DanceNCT07081191
Dose-response Effect of Community Dance Programme
A study testing Dance in people with Dance and Older Adults, run by National University of Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.
Trial summary
The goal of this interventional study is to examine the dose-response effect of Community Dance Programme (CDP) on the physical, cognitive and psychological health of pre-frail and mildly frail community-dwelling older adults. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dance, Older Adults, Frailty at Older Adults
- What is being tested?
- Dance
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 284 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSingapore
- Study dates
- 7 May 2025to Aug 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 85 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 60 to 85.
- Able to understand and communicate in either English or Mandarin.
- Able to give consent to participate.
- Able to commit for three months and able to achieve at least an attendance rate of 75% for the dance program.
- Lives within the community setting.
- Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) score>= 8
Show all 10Show fewer
- Obtain a score of less than or equal to 7 in Edmonton Frail Scale - Acute Care or less than or equal to 5 in Clinical Frailty Scale
- Able to ambulate with minimal assistance
- Willing to avoid other physical exercise during the interventional period.
- Consent to video and photography of the dance sessions and audio recording of the FGDs.
Who cannot join
- Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) score of less than 8.
- A score of more than 7 on the Edmonton Frail Scale - Acute Care or a score of more than 5 on Clinical Frailty Scale
- Diagnosed with severe cognitive or psychiatric disorders.
- Have severe hearing or vision impairments
- Have medical conditions which results in limitation of dancing (e.g. walking aids, wheelchair etc.)
- Older adults with serious chronic diseases (e.g. postural hypotension etc.)
- Registered in any other dance group during the intervention period
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Singapore1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Lion Befrienders' Active Ageing Centre
Singapore
Vivien Xi Wu, PhD, +65 66012756, nurwux@nus.edu.sg
About this study
Official title: Dose-response Effect of Community Dance Programme on the Physical, Cognitive, Psychosocial Health of Pre-frail and Mildly Frail Older Adults: A Cluster Randomised Trial With Co-design Approach and Process Evaluation
The goal of this interventional study is to examine the dose-response effect of Community Dance Programme (CDP) on the physical, cognitive and psychological health of pre-frail and mildly frail community-dwelling older adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Hypothesis 1: Two sessions of CDP per week (75 minutes each) significantly increase the physical outcomes (i.e. CFS, EFS, SPPB, grip strength) of community-dwelling older adults as compared to one session of CDP per week.
Read more
Hypothesis 2: Two sessions of CDP per week significantly improve the cognitive outcomes (i.e. MoCA, SDMT) of community-dwelling older adults as compared to one session of CDP per week.
Hypothesis 3: Two sessions of CDP per week significantly improve the psychosocial outcomes (i.e. WHOQOL-OLD, De Jong Giervald Loneliness Scale, GPIC scale, SHS, SSQ) of community-dwelling older adults as compared to one session of CDP per week.
Intervention: The participants will be asked to attend two sessions of CDP per week for 12 weeks at their respective Active Ageing Centres (AACs).
Active control: The participants will be asked to attend one session of CDP per week for 12 weeks AACs.
- The participants will be asked to go to the AACs at baseline and after 12 weeks of CDP intervention for the collection of data.
- The participants will be asked to wear fitness trackers to track their heart rates during the CDP sessions to ensure that the dance curriculum is kept within the moderate intensity.
Read the detailed description
Dance interventions have been shown beneficial for older adults, such as improving their physical health, cognitive function, as well as their psychosocial and emotional well-being by ameliorating depression, anxiety, and social isolation. A pilot study (NUS-IRB-2020-808) showed that those in the dancing group reported significantly higher quality of life (p=0.044). The qualitative findings provided insights that older adults enjoyed participating in the creatively crafted dance programme, while learning nature and world travel-based dance movements. Thus, this study aims to use data derived from the pilot study to design and conduct a definitive study to define the dose-response effect that a systematic dance programme may have on physical, cognitive, and psycho-social health in our local aging population.
A cluster-randomised trial with a co-design approach and process, evaluation will be applied. A qualitative approach with in-depth, face-to-face, focused group discussions (FGDs-needs assessment) will be conducted for stakeholders (older adults, AAC staff, and dance instructors) to understand their needs (e.g., factors promoting dance, measures to overcome common side effects of dance, social-cultural considerations) and seek their opinions further to develop the Community Dance Programme (CDP). CDP will be developed following the WHO ICOPE's guidelines and validated by a panel of multi-disciplinary experts. The participants will be randomly separated into 2 clusters: Intervention Clusters (2 sessions/week and 75 minutes/session) and Active Control Clusters (1 session/week and 1 hour/session). The interventional face to face sessions will be supported by instructional dance videos which allows the seniors to practice the dance on their own time.
12 weeks of dance sessions will be conducted. Objective assessments and self-reported questionnaires will be used pre and post-CDP. Outcome measures will include physical health (Short Physical Performance Battery, Edmonton Frailty Scale, biomarkers), cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Symbol Digit Modalities Test), psychosocial health (Geriatric Depression Scale, de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale, Subjective Happiness Scale, Social Support Questionnaire), and quality of life (WHOQOL).
- Conditions
- Dance, Older Adults, Frailty at Older Adults, Active Ageing
- Being tested
- Dance, Active Control
- Keywords
- dance, Older adults, Frailty
- Medical subject headings
- Frailty
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DanceBehavioural
Also called CDP
CDP was designed based on a 12-week dance curriculum, which involves 3 separate blocks of choreography of increasing complexity and intensity. According to World Health Organization, a minimum of 150 minutes of moderate intensity exercise would result in improvement in physical health, therefore, the intervention arm would involve 2 sessions of CDP, 75 minutes per session each week.
Active ControlBehavioural
CDP was designed based on a 12-week dance curriculum, which involves 3 separate blocks of choreography of increasing complexity and intensity. According to World Health Organization, a minimum of 150 minutes of moderate intensity exercise would result in improvement in physical health, therefore, the active control arm would only include 60 minutes of CDP (1 session) per week to assess the effect of CDP on the cognitive and physical health of older adults.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Experimental | 2 sessions per week of CDP (75 minutes per session) will be administered to the older adults at the various AACs over a period of 12 weeks. The face to face dance sessions will also be supported by dance instructional videos to help the seniors practice on their own time. Receives: Behavioral: Dance |
| Active control | Active comparator | 1 session per week of CDP (60 minutes per session) will be administered to the older adults at the various AACs over a period of 12 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Active Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Short Physical Performance Battery
Evaluates the physical function. This instrument comprises physical tests of standing balance, gait speed, and chair stand. Each component (i.e., balance, gait speed, chair stand) will be scored from 0 to 4, with a score of 0 indicating inability to carry out the test and a score of 4 indicating perfect execution of the test. The total score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating higher physical performance
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period at 12 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (11)
Clinical Frailty Scale
This is a 9 point-scale which assesses the degree of frailty based on a visual chart which aids trained assessors to evaluate frailty. This scale depends on individual clinical judgement assess if the patient can independently perform tasks such as bathing, dressing, housework, going upstairs, going out alone, going shopping, taking care of finances, taking medications, and preparing meals. The higher the number, the more frail the individual. It is a tool that has been validated and widely used in local clinical and community settings.
Measured: From enrollment to end of interventional period of 12 weeks
Edmonton Frailty Scale - Acute Care
This is an 11-item questionnaire that examines nine domains of frailty (i.e., cognition, general health status, functional independence, social support, medication use, nutrition, mood, continence, and functioning performance). The scores range from 0 to 17, with higher scores indicating higher levels of frailty. The scores can be categorized into five levels of frailty, namely: fit (0-3), vulnerable (4-5), mild frailty (6-7), Moderate frailty (8-9) and severe frailty (≥10).
This instrument has been utilised and validated in a local tertiary hospital, with high acceptability and low inter-rater variability
Measured: From enrollment to end of interventional period of 12 weeks
Screening for Oral Frailty Tool
The oral frailty scale comprises 6 items, including number of teeth, difficulty in swallowing, difficulty in chewing, difficulty in articulatory oral motor, dry mouth, and oral pain, and is assessed using a yes or no question. The correlations ranged from 0.40 to 0.66 when correlating each item with the total score of the scale. Using frailty and sarcopenia as criteria, the area under the curve for the SOFT was 0.71. The optimal cutoff for the SOFT was 2,
Measured: From enrollment to end of interventional period of 12 weeks
MOXY (muscle oxygenation)
MOXY (Moxy, Fortiori Design LLC, Minnesota, USA) is a non-invasive small wearable portable device that measures muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2), using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) [38]. MOXY measures oxygen levels in the muscles of participants during exercise. Saliva sampling and MOXY oxygen monitoring are non-invasive procedures.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks.
Examining the rate of DNA methylation
DNA methylation analysis will be conducted on the saliva samples collected from the older adults to examine the DNA methylation patterns at specific DNA sites to detect epigenetic clocks that change with age.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks
Global Perception of Intergenerational Communications
The Revised Global Perceptions of Intergenerational Communication scale measures both inter and intra intergenerational communication based on four domains, namely: accommodation, non-accommodation, respect/obligation and avoidant communication. The revised GPIC scale has shown cronbach alpha score of 0.7 for the older participants for the respect-obligation factor and higher cronbach alpha scores of 0.79 and 0.77 for in group and out group respectively for the accommodation factor and 0.79 and 0.75 for the in-group and out-group respectively for the non-accommodation score. This indicates a high reliability for the tool.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks.
Subjective Happiness Scale
Using a "subjectivist" approach to the assessment of happiness, a 4-item measure of global subjective happiness was developed and validated in 14 studies with a total of 2732 participants. Results indicated that the Subjective Happiness Scale has high internal consistency, which was found to be stable across samples. Test-retest and self/peer correlations suggested good to excellent reliability, and construct validation studies of convergent and discriminant validity confirmed the use of this scale to measure the construct of subjective happiness
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale
Loneliness concerns the subjective evaluation of one's situation, characterised by either a smaller than desirable number of relationships with friends (social loneliness), or situations whereby the intimacy in confidant relationships one wishes for has not been realised (emotional loneliness) [44]. dJGLS-6 (six-item) will be used to measure social and emotional loneliness.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks
Social Support Questionnaire-6
This scale is developed by Sarason et al. [47]. It is used to measure the number of people providing support to an individual and the satisfaction level of the individual who received the support. The scale consists of 6 items. Rating of the items is from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied). With excellent Cronbach alphas of 0.90 and 0.93 for 2 respective domains, the scale has been proved to be valid and reliable.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks
WHOQOL-OLD
WHOQOL-OLD for older adults to measure the quality of life for elderly. WHOQOL-OLD contain-ing six facets (including sensory abilities; autonomy; past, present, and future activities; social participation; death and dying; and intimacy), with four items in each facet [48]. Each of the facets has four items and therefore can obtain a possible score ranging from 4 to 20. The sum of the facet scores results in an overall QOL score.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks
Geriatric Depression Scale
This scale contains 15 close-ended questions [42]. One point is allocated per question with the total scores below four indicating the absence of clinically depressive symptoms while scores between four and nine are indicative of mild to moderate depression. Scores of 10 or more are suggestive of a major depressive episode.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jul 2025
- Study start7 May 2025
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for DanceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider
- Enrolment
- 284 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National University of Singapore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Medical Research Council (NMRC), Singapore
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Vivien Xi WU, PhD, National University of Singapore
- Investigators
- Vivien Wu Xi, Principal investigator, National University of Singapore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07081191
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NUS-IRB-2024-271
- Other IDs
- HCSAINV24jan-0003
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2025
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The data will be decoded and anonymised
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Dose-response Effect of Community Dance Programme on the Physical, Cognitive, Psychosocial Health of Pre-frail and Mildly Frail Older Adults: A Cluster Randomised Trial With Co-design Approach and Process Evaluation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07081191
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NUS-IRB-2024-271
- Conditions
- Dance, Older Adults, Frailty at Older Adults, Active Ageing
- Keywords
- dance, Older adults, Frailty
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 284 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National University of SingaporeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Medical Research Council (NMRC), Singapore
- Study start
- 7 May 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this interventional study is to examine the dose-response effect of Community Dance Programme (CDP) on the physical, cognitive and psychological health of pre-frail and mildly frail community-dwelling older adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Hypothesis 1: Two sessions of CDP per week (75 minutes each) significantly increase the physical outcomes (i.e. CFS, EFS, SPPB, grip strength) of community-dwelling older adults as compared to one session of CDP per week.
Hypothesis 2: Two sessions of CDP per week significantly improve the cognitive outcomes (i.e. MoCA, SDMT) of community-dwelling older adults as compared to one session of CDP per week.
Hypothesis 3: Two sessions of CDP per week significantly improve the psychosocial outcomes (i.e. WHOQOL-OLD, De Jong Giervald Loneliness Scale, GPIC scale, SHS, SSQ) of community-dwelling older adults as compared to one session of CDP per week.
Intervention: The participants will be asked to attend two sessions of CDP per week for 12 weeks at their respective Active Ageing Centres (AACs).
Active control: The participants will be asked to attend one session of CDP per week for 12 weeks AACs.
- The participants will be asked to go to the AACs at baseline and after 12 weeks of CDP intervention for the collection of data.
- The participants will be asked to wear fitness trackers to track their heart rates during the CDP sessions to ensure that the dance curriculum is kept within the moderate intensity.
Detailed description
Dance interventions have been shown beneficial for older adults, such as improving their physical health, cognitive function, as well as their psychosocial and emotional well-being by ameliorating depression, anxiety, and social isolation. A pilot study (NUS-IRB-2020-808) showed that those in the dancing group reported significantly higher quality of life (p=0.044). The qualitative findings provided insights that older adults enjoyed participating in the creatively crafted dance programme, while learning nature and world travel-based dance movements. Thus, this study aims to use data derived from the pilot study to design and conduct a definitive study to define the dose-response effect that a systematic dance programme may have on physical, cognitive, and psycho-social health in our local aging population.
A cluster-randomised trial with a co-design approach and process, evaluation will be applied. A qualitative approach with in-depth, face-to-face, focused group discussions (FGDs-needs assessment) will be conducted for stakeholders (older adults, AAC staff, and dance instructors) to understand their needs (e.g., factors promoting dance, measures to overcome common side effects of dance, social-cultural considerations) and seek their opinions further to develop the Community Dance Programme (CDP). CDP will be developed following the WHO ICOPE's guidelines and validated by a panel of multi-disciplinary experts. The participants will be randomly separated into 2 clusters: Intervention Clusters (2 sessions/week and 75 minutes/session) and Active Control Clusters (1 session/week and 1 hour/session). The interventional face to face sessions will be supported by instructional dance videos which allows the seniors to practice the dance on their own time.
12 weeks of dance sessions will be conducted. Objective assessments and self-reported questionnaires will be used pre and post-CDP. Outcome measures will include physical health (Short Physical Performance Battery, Edmonton Frailty Scale, biomarkers), cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Symbol Digit Modalities Test), psychosocial health (Geriatric Depression Scale, de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale, Subjective Happiness Scale, Social Support Questionnaire), and quality of life (WHOQOL).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Experimental | Behavioral: Dance2 sessions per week of CDP (75 minutes per session) will be administered to the older adults at the various AACs over a period of 12 weeks. The face to face dance sessions will also be supported by dance instructional videos to help the seniors practice on their own time. |
| Active control | Active comparator | Behavioral: Active Control1 session per week of CDP (60 minutes per session) will be administered to the older adults at the various AACs over a period of 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Aged 60 to 85.
- Able to understand and communicate in either English or Mandarin.
- Able to give consent to participate.
- Able to commit for three months and able to achieve at least an attendance rate of 75% for the dance program.
- Lives within the community setting.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) score of less than 8.
- A score of more than 7 on the Edmonton Frail Scale - Acute Care or a score of more than 5 on Clinical Frailty Scale
- Diagnosed with severe cognitive or psychiatric disorders.
- Have severe hearing or vision impairments
- Have medical conditions which results in limitation of dancing (e.g. walking aids, wheelchair etc.)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DanceAlso: CDPCDP was designed based on a 12-week dance curriculum, which involves 3 separate blocks of choreography of increasing complexity and intensity. According to World Health Organization, a minimum of 150 minutes of moderate intensity exercise would result in improvement in physical health, therefore, the intervention arm would involve 2 sessions of CDP, 75 minutes per session each week. | Behavioural | Intervention arm |
| Active ControlCDP was designed based on a 12-week dance curriculum, which involves 3 separate blocks of choreography of increasing complexity and intensity. According to World Health Organization, a minimum of 150 minutes of moderate intensity exercise would result in improvement in physical health, therefore, the active control arm would only include 60 minutes of CDP (1 session) per week to assess the effect of CDP on the cognitive and physical health of older adults. | Behavioural | Active control |
Primary outcome
Short Physical Performance Battery
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period at 12 weeks.
Evaluates the physical function. This instrument comprises physical tests of standing balance, gait speed, and chair stand. Each component (i.e., balance, gait speed, chair stand) will be scored from 0 to 4, with a score of 0 indicating inability to carry out the test and a score of 4 indicating perfect execution of the test. The total score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating higher physical performance
11 secondary outcomes
Clinical Frailty Scale
Time frame: From enrollment to end of interventional period of 12 weeks
Edmonton Frailty Scale - Acute Care
Time frame: From enrollment to end of interventional period of 12 weeks
Screening for Oral Frailty Tool
Time frame: From enrollment to end of interventional period of 12 weeks
MOXY (muscle oxygenation)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks.
Examining the rate of DNA methylation
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks
Global Perception of Intergenerational Communications
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks.
Subjective Happiness Scale
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks
Social Support Questionnaire-6
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks
WHOQOL-OLD
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks
Geriatric Depression Scale
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period of 12 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The data will be decoded and anonymised
Related trials for Dance
Active, not recruiting
Dance Study for Post-surgical Pain in Breast Cancer Survivors
Breast Cancer, Survivorship
Recruiting
Feasibility Trial of Family-Centered Therapeutic Dance for Children With Disabilities
Children With Disabilities
Not yet recruiting
Online Mindfulness-based Dance/Movement Therapy on Physical Activity and Whole-Person Health in Older Adults
Physical Activity and Wellbeing, Whole Health
RecruitingPhase 2
DAANCE FOR CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED NEUROPATHY
Cancer of the Breast, Chemotherapy-induced Neuropathy
Recruiting
Line Dancing With Blood Flow Restriction for Balance and Gait of Older Women (In-Person vs Online)
Older Women, Older Adults, Balance
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Vivien Wu Xi principal investigator
National University of Singapore
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dance in people with Dance and Older Adults, run by National University of Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Matilda Heng Wen An (+65 96429745, matilda.heng@u.nus.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Short Physical Performance Battery (time frame: From enrollment to the end of the interventional period at 12 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2025.