AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 2 DiabetesNCT07116902

Artificial Intelligence-based Methods to Predict Disease Progression in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes

A study testing phone application in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by University of California, San Francisco at 2 sites in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Currently, clinicians are unable to predict a patient's risk of long-term disease progression and development of a long-term complication based on the data that is available to them. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 21 years
Conditions the study is for
Type 2 Diabetes
What is being tested?
phone application
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
50 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2026to Sep 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 10- 21 years
  • Diagnosis of T2D based on clinical diagnosis or ICD 9 and 10 codes
  • Duration of T2D ≥ 3 months
  • HbA1C ≥ 7% which is the target HbA1C recommended by the American Diabetes Association
  • Stable medication regimen (No medication changes and no change in basal insulin dose by more than 20% in the 2 weeks prior to enrollment)
  • Ability to wear CGM for a total of 6 weeks while in the study.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • English or Spanish speakers.
  • Willing to abide by recommendations and study procedures.
  • Willing and able to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) and/or has a parent or guardian willing and able to sign the ICF.

Who cannot join

  • Pancreatic autoantibody positivity (GAD-65, insulin, IA-2, ICA 512, ZnT8).
  • Plan for undergoing bariatric surgery during the study period
  • Anticipated use of systemic glucocorticoids during the study period
  • Unable to stop taking more than 500mg/day of Vitamin C during the study period as this may affect the sensor readings.
  • Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.
  • Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would cause repeated hospitalizations or significant changes in medications.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Avani A Narayan, MS contact

415-530-8047

avani.narayan@ucsf.edu

Laura A Dapkus Humphries, NCPT contact

628-224-8364

laura.dapkus@ucsf.edu

United States2 sites
  • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, Pediatric Diabetes Clinic

    Oakland, California, 94609

    Shylaja A Srinivasan, MD, 415-353-9084, shylaja.srinivasan@ucsf.edu

    Laura A Dapkus Humphries, NCPT, 628-224-8364, laura.dapkus@ucsf.edu

  • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital San Francisco, Madison Clinic for Pediatric Diabetes

    San Francisco, California, 94158

    Shylaja A Srinivasan, MD, 415-353-9084, shylaja.srinivasan@ucsf.edu

    Laura A Dapkus Humphries, NCPT, 628-224-8364, laura.dapkus@ucsf.edu

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Artificial Intelligence-based Methods to Predict Disease Progression in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes: A Digital Twin Study

Currently, clinicians are unable to predict a patient's risk of long-term disease progression and development of a long-term complication based on the data that is available to them. The first aim of this is to develop and validate an Artificial Intelligence (AI) powered prediction model for Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) disease progression using existing data from previously collected studies and real-world electronic health medical data. Investigators will use clinical, pharmacologic, and genomic factors to develop the prediction model based on the most relevant clinical outcomes of change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and the development of a microvascular complication.

Despite the availability of newer medication options, lifestyle intervention is not effective in most youth and current therapeutic options are ineffective at producing sustained glycemic control. Newer and innovative methods are needed to identify the youth at highest risk of progression in terms of increase in HbA1c and development of long-term complications and to motivate behavioral change in youth. The goal of this aim is to create an AI-powered digital twin model for 50 youth with T2D using their baseline clinical, genetic, pharmacologic and lifestyle data and utilize AI algorithms developed in Aim 1 to simulate disease progression and treatment response. Investigators will then evaluate the digital twin model in an randomized controlled trail and prospectively compare the generated digital twin data to observed values over one year. Investigators will also measure whether knowledge of the digital twin prediction with targeted healthcare recommendations influence medication and lifestyle change adherence in the digital twin arm (n= 25) compared to the control arm (n= 25).

Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes
Being tested
phone application, Standard of Care (SOC)
Keywords
T2D, Type 2 Diabetes, AI, Artificial Intelligence, CGM
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • phone applicationDevice

    Participants in the digital twin arm will receive information on their disease progression which will be based on projected change in HbA1C in alternative realities and specific recommendations on medication dosing and lifestyle changes based on this data. The digital twin information will be presented on an iPad in a game- like manner. The alternate realities will include scenarios of change in medication adherence, physical activity metrics, dietary changes etc.

  • Standard of Care (SOC)Other

    Participants in the control arm will receive standard of care which is medication change recommendations based on HbA1C and blood glucose values every 3 months and standard lifestyle education.

Study groups in NCT07116902
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Digital twin armExperimentalParticipants in the digital twin arm will receive information on their disease progression which will be based on projected change in HbA1C in alternative realities and specific recommendations on medication dosing and lifestyle changes based on this data. The digital twin information will be presented on an iPad in a game- like manner. The alternate realities will include scenarios of change in medication adherence, physical activity metrics, dietary changes etc.
Receives: Device: phone application
Control armPlacebo comparatorParticipants in the control arm will receive standard of care which is medication change recommendations based on HbA1C and blood glucose values every 3 months and standard lifestyle education.
Receives: Other: Standard of Care (SOC)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in HbA1C

    The primary outcome will be the ability of the digital twin model to accurately predict longitudinal disease progression measured as the digital twin predicted HbA1C versus measured HbA1C and the difference in HbA1C between the digital twin arm and control arms.

    Measured: From enrollment to the close out visit at the 1-year mark

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Sleep Quality

    Change in measures related to sleep quality. (Actigraph measured duration, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)).

    Respondents rate each element of the questionnaire using Likert-type scales. Responses can range from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate more acute symptoms of insomnia.

    Scores are tallied and can be compared both to scores obtained at a different phase of treatment and to the scores of other individuals.

    A total score of:

    0-7 indicates "no clinically significant insomnia" 8-14 means "sub-threshold insomnia" 15-21 means "clinical insomnia (moderate severity)" 22-28 means "clinical insomnia (severe)"

    Measured: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark

  2. Psycho-Social Outcome

    Change in measures related to psycho-social outcomes for Quality of Life. (PedsQL-Diabetes Module).

    The Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Diabetes Module scores quality of life in children and adolescents with diabetes using a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. The PedsQL Diabetes Module uses a 5-point response scale (0-4) for each item.

    It assesses various aspects of life affected by diabetes, including physical symptoms, treatment barriers, and emotional well-being.

    Measured: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark

  3. Sugar Intake

    Change in measures related to sugar intake (g/day).

    Measured: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark

  4. Physical Activity

    Change in measures related to physical activity (days/week)

    Measured: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark

  5. BMI

    Change in BMI (BMI z-score).

    Measured: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark

  6. CGM Time In Range

    Change in CGM based measures including time in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dL.

    Measured: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark

  7. CGM Time Above Range

    Change in CGM based measures including time above the target glucose range of greater than 250 mg/dL for glucose and co-efficient of variation of glucose.

    Measured: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark

  8. Psycho-Social Outcome

    Change in measures related to psycho-social outcomes for Diabetes Distress. (Diabetes Distress Scale).

    Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) is used to assess the level of emotional distress related to managing diabetes.

    • Individual Item Score: Each item on the DDS is rated on a 6-point scale.
    • Minimum: 1 (not a problem)
    • Maximum: 6 (a very significant problem)
    • Total Score: The DDS yields an overall distress score calculated by averaging the responses to the individual items.
    • Minimum: 1
    • Maximum: 6
    • Interpretation of Scores:
    • < 2.0: Little or no distress
    • 2.0-2.9: Moderate distress
    • ≥ 3.0: High distress

    Measured: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark

  9. Psycho-Social Outcome

    Change in measures related to psycho-social outcomes for Overall QOL and Wellbeing using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health questionnaire.

    • PROMIS Global Health is a broader measure of overall physical and mental health.
    • PROMIS Global Health scores are reported as T-scores, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the US general population.
    • Higher T-scores indicate better physical and mental health. A score of 60 is one standard deviation above the mean, while 40 is one standard deviation below the mean.

    Measured: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark

  10. Psycho-Social Outcome

    Change in measures related to psycho-social outcomes for Overall QOL and Wellbeing using the World Health Organization- Five (WHO-5) questionnaire.

    • Measures well-being, specifically positive psychological states.
    • It consists of five statements relating to the past two weeks.
    • Aims to assess the subjective experience of well-being, capturing feelings of positive mood, energy, and interest. A short, 5-item questionnaire.
    • Typically uses a 6-point Likert scale for each item, with higher scores indicating better well-being.

    Measured: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2025
  2. Study startApr 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07116902
Sponsor's protocol ID
24-42259
Other IDs
#7-24-ICTST2DY-05
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
13 Jun 2025
Last updated
4 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing phone application in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by University of California, San Francisco at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Avani A Narayan, MS (415-530-8047, avani.narayan@ucsf.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in HbA1C (time frame: From enrollment to the close out visit at the 1-year mark). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in