Breast Cancer-Related LymphedemaNCT07154043
Comparison of IPC Therapy as an Alternative or an Adjunct to MLD Within CDT for BCRL
A study testing Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT), CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) and CDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression in people with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema and BCRL, run by Pamukkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide and lymphedema is one of its most significant complications. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) may develop shortly after treatment or even years later, causing physical and psychological burden, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema, BCRL
- What is being tested?
- Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT), CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) and CDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 45 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 15 Sep 2025to 1 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female gender
- Patients aged 18-65 years
- Having a history of unilateral mastectomy and lymph node dissection at least one year ago due to breast cancer diagnosis.
- Having unilateral breast cancer-related upper extremity lymphedema (>20% volume difference between the two upper extremities or >2 cm difference in circumference at any measured point) according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Society of Lymphology (Committee 2023) for at least six months.
- Not having received lymphedema treatment or exercise therapy for the last six months
- Completing breast cancer primary treatment at least 6 months ago (except hormone therapy/aromatase inhibitors)
Who cannot join
- Bilateral breast cancer
- Bilateral axillary lymph node dissection
- Metastatic breast cancer
- Receiving ongoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy
- Primary or bilateral lymphedema
- Having active cancer
Show all 14Show fewer
- Presence of stage 3 lymphedema
- Uncontrolled serious systemic disease (cardiopulmonary diseases, arterial or venous diseases, renal dysfunction, uncontrolled hypertension or hypotension, cardiac arrhythmia, scleroderma, Sudek's atrophy).
- Current or recent (within the last 3 months) infection (cellulitis, lymphangitis) or deep venous thrombosis
- Presence of open wounds
- Using medications that may affect body fluid and electrolyte balance (diuretics, etc.).
- Individuals with serious mental and sensory problems
- Being pregnant
- Body mass index >40 kg/m2
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Pamukkale University
Denizli
Emre Bezmez, M.D., +905319902220
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Therapy as an Alternative or an Adjunct to Manual Lymphatic Drainage Within Complete Decongestive Therapy for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide and lymphedema is one of its most significant complications. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) may develop shortly after treatment or even years later, causing physical and psychological burden, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. Complete decongestive therapy (CDT), which includes manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression, skin care, and exercise, is the standard approach. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) has been proposed as an additional option, and current consensus reports emphasize the need for studies evaluating IPC in combination with MLD.
Previous studies comparing IPC and MLD, either alone or in combination, have shown inconsistent results. Some reported no significant difference between treatment groups, while others suggested additional benefits of IPC, particularly in reducing limb heaviness and tension. However, there is still insufficient evidence to clarify the exact role of IPC within CDT.
The aim of this study is to investigate the acute effects of using IPC instead of MLD, or in combination with MLD, on arm circumference, arm volume, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life in patients with BCRL.
Read the detailed description
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide and remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is one of the most important complications of breast cancer treatment. It may occur due to lymphatic system damage caused by surgery and/or radiotherapy, or as a result of tumor-related lymphangiogenesis, leading to interstitial fluid accumulation. BCRL can develop immediately after treatment or months to years later.
BCRL is associated with swelling, heaviness, discomfort, weakness, increased risk of infection, and progressive chronicity, which together result in upper extremity dysfunction and reduced quality of life. Compared with women without lymphedema, patients with BCRL report more frequent pain, decreased shoulder mobility, reduced upper extremity strength, impaired daily activities, and sensory disturbances.
The standard treatment for BCRL is complete decongestive therapy (CDT), which consists of manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression, skin care, and exercise. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) has also been proposed as a treatment option, and the 2023 consensus report of the International Society of Lymphology emphasized the need for further studies evaluating IPC in combination with MLD.
However, the number of studies directly comparing IPC with MLD, or evaluating their combined use, is limited and results remain inconsistent. Some trials reported no significant difference between MLD and IPC in terms of limb volume reduction, while others demonstrated additional benefits of IPC in relieving heaviness and tension. The role of IPC in CDT, whether as a replacement for MLD or as an adjunct, is not yet clearly defined.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the acute effects of using IPC instead of MLD, or in combination with MLD, within CDT on arm circumference, arm volume, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life in patients with BCRL.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema, BCRL
- Being tested
- Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT), CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC), CDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression
- Keywords
- Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema, Manual Lymph Drainage, Intermittent Pneumatic Compression, Complete Decongestive Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Cancer Lymphedema
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT)Procedure or surgery
Manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.
CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC)Procedure or surgery
Complete decongestive therapy program including manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise, plus intermittent pneumatic compression at 20-50 mmHg for 40 minutes per session. Total duration: 115 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.
CDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic CompressionProcedure or surgery
Complete decongestive therapy consisting of multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise, with manual lymph drainage replaced by intermittent pneumatic compression at 20-50 mmHg for 40 minutes per session. Total duration: 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Complete Decongestive Therapy plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Group | Experimental | Complete decongestive therapy program consisting of manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. In addition, patients will receive intermittent pneumatic compression with a device at 20-50 mmHg pressure for 40 minutes per session. The total treatment duration will be 115 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks. Receives: Procedure: CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) |
| Complete Decongestive Therapy without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression | Experimental | This group will receive a complete decongestive therapy program consisting of multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. Manual lymph drainage will be replaced by intermittent pneumatic compression. Intermittent pneumatic compression will be applied with a device at 20-50 mmHg pressure for 40 minutes per session. The total treatment duration will be 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks. Receives: Procedure: CDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression |
| Complete Decongestive Therapy Group | Active comparator | This group will receive a complete decongestive therapy program consisting of manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. The treatment duration will be 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks. Receives: Procedure: Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Arm volumetric measurements
Arm volume will be calculated using circumferential measurements taken with a standard 7 mm measuring tape at 4 cm intervals along the arm. Segmental arm volumes (mL-cm³) will be calculated using the simplified frustum formula (Frustum Model). This formula, as described by Sitzia et al., has shown high correlation with water displacement measurements and is widely used in the literature as a valid and reliable indirect method for assessing lymphedema.
Measured: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Secondary outcomes (10)
Shoulder Range of Motion
Goniometric measurements of the affected shoulder will be performed to assess flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, and external rotation in patients with lymphedema.
Measured: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Quality of Life Measurement ULL-27
ULL-27 quality of life questionnaire, developed specifically for upper extremity lymphedema patients. The scale has physical, psychological and social dimensions. It consists of 27 questions. A high score on the scale indicates that lymphedema negatively affects the quality of life.
Measured: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Arm Circumference Measurements
To assess lymphedema severity, circumferential measurements of the affected and unaffected upper extremities will be performed. Patients' forearms will be in a supine position, elbows fully extended, and arms abducted at 90 degrees. Arm-hand circumference will be measured at four points: metacarpal region, wrist, 10 cm below the lateral epicondyle, and 15 cm above the lateral epicondyle, using a non-stretchable 7 mm tape of 150 cm length. Measurements will be taken on both upper extremities, and the differences between sides will be recorded in centimeters.
Measured: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) Questionnaire
The Quick-DASH is an 11-item questionnaire used to assess activity limitations of the upper extremity in patients with lymphedema related to breast cancer. Each item is scored from 1 to 5, and total scores are summed. A total score of 0 indicates no disability, while a score of 100 indicates the highest level of disability. The Turkish version was validated in 2011 and has been found valid and reliable for assessing upper extremity activity limitations in breast cancer-related lymphedema.
Measured: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Upper Extremity Swelling (Visual Analog Scale)
Swelling in the affected extremity will be assessed using a 0-10 cm (0-100 mm) horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score of 0 indicates no symptom, and 10 cm indicates the most severe presence of the symptom. Participants will mark the severity of each symptom and the discomfort caused by the symptom on the VAS ("0" = no complaint, "10" = maximal complaint). The mark will be measured in centimeters with a ruler. The VAS is a valid and reliable method for measuring experimental and clinical pain as well as lymphedema-specific symptoms, and it is sensitive to small changes in symptom intensity.
Measured: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Upper Extremity Heaviness (Visual Analog Scale)
Heaviness in the affected extremity will be assessed using a 0-10 cm (0-100 mm) horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score of 0 indicates no symptom, and 10 cm indicates the most severe presence of the symptom. Participants will mark the severity of each symptom and the discomfort caused by the symptom on the VAS ("0" = no complaint, "10" = maximal complaint). The mark will be measured in centimeters with a ruler. The VAS is a valid and reliable method for measuring experimental and clinical pain as well as lymphedema-specific symptoms, and it is sensitive to small changes in symptom intensity.
Measured: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Upper Extremity Tightness (Visual Analog Scale)
Tightness in the affected extremity will be assessed using a 0-10 cm (0-100 mm) horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score of 0 indicates no symptom, and 10 cm indicates the most severe presence of the symptom. Participants will mark the severity of each symptom and the discomfort caused by the symptom on the VAS ("0" = no complaint, "10" = maximal complaint). The mark will be measured in centimeters with a ruler. The VAS is a valid and reliable method for measuring experimental and clinical pain as well as lymphedema-specific symptoms, and it is sensitive to small changes in symptom intensity.
Measured: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Upper Extremity Pain (Visual Analog Scale)
Pain in the affected extremity will be assessed using a 0-10 cm (0-100 mm) horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score of 0 indicates no symptom, and 10 cm indicates the most severe presence of the symptom. Participants will mark the severity of each symptom and the discomfort caused by the symptom on the VAS ("0" = no complaint, "10" = maximal complaint). The mark will be measured in centimeters with a ruler. The VAS is a valid and reliable method for measuring experimental and clinical pain as well as lymphedema-specific symptoms, and it is sensitive to small changes in symptom intensity.
Measured: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Patient Satisfaction
Patient satisfaction with the exercise programs will be assessed using a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not satisfied, 1 = slightly satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = very satisfied).
Measured: 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Perceived Improvement
Patients' perceived improvement will be measured using the Patient Global Perceived Improvement Scale, asking participants to compare their current condition with baseline regarding lymphedema (1 = much better, 2 = better, 3 = slightly better, 4 = no change, 5 = slightly worse, 6 = worse, 7 = much worse). The Turkish version of this scale was validated and culturally adapted by Yalçın et al. in 2003, showing good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.79) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.75).
Measured: 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Sep 2025
- Study start15 Sep 2025
- Primary completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (30)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast Cancer-Related LymphedemaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Pamukkale UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pamukkale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Oya Topuz, Pamukkale University
- Investigators
- Oya Topuz, Professor, Study director, Pamukkale University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07154043
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PamukkaleU.ftr-OTopuz-001
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2025
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 May 18;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-44.
PubMed 16709254LeBlanc M, Stineman M, DeMichele A, Stricker C, Mao JJ. Validation of QuickDASH outcome measure in breast cancer survivors for upper extremity disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
PubMed 24095658Koldas Dogan S, Ay S, Evcik D, Baser O. Adaptation of Turkish version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Feb;30(2):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1470-y. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
PubMed 20411289Sitzia J. Volume measurement in lymphoedema treatment: examination of formulae. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1995 Mar;4(1):11-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1995.tb00047.x.
PubMed 7620649Karges JR, Mark BE, Stikeleather SJ, Worrell TW. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume. Phys Ther. 2003 Feb;83(2):134-45.
PubMed 12564949Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology. 2020;53(1):3-19.
PubMed 32521126De Vrieze T, Gebruers N, Tjalma WA, Nevelsteen I, Thomis S, De Groef A, Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Belgrado JP, Vandermeeren L, Devoogdt N. What is the best method to determine excessive arm volume in patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema in clinical practice? Reliability, time efficiency and clinical feasibility of five different methods. Clin Rehabil. 2019 Jul;33(7):1221-1232. doi: 10.1177/0269215519835907. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PubMed 30880473Keeley V, Riches K, Ward L, Franks PJ. A Prospective Preliminary Study Examining the Physiological Impact of Pneumatic Compression Dosing in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2023 Oct;21(5):456-462. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2022.0087. Epub 2023 May 4.
PubMed 37140559Kayali Vatansever A, Yavuzsen T, Karadibak D. The Reliability and Validity of Quality of Life Questionnaire Upper Limb Lymphedema (ULL-27) Turkish Patient With Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema. Front Oncol. 2020 May 12;10:455. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00455. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32477925Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379.
PubMed 12861145Stanton AW, Badger C, Sitzia J. Non-invasive assessment of the lymphedematous limb. Lymphology. 2000 Sep;33(3):122-35.
PubMed 11019400Szuba A, Achalu R, Rockson SG. Decongestive lymphatic therapy for patients with breast carcinoma-associated lymphedema. A randomized, prospective study of a role for adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression. Cancer. 2002 Dec 1;95(11):2260-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10976.
PubMed 12436430Szolnoky G, Lakatos B, Keskeny T, Varga E, Varga M, Dobozy A, Kemeny L. Intermittent pneumatic compression acts synergistically with manual lymphatic drainage in complex decongestive physiotherapy for breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema. Lymphology. 2009 Dec;42(4):188-94.
PubMed 20218087Tastaban E, Soyder A, Aydin E, Sendur OF, Turan Y, Ture M, Bilgen M. Role of intermittent pneumatic compression in the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Feb;34(2):220-228. doi: 10.1177/0269215519888792. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
PubMed 31795748Uzkeser H, Karatay S, Erdemci B, Koc M, Senel K. Efficacy of manual lymphatic drainage and intermittent pneumatic compression pump use in the treatment of lymphedema after mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer. 2015 May;22(3):300-7. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0481-3. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
PubMed 23925581
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Therapy as an Alternative or an Adjunct to Manual Lymphatic Drainage Within Complete Decongestive Therapy for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07154043
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PamukkaleU.ftr-OTopuz-001
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema, BCRL
- Keywords
- Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema, Manual Lymph Drainage, Intermittent Pneumatic Compression, Complete Decongestive Therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Pamukkale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide and lymphedema is one of its most significant complications. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) may develop shortly after treatment or even years later, causing physical and psychological burden, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. Complete decongestive therapy (CDT), which includes manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression, skin care, and exercise, is the standard approach. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) has been proposed as an additional option, and current consensus reports emphasize the need for studies evaluating IPC in combination with MLD.
Previous studies comparing IPC and MLD, either alone or in combination, have shown inconsistent results. Some reported no significant difference between treatment groups, while others suggested additional benefits of IPC, particularly in reducing limb heaviness and tension. However, there is still insufficient evidence to clarify the exact role of IPC within CDT.
The aim of this study is to investigate the acute effects of using IPC instead of MLD, or in combination with MLD, on arm circumference, arm volume, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life in patients with BCRL.
Detailed description
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide and remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is one of the most important complications of breast cancer treatment. It may occur due to lymphatic system damage caused by surgery and/or radiotherapy, or as a result of tumor-related lymphangiogenesis, leading to interstitial fluid accumulation. BCRL can develop immediately after treatment or months to years later.
BCRL is associated with swelling, heaviness, discomfort, weakness, increased risk of infection, and progressive chronicity, which together result in upper extremity dysfunction and reduced quality of life. Compared with women without lymphedema, patients with BCRL report more frequent pain, decreased shoulder mobility, reduced upper extremity strength, impaired daily activities, and sensory disturbances.
The standard treatment for BCRL is complete decongestive therapy (CDT), which consists of manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression, skin care, and exercise. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) has also been proposed as a treatment option, and the 2023 consensus report of the International Society of Lymphology emphasized the need for further studies evaluating IPC in combination with MLD.
However, the number of studies directly comparing IPC with MLD, or evaluating their combined use, is limited and results remain inconsistent. Some trials reported no significant difference between MLD and IPC in terms of limb volume reduction, while others demonstrated additional benefits of IPC in relieving heaviness and tension. The role of IPC in CDT, whether as a replacement for MLD or as an adjunct, is not yet clearly defined.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the acute effects of using IPC instead of MLD, or in combination with MLD, within CDT on arm circumference, arm volume, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life in patients with BCRL.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Complete Decongestive Therapy plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Group | Experimental | Procedure: CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC)Complete decongestive therapy program consisting of manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. In addition, patients will receive intermittent pneumatic compression with a device at 20-50 mmHg pressure for 40 minutes per session. The total treatment duration will be 115 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks. |
| Complete Decongestive Therapy without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression | Experimental | Procedure: CDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic CompressionThis group will receive a complete decongestive therapy program consisting of multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. Manual lymph drainage will be replaced by intermittent pneumatic compression. Intermittent pneumatic compression will be applied with a device at 20-50 mmHg pressure for 40 minutes per session. The total treatment duration will be 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks. |
| Complete Decongestive Therapy Group | Active comparator | Procedure: Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT)This group will receive a complete decongestive therapy program consisting of manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. The treatment duration will be 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Female gender
- Patients aged 18-65 years
- Having a history of unilateral mastectomy and lymph node dissection at least one year ago due to breast cancer diagnosis.
- Having unilateral breast cancer-related upper extremity lymphedema (>20% volume difference between the two upper extremities or >2 cm difference in circumference at any measured point) according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Society of Lymphology (Committee 2023) for at least six months.
- Not having received lymphedema treatment or exercise therapy for the last six months
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Bilateral breast cancer
- Bilateral axillary lymph node dissection
- Metastatic breast cancer
- Receiving ongoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy
- Primary or bilateral lymphedema
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT)Manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks. | Procedure or surgery | Complete Decongestive Therapy Group |
| CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC)Complete decongestive therapy program including manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise, plus intermittent pneumatic compression at 20-50 mmHg for 40 minutes per session. Total duration: 115 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks. | Procedure or surgery | Complete Decongestive Therapy plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Group |
| CDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic CompressionComplete decongestive therapy consisting of multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise, with manual lymph drainage replaced by intermittent pneumatic compression at 20-50 mmHg for 40 minutes per session. Total duration: 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks. | Procedure or surgery | Complete Decongestive Therapy without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression |
Primary outcome
Arm volumetric measurements
Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Arm volume will be calculated using circumferential measurements taken with a standard 7 mm measuring tape at 4 cm intervals along the arm. Segmental arm volumes (mL-cm³) will be calculated using the simplified frustum formula (Frustum Model). This formula, as described by Sitzia et al., has shown high correlation with water displacement measurements and is widely used in the literature as a valid and reliable indirect method for assessing lymphedema.
10 secondary outcomes
Shoulder Range of Motion
Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Quality of Life Measurement ULL-27
Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Arm Circumference Measurements
Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) Questionnaire
Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Upper Extremity Swelling (Visual Analog Scale)
Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Upper Extremity Heaviness (Visual Analog Scale)
Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Upper Extremity Tightness (Visual Analog Scale)
Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Upper Extremity Pain (Visual Analog Scale)
Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Perceived Improvement
Time frame: 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2026.
- Background: PubMed 16709254Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 May 18;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-44.
- Background: PubMed 24095658LeBlanc M, Stineman M, DeMichele A, Stricker C, Mao JJ. Validation of QuickDASH outcome measure in breast cancer survivors for upper extremity disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
- Background: PubMed 20411289Koldas Dogan S, Ay S, Evcik D, Baser O. Adaptation of Turkish version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Feb;30(2):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1470-y. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
- Background: PubMed 7620649Sitzia J. Volume measurement in lymphoedema treatment: examination of formulae. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1995 Mar;4(1):11-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1995.tb00047.x.
- Background: PubMed 12564949Karges JR, Mark BE, Stikeleather SJ, Worrell TW. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume. Phys Ther. 2003 Feb;83(2):134-45.
- Background: PubMed 32521126Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology. 2020;53(1):3-19.
- Background: PubMed 30880473De Vrieze T, Gebruers N, Tjalma WA, Nevelsteen I, Thomis S, De Groef A, Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Belgrado JP, Vandermeeren L, Devoogdt N. What is the best method to determine excessive arm volume in patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema in clinical practice? Reliability, time efficiency and clinical feasibility of five different methods. Clin Rehabil. 2019 Jul;33(7):1221-1232. doi: 10.1177/0269215519835907. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 37140559Keeley V, Riches K, Ward L, Franks PJ. A Prospective Preliminary Study Examining the Physiological Impact of Pneumatic Compression Dosing in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2023 Oct;21(5):456-462. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2022.0087. Epub 2023 May 4.
- Background: PubMed 32477925Kayali Vatansever A, Yavuzsen T, Karadibak D. The Reliability and Validity of Quality of Life Questionnaire Upper Limb Lymphedema (ULL-27) Turkish Patient With Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema. Front Oncol. 2020 May 12;10:455. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00455. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 12861145Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379.
- Background: PubMed 11019400Stanton AW, Badger C, Sitzia J. Non-invasive assessment of the lymphedematous limb. Lymphology. 2000 Sep;33(3):122-35.
- Background: PubMed 12436430Szuba A, Achalu R, Rockson SG. Decongestive lymphatic therapy for patients with breast carcinoma-associated lymphedema. A randomized, prospective study of a role for adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression. Cancer. 2002 Dec 1;95(11):2260-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10976.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
Enrolling by invitation
Comparison of the Effects of Kinesio Taping and Compression Bandaging on Edema, Range of Motion, Upper Extremity Function, and Grip Strength in Patients With Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
Lymphedema, Lymphedema Arm
Active, not recruiting
The Effectiveness of Lymphatic Bypass Supermicrosurgery
Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema, Lymphedema Arm
Recruiting
The LYMPH Trial - Microsurgical Versus Conservative Treatment of Chronic Breast Cancer Associated Lymphedema
Lymphedema, Breast Cancer
Recruiting
EFFECT OF ESWT ON BREAST-CANCER RELATED LYMPHEDEMA
Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Oya Topuz, Professor study director
Pamukkale University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT), CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) and CDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression in people with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema and BCRL, run by Pamukkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Emre Bezmez, M.D. (+905319902220, emrebezmez@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Arm volumetric measurements (time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07154043, which also lists 30 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2026.