Breast CancerINFINITENCT07146295
Implementation of Indocyanine Green to Identify Sentinel Lymph Nodes During Surgery for Breast Cancer
A study testing Technetium (99mTc), Indocyanine Green and Sentinel lymph node biopsy in people with Breast Cancer and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB), run by Isabelle Henskens at 7 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how to successfully introduce a new method for finding the sentinel lymph node during breast cancer surgery into routine hospital care. The method uses a dye called indocyanine green (ICG) and a special camera to see the lymph node. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB), Sentinel Lymph Node Detection
- What is being tested?
- Technetium (99mTc), Indocyanine Green and Sentinel lymph node biopsy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,760 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 18 Apr 2025to Aug 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients ≥ 18 years old.
- DCIS or invasive breast cancer, confirmed by biopsy
- Clinically node-negative, confirmed by preoperative axillary ultrasound
- Indication for breast cancer surgery with SLN procedure via axillar incision
Who cannot join
- Combined MARI procedure
- Known allergy for Indocyanine Green (ICG), intravenous contrast or iodine
- History of axillary lymph node dissection
- Hyperthyroidism or thyroid cancer
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
- No written informed consent according to ICH/GCP and national regulations.
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
7 sites in 1 country
Netherlands7 sites, 7 recruiting
- Recruiting
Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep
Alkmaar
Gea Gooiker, +31725484160, borstkliniek-alkmaar@nwz.nl
Gea Gooiker
- Recruiting
Ziekenhuisgroep Twente
Hengelo
Daniël Evers, +31887085232, secretariaatmamma@zgt.nl
Daniël Evers
- Recruiting
Spaarne Gasthuis
Hoofddorp
Kirsten Blaauwendraat, +3123224 0000, kblaauwendraat@spaarnegasthuis.nl
Kirsten Blaauwendraat
- Recruiting
Dijklander Ziekenhuis
Hoorn
Louise de Widt-Levert, +31299457457, secretariaatchirurgie-Hoorn@dijklander.nl
Louise de Widt-Levert
- Recruiting
Alrijne Hospital
Leiden
Carmen van der Pol, +31715828987, c.c.vanderpol@alrijne.nl
Carmen van der Pol
- Recruiting
Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis
Nijmegen
Dominique van Uden, +3124-3658721, d.vanuden@cwz.nl
Dominique van Uden
- Recruiting
Diakonessenhuis
Utrecht
José Volders, +3188 250 5000, researchoncologie@diakhuis.nl
José Volders
About this study
Official title: Implementation of Fluorescence Imaging Using Indocyanine Green to Identify Sentinel Lymph Nodes During Surgery for Breast Cancer
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how to successfully introduce a new method for finding the sentinel lymph node during breast cancer surgery into routine hospital care. The method uses a dye called indocyanine green (ICG) and a special camera to see the lymph node. The sentinel lymph node is the first lymph node that cancer is likely to spread to.
In the Netherlands, about 1 in 7 women develops breast cancer. Finding out whether cancer has spread to the lymph nodes is important for planning treatment and predicting outcomes. The current standard method for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) uses a radioactive tracer called radioisotope technetium-labeled (99mTc)-nanocolloid. While accurate, this method has several drawbacks: it exposes patients to radioactivity, requires an extra hospital visit or travel to another hospital due to limited nuclear medicine facilities, and is not sustainable. Surgeries using 99mTc can only take place on certain days due to logistical issues, and the signal from 99mTc can be disturbed by the tumor marker placed in the breast.
Read more
ICG works as well as 99mTc for SLNB and offers several advantages: it is given during surgery (no extra visit needed), produces no radiation, and reduces costs. However, it is still not widely used in the Netherlands because hospitals may not be familiar with it or unsure how to make the switch.
This study will introduce ICG step-by-step in several Dutch hospitals and evaluate how to make the change as smooth and effective as possible. It will take place in three stages: I) SLNB with 99mTc only (current practice); II) SLNB with both 99mTc and ICG (transition phase); III) SLNB with ICG only (full implementation).
All study procedures take place during planned surgery, with no extra hospital visits. After surgery, participants will receive a short questionnaire (10-15 minutes) to share their experiences with the procedure. Their feedback, combined with input from healthcare providers, will help researchers develop a uniform medical protocol, an implementation guide, and educational materials for surgeons and surgical trainees.
The aim is to make ICG widely available across the Netherlands, ensuring that care is less burdensome, more sustainable, and more cost-effective, while keeping treatment accessible in local hospitals.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Breast cancer affects one in seven women. Detecting lymph node metastases via the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is crucial for prognosis and treatment. The gold standard is radio-guided surgery using the radioisotope technetium-labeled (99mTc)-nanocolloid, which requires preoperative injection and lymphoscintigraphy. However, the use of 99mTc poses significant burdens on patients, as it requires additional hospital visits or travel to another hospital due to the limited availability of nuclear medicine facilities. The use of 99mTc also creates logistical challenges and lacks sustainability. A recently proven, equally effective and safe alternative method is peroperative real-time fluorescence imaging using Indocyanine Green (ICG). ICG offers many advantages over 99mTc for patients, healthcare providers, and society. Yet, the use of ICG for SLNB remains limited, as hospitals face challenges due to uncertainty in transitioning and limited familiarity with recent findings. Implementation guidance is imperative for effective adoption, to avert further practice variation and to ensure patients benefit from this evidence-based alternative method.
Objectives:
The INFINITE trial aims to successfully implement ICG-fluorescence for identifying the sentinel lymph node by guiding the implementation process using the Effective Implementation of Change model developed by Grol and Wensing, identifying and understanding the factors influencing implementation outcomes through the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, evaluating the outcomes of implementation efforts using a mixed-methods approach and the outcomes framework proposed by Proctor et al., and creating conditions for nationwide implementation. Secondary aims are to develop a uniform medical protocol for the use of ICG for SLNB, to develop an implementation guide that aligns with current practice, to prepare educational materials for surgeons and modules for the curriculum of surgical residents (CASH), to produce patient information materials and organize interactive meetings for surgical healthcare providers and their teams, to further substantiate the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of ICG, to increase support and a sense of urgency for ICG implementation by organizing informational sessions during annual conferences of the relevant scientific associations, and to facilitate nationwide scale-up by incorporating ICG into SLNB guidelines.
Study Design:
ICG will be implemented in seven strategically chosen Dutch hospitals during the INFINITE trial. These hospitals have been selected to represent different areas, settings, and sizes, ensuring broad applicability and support for subsequent nationwide implementation. The INFINITE trial is a multicenter hybrid effectiveness-implementation study using a stepped-wedge cluster trial design across three phases: Phase I, pre-implementation (99mTc only); Phase II, transition period (99mTc and ICG); and Phase III, post-implementation (ICG only). Based on site readiness and in consultation with the participating centers, three clusters will be formed, each consisting of two or three hospitals. Clusters will transition to the next phase at fixed intervals, creating an iterative learning cycle. This approach allows for regular evaluations of the implementation strategies, processes, and products, including the protocol, implementation guide, educational materials, and patient information. Process evaluations will inform adjustments using the ERIC-CFIR matching tool, ensuring rapid integration of lessons learned to enhance implementation in the next cluster.
Intervention:
In Phase I, pre-implementation, SLNB is performed using standard care with 99mTc injection and lymphoscintigraphy the day or morning before surgery, followed by radio-guided surgery with a gamma-detection probe. In Phase II, the transition period, SLNB is performed using both ICG and 99mTc. Patients receive 99mTc injection and lymphoscintigraphy before surgery, with the surgeon blinded to the imaging results. During surgery, after induction of general anesthesia and before axillary incision, 5 mg (2 ml) ICG is injected periareolarly, and SLNB is performed using fluorescence imaging. After excision of the sentinel lymph node(s), the standard gamma probe is used to test the excised nodes and the axilla for 99mTc activity, and the axilla is also explored by direct visualization and palpation. In Phase III, post-implementation, SLNB is performed using ICG as the sole tracer, with the same dosage and injection method, and the sentinel lymph node is visualized using fluorescence imaging and excised.
Outcomes:
Study endpoints are categorized into actual and anticipated implementation outcomes, client outcomes, and service outcomes. The primary endpoint is adoption, defined as the proportion of SLNB procedures conducted with ICG only, 99mTc only, or both during Phase III, compared to the total SLNBs in that phase, measured using screening logs and hospital records. All other outcomes are secondary. Fidelity, another actual implementation outcome, is measured through an intraoperative survey. Anticipated implementation outcomes such as appropriateness, feasibility, and acceptability are evaluated via a healthcare provider survey during Phase III. Client outcomes include patient satisfaction assessed through a post-procedure survey. Service outcomes encompass effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, and the impact on necessary personnel, evaluated using perioperative and hospital administration data.
Risks and Burden:
Patients who consent will not experience any extra burden from ICG-fluorescence. ICG will be administered under general anesthesia, so patients will not experience additional discomfort, site visits, or procedures. ICG is non-ionizing and has very few reported complications or adverse events. Considering a maximum of two additional nodes sampled, the preferred anatomical location of these nodes, and the clinical experience with additional lymph node sampling, no increase in surgical morbidity is expected. Patients may benefit from the intervention as ICG can increase sentinel lymph node identification rates and eliminate the need for a preoperative visit to the Nuclear Medicine department for 99mTc injection. Completion of the patient satisfaction questionnaire will take approximately 10 to 15 minutes. Both risks and burden are therefore considered negligible.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB), Sentinel Lymph Node Detection, Sentinel Lymph Node, Lymphatic Metastasis, Fluorescence Imaging
- Being tested
- Technetium (99mTc), Indocyanine Green, Sentinel lymph node biopsy
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Sentinel lymph node biopsy, Lymphatic metastasis, Indocyanine green, Techetium nanocolloïd, Fluorescence imaging, Surgical oncology, Lymph node mapping, Implementation, Radioisotope
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Lymphatic Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Technetium (99mTc)Drug
Also called 99mTc, Technetium-99m labelled nanocolloid, Technetium-99, Technetium-99m
A radiopharmaceutical tracer consisting of technetium-99m (99mTc)-labelled nanocolloid used for sentinel lymph node mapping. In this study, 99mTc-nanocolloid is administered via periareolar injection with an activity of 40 MBq for the one-day protocol or 100 MBq for the two-day protocol, according to local hospital practice. Injection is performed either on the day of surgery or the afternoon before surgery. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is carried out to visualize lymphatic drainage. During surgery, a gamma-detection probe is used to locate and remove the sentinel lymph node(s) identified by 99mTc uptake.
Indocyanine GreenDrug
Also called ICG, fluorescence imaging
Indocyanine Green (ICG) is a fluorescent dye used for intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping. In this study, a total dose of 5 mg (2 mL) of ICG is administered via periareolar injection after induction of general anesthesia and prior to axillary incision. During surgery, near-infrared fluorescence imaging is used to visualize lymphatic drainage and identify the sentinel lymph node(s). The identified node(s) are surgically removed under fluorescence guidance. In the transition phase, fluorescence findings are cross-checked against 99mTc uptake to ensure accuracy and safety.
Sentinel lymph node biopsyProcedure or surgery
Also called Sentinel lymph node mapping, SLNB, SLN procedure, Sentinel lymph node procedure
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a surgical procedure used to identify and remove the first lymph node(s) that drain lymph from a tumor area. In this study, SLNB is performed through a small axillary incision after mapping the sentinel lymph node(s) using either radioisotope technetium-labeled (99mTc)-nanocolloid, indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging, or a combination of both. The identified lymph node(s) are excised and sent for pathological examination to determine the presence of cancer cells. The procedure is carried out under general anesthesia as part of breast cancer surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-implementation (99mTc only) | Active comparator | Participants undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using the current standard of care: injection of radioisotope technetium-labeled (99mTc)-nanocolloid and preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, followed by radio-guided surgery with a gamma-detection probe. Receives: Drug: Technetium (99mTc); Drug: Indocyanine Green; Procedure: Sentinel lymph node biopsy |
| Transition phase (99mTc + ICG) | Experimental | Participants receive preoperative injection of radioisotope technetium-labeled (99mTc)-nanocolloid and preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (without marking the location on the skin). Surgeons are blinded to preoperative lymphoscintigraphy results. After induction of general anesthesia, indocyanine green (ICG) is injected periareolar. Surgery is primarily guided by ICG fluorescence imaging to identify and remove the sentinel lymph node(s). Excised lymph nodes are then checked for 99mTc activity using a gamma-detection probe as a control. This phase is designed to allow surgeons to gain experience with the ICG technique while maintaining safety through parallel use of the established 99mTc method. Receives: Drug: Indocyanine Green; Procedure: Sentinel lymph node biopsy |
| Post-implementation (ICG only) | Active comparator | Participants undergo SLNB using ICG only. ICG is injected periareolar after induction of general anesthesia and visualized intraoperatively with a fluorescence camera to guide excision of the sentinel lymph node(s). Receives: Drug: Technetium (99mTc); Procedure: Sentinel lymph node biopsy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adoption of ICG for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)
Proportion of SLNB procedures performed using indocyanine green (ICG) only, compared to the total number of SLNB procedures perfomed, using any tracer, on the target population in the observational cohort of phase III. Adoption will be assessed using hospital administrative data, with cross-checking against the prospective screening and inclusion log.
Measured: During Phase III, the post-implementation period, which is the final 9 months for hospitals in cluster 1, final 6 months for cluster 2, and final 3 months for cluster 3, within the 18-month trial.
Secondary outcomes (17)
Fidelity of ICG-fluorescence implementation
Degree to which the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedure using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence is performed as intended according to the developed protocol. Measured by identifying deviations from the established protocol through an intraoperative survey completed by the operating surgeon.
Measured: Phase III; intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure.
Appropriateness of ICG-fluorescence
Perceived fit, relevance, and compatibility of ICG use for SLNB within the clinical workflow of participating hospitals. Measured at the provider level using a structured questionnaire assessing perceived clinical usefulness, integration into existing practice, and alignment with patient care goals. The questionnaire uses a 5-point Likert scale with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5. Higher scores indicate better appropriateness.
Measured: A questionnaire is administered to healthcare providers in each participating hospital during the 3rd month of Phase III, corresponding to month 12 for cluster 1, month 15 for cluster 2, and month 18 for cluster 3.
Feasibility of ICG-fluorescence implementation
Extent to which ICG use for SLNB can be successfully carried out within the resources, organizational structure, and time constraints of each participating hospital. Measured via healthcare provider questionnaire assessing practical implementation challenges. The questionnaire uses a 5-point Likert scale with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5. Higher scores indicate better feasibility.
Measured: A questionnaire is administered to healthcare providers in each participating hospital during the 3rd month of Phase III, corresponding to month 12 for cluster 1, month 15 for cluster 2, and month 18 for cluster 3.
Acceptability of ICG-fluorescence implementation
Satisfaction and acceptance of ICG use for SLNB among healthcare providers. Measured through structured provider questionnaires evaluating perceived benefits, challenges, and willingness to continue using ICG. The questionnaire uses a 5-point Likert scale with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5. Higher scores indicate better acceptability.
Measured: A questionnaire is administered to healthcare providers in each participating hospital during the 3rd month of Phase III, corresponding to month 12 for cluster 1, month 15 for cluster 2, and month 18 for cluster 3.
Patient satisfaction with SLNB procedure
Satisfaction of participants undergoing SLNB using ICG, 99mTc, or both. Measured at the patient level using phase-specific structured questionnaires administered after surgery. The questionnaires assess understanding of the procedure, clarity of information, burden of additional appointments, pain or discomfort, cosmetic effects (e.g. temporary skin discoloration), and perceived exposure to radioactivity where applicable. Most items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale, where higher scores may reflect either greater burden or greater satisfaction depending on the item. The overall satisfaction item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. In addition, tracer preference is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strong preference for ICG to strong preference for Technetium. An open-ended question captures reasons for tracer preference.
Measured: Questionnaire administered within 1 week after surgery during all phases of the trial (from study start up to 18 months).
Total number of lymph nodes removed, SLNs, and non-SLNs
The total number of lymph nodes excised during SLNB and sent for pathological examination, including the total number of SLNs, the total number of non-SLNs, and the mean number of nodes excised per SLNB.
Measured: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure across all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Per-node detection of SLNs by tracer
Count and proportion of excised SLNs identified intraoperatively by ICG, 99mTc, both, or neither. Non-SLNs are excluded. This represents the per-node detection rate.
Measured: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure across all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Tracer Concordance of SLNs
Proportion of excised SLNs detected by both ICG and 99mTc compared to those detected by only one tracer. Reported as the percentage of SLNs fluorescent but not 99mTc-positive and vice versa. Non-SLNs are excluded.
Measured: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure during Phase II only.
Per-case identification rate of SLNs by tracer
Proportion of SLNB procedures in which at least one SLN is identified by the assigned tracer. Reported separately for: Phase I (Tc-99m only), Phase III (ICG only), and Phase II descriptively (tracer-specific rates for Tc-99m and ICG, and combined). This represents the per-case identification rate, including cases of mapping failure.
Measured: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure across all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Paired per-case detection rate of SLNs by ICG versus 99mTc
Paired comparison in which both ICG and 99mTc are used within the same patient. Proportion of SLNB procedures in which at least one SLN is identified by ICG versus 99mTc, reported as a within-patient comparison.
Measured: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure during Phase II only.
Detection time to first, second and/or third (sentinel) lymph node
Minutes from axillary incision to excision of the first, second and/or third (sentinel node); recorded intraoperatively.
Measured: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure across all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Total SLNB procedure duration
Minutes from axillary skin incision to closure of the axillary wound.
Measured: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure across all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Pathology of SLNs
Pathology results of excised SLNs, summarized per node and per patient: number examined at pathology and number classified as benign, with isolated tumor cells, micrometastasis, or macrometastasis. Analyses will be stratified by tracer and study phase (Phase I: 99mTc; Phase II: dual tracer; Phase III: ICG).
Measured: Data collected from the pathology report within 2-3 weeks after surgery, across all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Safety of ICG-fluorescence for SLNB
Incidence of perioperative (serious) adverse events potentially related to the use of ICG-fluorescence during SLNB.
Measured: Events are systematically recorded using a standardized postoperative case report form in REDCap, completed within 3 to 4 weeks after surgery in all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Direct in-hospital per-patient costs per SLNB ICG compared to 99mTc
This outcome measures the direct in-hospital costs per patient for SLNB comparing the two surgical pathways of ICG and 99mTc-guided SLNB. The analysis includes costs related to equipment, consumables, diagnostics, histopathology, and outpatient care, covering the period from the day before surgery until hospital discharge. Sources for cost determination include Dutch Costing Guidelines (DCG), manufacturer price lists, and the hospital's financial ledger. Costs are calculated by multiplying unit costs with actual resource use.
Measured: Conducted in parallel with the current study. The cost overview is based on cost drivers associated with each surgical pathway, as identified from the literature and clinical experience.
National budget impact of ICG-fluorescence implementation
A budget impact analysis from the provider's perspective will be performed using the tool developed by ZonMw to evaluate annual and cumulative five-year national savings and assess the economic impact of phased implementation of ICG on the Dutch healthcare system across 70 institutions within the Dutch healthcare system.
Measured: Conducted in parallel with the current study. The BIA covers the period of 2025-2029.
Patient-level costs for SLNB using 99mTc or ICG-fluorescence
Participant-reported travel distance, sick-leave duration, and childcare hours converted into monetary values using national unit-cost references.
Measured: Patient survey administered within 1 week after surgery during Phase I (99mTc) and Phase III (ICG).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2025
- Study start18 Apr 2025
- Primary completionJul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- This is a stepped-wedge cluster trial in which participating hospitals (clusters) are selected to represent different regions, settings, and sizes. The order in which hospitals transition is based on site readiness and in consultation with the participating centers. All hospitals begin with the current standard of care using radioisotope technetium-labeled (99mTc)-nanocolloid for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). At fixed intervals, clusters move to a transition phase using both 99mTc and indocyanine green (ICG), and then to ICG only. This sequential rollout creates an iterative learning cycle, allowing evaluation of the implementation process and refinements between phases. The total study duration is 18 months, with a fixed 6-month transition phase per cluster.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,760 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Isabelle Henskens
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Spaarne Gasthuis, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alrijne Hospital, Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Isabelle Henskens, St. Antonius Hospital
- Investigators
- Annemiek Doeksen, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, St. Antonius Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07146295
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL87551.100.24
- Other IDs
- 10390172310041
- Acronym
- INFINITE
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Aug 2025
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: At present, there is no final decision regarding sharing of individual participant data (IPD). Data sharing will depend on ethical approval, participant consent, and compliance with applicable privacy regulations. If IPD sharing is pursued, only de-identified datasets relevant to the research question will be made available upon reasonable request to qualified researchers, under a data use agreement ensuring confidentiality and scientific integrity
Publications
Henskens IJ, Dinger TL, Stekelenburg I, Dijksman LM, Verkooijen HM, Postma EL, Doeksen A, Schuijt HJ; INFINITE Study Group. Fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green to identify sentinel lymph nodes during surgery for breast cancer (INFINITE): protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial using a stepped-wedge cluster design. BMJ Open. 2026 Jun 24;16(6):e117847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117847.
PubMed 42342397
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Implementation of Fluorescence Imaging Using Indocyanine Green to Identify Sentinel Lymph Nodes During Surgery for Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07146295
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INFINITE / NL87551.100.24
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB), Sentinel Lymph Node Detection, Sentinel Lymph Node, Lymphatic Metastasis, Fluorescence Imaging
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Sentinel lymph node biopsy, Lymphatic metastasis, Indocyanine green, Techetium nanocolloïd, Fluorescence imaging, Surgical oncology, Lymph node mapping
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,760 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Isabelle HenskensUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Spaarne Gasthuis, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alrijne Hospital, Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
- Study start
- 18 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how to successfully introduce a new method for finding the sentinel lymph node during breast cancer surgery into routine hospital care. The method uses a dye called indocyanine green (ICG) and a special camera to see the lymph node. The sentinel lymph node is the first lymph node that cancer is likely to spread to.
In the Netherlands, about 1 in 7 women develops breast cancer. Finding out whether cancer has spread to the lymph nodes is important for planning treatment and predicting outcomes. The current standard method for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) uses a radioactive tracer called radioisotope technetium-labeled (99mTc)-nanocolloid. While accurate, this method has several drawbacks: it exposes patients to radioactivity, requires an extra hospital visit or travel to another hospital due to limited nuclear medicine facilities, and is not sustainable. Surgeries using 99mTc can only take place on certain days due to logistical issues, and the signal from 99mTc can be disturbed by the tumor marker placed in the breast.
ICG works as well as 99mTc for SLNB and offers several advantages: it is given during surgery (no extra visit needed), produces no radiation, and reduces costs. However, it is still not widely used in the Netherlands because hospitals may not be familiar with it or unsure how to make the switch.
This study will introduce ICG step-by-step in several Dutch hospitals and evaluate how to make the change as smooth and effective as possible. It will take place in three stages: I) SLNB with 99mTc only (current practice); II) SLNB with both 99mTc and ICG (transition phase); III) SLNB with ICG only (full implementation).
All study procedures take place during planned surgery, with no extra hospital visits. After surgery, participants will receive a short questionnaire (10-15 minutes) to share their experiences with the procedure. Their feedback, combined with input from healthcare providers, will help researchers develop a uniform medical protocol, an implementation guide, and educational materials for surgeons and surgical trainees.
The aim is to make ICG widely available across the Netherlands, ensuring that care is less burdensome, more sustainable, and more cost-effective, while keeping treatment accessible in local hospitals.
Detailed description
Background:
Breast cancer affects one in seven women. Detecting lymph node metastases via the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is crucial for prognosis and treatment. The gold standard is radio-guided surgery using the radioisotope technetium-labeled (99mTc)-nanocolloid, which requires preoperative injection and lymphoscintigraphy. However, the use of 99mTc poses significant burdens on patients, as it requires additional hospital visits or travel to another hospital due to the limited availability of nuclear medicine facilities. The use of 99mTc also creates logistical challenges and lacks sustainability. A recently proven, equally effective and safe alternative method is peroperative real-time fluorescence imaging using Indocyanine Green (ICG). ICG offers many advantages over 99mTc for patients, healthcare providers, and society. Yet, the use of ICG for SLNB remains limited, as hospitals face challenges due to uncertainty in transitioning and limited familiarity with recent findings. Implementation guidance is imperative for effective adoption, to avert further practice variation and to ensure patients benefit from this evidence-based alternative method.
Objectives:
The INFINITE trial aims to successfully implement ICG-fluorescence for identifying the sentinel lymph node by guiding the implementation process using the Effective Implementation of Change model developed by Grol and Wensing, identifying and understanding the factors influencing implementation outcomes through the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, evaluating the outcomes of implementation efforts using a mixed-methods approach and the outcomes framework proposed by Proctor et al., and creating conditions for nationwide implementation. Secondary aims are to develop a uniform medical protocol for the use of ICG for SLNB, to develop an implementation guide that aligns with current practice, to prepare educational materials for surgeons and modules for the curriculum of surgical residents (CASH), to produce patient information materials and organize interactive meetings for surgical healthcare providers and their teams, to further substantiate the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of ICG, to increase support and a sense of urgency for ICG implementation by organizing informational sessions during annual conferences of the relevant scientific associations, and to facilitate nationwide scale-up by incorporating ICG into SLNB guidelines.
Study Design:
ICG will be implemented in seven strategically chosen Dutch hospitals during the INFINITE trial. These hospitals have been selected to represent different areas, settings, and sizes, ensuring broad applicability and support for subsequent nationwide implementation. The INFINITE trial is a multicenter hybrid effectiveness-implementation study using a stepped-wedge cluster trial design across three phases: Phase I, pre-implementation (99mTc only); Phase II, transition period (99mTc and ICG); and Phase III, post-implementation (ICG only). Based on site readiness and in consultation with the participating centers, three clusters will be formed, each consisting of two or three hospitals. Clusters will transition to the next phase at fixed intervals, creating an iterative learning cycle. This approach allows for regular evaluations of the implementation strategies, processes, and products, including the protocol, implementation guide, educational materials, and patient information. Process evaluations will inform adjustments using the ERIC-CFIR matching tool, ensuring rapid integration of lessons learned to enhance implementation in the next cluster.
Intervention:
In Phase I, pre-implementation, SLNB is performed using standard care with 99mTc injection and lymphoscintigraphy the day or morning before surgery, followed by radio-guided surgery with a gamma-detection probe. In Phase II, the transition period, SLNB is performed using both ICG and 99mTc. Patients receive 99mTc injection and lymphoscintigraphy before surgery, with the surgeon blinded to the imaging results. During surgery, after induction of general anesthesia and before axillary incision, 5 mg (2 ml) ICG is injected periareolarly, and SLNB is performed using fluorescence imaging. After excision of the sentinel lymph node(s), the standard gamma probe is used to test the excised nodes and the axilla for 99mTc activity, and the axilla is also explored by direct visualization and palpation. In Phase III, post-implementation, SLNB is performed using ICG as the sole tracer, with the same dosage and injection method, and the sentinel lymph node is visualized using fluorescence imaging and excised.
Outcomes:
Study endpoints are categorized into actual and anticipated implementation outcomes, client outcomes, and service outcomes. The primary endpoint is adoption, defined as the proportion of SLNB procedures conducted with ICG only, 99mTc only, or both during Phase III, compared to the total SLNBs in that phase, measured using screening logs and hospital records. All other outcomes are secondary. Fidelity, another actual implementation outcome, is measured through an intraoperative survey. Anticipated implementation outcomes such as appropriateness, feasibility, and acceptability are evaluated via a healthcare provider survey during Phase III. Client outcomes include patient satisfaction assessed through a post-procedure survey. Service outcomes encompass effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, and the impact on necessary personnel, evaluated using perioperative and hospital administration data.
Risks and Burden:
Patients who consent will not experience any extra burden from ICG-fluorescence. ICG will be administered under general anesthesia, so patients will not experience additional discomfort, site visits, or procedures. ICG is non-ionizing and has very few reported complications or adverse events. Considering a maximum of two additional nodes sampled, the preferred anatomical location of these nodes, and the clinical experience with additional lymph node sampling, no increase in surgical morbidity is expected. Patients may benefit from the intervention as ICG can increase sentinel lymph node identification rates and eliminate the need for a preoperative visit to the Nuclear Medicine department for 99mTc injection. Completion of the patient satisfaction questionnaire will take approximately 10 to 15 minutes. Both risks and burden are therefore considered negligible.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This is a stepped-wedge cluster trial in which participating hospitals (clusters) are selected to represent different regions, settings, and sizes. The order in which hospitals transition is based on site readiness and in consultation with the participating centers. All hospitals begin with the current standard of care using radioisotope technetium-labeled (99mTc)-nanocolloid for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). At fixed intervals, clusters move to a transition phase using both 99mTc and indocyanine green (ICG), and then to ICG only. This sequential rollout creates an iterative learning cycle, allowing evaluation of the implementation process and refinements between phases. The total study duration is 18 months, with a fixed 6-month transition phase per cluster.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-implementation (99mTc only) | Active comparator | Drug: Technetium (99mTc), Drug: Indocyanine Green, Procedure: Sentinel lymph node biopsyParticipants undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using the current standard of care: injection of radioisotope technetium-labeled (99mTc)-nanocolloid and preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, followed by radio-guided surgery with a gamma-detection probe. |
| Transition phase (99mTc + ICG) | Experimental | Drug: Indocyanine Green, Procedure: Sentinel lymph node biopsyParticipants receive preoperative injection of radioisotope technetium-labeled (99mTc)-nanocolloid and preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (without marking the location on the skin). Surgeons are blinded to preoperative lymphoscintigraphy results. After induction of general anesthesia, indocyanine green (ICG) is injected periareolar. Surgery is primarily guided by ICG fluorescence imaging to identify and remove the sentinel lymph node(s). Excised lymph nodes are then checked for 99mTc activity using a gamma-detection probe as a control. This phase is designed to allow surgeons to gain experience with the ICG technique while maintaining safety through parallel use of the established 99mTc method. |
| Post-implementation (ICG only) | Active comparator | Drug: Technetium (99mTc), Procedure: Sentinel lymph node biopsyParticipants undergo SLNB using ICG only. ICG is injected periareolar after induction of general anesthesia and visualized intraoperatively with a fluorescence camera to guide excision of the sentinel lymph node(s). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients ≥ 18 years old.
- DCIS or invasive breast cancer, confirmed by biopsy
- Clinically node-negative, confirmed by preoperative axillary ultrasound
- Indication for breast cancer surgery with SLN procedure via axillar incision
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Combined MARI procedure
- Known allergy for Indocyanine Green (ICG), intravenous contrast or iodine
- History of axillary lymph node dissection
- Hyperthyroidism or thyroid cancer
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Technetium (99mTc)Also: 99mTc, Technetium-99m labelled nanocolloid, Technetium-99, Technetium-99mA radiopharmaceutical tracer consisting of technetium-99m (99mTc)-labelled nanocolloid used for sentinel lymph node mapping. In this study, 99mTc-nanocolloid is administered via periareolar injection with an activity of 40 MBq for the one-day protocol or 100 MBq for the two-day protocol, according to local hospital practice. Injection is performed either on the day of surgery or the afternoon before surgery. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is carried out to visualize lymphatic drainage. During surgery, a gamma-detection probe is used to locate and remove the sentinel lymph node(s) identified by 99mTc uptake. | Drug | Post-implementation (ICG only), Pre-implementation (99mTc only) |
| Indocyanine GreenAlso: ICG, fluorescence imagingIndocyanine Green (ICG) is a fluorescent dye used for intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping. In this study, a total dose of 5 mg (2 mL) of ICG is administered via periareolar injection after induction of general anesthesia and prior to axillary incision. During surgery, near-infrared fluorescence imaging is used to visualize lymphatic drainage and identify the sentinel lymph node(s). The identified node(s) are surgically removed under fluorescence guidance. In the transition phase, fluorescence findings are cross-checked against 99mTc uptake to ensure accuracy and safety. | Drug | Pre-implementation (99mTc only), Transition phase (99mTc + ICG) |
| Sentinel lymph node biopsyAlso: Sentinel lymph node mapping, SLNB, SLN procedure, Sentinel lymph node procedureSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a surgical procedure used to identify and remove the first lymph node(s) that drain lymph from a tumor area. In this study, SLNB is performed through a small axillary incision after mapping the sentinel lymph node(s) using either radioisotope technetium-labeled (99mTc)-nanocolloid, indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging, or a combination of both. The identified lymph node(s) are excised and sent for pathological examination to determine the presence of cancer cells. The procedure is carried out under general anesthesia as part of breast cancer surgery. | Procedure or surgery | Post-implementation (ICG only), Pre-implementation (99mTc only), Transition phase (99mTc + ICG) |
Primary outcome
Adoption of ICG for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)
Time frame: During Phase III, the post-implementation period, which is the final 9 months for hospitals in cluster 1, final 6 months for cluster 2, and final 3 months for cluster 3, within the 18-month trial.
Proportion of SLNB procedures performed using indocyanine green (ICG) only, compared to the total number of SLNB procedures perfomed, using any tracer, on the target population in the observational cohort of phase III. Adoption will be assessed using hospital administrative data, with cross-checking against the prospective screening and inclusion log.
17 secondary outcomes
Fidelity of ICG-fluorescence implementation
Time frame: Phase III; intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure.
Appropriateness of ICG-fluorescence
Time frame: A questionnaire is administered to healthcare providers in each participating hospital during the 3rd month of Phase III, corresponding to month 12 for cluster 1, month 15 for cluster 2, and month 18 for cluster 3.
Feasibility of ICG-fluorescence implementation
Time frame: A questionnaire is administered to healthcare providers in each participating hospital during the 3rd month of Phase III, corresponding to month 12 for cluster 1, month 15 for cluster 2, and month 18 for cluster 3.
Acceptability of ICG-fluorescence implementation
Time frame: A questionnaire is administered to healthcare providers in each participating hospital during the 3rd month of Phase III, corresponding to month 12 for cluster 1, month 15 for cluster 2, and month 18 for cluster 3.
Patient satisfaction with SLNB procedure
Time frame: Questionnaire administered within 1 week after surgery during all phases of the trial (from study start up to 18 months).
Total number of lymph nodes removed, SLNs, and non-SLNs
Time frame: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure across all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Per-node detection of SLNs by tracer
Time frame: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure across all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Tracer Concordance of SLNs
Time frame: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure during Phase II only.
Per-case identification rate of SLNs by tracer
Time frame: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure across all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Paired per-case detection rate of SLNs by ICG versus 99mTc
Time frame: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure during Phase II only.
Detection time to first, second and/or third (sentinel) lymph node
Time frame: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure across all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Total SLNB procedure duration
Time frame: Intraoperative survey completed immediately after each SLNB procedure across all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Pathology of SLNs
Time frame: Data collected from the pathology report within 2-3 weeks after surgery, across all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Safety of ICG-fluorescence for SLNB
Time frame: Events are systematically recorded using a standardized postoperative case report form in REDCap, completed within 3 to 4 weeks after surgery in all study phases (from study start up to 18 months).
Direct in-hospital per-patient costs per SLNB ICG compared to 99mTc
Time frame: Conducted in parallel with the current study. The cost overview is based on cost drivers associated with each surgical pathway, as identified from the literature and clinical experience.
National budget impact of ICG-fluorescence implementation
Time frame: Conducted in parallel with the current study. The BIA covers the period of 2025-2029.
Patient-level costs for SLNB using 99mTc or ICG-fluorescence
Time frame: Patient survey administered within 1 week after surgery during Phase I (99mTc) and Phase III (ICG).
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42342397Henskens IJ, Dinger TL, Stekelenburg I, Dijksman LM, Verkooijen HM, Postma EL, Doeksen A, Schuijt HJ; INFINITE Study Group. Fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green to identify sentinel lymph nodes during surgery for breast cancer (INFINITE): protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial using a stepped-wedge cluster design. BMJ Open. 2026 Jun 24;16(6):e117847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117847.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. At present, there is no final decision regarding sharing of individual participant data (IPD). Data sharing will depend on ethical approval, participant consent, and compliance with applicable privacy regulations. If IPD sharing is pursued, only de-identified datasets relevant to the research question will be made available upon reasonable request to qualified researchers, under a data use agreement ensuring confidentiality and scientific integrity
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Annemiek Doeksen, MD, PhD principal investigator
St. Antonius Hospital
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Technetium (99mTc), Indocyanine Green and Sentinel lymph node biopsy in people with Breast Cancer and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB), run by Isabelle Henskens at 7 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Isabelle Henskens, MD (+31883202902, i.henskens@antoniusziekenhuis.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adoption of ICG for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) (time frame: During Phase III, the post-implementation period, which is the final 9 months for hospitals in cluster 1, final 6 months for cluster 2, and final 3 months for cluster 3, within the 18-month trial.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07146295, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2026.