attempted adoption of RTSS into clinical notes. Applying Malterud et al's concept of information power suggests an estimated sample of 12-16 participants will be required, calculated from the study's narrow aim, the specificity of the sample with respect to the aim, the application of theory and encouragement of strong dialogue via an interviewer experienced in the subject. Purposive maximum variation sampling will ensure heterogeneity of clinical experience (Agenda for Change (AFC) bandings 3-8) to support diversity of perspectives and experiences for data analysis. Receives: Other: Qualitative semi structured interview |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Semi Structured qualitative Interview
Semi structured qualitative interviews performed via MS Teams lasting up to 1 hour in duration
Measured: From early July 2025 to end of July 2025
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2025
- Study start1 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion5 Sep 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for RehabilitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King's College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07038694
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12584
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Hart T, Dijkers MP, Whyte J, Turkstra LS, Zanca JM, Packel A, Van Stan JH, Ferraro M, Chen C. A Theory-Driven System for the Specification of Rehabilitation Treatments. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09.109. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
PubMed 30267669
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A New Rehabilitation Language: Understanding Adoption of the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System Into Physiotherapists Documentation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07038694
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12584
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- King's College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 5 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) is a framework that aims to support clinicians in reasoning and documenting how to deliver rehabilitation. This was explored in a pilot study in 2023 that tested the feasibility of a 6-week teaching programme aiming to support the adoption of the RTSS into practise of physiotherapists and subsequently measure its effect on clinicians reasoning of treatment. Whilst clinical reasoning scores improved, adoption of the framework remained low. Interviews within this study revealed the difficulty clinicians experienced in transitioning to documenting the RTSS.
Further local work within Guy's \& St Thomas NHS foundation trust (GSTT) resulted in modified integrations of the RTSS into electronic health record systems as well as training, yet adoption still remained limited. With documentation being cited as an influence of RTSS adoption and thus contributing to its clinical benefit, this qualitative study will attempt to make clear what factors facilitate and/or limit RTSS documentation adoption, and how they exert their influence. The findings from this study will inform the design of interventions that will aid future study of benefit of the RTSS on physiotherapy practice.
To achieve these aims, interviews will be conducted virtually via MS Teams, by the lead researcher, with approximately 12-16 volunteering physiotherapists who have attempted to document the RTSS, within the site of GSTT. The interviews will last approximately 1 hour, and will be partially structured in nature to invite in-depth discussion of topic. Analyses of the data will be performed by a team of 3 clinical academics working between GSTT and King's College London with study findings to be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at professional conferences
Detailed description
Rehabilitation frameworks, such as the international classification of functioning, disability and health, 1 support the reasoning and identification of what should be targeted by clinicians to achieve desired patient outcomes. However, frameworks supporting the reasoning about how these targets should be treated are scarce. A promising candidate that provides this function is the rehabilitation treatment specification system (RTSS) 2. The RTSS encourages clinicians to hypothesise a claim (a treatment theory) about how they are going to treat an individual patient by identifying treatment components - the tripartite building block of a specified treatment composed of a singular (measurable) treatment target i.e., an aspect of function or disability that is to be changed directly by the ingredient(s), 1 or more (measurable) ingredients i.e., what the clinician does to modify the target, and the mechanism(s) of action (MoA) i.e., the causal chain through which the treatment is known or hypothesised to work (i.e. how the ingredients affect the target) 3. Proponents of the RTSS hypothesised that by facilitating clinicians to explicate their treatment theory, their treatment reasoning would develop 4. We explored this hypothesis in a first-phase pilot study which assessed whether a 6-week multi-modal RTSS teaching programme was feasible and had any effect on a small group of clinicians' clinical reasoning 5. We observed an improvement in self-reported measures of clinical reasoning despite the targeted behaviour (clinical uptake of the RTSS) remaining low. Critically, nested qualitative data revealed the difficulty clinicians experienced in transitioning to documenting the RTSS, citing the need for documenting training and more integrative electronic medical record (EMR) systems. Since the publication of this work, a quality improvement project within Guy's \& St Thomas' NHS foundation trust has seen the design and implementation of an RTSS EMR integration which physiotherapists have attempted to adopt.
Clinicians concur with the concept that documentation practices can enhance clinical reasoning and quality of care 6. They also report documenting as becoming increasingly burdensome, with a need to satisfy evolving legislative, funding and medico-legal purposes 7, 8 resulting in clinicians' time spent documenting becoming similar to time spent providing clinical care 9. As well as navigating the multitude of purposes, clinicians cite a number of personal and environmental factors that contribute to their documenting practices 10. If not considered, these can lead to non-adoption. For example one study concluded that a novel documenting practice for physiotherapists was infeasible due to time requirements, differing personal and interpersonal cultures, disagreements with the EMR structure, and a lack of organisational support and motivation 11. Thus, contextual exploration of the lived experience of physiotherapists attempting to adopt an RTSS EMR integration is imperative to better understand adoption behaviours and inform development of strategies that could enhance adoption.
This is a student project as part of a Masters in Clinical Research (MRes) course. Through critically exploring the experience of clinical physiotherapists attempting to adopt RTSS documentation practices through a framework analysis method, valuable insight will be provided on what and how determinants modulate RTSS documentation adoption, and inform implementation interventions that seek to utilise the RTSS in physiotherapy, and rehabilitation practice.
- The aim of this study is to explore attitudes and perceptions regarding the implementation of the RTSS into documentation practises of physiotherapists working in a hospital setting
- The primary objectives of this study are:
- To explore perceived facilitators to adoption of the RTSS into physiotherapists documentation practice
- To explore perceived barriers to adoption of the RTSS into physiotherapists documentation practices
- To understand how facilitators and barriers exert their influence on physiotherapists behaviours of adopting the RTSS into their documentation practices
- To identify implementation interventions that may support the behaviour of adopting the RTSS into documentation practices
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation physiotherapy RTSS users | – | Other: Qualitative semi structured interviewPhysiotherapists will be recruited exclusively from the rehabilitation department of physiotherapy at Guy's and St Thomas' hospital,. Purposive, maximum variation sampling will be used to sample physiotherapists who have attempted adoption of RTSS into clinical notes. Applying Malterud et al's concept of information power suggests an estimated sample of 12-16 participants will be required, calculated from the study's narrow aim, the specificity of the sample with respect to the aim, the application of theory and encouragement of strong dialogue via an interviewer experienced in the subject. Purposive maximum variation sampling will ensure heterogeneity of clinical experience (Agenda for Change (AFC) bandings 3-8) to support diversity of perspectives and experiences for data analysis. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Physiotherapists will be recruited exclusively from the rehabilitation department of physiotherapy at Guy's and St Thomas' hospital, these are physiotherapists who have attempted to use the RTSS in clinical documentation.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Physiotherapy staff who have attempted adoption of the RTSS documentation integration
- Are actively working in the physiotherapy department setting with in substantive positions
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Are unable to consent to the study
- Are student physiotherapists or temporary staff
- Are actively working with the PI
- Are unable to conduct the interview in English
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Qualitative semi structured interview60 minute, virtually performed via Microsoft Teams, semi-structured interview | Other | Rehabilitation physiotherapy RTSS users |
Primary outcome
Semi Structured qualitative Interview
Time frame: From early July 2025 to end of July 2025
Semi structured qualitative interviews performed via MS Teams lasting up to 1 hour in duration
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2025.
- Background: PubMed 30267669Hart T, Dijkers MP, Whyte J, Turkstra LS, Zanca JM, Packel A, Van Stan JH, Ferraro M, Chen C. A Theory-Driven System for the Specification of Rehabilitation Treatments. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09.109. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Rehabilitation
Recruiting
Outpatient Physiotherapy vs. mHealth Exercise and Self-Management for Knee Osteoarthritis (MOKneeTOR)
Knee Osteoarthristis
Not yet recruiting
Evidence-based, Customized, Motion-recognition Rehabilitation System Development for Bed-ridden Patients - Validation of Effectiveness: Rehabit: Swim
ICU-acquired Weakness
RecruitingPhase 1
Rehabilitation Through Virtual Immersion & Integrated Exposure for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (ReVIVE for mTBI)
Traumatic Brain Injuries, TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
Recruiting
Cycling Within an Interactive and Immersive Virtual Environment During Critical Illness: a Patient-centred Approach for Lower Limb Rehabilitation
Critical Illness
RecruitingObservational study
Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in a Rehabilitation Setting
Aphasia, Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rehabilitation and Clinical Reasoning, run by King's College London.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Emma L Godfrey, Dr (+442071880174, emma.l.godfrey@kcl.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Semi Structured qualitative Interview (time frame: From early July 2025 to end of July 2025). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07038694, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2025.