AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck CancerNCT07057284

DENTOFACIAL-PBT Stage 2 - Feasibility Study

An observational study of Head and Neck Cancer and Radiotherapy Side Effect, run by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

What is the health problem? Proton beam therapy (PBT), a type of radiotherapy treatment, can be especially beneficial to children and teenagers with cancer. PBT works by damaging cancer cells, but it can also damage healthy parts of the body nearby. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 32 years
What is being tested?
Orthopantomogram (or a set of Lateral Oblique Radiographs)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
255 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
16 Jan 2026to 31 Jan 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 32 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: Childhood head and neck cancer survivors who were treated with proton beam therapy either in the National Health Service Proton Overseas Programme or at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust.

Who may be able to join

  • (i) CCS previously diagnosed with HNC. This includes the oral cavity (lips, front two-thirds of the tongue, the gums, the lining inside the cheeks and lips, the floor of the mouth, under the tongue and the hard palate), the throat (nasopharynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx), the voice box (larynx), the paranasal sinuses, nasal cavity and the salivary glands.
  • (ii) Any sex.
  • (iii) Currently a minimum age of 2 years old for a clinical assessment without a radiograph to be conducted. The minimum age of a participant that a radiograph will be attempted at is 3 years old.
  • (iv) Referred for PBT treatment by the Oncology team at The Royal Manchester Children's Hospital.
  • (v)Treated with PBT at The Christie PBT centre (Manchester, UK) or treated overseas with PBT as part of the NHS Proton Overseas Programme.
  • (vi) Completed treatment with PBT when aged 15 years and under.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • (vii) Completed treatment with PBT more than 12 months ago.
  • (viii) Attending annual review clinics at either The Royal Manchester Children's Hospital ("follow-up clinic") or at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust ("late effects clinic") with the Oncology team.
  • (ix) Able and willing to provide informed consent or informed consent provided by a parent or person with parental responsibility in law for a child currently aged less than 16 years old who meets the inclusion criteria outlined in (i) to (viii).
  • (x) Language - English, Arabic, Chinese, Dutch, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish and Turkish.
  • EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR THE SURVEY AND FEASIBILITY STUDY (steps A-D)
  • (i) Deceased patients
  • (ii) Aged greater than or equal to 16 years old at the time of diagnosis
  • (iii) Currently aged less than 2 years old
  • (iv) Completed PBT less than 12 months ago. (Although the minimal follow-up time for dentofacial toxicities to develop is unknown, it is felt that setting this restriction will enable eligible participants to have processed their treatment and had multiple reviews within this first year. This criterion of follow-up was discussed with the developed patient advisory group and this timeframe was felt to be the most appropriate).
  • (v) Individuals treated with PBT overseas but not referred from a UK centre (not in the Proton Overseas Programme). For example, individuals whose care was privately funded or funded by an insurance company. The PCO Database maintained by the PCOU will not hold outcome data for privately funded patients.
  • (vi) A parent or person with parental responsibility in law for a CCS now aged greater than 16 years old.
  • (vii) Exclusion of any participant who does not speak a language specified in the inclusion criteria.

Who cannot join

  • (i) Deceased patients
  • (ii) Aged greater than or equal to 16 years old at the time of diagnosis
  • (iii) Currently aged less than 2 years old
  • (iv) Completed PBT less than 12 months ago.
  • (v) Individuals treated with PBT overseas but not referred from a UK centre (not in the Proton Overseas Programme). For example, individuals whose care was privately funded or funded by an insurance company.
  • (vi) No radiation delivered to the maxilla, mandible and/or teeth.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • (vii) A parent or person with parental responsibility in law for a CCS now aged greater than 16 years old.
  • (viii) Living outside of the Greater Manchester region and not attending routine annual clinics with the Oncology team at The Royal Manchester Children's Hospital or at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust.
  • (ix) Exclusion of any participant who does not speak a language specified in the inclusion criteria.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

    Manchester, M13 9WL

  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

    Manchester, M20 4BX

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: DENtofacial TOxicity: Facilitating Advancement in Paediatric Cancer toxIcity Reporting And Liaison in Proton Beam Therapy. Stage 2 - Feasibility of Retrospective Toxicity Outcome Collection [DENTOFACIAL-PBT(2)]

What is the health problem? Proton beam therapy (PBT), a type of radiotherapy treatment, can be especially beneficial to children and teenagers with cancer. PBT works by damaging cancer cells, but it can also damage healthy parts of the body nearby. This can include the teeth and jaws if the cancer is in the head and neck region. Unfortunately, the investigators do not yet fully understand the potential side effects of PBT on the teeth or jaws.

What is the aim? The DENTOFACIAL-PBT research project aims to learn about the side effects to the teeth and jaws in children treated with PBT. This stage of the research aims to determine how frequently issues ('toxicities') in the development of the teeth and growth of the jaws have occurred in previously treated patients. DENTOFACIAL-PBT is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Read more

How is the researched being approached? The investigators will ask head and neck childhood cancer survivors treated with PBT overseas or in Manchester to support this research. Surveys will be sent initially, asking questions about their teeth and jaws after treatment. If interested, these survivors can be involved in the next part of this stage, which is a mixed-methods feasibility study. This will involve online interviews and dental assessments with some and the collection of dental information from a participant's dentist. Radiation dose to the teeth and the jaw bones will then be linked to any side effects seen.

What will be the outcome? The information gained in this study will allow the research team to look at how age, location and amount of dose given affects the toxicities seen. Information learnt will help develop the final stage of the DENTOFACIAL-PBT study. In this, a new toxicity reporting tool will be developed which aims to improve the communication between dentists, doctors, and cancer patients.

Read the detailed description

The overall aim is to ascertain if it is feasible to determine the prevalence of adverse effects to the teeth and jaws in the United Kingdom National Health Service cohort of childhood head and neck cancer survivors treated with proton beam therapy using a mixed methods study. This will involve data being collected both retrospectively and prospectively. This study is being hosted by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust with the support of the Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS:

[RQ-1]: How often have adverse effects to the teeth and jaws occurred in UK childhood head and neck cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and overseas in the NHS Proton Overseas Programme? [RQ-2] Is it practical to collect data on side effects to the teeth and jaws in this group of patients? [RQ-3] Is it possible to reliably contour the maxilla, mandible and the teeth on treatment planning computed tomography images to extract the radiation dose to these structures? [RQ-4] How should dental outcomes in childhood head and neck cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy be monitored? [RQ-5] Is it possible to link side effects reported by patients to their treatment dose? [RQ-6] Do side effects reported by patients align with those reported by their dentist? [RQ-7] What is the effect of age at the time of treatment on dentofacial development? [RQ-8] What is the effect of radiation dose on dentofacial development? [RQ-9] Is the QoL in childhood head and neck cancer survivors different in those with and without reported / identified dentofacial toxicities?

STUDY DESIGN:

A mixed methods, cross-sectional, self-administered survey has been developed. This is to be completed once by an eligible study participant. The survey contains pre- and post-treatment questions focused on the teeth and jaws, as well as including select scales from the FACE-Q™ Craniofacial module to collect HRQoL data. Participants aged 16 years or older will be directed to complete the survey individually. For participants aged less than 16 years old at the time of survey distribution, an individual with parental responsibility will be directed to complete the survey alongside their child. At the end of the survey, participants will be asked if they would be interested in being involved in a feasibility study regardless of whether they have reported a dentofacial toxicity. If a survey respondent enrols in the feasibility study, their completed survey will be linked to the data collected in the feasibility study. If a survey respondent does not enrol in the feasibility study, no patient-identifiable data will be collected, therefore their survey answers will be anonymous.

This feasibility study will aim to retrospectively analyse paediatric HNC patients treated with PBT to determine the prevalence of dentofacial toxicities, the feasibility of correlating PROs to PBT dosimetric data to establish dose-effect relationships, and to determine if it is possible to compare PROs to those reported by dental professionals. Information on the development of a participant's teeth and jaws will be requested from their dentist (if applicable). Further insight into the beliefs and concerns of patients will be elicited through virtual semi-structured qualitative interviews, which will adopt a 'palette of methods' approach. Additionally, individuals residing in the Greater Manchester area who attend an annual review with an Oncologist will be offered the opportunity to have a dental assessment at their next scheduled visit (n = approximately 25 patients). This will not only provide an additional opportunity for study recruitment should an individual not already be enrolled, but it will allow additional data collection on dental outcomes in this cohort. There will be no randomisation, blinding or masking of recruited participants.

Once a participant has consented and is enrolled into the study, the research team will conduct the following steps:

(A) Notify the Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit of a participant's enrolment and request patient identifiable treatment planning data from the clinical system at The Christie. For example, this data will include, sex, age at treatment, diagnosis, subsite, treatment location, chemotherapy history, surgery history and follow-up time. This will include any data collected on select AEs/toxicities, specifically 'musculoskeletal deformity', 'dental development disorders', 'dental caries' and 'periodontal disease' as graded in the 'Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects' (CTCAE) version 5.0 (2017).

(B) Details of the participant's dentist (if registered) will be requested directly from the participant at the start of the study. Once these details are available, a letter will be sent to a participant's dentist outlining the following about the study: its aims, source of funding, ethical approval status, information requests, timeframes, and plans for dissemination of findings. Only information on the development of the teeth and jaws will be requested. This will include requesting relevant radiographs (X-Rays) that show the patient's teeth before (if available) and after treatment.

(C) Assessment of dental radiographs and dental clinical photographs (if available) from the clinical system at The Christie or MFT.

(D) Qualitative Interviews on MS Teams: Further insight into CCS thoughts and experiences will be elicited through virtual semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of participants to enhance and enrich the quantitative data.To enable participants with a variety of different skill sets and confidence levels to participate, the researcher will offer a list of methods for the individual to opt into. It is recognised that children are key stakeholders in this study and that their perspectives on dentofacial toxicities need to be considered. Allowing alternative approaches to participation to a traditional one-to-one interview may empower participants, thus making the research more inclusive.

Participation in the interviews could occur in five ways:

  1. Individual participation of a CCS now aged 16 years or older,
  2. A CCS now aged 16 years or older alongside a friend or family member for moral support.
  3. Individual participation of a person with parental responsibility for an eligible participant aged less than16 years,
  4. Participation of a person with parental responsibility alongside an eligible participant aged less than 16 years.
  5. Participation of a person with parental responsibility alongside a friend or family member for moral support (without CCS) [healthy volunteer/s]. (E) Dental assessment and collection of PROMs data on established Oncology clinics: 10% (n = approximately 25) of the eligible study cohort attend a follow-up clinic in Manchester to review any late treatment adverse effects once a year. These established clinics are held at The Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (RMCH) [for individuals <16 years old, known to patients as a "follow-up clinic"] and at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust [for individuals >16 years old, known to patients as a "late effects clinic"]. Prior to contacting eligible participants, the radiation plan will be checked to confirm that radiation dose to the maxilla, mandible and/or teeth was received. If radiation was not delivered to these structures, a participant will not be contacted. Eligible participants attending these clinics will be contacted with a separate PIS, outlining the opportunity to see a dentist at their next scheduled clinical visit and to have a dental assessment, which will include an orthopantomogram (OPT).
Being tested
Orthopantomogram (or a set of Lateral Oblique Radiographs)
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms, Radiation Injuries, Neoplasms, Congenital Abnormalities, Developmental Disabilities

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Orthopantomogram (or a set of Lateral Oblique Radiographs)Radiation

    A dental assessment will be conducted on eligible participants who still attend annual review appointments in the Oncology Departments at the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital or at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (approximately 10% of eligible study population). The dental assessment will include the following: a tooth chart, a basic periodontal examination (BPE), a brief orthodontic assessment (incisor, molar and skeletal classification including any asymmetry), caries assessment and an assessment of any dental development disturbances. Clinical photographs of the teeth and face will be taken with a patient's consent. If clinically justified, an OPT will be taken. If cooperation for an OPT proves challenging, lateral obliques as an alternative radiographic image modality will be considered.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recruitment rate and number of participants with complete datasets.

    Usability and completeness of the study data. A 'complete dataset' for a participant refers to the following: completed survey, cancer diagnosis, treatment and follow-up information, pre- and post- radiotherapy dental radiographs, dental information from a participants dentist and extracted dentofacial dosimetric statistics.

    Measured: From enrolment until study completion, an average of 1 year.

  2. Presence of dentofacial toxicities

    Prevalence of dentofacial toxicities in the UK cohort of paediatric HNC patients treated with PBT.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Patient perspectives on dentofacial development and toxicities.

    Generation of themes during the analysis of qualitative interviews.

    Measured: From enrolment to the completion of the last study interview, an average of 1 year.

  2. Dental health seeking behaviour and practices.

    Generation of themes via qualitative interviews.

    Measured: From enrolment to the completion of the last study interview, an average of 1 year.

  3. Patient-reported dentofacial toxicity outcomes.

    Dose-effect relationship determination from PROs and PBT dosimetric data. Correlation of clinician-reported outcomes to patient-reported outcomes.

    Measured: From enrolment to study completion, an average of 1 year.

  4. Clinician-reported dentofacial toxicity outcomes

    Dose-effect relationship determination from PROs and PBT dosimetric data. Correlation of clinician-reported outcomes to patient-reported outcomes.

    Measured: From enrolment to study completion, an average of 1 year.

  5. Extracted radiation dose statistics.

    and PBT dosimetric data. Correlation of clinician-reported outcomes to patient-reported outcomes.

    Measured: Following collection of all data (30/09/2026)

  6. Dentofacial development and age

    The effect of chronological age at treatment on dentofacial development.

    Measured: Following collection of all data (30/09/2026).

  7. Dentofacial development and radiation dose.

    The effect of mean radiation dose on dentofacial development.

    Measured: Following completion of all data (30/09/2026).

  8. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessed using scales from the FACE-Q™ Craniofacial module.

    HRQoL outcomes reported via the FACE-Q Craniofacial Module (unabbreviated title). Ten scales from this module will be used, specifically, 'face', 'jaws', 'smile', 'teeth', 'cheeks', 'nose', 'facial', 'appear distress', 'social' and 'psychological'. There is no overall or total FACE-Q score. The FACE-Q is composed of independently functioning scales, checklists, and stand-alone items. To score a scale, raw scores for the set of items in a scale are added together to produce a total raw score. A conversion table will then be used to convert the total raw score into a score that ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores reflect a better outcome.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2025
  2. Study start16 Jan 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
255 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07057284
Sponsor's protocol ID
B02096
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
16 May 2025
Last updated
26 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Head and Neck Cancer and Radiotherapy Side Effect, run by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recruitment rate and number of participants with complete datasets. (time frame: From enrolment until study completion, an average of 1 year.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in