AzTrials
AzTrials

Gingival Recession, LocalizedNCT07064304

Er,Cr:YSGG Laser for Deepithelialization in Gingival Recession.

A study testing Laser Deepithelialization of Free Gingival Graft and Scalpel Deepithelialization of Free Gingival Graft in people with Gingival Recession, Localized and Keratinized Tissue, run by Wroclaw Medical University at 1 site in Poland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Abstract: Introduction: The deepithelialized free gingival graft (DGG) technique provides high-quality connective tissue grafts (CTGs) with predictable outcomes for recession cov-erage. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
What is being tested?
Laser Deepithelialization of Free Gingival Graft and Scalpel Deepithelialization of Free Gingival Graft
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
9 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
1 Feb 2021to 31 Aug 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18 and 70 years
  • Presence of multiple Miller Class I or II gingival recessions
  • Good general and oral health
  • Patient consent to participate in the clinical trial
  • Availability for follow-up at 3 and 6 months

Who cannot join

  • Smoking or history of smoking in the last 6 months
  • Systemic diseases affecting wound healing (e.g., diabetes, immunodeficiencies)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Use of medications that influence periodontal tissues (e.g., immunosuppressants, corticosteroids)
  • History of periodontal surgery in the area of interest within the past 12 months Inadequate oral hygiene (plaque index >20%)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • Dentoplex

    Bielsko-Biala, 43-300

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Clinical Efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser for Deepithelialization of Free Gingival Grafts in Gingival Recession Treatment: A Randomized, Split-Mouth Clinical Trial

Abstract: Introduction: The deepithelialized free gingival graft (DGG) technique provides high-quality connective tissue grafts (CTGs) with predictable outcomes for recession cov-erage. This study evaluates a novel method of free gingival graft (FGG) deepithelialization using an Er,Cr:YSGG laser (LDEE) for treating multiple gingival recessions. Methods: A split-mouth study was conducted on 46 (n=46) recessions in 9 patients (23 per test and control group). Sites were randomized. Full-thickness palatal grafts were harvested with a scalpel. In the test group (LDEE), deepithelialization was performed extraorally using an Er,Cr:YSGG laser (2780 nm; 2.5 W, 83.3 mJ, 30 Hz, 600 µm tip). In the control group (DEE), a 15c scalpel was used. All CTGs were applied using the modified coronally advanced tunnel (TUN) technique. Clinical parameters-recession depth (RD), keratinized tissue width (KT), gingival thickness (GT), pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), pink esthetic score (PES), approximal plaque index (API), mean root coverage (MRC), and complete root coverage (CRC)-were assessed at baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), and 6 months (T2). Results: Both LDEE and DEE groups showed significant improvements in RD, KT, GT, PD, and CAL over time (p < 0.001). At T1 and T2, KT was significantly higher in the LDEE group (T1: 3.73±0.72 mm; T2: 3.98±0.76 mm) compared to the DEE group (T1: 3.21±0.61 mm; T2: 3.44±0.74 mm; p < 0.05). Other parameters (RD, GT, PD, CAL) showed no statistically significant intergroup differences at any time point (p > 0.05). After 6 months, MRC was 95% and CRC 82.6% for LDEE, compared to 94.8% and 82.6% for DEE (p > 0.05). PES scores were similar between groups at all time points (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Both laser- and scalpel-deepithelialized grafts effectively treated gingival recessions. LDEE combined with TUN resulted in significantly greater KT width compared to DEE + TUN.

Being tested
Laser Deepithelialization of Free Gingival Graft, Scalpel Deepithelialization of Free Gingival Graft
Medical subject headings
Gingival Recession

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laser Deepithelialization of Free Gingival GraftProcedure or surgery

    Extraoral deepithelialization of harvested free gingival graft using Er,Cr:YSGG laser (2780 nm, 2.5 W, 83.3 mJ, 30 Hz, 600 μm tip) before placement in gingival recession treatment.

  • Scalpel Deepithelialization of Free Gingival GraftProcedure or surgery

    Extraoral deepithelialization of harvested free gingival graft using a 15c surgical scalpel blade before placement in gingival recession treatment.

Study groups in NCT07064304
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Laser Deepithelialization (LDEE)ExperimentalIn this arm, deepithelialization of the free gingival graft was performed extraorally using an Er,Cr:YSGG laser (2780 nm; 2.5 W; 83.3 mJ; 30 Hz; 600 μm tip) before graft placement at the recipient site.
Receives: Procedure: Laser Deepithelialization of Free Gingival Graft
Scalpel Deepithelialization (DEE)Active comparatorIn this arm, the epithelium was removed manually using a 15c surgical scalpel from the harvested palatal free gingival graft before placement.
Receives: Procedure: Scalpel Deepithelialization of Free Gingival Graft

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Recession Depth

    Measurement of gingival recession depth in millimeters to evaluate soft tissue response to treatment.

    Unit of Measure: mm

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively

  2. Change in Keratinized Tissue Width

    Measurement of the width of keratinized gingiva in millimeters from the mucogingival junction to the free gingival margin.

    Unit of Measure: mm

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively

  3. Change in Gingival Thickness

    Assessment of gingival tissue thickness using a standardized probe. Unit of Measure: mm

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively

  4. Change in Pocket Depth

    Probing depth measured from the gingival margin to the base of the periodontal pocket.

    Unit of Measure: mm

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively

  5. Change in Clinical Attachment Level

    Measurement of the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the base of the periodontal pocket.

    Unit of Measure: mm

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively

  6. Change in Pink Esthetic Score

    Percentage of interdental spaces with visible plaque, calculated to assess oral hygiene status. A lower percentage indicates better plaque control.

    Unit of Measure: percentage (%)

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively

  7. Mean Root Coverage

    Average percentage of root surface covered by soft tissue following treatment, calculated across all treated sites.

    Unit of Measure: percentage (%)

    Measured: 6 months postoperatively

  8. Complete Root Coverage

    Proportion of treated sites that achieved 100% root coverage postoperatively. Unit of Measure: percentage (%)

    Measured: 6 months postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Histopathological Evaluation of Laser-Treated Connective Tissue Grafts

    Microscopic assessment of grafts treated with Er,Cr:YSGG laser to evaluate the quality of deepithelialization and potential thermal damage. Parameters included the presence of a clear boundary between epithelium and connective tissue, absence of carbonization or necrosis, and preservation of tissue architecture.

    Measured: Immediately postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jul 2025
  2. Study start1 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2022
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
9 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07064304
Sponsor's protocol ID
WroclawMU6
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
30 Jun 2025
Last updated
14 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Although this was a prospective clinical study, we do not plan to share individual participant data (IPD) due to lack of consent for data sharing obtained at the time of enrollment.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laser Deepithelialization of Free Gingival Graft and Scalpel Deepithelialization of Free Gingival Graft in people with Gingival Recession, Localized and Keratinized Tissue, run by Wroclaw Medical University at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Recession Depth (time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in