Heart FailureNCT07153718
Optimal Ablation Strategies for Persistent AF With HF
A study testing Electrogram-guided ablation, Anatomical-guided Ablation and Extensive electrogram-anatomical guided ablation in people with Heart Failure and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, run by Xu Liu at 10 sites in China.
Trial summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the context of heart failure (HF) is associated with a markedly poor prognosis. Catheter ablation has been shown to improve outcomes in this population, enhancing ablation success rates in these patients is critical for further reducing morbidity and mortality. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Electrogram-guided ablation, Anatomical-guided Ablation and Extensive electrogram-anatomical guided ablation
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2021to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All inclusion criteria must be met to be included in the study.
- Age: Patients aged 18-80 years, with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), regardless of ejection fraction (EF).
- Diagnosis of Heart Failure:
- Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF): LVEF ≤ 40%. Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): LVEF > 40%, including HFmrEF (LVEF 41-50%).
- Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation: Patients with symptomatic persistent AF who have failed or are intolerant to at least one antiarrhythmic drug.
- NYHA Class II-III: Patients with heart failure classified as NYHA class II-III, who are symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. Informed Consent: Able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study.
- Guideline-Recommended Pharmacologic Therapy: Patients who have received and are currently on guideline-recommended pharmacologic therapy for heart failure, including but not limited to ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, diuretics, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs).
Who cannot join
- Any of the following criteria shall be excluded.
- End-Stage Heart Failure: Patients with heart failure classified as NYHA class IV or with LVEF ≤ 20%.
- Severe Comorbidities:
- Patients with severe pulmonary disease (e.g., COPD, severe restrictive lung disease).
- Severe renal dysfunction (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m²) or advanced liver disease.
- Active malignancy or other terminal illnesses with a prognosis of less than one year.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Inability to Tolerate Ablation:
- <!-- -->
- Patients unable to undergo catheter ablation due to anatomical or procedural issues.
- Patients with contraindications to the procedure, including allergy to contrast agents or inability to tolerate anesthesia.
- Left atrial thrombus confirmed by preoperative esophageal ultrasound; 7. Uncontrolled Arrhythmias: Patients with persistent or paroxysmal AF who are unable to maintain sinus rhythm despite optimal medical therapy or require frequent hospitalization for arrhythmia control.
- 8. Pregnancy: Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 9. Contraindications to Anticoagulation: 10. Patients who are contraindicated for anticoagulation therapy (e.g., history of major bleeding or bleeding diathesis).
- 11. History of Severe Valve Disease: Patients with a history of severe valve disease and/or prosthetic valve replacement.
- 12. Recent Myocardial Infarction or Stroke: Patients who have had a myocardial infarction or stroke within the past 3 months.
- 13. Contrast Agent Allergy: Patients with a known allergy to contrast agents. 14. Contraindications for Cardiac Catheterization: Any contraindications for cardiac catheterization, including inability to safely perform the procedure.
- 15. Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Patients who have previously undergone atrial fibrillation ablation.
- 16. Cardiac Surgery: Patients who have undergone any cardiac surgery within the last 2 months.
- 17. Life Expectancy: Patients with a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
10 sites in 1 country
China10 sites
The PLA Navy Anqing Hospital
Anqing, Anhui, 246000
Changshu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Changshu, Jiangsu, 215516
Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Jinan, Shandong, 250000
Jinan City People's Hospital
Jinan, Shandong, 271100
Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University
Jining, Shandong, 272000
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital
Shanghai, 200030
Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, 200127
The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430014
Xuzhou Central Hospital
Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221009
Yuhuan Second People's Hospital
Yuhuan, Zhejiang, 317600
About this study
Official title: Optimal Ablation Strategies for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure - Optimization of Intervention Strategies for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the context of heart failure (HF) is associated with a markedly poor prognosis. Catheter ablation has been shown to improve outcomes in this population, enhancing ablation success rates in these patients is critical for further reducing morbidity and mortality. We conducted this multicenter, randomized clinical trial to systematically evaluate the optimal ablation strategy in patients with heart failure and persistent AF.
Read the detailed description
Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the context of heart failure (HF) is associated with a markedly poor prognosis, with one-year all-cause mortality rates approaching 34% and substantially elevated risks of stroke and rehospitalization. Catheter ablation has been shown to improve outcomes in this population, as evidenced by numerous pivotal studies, such as CASTLE-AF. It is well recognized that the majority of patients with HF and AF exhibit persistent AF; however, the underlying mechanisms responsible for sustaining persistent AF in this population remain to be fully elucidated. Thus, enhancing ablation success rates in these patients is therefore critical for further reducing morbidity and mortality.
Building on prior research, we have identified driver regions as critical determinants in the maintenance of persistent atrial fibrillation. Moreover, our randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that electro-anatomical ablation may represent the optimal strategy for persistent AF. Based on these findings, we conducted a multicenter, randomized clinical trial to systematically evaluate the optimal ablation strategy in patients with heart failure and persistent AF.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- Electrogram-guided ablation, Anatomical-guided Ablation, Extensive electrogram-anatomical guided ablation
- Keywords
- ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation with heart failure
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Electrogram-guided ablationProcedure or surgery
pulmonary vein ioslation; target electrograms ablation, including (1) Spatial-temporal Dispersion Activation, (2) Locally Short Cycle Length Activity, (3) High-Frequency Potentials, (4) Focal Activity.
Anatomical-guided AblationProcedure or surgery
pulmonary vein isolation; LA roof, posterior inferior wall and mitral isthmus linear lesion; Vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion.
Extensive electrogram-anatomical guided ablationProcedure or surgery
pulmonary vein isolation; target electrogram ablation; linear ablation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Anatomical-guided Ablation Group | Active comparator | Patients in the ANAT group would receive anatomical-guided ablation after PVI, including linear ablation and Vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion. Receives: Procedure: Anatomical-guided Ablation |
| Electrogram-guided Ablation Group | Active comparator | Patients in the EGM group received target electrogram ablation after PVI while did not receive anatomical-guided ablation. We defined the target electrograms into 4 types as follows.(1) Spatial-temporal Dispersion Activation (2) Locally Short Cycle Length Activity (3) High-Frequency Potentials (4) Focal Activity Receives: Procedure: Electrogram-guided ablation |
| Extensive Electrogram-Anatomical Guided Ablation Group | Experimental | Patients in the extensive ablation group (EXT group) would receive EGM-guided ablation firstly. The anatomical-guided ablation would be performed after EGM-guided ablation no matter whether AF terminated during EGM-guided ablation. Receives: Procedure: Extensive electrogram-anatomical guided ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
a composite of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization or urgent visits
The primary endpoint was the incidence of a composite of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization or urgent visits due to worsening heart failure during the follow-up period after a single catheter ablation procedure
Measured: 12, 18, 24, 36, 46, 60months
freedom from any documented AF/AT
freedom from any documented AF/AT episode lasting more than 30 seconds after the blanking period without anti-arrhythmic drug treatment
Measured: 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60months
Secondary outcomes (5)
AF burden <1%
AF burden <1% after a single ablation procedure, as measured by Holter monitoring or device-recorded data (Patients who remained in persistent AF throughout follow-up were assigned AF burden=100%. Both ends of the distribution (burden=0% and burden=100%) were included in statistical analysis.).
Measured: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure
Improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class
Improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class by at least one grade
Measured: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure
Change in 6-minute walk test
Change in 6-minute walk test from baseline to Month 3, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure
Measured: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure
Change in N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)
Change in N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline to Month 3,12, 24, 36, 48, 60 after a single procedure
Measured: Month 3,12, 24, 36, 48, 60 after a single procedure
Incidence of procedure-related complications
Incidence of procedure-related complications, including but not limited to: vascular complications (e.g., hematoma, pseudoaneurysm), cardiac tamponade, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), phrenic nerve injury, atrioesophageal fistula, procedure-related death within 30 days.
Measured: 30 days after a single procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Sep 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Xu Liu
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Xu Liu, Shanghai Chest Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07153718
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EXT- AF&HF
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2025
- Last updated
- 4 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The individual participant data (IPD) from this study will not be shared publicly due to concerns regarding patient confidentiality and the sensitive nature of medical data. Given the potential risks of identifying participants from detailed clinical information, the data will remain confidential and will not be made available for public sharing. Additionally, the study involves proprietary methodologies and ongoing analyses that are part of the intellectual property of the institution. As such, sharing the IPD at this stage could compromise the integrity of the study's findings and its future applications.
Publications
Li K, Wang X, Qin M, Ye P, Han B, Jiang W, Zhang Y, Zheng Q, Ji A, Zhang M, Wang Y, Wu S, Xu K, Xu C, Liu X, Hou X. Optimal Ablation Strategies for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure: Three-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2026 Apr;19(4):e014394. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.125.014394. Epub 2026 Mar 31.
PubMed 41914182
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimal Ablation Strategies for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure - Optimization of Intervention Strategies for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07153718
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EXT- AF&HF
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
- Keywords
- ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation with heart failure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Xu LiuUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the context of heart failure (HF) is associated with a markedly poor prognosis. Catheter ablation has been shown to improve outcomes in this population, enhancing ablation success rates in these patients is critical for further reducing morbidity and mortality. We conducted this multicenter, randomized clinical trial to systematically evaluate the optimal ablation strategy in patients with heart failure and persistent AF.
Detailed description
Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the context of heart failure (HF) is associated with a markedly poor prognosis, with one-year all-cause mortality rates approaching 34% and substantially elevated risks of stroke and rehospitalization. Catheter ablation has been shown to improve outcomes in this population, as evidenced by numerous pivotal studies, such as CASTLE-AF. It is well recognized that the majority of patients with HF and AF exhibit persistent AF; however, the underlying mechanisms responsible for sustaining persistent AF in this population remain to be fully elucidated. Thus, enhancing ablation success rates in these patients is therefore critical for further reducing morbidity and mortality.
Building on prior research, we have identified driver regions as critical determinants in the maintenance of persistent atrial fibrillation. Moreover, our randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that electro-anatomical ablation may represent the optimal strategy for persistent AF. Based on these findings, we conducted a multicenter, randomized clinical trial to systematically evaluate the optimal ablation strategy in patients with heart failure and persistent AF.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Anatomical-guided Ablation Group | Active comparator | Procedure: Anatomical-guided AblationPatients in the ANAT group would receive anatomical-guided ablation after PVI, including linear ablation and Vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion. |
| Electrogram-guided Ablation Group | Active comparator | Procedure: Electrogram-guided ablationPatients in the EGM group received target electrogram ablation after PVI while did not receive anatomical-guided ablation. We defined the target electrograms into 4 types as follows.(1) Spatial-temporal Dispersion Activation (2) Locally Short Cycle Length Activity (3) High-Frequency Potentials (4) Focal Activity |
| Extensive Electrogram-Anatomical Guided Ablation Group | Experimental | Procedure: Extensive electrogram-anatomical guided ablationPatients in the extensive ablation group (EXT group) would receive EGM-guided ablation firstly. The anatomical-guided ablation would be performed after EGM-guided ablation no matter whether AF terminated during EGM-guided ablation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- All inclusion criteria must be met to be included in the study.
- Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF): LVEF ≤ 40%. Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): LVEF > 40%, including HFmrEF (LVEF 41-50%).
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Any of the following criteria shall be excluded.
- <!-- -->
- 8. Pregnancy: Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 9. Contraindications to Anticoagulation: 10. Patients who are contraindicated for anticoagulation therapy (e.g., history of major bleeding or bleeding diathesis).
- 11. History of Severe Valve Disease: Patients with a history of severe valve disease and/or prosthetic valve replacement.
- 12. Recent Myocardial Infarction or Stroke: Patients who have had a myocardial infarction or stroke within the past 3 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Electrogram-guided ablationpulmonary vein ioslation; target electrograms ablation, including (1) Spatial-temporal Dispersion Activation, (2) Locally Short Cycle Length Activity, (3) High-Frequency Potentials, (4) Focal Activity. | Procedure or surgery | Electrogram-guided Ablation Group |
| Anatomical-guided Ablationpulmonary vein isolation; LA roof, posterior inferior wall and mitral isthmus linear lesion; Vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion. | Procedure or surgery | Anatomical-guided Ablation Group |
| Extensive electrogram-anatomical guided ablationpulmonary vein isolation; target electrogram ablation; linear ablation | Procedure or surgery | Extensive Electrogram-Anatomical Guided Ablation Group |
Primary outcome
a composite of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization or urgent visits
Time frame: 12, 18, 24, 36, 46, 60months
The primary endpoint was the incidence of a composite of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization or urgent visits due to worsening heart failure during the follow-up period after a single catheter ablation procedure
freedom from any documented AF/AT
Time frame: 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60months
freedom from any documented AF/AT episode lasting more than 30 seconds after the blanking period without anti-arrhythmic drug treatment
5 secondary outcomes
AF burden <1%
Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure
Improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class
Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure
Change in 6-minute walk test
Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure
Change in N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)
Time frame: Month 3,12, 24, 36, 48, 60 after a single procedure
Incidence of procedure-related complications
Time frame: 30 days after a single procedure
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Sep 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41914182Li K, Wang X, Qin M, Ye P, Han B, Jiang W, Zhang Y, Zheng Q, Ji A, Zhang M, Wang Y, Wu S, Xu K, Xu C, Liu X, Hou X. Optimal Ablation Strategies for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure: Three-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2026 Apr;19(4):e014394. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.125.014394. Epub 2026 Mar 31.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The individual participant data (IPD) from this study will not be shared publicly due to concerns regarding patient confidentiality and the sensitive nature of medical data. Given the potential risks of identifying participants from detailed clinical information, the data will remain confidential and will not be made available for public sharing. Additionally, the study involves proprietary methodologies and ongoing analyses that are part of the intellectual property of the institution. As such, sharing the IPD at this stage could compromise the integrity of the study's findings and its future applications.
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Lonapegsomatropin Compared to Daily Somatropin in Children and Adolescents With Short Stature or Growth Failure Due to Growth Hormone Sufficient Disorders
Turner Syndrome, Short Stature Homeobox Gene Mutation
RecruitingObservational study
Heart Failure and Aortic Stenosis Transcriptome
Heart Failure, Aortic Stenosis
Active, not recruiting
REsynchronization Comparison In LBBB and Normal or Mildly Reduced VENTricular Function With CRT (REINVENT-CRT)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure (HF)
RecruitingObservational study
Product Performance Report: Evaluate Long-term Reliability & Performance of Medtronic Marketed Cardiac Therapy Products
Arrhythmia, Bradycardia
Recruiting
Determining Efficacy of an Artificial Intelligence-based System for Heart Failure Detection Through Interpretation of Electrocardiograms (DECISION)
Heart Failure, Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Electrogram-guided ablation, Anatomical-guided Ablation and Extensive electrogram-anatomical guided ablation in people with Heart Failure and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, run by Xu Liu at 10 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
a composite of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization or urgent visits (time frame: 12, 18, 24, 36, 46, 60months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07153718, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2025.