AzTrials
AzTrials

Depressive SymptomsVIP-RACENCT07055906

Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Racial-Ethnic Socialization Competency (VIP-RACE)

A study testing Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Racial-Ethnic Socialization CompEtency (VIP-RACE) in people with Depressive Symptoms and Anxiety Symptoms, run by Penn State University at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate a novel cultural strengths parenting program - the Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Racial-Ethnic Socialization CompEtency (VIP-RACE) - which seeks to support Latine parents' motivation to engage in racial-ethnic socialization (RES) and strengthen their RES competency… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 14 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Racial-Ethnic Socialization CompEtency (VIP-RACE)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
110 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
12 May 2025to 31 Mar 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 14 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Adolescent is 10-to-14 years old (inclusive)
  • Adolescent and parent are Latino/a/x/e or Hispanic
  • Parent and youth have the capacity to provide consent/assent
  • One parent is willing to participate
  • Families must be willing to be video or audio recorded for the parent-child interaction task
  • Youth and parent(s) must be willing to participate as dyads.
  • Primary language of parent and adolescent is English and/or Spanish

Who cannot join

  • Parent or adolescent has an intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, or other disorder that may limit ability to complete study (surveys and interviews require sustained attention, mental processing, and comprehension).
  • Adolescent is not 10-to-14 years old
  • Adolescent and/or parent are not Latino/a/x/e or Hispanic
  • Primary language of parent and/or adolescent is not English and/or Spanish
  • Youth and parent(s) are not willing to participate as dyads
  • Family participated in Phase 1 of the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Principal Investigator contact

626-205-5563

cag6443@psu.edu

Project Coordinator contact

240-374-8559

bvg5454@psu.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Parents and Children Together (PACT) Lab Space

    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17102

    Principal Investigator, 626-205-5563, cag6443@psu.edu

    Project Coordinator, 626-205-5563, bvg5454@psu.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Developing and Testing a Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Racial-Ethnic Socialization Competency in Latino/a/x Families

The aim of this study is to evaluate a novel cultural strengths parenting program - the Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Racial-Ethnic Socialization CompEtency (VIP-RACE) - which seeks to support Latine parents' motivation to engage in racial-ethnic socialization (RES) and strengthen their RES competency (improved skills and confidence, decreased stress). In the preliminary phases of this project, we iteratively refined the VIP-RACE program in partnership with advisory boards of youth, parents, and providers. The refined intervention will now be tested with five parents of 10-14-year-old Latine youth to identify gaps in the curriculum and obstacles to implementation that can be addressed prior to a larger pilot. The investigators will then conduct a proof-of-concept single-arm trial with Latine families to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of VIP-RACE. The investigators hypothesize that VIP-RACE will be shown to be feasible and acceptable to families. The investigators also predict that bolstering parents' RES motivation and competency will result in increased frequency and quality of these conversations between parents and youth which, in turn, are expected to strengthen youth racial-ethnic identity and coping and have cascading effects on mental and behavioral health.

Being tested
Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Racial-Ethnic Socialization CompEtency (VIP-RACE)
Keywords
parenting program, Latino/a/x/é, racial-ethnic socialization
Medical subject headings
Depression, Anxiety Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Racial-Ethnic Socialization CompEtency (VIP-RACE)Behavioural

    Also called Resiliencia y Apoyo hacia la Identidad Cultural, Educación y Superación juvenil (RAÍCES)

    VIP-RACE is a brief, strengths-based, video-feedback intervention that targets parental racial-ethnic socialization (RES) motivation and competency in parents of 10-to-14-year-old Latino/a/x/e youth. Intervention sessions include: (1) Youth and parent assessment including videotaped parent-adolescent RES conversations; (2) Parent interview; and (3) Video feedback session during which parents and RES coaches review clips from the RES interaction tasks. Video feedback highlights parents' RES strengths and when sensitively applied, encourages parents to examine missed opportunities for engaging in RES. RES coaches emphasize that through the provision of cultural socialization and preparation for bias messages, parents can help protect their children from the damaging effects of discrimination and support positive racial-ethnic identity development. Parents develop a personalized action plan with goals and have the opportunity to receive up to 3-5 follow-up sessions to strengthen RES skill

Study groups in NCT07055906
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Racial-Ethnic Socialization CompEtency (VIP-RACE)ExperimentalAll parent-child dyads will be assigned to the VIP-RACE parenting program.
Receives: Behavioral: Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Racial-Ethnic Socialization CompEtency (VIP-RACE)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility (Quantitative)

    An adapted version of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure will obtain parents' feedback on the perceived feasibility of VIP-RACE. The Feasibility of Intervention Measure consists of five items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., "This program is easy to use") and demonstrates acceptable reliability. The measure will also include space for participants to provide open-ended feedback. The minimum value for this measure is 1 and the maximum value for this measure is 5, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention

  2. Acceptability (Quantitative)

    An adapted version of the Acceptability of Intervention Measure will obtain parents' feedback on the perceived acceptability of VIP-RACE. The Acceptability of Intervention Measure consists of five items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., "I like this program") and demonstrates acceptable reliability. The measure will also include space for participants to provide open-ended feedback on which aspects of VIP-RACE were the most and least useful. The minimum value for this measure is 1 and the maximum value for this measure is 5, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention

  3. Feasibility and Acceptability (Qualitative)

    A subgroup of parent participants (n=10-15) will complete semi-structured qualitative exit interviews to provide more in-depth feedback on their experience participating in the intervention. The interview will probe parents' views of the program, including what they found most and least useful, how the program helped them navigate RES conversations, barriers to participation, and suggestions for improving implementation in the future. The investigators will also include questions to explore variation in parents' RES practices, perceptions of program, and intervention impact based on youth and parent sex, and will also conduct semi-structured interviews with RES coaches to further assess feasibility and acceptability and guide refinements for a larger efficacy trial. The investigators will collect critical information that can be used in future trials, including barriers and facilitators to implementing the intervention and modifications that can be made to the program.

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention

  4. Feasibility (Attendance tracking)

    Participant attendance of VIP-RACE sessions will be tracked. VIP-RACE will be judged feasible if at least 75% of participants complete all three sessions of the program.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 9 weeks

  5. Change in Parental Racial-Ethnic Socialization (RES) Motivation

    An adapted version of the Motivation to Change Scale will assess parent-reported parental motivation to engage in RES with their children (e.g., "How important is it for you to talk to your child about discrimination they may experience"). The minimum value for this measure is 1 and the maximum value for this measure is 6, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 1-month follow-up

  6. Change in Parental RES Competency

    The Racial Socialization Competency Scale will assess parent-reported parental RES competency. The measure comprises 28 items (e.g., "teach my child to resolve a negative racial encounter with their peers."), and for each item, parents are asked to rate their confidence ("I believe I can"), skills ("I am/would be prepared to"), and stress ("I am/would be stressed to"). Parents respond using a 5-point Likert scale, with the lowest endorsement corresponding to the least confident, prepared, and stressed. Subscales include RES confidence, RES skill, and RES stress. The measure has been validated with diverse racial-ethnic groups, including with Latino/a/x caregivers (validation paper under review). The minimum value for this measure is 1 and the maximum value for this measure is 5, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 1-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change in Parental RES Frequency

    The Ethnic-Racial Socialization Scale (minimum value 1, maximum value 5) and the Familial Ethnic Socialization Measure (minimum value 1, maximum value 5) will assess the frequency of parent- and youth-reported parental RES, specifically cultural socialization and preparation for bias messages. These measures have been adapted, validated, and utilized with diverse racial-ethnic groups since 1997 and 2001, respectively. Higher scores on both of these measures indicate better outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, 1-month follow-up

  2. Change in Parental RES Quality

    The Observational Paradigm for Ethnic-Racial Socialization will be used to assess the quality of parents' cultural socialization and preparation for bias messaging. Specifically, parents and youth will be videotaped engaging in conversations about topics such as discrimination. Interactions will be coded using the Observational Measure for Ethnic-Racial Socialization, the companion coding system to the Observational Paradigm for Ethnic-Racial Socialization observational paradigm. The Observational Measure for Ethnic-Racial Socialization uses macro rating, a method that requires observers to synthesize interactions and apply a global impression on a 9-point scale (minimum value 1, maximum value 9). It includes codes for cultural socialization and preparation for bias (discrimination awareness and racial-ethnic coping strategies). Higher scores on this measure indicate better outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, 1-month follow-up

  3. Change in Positive and Harsh Parenting during RES Conversations

    The investigators will assess global aspects of parenting (e.g., positive, harsh parenting) as observed during videotaped dyadic discussions of topics such as discrimination.

    Measured: Baseline, 1-month follow-up

  4. Change in Youth Racial-Ethnic Coping

    The Discrimination Coping Strategies Scale will assess parent- and youth-reported youth strategies for coping with racial-ethnic discrimination. The 6-item scale (minimum value = 1, maximum value = 5) includes two subscales, proactive coping and secondary coping, and has been validated for use with Latino/a/x youth. Higher scores on this measure indicate better outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, 1-month follow-up

  5. Change in Youth Racial-Ethnic Identity

    The Ethnic Identity Scale will assess youth-reported youth racial-ethnic identity. The 17-item scale (minimum value = 1, maximum value = 4) includes three subscales, exploration, resolution, and affirmation, and has been validated for use with Latino/a/x youth. Higher scores on the exploration and resolution subscales indicate better outcomes, while lower scores on the affirmation susbscale indicates better outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, 1-month follow-up

  6. Change in Youth Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms

    The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale will assess parent- and youth- reported youth depressive and anxiety symptoms. The measure has been validated for use with children between 8 and 18 years of age. This measure has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 2, with lower scores indicating better outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, 1-month follow-up

  7. Change in Youth Conduct Problems

    The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire will assess parent- and youth- reported conduct problems. The Conduct Problems Scale will be used which includes items about rule-breaking and aggressive behaviors. The maximum value for this measure is 2 and the minimum value is 0, with lower scores indicating better outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, 1-month follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2025
  2. Study start12 May 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
110 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07055906
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00025027
Other IDs
R21MD018693
Acronym
VIP-RACE
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
11 Jun 2025
Last updated
9 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual and aggregate survey data (including raw and recoded data) will be shared. The de-identification process will remove direct and indirect respondent identifiers. Once data are confirmed final, respondent identifiers will be deleted. Transcripts from interviews will be de-identified and sensitive content redacted where identification is plausible. These de-identified and redacted transcripts and coding summaries will be shared. Attendace data will also be shared. Following generation and quality check of raw transcripts from interviews, digital voice recordings will be permanently deleted to protect participant privacy. Respondent identifiers will not be shared. Raw transcripts and parent-child interaction task videos will be maintained but not shared. Transcripts from interviews and tasks will be de-identified and sensitive content redacted where identification is plausible. These de-identified and redacted transcripts and coding summaries will be shared.

Publications

  • Kalofonos I, McCoy M, Altman L, Gelberg L, Hamilton AB, Gabrielian S. A Sanctioned Encampment as a Strategy for Increasing Homeless Veterans' Access to Housing and Healthcare During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jul;38(Suppl 3):857-864. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08124-4. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

    PubMed 37340271
  • Vindrola-Padros C, Johnson GA. Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature. Qual Health Res. 2020 Aug;30(10):1596-1604. doi: 10.1177/1049732320921835.

    PubMed 32667277
  • Umaña-Taylor AJ, Yazedjian A, Bámaca-Gómez MY. Developing the Ethnic Identity Scale using Eriksonian and social identity perspectives. Identity Int J Theory Res. 2004;4:9-38.

  • Berkel C, Knight GP, Zeiders KH, Tein JY, Roosa MW, Gonzales NA, Saenz D. Discrimination and adjustment for Mexican American adolescents: A prospective examination of the benefits of culturally-related values. J Res Adolesc. 2010 Nov 15;20(4):893-915. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00668.x.

    PubMed 21359093
  • Kulish AL, Cavanaugh AM, Stein GL, Kiang L, Gonzalez LM, Supple A, Mejia Y. Ethnic-racial socialization in Latino families: The influence of mothers' socialization practices on adolescent private regard, familism, and perceived ethnic-racial discrimination. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2019 Apr;25(2):199-209. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000222. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

    PubMed 30284851
  • Yasui M, Dishion TJ. Direct observation of family management: validity and reliability as a function of coder ethnicity and training. Behav Ther. 2008 Dec;39(4):336-47. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2007.10.001. Epub 2008 Apr 20.

    PubMed 19027430
  • Achenbach TM. Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 Profile. Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont;1991

  • Achenbach TM, Edelbrock C. Child behavior checklist. Burlington. 1991;7:371-392.

  • Irwin DE, Gross HE, Stucky BD, Thissen D, DeWitt EM, Lai JS, Amtmann D, Khastou L, Varni JW, DeWalt DA. Development of six PROMIS pediatrics proxy-report item banks. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Feb 22;10:22. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-22.

    PubMed 22357192
  • Irwin DE, Stucky B, Langer MM, Thissen D, Dewitt EM, Lai JS, Varni JW, Yeatts K, DeWalt DA. An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales. Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):595-607. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9619-3. Epub 2010 Mar 7.

    PubMed 20213516
  • McDermott ER, Umaña-Taylor AJ, Martinez-Fuentes S. Measuring Latino adolescents' coping with ethnic-racial discrimination. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2019;37(6):730-742.

  • Hughes D, Chen L. When and what parents tell children about race: An examination of race-related socialization among African American families. Appl Dev Sci. 1997;1(4):200-214. doi:10.1207/S1532480XADS0104_4

  • Christophe NK, Stein GL, Kiang L. A 21st Century take on patterns of racial-ethnic socialization: Competency and content among minoritized parents. Soc Sci. 2022;11(2).

  • Jones SCT, Christophe NK, Stevenson HC, Stein GL, Kiang L, Chan M, Anderson RE. We got this: Evaluating racial socialization competency among diverse ethnic-racial groups. J Fam Psychol. 2024 Jun;38(4):571-581. doi: 10.1037/fam0001210. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

    PubMed 38573697
  • Anderson RE, Jones SCT, Stevenson HC. The initial development and validation of the Racial Socialization Competency Scale: Quality and quantity. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2020 Oct;26(4):426-436. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000316. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

    PubMed 31886685

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Racial-Ethnic Socialization CompEtency (VIP-RACE) in people with Depressive Symptoms and Anxiety Symptoms, run by Penn State University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Principal Investigator (626-205-5563, cag6443@psu.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility (Quantitative) (time frame: Immediately after the intervention). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07055906, which also lists 74 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in