Training EffectivenessNCT07082647
Different Types of Feedback in Sports
A study testing Mixed feedback method, Visual feedback method and Verbal feedback method in people with Training Effectiveness and Motor Skills Development, run by TC Erciyes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to examine the effects of mixed (visual + verbal) feedback, visual feedback and verbal feedback methods applied to gymnasts between the ages of 7-11 on the front scale, back scale (knee-knee), back scale (shoulder-knee) and split jump elements by kinematic methods. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 11 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Training Effectiveness, Motor Skills Development, Motor Learning
- What is being tested?
- Mixed feedback method, Visual feedback method and Verbal feedback method
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 15 Sep 2023to 12 Nov 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 11 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Being between 7-11 years old
- Being a female
- Being an active gymnast
Who cannot join
- Being outside between the ages of 7-11
- Being a man
- Not being involved in gymnastics
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Erciyes University
Talas, None Selected, 38280
About this study
Official title: The Importance of Different Types of Feedback in Sports Pedagogy
The aim of the study is to examine the effects of mixed (visual + verbal) feedback, visual feedback and verbal feedback methods applied to gymnasts between the ages of 7-11 on the front scale, back scale (knee-knee), back scale (shoulder-knee) and split jump elements by kinematic methods.
Read the detailed description
The participants were asked to perform the measured movements one by one during the training, and feedback was given to each participant one by one. In the study, kinematic analyzes were made by taking video recordings (measurements taken at 3 different times) of the elements performed by the participants in gymnastics. As a result, it was determined that the most effective feedback method for all elements except the split jump element was the mixed method, the most effective method for the split jump was the visual method, and the least effective method for all elements was the verbal method.The students were given the following training program (2 days a week) for 8 weeks and each group was given the same training curriculum with its own feedback method; Weeks: 1 Lesson 1:Running, Animal Walks, Forward Roll, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Animal Walks, Forward Roll, Backward Roll, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Balance (static) Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Weeks:2 Lesson 1: Running, Animal Walks, Forward Roll, Backward Roll, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Static Strength Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Animal Walks, Roll Exercises, Cartwheel, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Staircase Exercise, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits
Weeks 3:
Lesson 1: Running, Stretching Exercises, Animal Walks, Roll Exercises, Cartwheel, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Plyometric Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Animal Walks, Cartwheel, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Balance (static) Exercise, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Weeks:4 Lesson 1: Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Dynamic Strength Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Animal Walks, Cartwheel, Handstand Exercise, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Stretching Exercise, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Weeks:5 Lesson 1: Running, Stretching, Animal Walks, Roll Exercises, Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Static Strength Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Stretching, Animal Walks, Roll Exercises, Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Staircase Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Weeks:6 Lesson 1:Running, Stretching, Animal Walks, Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Plyometric Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Animal Walks, Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Weeks: 7 Lesson 1: Running, Stretching, Animal Walks, Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Dynamic Strength Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Stretching, Animal Walks, Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Running Exercise, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Weeks:8 Lesson 1: Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Static Strength Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Stretching, Animal Walks, An overview, Back Scale, Split Jump, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits.
As a result of the training program, the development of the gymnasts' Front Scale, Back Scale (Knee-Knee), Back Scale (Shoulder-Knee) and Split jump movements was examined.
Body weight measurement The participants' body weights were measured with a Xiaomi electronic scale with an accuracy of ±0.1 kg Participants' BMI was calculated as body mass (kg)/height (m2).
Height measurement Participants' heights and leg lengths measurements were measured using a Fisco brand meter ±0.1 (cm)
ELEMENTS AND ANALYSIS Front scale The basic posture begins with position and posture. With the arms up and one foot stretched above 90 degrees, the other foot at the bottom rises up to the toes and waits steadily for two seconds Back scale The movement begins with a standing position and a basic posture. In gymnastics, it is a posture in which one of the feet is on the ground and the body weight is on one leg. In the scale pose, the other leg is expected to lift up tautly. The arms are open at the sides and shoulder level. The body and arms are parallel to the ground Split jump The split jump movement, the arms are positioned above, and the legs are opened forward and back, creating a 180-degree angle KINOVEA VIDEO ANALYSING The video recordings of the athletes during the lessons were analyzed with the Kinovea program: Kinovea is a free software application that analyzes, compares, and evaluates movement. It is often used to evaluate an athlete's progress in training For kinematic analysis, recordings were made with a Redmi Note 11 mobile phone, and a Lenovo G5 laptop was used for the relevant analysis.
Front scale analysis The highest angular distance between the knee joints and the two legs was measured on the front scale (stance over 90 degrees with the leg forward).
Back scale analysis (knee-knee) and (shoulder-knee) The angle between the hind leg knee joint (knee-knee) and the shoulder and the highest angular (shoulder-knee) distance between the two legs were recorded in the scale movement. Although the back scale (knee-knee) and back scale (shoulder-knee) elements were tested on the same movement, their angular values were recorded and evaluated independently.
Split jump analysis When the jump occurred in the split jump movement, the highest angle that could be reached between the two legs and the angles of the knee joints in the relevant position were recorded.
ANALYSIS OF DATA The data used in the research were analyzed through the SPSS 27 program. The normality distributions of the data obtained with the Shapiro Wilk test are examined. Since the data obtained showed a parametric distribution, a one-way analysis of variance was applied for comparison between groups. For intragroup comparisons, analysis of variance was used for repeated measurements, and the Bonferroni test was used to reveal the source of the difference.
- Being tested
- Mixed feedback method, Visual feedback method, Verbal feedback method
- Keywords
- Learning, Motor Learning, Motor Skill, Feedback
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mixed feedback methodBehavioural
Feedback (technical correction) method in which both visual and verbal feedback are predominantly used in the feedback given to the participants throughout the training program.
Visual feedback methodBehavioural
Feedback (technical correction) method in which visual feedback is predominantly used in the feedback given to gymnasts throughout the training program.
Verbal feedback methodBehavioural
Feedback (technical correction) method in which verbal feedback is predominantly used in the feedback given to gymnasts throughout the training program.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mixed Group | Experimental | Group 1 (Mixed Feedback Group n=20) is the group in which both verbal and visual (video-supported) feedback methods were used together while applying the training program to the gymnasts. Receives: Behavioral: Mixed feedback method |
| Visual Feedback Group | Experimental | Group 2 is the group where the gymnasts are provided with visual feedback in some way throughout the training program. (Visual Feedback Group = 20) Receives: Behavioral: Visual feedback method |
| Verbal Group | Experimental | Group 3 (Verbal Group n=20) is the group in which verbal feedback methods are predominantly used when applying the training program to gymnasts. Receives: Behavioral: Verbal feedback method |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison of the effects of feedback methods.
All feedback methods (each group having its own method) were applied to athletes who received the same gymnastics training 2 days a week for 8 weeks, in addition to their training. The unit of all measurements is the angle degree. This refers to the measurement of the angle between the designated points (knee, shoulder) when the relevant gymnastic element is performed. ELEMENTS AND ANALYSIS Front scale The basic posture begins with position and posture. With the arms up and one foot stretched above 90 degrees, the other foot at the bottom rises up to the toes and waits steadily for two seconds Back scale The movement begins with a standing position and a basic posture. In gymnastics, it is a posture in which one of the feet is on the ground and the body weight is on one leg. In the scale pose, the other leg is expected to lift up tautly. The arms are open at the sides and shoulder level. The body and arms are parallel to the ground Split jump The split jump movement, the arms are pos
Measured: Measurements were taken three times: before the training program was implemented, at the end of the 4th week of the training program, and at the end of the 8th week after the training program was completed.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jul 2025
- Study start15 Sep 2023
- Primary completion15 Sep 2023
- Study completion12 Nov 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Training EffectivenessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by TC Erciyes UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Interventional Study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- TC Erciyes University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Vesile Şahiner Güler, TC Erciyes University
- Investigators
- Mehmet Behzat Turan, Associate Professor, Principal investigator, TC Erciyes University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07082647
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ERU-SAGENS-VSG-02
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2025
- Last updated
- 24 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Guler VS, Turan MB, Pepe O, Gulsen DBA, Soyal M, Yildiz M. Multisensory feedback in gymnastics education: a kinematic study on skill acquisition in youth athletes. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2026 Jun 29;18(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s13102-026-01830-6.
PubMed 42374486
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Importance of Different Types of Feedback in Sports Pedagogy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07082647
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ERU-SAGENS-VSG-02
- Keywords
- Learning, Motor Learning, Motor Skill, Feedback
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- TC Erciyes UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Nov 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to examine the effects of mixed (visual + verbal) feedback, visual feedback and verbal feedback methods applied to gymnasts between the ages of 7-11 on the front scale, back scale (knee-knee), back scale (shoulder-knee) and split jump elements by kinematic methods.
Detailed description
The participants were asked to perform the measured movements one by one during the training, and feedback was given to each participant one by one. In the study, kinematic analyzes were made by taking video recordings (measurements taken at 3 different times) of the elements performed by the participants in gymnastics. As a result, it was determined that the most effective feedback method for all elements except the split jump element was the mixed method, the most effective method for the split jump was the visual method, and the least effective method for all elements was the verbal method.The students were given the following training program (2 days a week) for 8 weeks and each group was given the same training curriculum with its own feedback method; Weeks: 1 Lesson 1:Running, Animal Walks, Forward Roll, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Animal Walks, Forward Roll, Backward Roll, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Balance (static) Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Weeks:2 Lesson 1: Running, Animal Walks, Forward Roll, Backward Roll, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Static Strength Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Animal Walks, Roll Exercises, Cartwheel, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Staircase Exercise, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits
Weeks 3:
Lesson 1: Running, Stretching Exercises, Animal Walks, Roll Exercises, Cartwheel, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Plyometric Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Animal Walks, Cartwheel, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Balance (static) Exercise, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Weeks:4 Lesson 1: Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Dynamic Strength Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Animal Walks, Cartwheel, Handstand Exercise, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Stretching Exercise, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Weeks:5 Lesson 1: Running, Stretching, Animal Walks, Roll Exercises, Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Static Strength Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Stretching, Animal Walks, Roll Exercises, Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Staircase Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Weeks:6 Lesson 1:Running, Stretching, Animal Walks, Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Plyometric Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Animal Walks, Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Weeks: 7 Lesson 1: Running, Stretching, Animal Walks, Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Dynamic Strength Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Stretching, Animal Walks, Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Running Exercise, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Weeks:8 Lesson 1: Cartwheel, Handstand, Front Scale, Back Scale, Split Jump, Static Strength Exercises, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits Lesson 2: Running, Stretching, Animal Walks, An overview, Back Scale, Split Jump, Bridge, Middle Split, Front Splits.
As a result of the training program, the development of the gymnasts' Front Scale, Back Scale (Knee-Knee), Back Scale (Shoulder-Knee) and Split jump movements was examined.
Body weight measurement The participants' body weights were measured with a Xiaomi electronic scale with an accuracy of ±0.1 kg Participants' BMI was calculated as body mass (kg)/height (m2).
Height measurement Participants' heights and leg lengths measurements were measured using a Fisco brand meter ±0.1 (cm)
ELEMENTS AND ANALYSIS Front scale The basic posture begins with position and posture. With the arms up and one foot stretched above 90 degrees, the other foot at the bottom rises up to the toes and waits steadily for two seconds Back scale The movement begins with a standing position and a basic posture. In gymnastics, it is a posture in which one of the feet is on the ground and the body weight is on one leg. In the scale pose, the other leg is expected to lift up tautly. The arms are open at the sides and shoulder level. The body and arms are parallel to the ground Split jump The split jump movement, the arms are positioned above, and the legs are opened forward and back, creating a 180-degree angle KINOVEA VIDEO ANALYSING The video recordings of the athletes during the lessons were analyzed with the Kinovea program: Kinovea is a free software application that analyzes, compares, and evaluates movement. It is often used to evaluate an athlete's progress in training For kinematic analysis, recordings were made with a Redmi Note 11 mobile phone, and a Lenovo G5 laptop was used for the relevant analysis.
Front scale analysis The highest angular distance between the knee joints and the two legs was measured on the front scale (stance over 90 degrees with the leg forward).
Back scale analysis (knee-knee) and (shoulder-knee) The angle between the hind leg knee joint (knee-knee) and the shoulder and the highest angular (shoulder-knee) distance between the two legs were recorded in the scale movement. Although the back scale (knee-knee) and back scale (shoulder-knee) elements were tested on the same movement, their angular values were recorded and evaluated independently.
Split jump analysis When the jump occurred in the split jump movement, the highest angle that could be reached between the two legs and the angles of the knee joints in the relevant position were recorded.
ANALYSIS OF DATA The data used in the research were analyzed through the SPSS 27 program. The normality distributions of the data obtained with the Shapiro Wilk test are examined. Since the data obtained showed a parametric distribution, a one-way analysis of variance was applied for comparison between groups. For intragroup comparisons, analysis of variance was used for repeated measurements, and the Bonferroni test was used to reveal the source of the difference.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Interventional Study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mixed Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Mixed feedback methodGroup 1 (Mixed Feedback Group n=20) is the group in which both verbal and visual (video-supported) feedback methods were used together while applying the training program to the gymnasts. |
| Visual Feedback Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Visual feedback methodGroup 2 is the group where the gymnasts are provided with visual feedback in some way throughout the training program. (Visual Feedback Group = 20) |
| Verbal Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Verbal feedback methodGroup 3 (Verbal Group n=20) is the group in which verbal feedback methods are predominantly used when applying the training program to gymnasts. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 11 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Being between 7-11 years old
- Being a female
- Being an active gymnast
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Being outside between the ages of 7-11
- Being a man
- Not being involved in gymnastics
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mixed feedback methodFeedback (technical correction) method in which both visual and verbal feedback are predominantly used in the feedback given to the participants throughout the training program. | Behavioural | Mixed Group |
| Visual feedback methodFeedback (technical correction) method in which visual feedback is predominantly used in the feedback given to gymnasts throughout the training program. | Behavioural | Visual Feedback Group |
| Verbal feedback methodFeedback (technical correction) method in which verbal feedback is predominantly used in the feedback given to gymnasts throughout the training program. | Behavioural | Verbal Group |
Primary outcome
Comparison of the effects of feedback methods.
Time frame: Measurements were taken three times: before the training program was implemented, at the end of the 4th week of the training program, and at the end of the 8th week after the training program was completed.
All feedback methods (each group having its own method) were applied to athletes who received the same gymnastics training 2 days a week for 8 weeks, in addition to their training. The unit of all measurements is the angle degree. This refers to the measurement of the angle between the designated points (knee, shoulder) when the relevant gymnastic element is performed. ELEMENTS AND ANALYSIS Front scale The basic posture begins with position and posture. With the arms up and one foot stretched above 90 degrees, the other foot at the bottom rises up to the toes and waits steadily for two seconds Back scale The movement begins with a standing position and a basic posture. In gymnastics, it is a posture in which one of the feet is on the ground and the body weight is on one leg. In the scale pose, the other leg is expected to lift up tautly. The arms are open at the sides and shoulder level. The body and arms are parallel to the ground Split jump The split jump movement, the arms are pos
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jul 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42374486Guler VS, Turan MB, Pepe O, Gulsen DBA, Soyal M, Yildiz M. Multisensory feedback in gymnastics education: a kinematic study on skill acquisition in youth athletes. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2026 Jun 29;18(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s13102-026-01830-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Training Effectiveness
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Effect of a Novel Episiotomy Repair Simulator on Midwifery Students' Self-Efficacy and Anxiety
Episiotomy Repair Training
Not yet recruiting
AI Smart Glasses Feedback for Intubation Training in Medical Students
Intubation, Intratracheal, Medical Education
Not yet recruiting
Radiofrequency and Pelvic Floor Exercise for Primary Dysmenorrhea
Primary Dysmenorrhea
Recruiting
Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Combined With Cognitive Training in Alzheimer's Disease
Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation, Alzheimer Disease (AD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mehmet Behzat Turan, Associate Professor principal investigator
TC Erciyes University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mixed feedback method, Visual feedback method and Verbal feedback method in people with Training Effectiveness and Motor Skills Development, run by TC Erciyes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison of the effects of feedback methods. (time frame: Measurements were taken three times: before the training program was implemented, at the end of the 4th week of the training program, and at the end of the 8th week after the training program was completed.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07082647, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2025.