Migraineindividua rTMSNCT07086274
Individualized Location-based rTMS for Migraine Treatment: A Multicenter Clinical Study
A study testing Individualized location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Traditional location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in people with Migraine and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Repetitive, run by First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
For migraine patients experiencing at least four attack days per month and undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment, a randomized, double-blind controlled trial is conducted, dividing participants into a traditional targeting group and an individualized targeting group. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Migraine, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Repetitive
- What is being tested?
- Individualized location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Traditional location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 152 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 25 Jul 2025to 25 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 18 and 65 years; both men and women.
- Diagnosis of migraine according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-III), with first onset before age 50 and a history of migraine for more than 1 year.
- Migraine frequency of ≥4 days per month during both the 3 months prior to the screening period and the screening period itself.
- Informed consent documents are signed, and subjects are cooperative with the evaluation and rTMS treatment, having been informed of known and potential risks and available alternative treatments.
Who cannot join
- Patients with contraindications to TMS (e.g., metal implants, pacemakers).
- Severe anxiety or depression (HAMD score >35, HAMA score >29).
- History of migraine prophylactic drug adjustment during the screening and treatment period.
- Aphasia or cognitive dysfunction (MMSE score ≤23).
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Clinicians assess severe comorbidities that are not treatable.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site
The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang
Li, + 86( 571) 8723 6309, zdyymzb@126.com
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Individualized Location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Migraine: a Prospective Clinical Study
For migraine patients experiencing at least four attack days per month and undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment, a randomized, double-blind controlled trial is conducted, dividing participants into a traditional targeting group and an individualized targeting group. Patients in both groups are followed up before treatment and at 1, 2, and 3 months post-treatment, evaluating the following parameters: migraine diaries, the number of migraine days, rescue medication usage, headache intensity, the number of moderate-to-severe migraine days, and the proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% reduction in migraine days. Further assessments include changes in the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-24), and 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA-14). Biomarker and metabolic analyses include tryptophan and kynurenine metabolism, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), substance P, endothelin-1, inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, TGF-β1), glutamate, endocannabinoids and related lipids, as well as gut microbiota composition. Additionally, changes in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) before and after treatment are analyzed. This study aims to compare the efficacy of TMS treatment under different targeting strategies in migraine patients, providing theoretical support for clinical applications.
- Being tested
- Individualized location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Traditional location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Keywords
- Individualized location-based
- Medical subject headings
- Migraine Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Individualized location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic StimulationDevice
Enhancing targeting accuracy through personalized target localization to improve the analgesic response rate of rTMS.
Traditional location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic StimulationDevice
Recent studies have shown that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) plays an inhibitory role in the human pain pathway. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the left DLPFC has been found to improve chronic migraine.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Experimental | Enhancing targeting accuracy through personalized target localization to improve the analgesic response rate of rTMS. Receives: Device: Individualized location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| Traditional location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Active comparator | Recent studies have shown that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) plays an inhibitory role in the human pain pathway. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the left DLPFC has been found to improve chronic migraine. Receives: Device: Traditional location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the monthly average number of migraine days
A migraine day: any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache: a migraine with or without aura, lasting for ≥30 minutes, and meeting at least 1 of the following criteria (a and/or b): a) ≥2 of the following: unilateral location, pulsating quality, moderate to severe pain intensity, aggravation by or causing avoidance of routine physical activity; b) ≥1 of the following: nausea and/or vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. If the participant took a migraine-specific medication during aura or to treat headache on a calendar day, it was counted as a migraine day regardless of the duration and pain features/associated symptoms.
Measured: from baseline to 1 month after treatment completion.
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change in the monthly average number of migraine days
A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (as previously described). If the participant took a migraine-specific medication during aura or to treat headache on a calendar day, it was counted as a migraine day regardless of the duration and pain features/associated symptoms. A moderate or severe migraine day was a migraine day of moderate or severe pain intensity. Months were defined as 28-day intervals.
Measured: from baseline to 2.3 month after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Total Score
The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) is a retrospective, self-administered, 5-item questionnaire that measures headache-related disability as lost time due to headache from paid work or school, household work, and non-work activities. Participants provide the number of missed work or school days; missed household chores days; missed social or leisure activity days; and days at work or school, and separately at home, where productivity was reduced by half or more in the last 3 months (scale: 0 - 90 for each of 5 subscales). The 5 subscale scores are summed to compute the MIDAS total score (scale: 0 - 450). Lower scores indicate less headache-related disability.
Measured: Compared to baseline 3 months after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ)
The Migraine Specific Quality of Life (MSQoL) is a self-administered, 14-item instrument that has been validated in 3 domains: role restriction, role prevention, and the emotional function. The role function-restrictive domain consists of 7 items that describe how migraine limits one's daily social and work-related activities. Participants respond to items using a 6-point scale: "none of the time," "a little bit of the time," "some of the time," "a good bit of the time," "most of the time," and "all of the time," which are assigned scores of 1 to 6, respectively. Item scores are recoded using (7 - original score). Next, raw dimension scores are computed as a sum of recoded item scores and rescaled from a 0 to 100 scale such that higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Measured: from baseline to 1.2.3 month after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6 )
HIT-6 (Headache Impact Test-6) for Migraine: The HIT-6 is a widely used tool to assess the impact of headaches on a patient's quality of life. It consists of 6 questions, each rated on a 5-point scale ranging from "Never" to "Always." The total score is obtained by summing the individual item scores, with a higher score indicating a greater impact of migraine on the patient's daily functioning. A decrease in the HIT-6 score from baseline indicates an improvement in the patient's condition and a reduction in the impact of migraines on their life.
Measured: from baseline to 1.2.3 month after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI )
PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) for Sleep: The PSQI is a validated questionnaire used to assess the quality and patterns of sleep in the past month. It includes 19 items across 7 component areas: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each component is scored on a 0 to 3 scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. A decrease in the PSQI score from baseline indicates an improvement in sleep quality.
Measured: from baseline to 1.2.3 month after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC )
PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change): The PGIC is a single-item scale used to assess the patient's overall perception of change in their condition over time. The patient rates their perceived change in symptoms or overall health since the start of the study or treatment on a 7-point scale, where:
- = Very Much Improved
- = Much Improved
- = Minimally Improved
- = No Change
- = Minimally Worse
- = Much Worse
- = Very Much Worse
A higher score indicates a negative change in the patient's condition, while a lower score indicates improvement. The mean change from baseline reflects the overall perceived improvement or worsening of the patient's condition during the study period.
Measured: from baseline to 3 month after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the HAMD-24 (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 24-item).
HAMD-24 (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 24-item): The HAMD-24 is a clinician-administered scale used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. It consists of 24 items, with each item scored on a 3 to 5-point scale based on the severity of the symptom (e.g., 0 = not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The total score is calculated by summing the individual item scores, with higher scores indicating more severe depression. A reduction in the HAMD-24 score from baseline indicates improvement in the severity of depressive symptoms.
Measured: from baseline to 1.2.3 month after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the HAMA-14 (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, 14-item).
HAMA-14 (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, 14-item): The HAMA-14 is a clinician-administered scale used to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms. It includes 14 items that cover both psychic and somatic aspects of anxiety, such as tension, fear, insomnia, and somatic symptoms (e.g., gastrointestinal distress, dizziness). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe). The total score is calculated by summing the individual item scores, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety. A reduction in the HAMA-14 score from baseline indicates a decrease in anxiety symptoms.
Measured: from baseline to 1.2.3 month after treatment completion.
Metabolomics (Tryptophan and Kynurenine)
Tryptophan and Kynurenine:
Measurement Method: Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) or High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) with UV detection.
Units: µmol/L or nmol/mL.
Measured: Treatment completion (2 weeks) vs. baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarker Levels.
CGRP (Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide), PACAP (Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide), VIP (Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide), NPY (Neuropeptide Y), Substance P, Endothelin-1:
Measurement Method: Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), Radioimmunoassay (RIA), or Luminex xMAP technology.
Units: pg/mL or ng/mL.
Inflammatory Factors (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, TGF-β1):
Measurement Method: ELISA. Units: pg/mL or ng/mL.
Measured: Treatment completion (2 weeks) vs. baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Glutamate, Endocannabinoids and Related Lipids
Glutamate:
Measurement Method:High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection or LC-MS/MS.
Units:µmol/L or nmol/mL.
Endocannabinoids:
Measurement Method:Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) or Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS).
Units: pg/mL or nmol/L.
Related Lipids:
Measurement Method: LC-MS/MS or Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). Units:ng/mL or µg/mL.
Measured: Treatment completion (2 weeks) vs. baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Gut Microbiota Composition
Gut Microbiota:
Measurement Method: 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing (Next-Generation Sequencing, NGS) or Metagenomic Sequencing.
Units: Relative abundance (percentage of total microbiota composition) or Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) counts.
Measured: Treatment completion (2 weeks) vs. baseline.
Changes in pain-related brain regions and connectivity in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI)
Resting-State fMRI (rs-fMRI): This imaging technique assesses brain activity in the absence of an explicit task. It measures spontaneous fluctuations in the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal, which is an indicator of neural activity.
Analysis Focus:The primary focus is on pain-related brain regions such as the somatosensory cortex, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insula, thalamus, and prefrontal cortex , as well as changes in the functional connectivity between these regions.
Connectivity Analysis:Functional connectivity will be evaluated by examining seed-based analysis or independent component analysis (ICA) to identify altered networks related to pain processing and perception.
Measured: Treatment completion (2 weeks) vs. baseline.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jul 2025
- Study start25 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion25 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion25 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MigraineStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 152 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, China, The Third Affiliated hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07086274
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- [2025C]IIT. No. 013
- Acronym
- individua rTMS
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Individualized Location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Migraine: a Prospective Clinical Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07086274
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- individua rTMS / [2025C]IIT. No. 013
- Keywords
- Individualized location-based
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 152 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, China, The Third Affiliated hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
- Study start
- 25 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 25 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 25 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
For migraine patients experiencing at least four attack days per month and undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment, a randomized, double-blind controlled trial is conducted, dividing participants into a traditional targeting group and an individualized targeting group. Patients in both groups are followed up before treatment and at 1, 2, and 3 months post-treatment, evaluating the following parameters: migraine diaries, the number of migraine days, rescue medication usage, headache intensity, the number of moderate-to-severe migraine days, and the proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% reduction in migraine days. Further assessments include changes in the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-24), and 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA-14). Biomarker and metabolic analyses include tryptophan and kynurenine metabolism, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), substance P, endothelin-1, inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, TGF-β1), glutamate, endocannabinoids and related lipids, as well as gut microbiota composition. Additionally, changes in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) before and after treatment are analyzed. This study aims to compare the efficacy of TMS treatment under different targeting strategies in migraine patients, providing theoretical support for clinical applications.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Experimental | Device: Individualized location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic StimulationEnhancing targeting accuracy through personalized target localization to improve the analgesic response rate of rTMS. |
| Traditional location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Active comparator | Device: Traditional location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic StimulationRecent studies have shown that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) plays an inhibitory role in the human pain pathway. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the left DLPFC has been found to improve chronic migraine. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Aged between 18 and 65 years; both men and women.
- Diagnosis of migraine according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-III), with first onset before age 50 and a history of migraine for more than 1 year.
- Migraine frequency of ≥4 days per month during both the 3 months prior to the screening period and the screening period itself.
- Informed consent documents are signed, and subjects are cooperative with the evaluation and rTMS treatment, having been informed of known and potential risks and available alternative treatments.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with contraindications to TMS (e.g., metal implants, pacemakers).
- Severe anxiety or depression (HAMD score >35, HAMA score >29).
- History of migraine prophylactic drug adjustment during the screening and treatment period.
- Aphasia or cognitive dysfunction (MMSE score ≤23).
- Pregnancy or lactation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic StimulationEnhancing targeting accuracy through personalized target localization to improve the analgesic response rate of rTMS. | Device | Individualized location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| Traditional location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic StimulationRecent studies have shown that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) plays an inhibitory role in the human pain pathway. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the left DLPFC has been found to improve chronic migraine. | Device | Traditional location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
Primary outcome
Change in the monthly average number of migraine days
Time frame: from baseline to 1 month after treatment completion.
A migraine day: any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache: a migraine with or without aura, lasting for ≥30 minutes, and meeting at least 1 of the following criteria (a and/or b): a) ≥2 of the following: unilateral location, pulsating quality, moderate to severe pain intensity, aggravation by or causing avoidance of routine physical activity; b) ≥1 of the following: nausea and/or vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. If the participant took a migraine-specific medication during aura or to treat headache on a calendar day, it was counted as a migraine day regardless of the duration and pain features/associated symptoms.
13 secondary outcomes
Change in the monthly average number of migraine days
Time frame: from baseline to 2.3 month after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Total Score
Time frame: Compared to baseline 3 months after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ)
Time frame: from baseline to 1.2.3 month after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6 )
Time frame: from baseline to 1.2.3 month after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI )
Time frame: from baseline to 1.2.3 month after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC )
Time frame: from baseline to 3 month after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the HAMD-24 (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 24-item).
Time frame: from baseline to 1.2.3 month after treatment completion.
Mean Change From Baseline in the HAMA-14 (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, 14-item).
Time frame: from baseline to 1.2.3 month after treatment completion.
Metabolomics (Tryptophan and Kynurenine)
Time frame: Treatment completion (2 weeks) vs. baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarker Levels.
Time frame: Treatment completion (2 weeks) vs. baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Glutamate, Endocannabinoids and Related Lipids
Time frame: Treatment completion (2 weeks) vs. baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Gut Microbiota Composition
Time frame: Treatment completion (2 weeks) vs. baseline.
Changes in pain-related brain regions and connectivity in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI)
Time frame: Treatment completion (2 weeks) vs. baseline.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jul 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Migraine
Recruiting
Headache Education and Awareness vs. Daily Mindfulness Strategies - Understanding Pain
Migraine, Migraine in Adolescence
Active, not recruiting
Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of tDCS to Visual and Motor Cortex in Migraine
Migraine
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
Active, not recruiting
App-Based Migraine Treatment: The Health enSuite Study
Migraine, Migraine With Aura
Not yet recruiting
A Prospective Study of Rimegepant for Short-term Preventive Treatment of Night-shift-related Migraine in Healthcare Professionals
Migraine Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Individualized location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Traditional location-based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in people with Migraine and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Repetitive, run by First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yunze Li (86-13336136379, 1517055@zju.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the monthly average number of migraine days (time frame: from baseline to 1 month after treatment completion.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2025.