AzTrials
AzTrials

Periodontal Intrabony DefectsNCT07160101

Comparison of Effects of Eggshell Derived Nano Hydroxyapatite and Hydroxyapatite in Management of Periodontal Intrabony Defects

A study testing Eggshell derived nano hydroxyapatite and Hydroxyapatite in people with Periodontal Intrabony Defects and Bone Regeneration, run by Dr R Viswa Chandra at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate osseous regenerative efficacy of eggshell derived nanohydroxyapatite in comparison with hydroxyapatite The test group includes patients with intrabony defects where flap surgery will be performed \& Eggshell derived nano hydroxyapatite (ESnHA) is placed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 years
What is being tested?
Eggshell derived nano hydroxyapatite and Hydroxyapatite
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
28 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
22 Mar 2023to 27 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Presence of Two-walled or three-walled intrabony defects \& Probing pocket depths (PPD) of >5mm after initial therapy Systemically healthy male and female patients of age >18 years

Who cannot join

  • Medically compromised patients Pregnant women, Heavy smokers, and Patients who underwent radiotherapy or chemotherapy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • Svs Institute of Dental Sciences

    Mahbūbnagar, Telangana, 509001

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: "Comparative Efficacy Of Eggshell Derived Nano Hydroxyapatite Over Hydroxyapatite In The Treatment Of Periodontal Intrabony Defects: A Clinico-Radiographic Study"

The aim of the study is to evaluate osseous regenerative efficacy of eggshell derived nanohydroxyapatite in comparison with hydroxyapatite The test group includes patients with intrabony defects where flap surgery will be performed \& Eggshell derived nano hydroxyapatite (ESnHA) is placed.

Read the detailed description

Experimental : Main treatment group Eggshell derived nano hydroxyapatite is placed into defect site Comparator : In patients allocated to control group, only Hydroxyapatite is placed.

Being tested
Eggshell derived nano hydroxyapatite, Hydroxyapatite

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Eggshell derived nano hydroxyapatiteOther

    Eggshell derived nano hydroxyapatite has high solubility and allows faster integration \& replaces with osseous tissue

  • HydroxyapatiteOther

    Hydroxyapatite has similar chemical composition with crystalline structure of native bone

Study groups in NCT07160101
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Test group Eggshell derived nano hydroxyapatiteExperimentalIn Test group after flap reflection \& degranulation, bone graft i.e Eggshell derived nano hydroxyapatite is placed into defect.
Receives: Other: Eggshell derived nano hydroxyapatite
Control groupActive comparatorIn Control group, after flap reflection \& debridment bone graft i.e Hydroxyapatite is placed into defect.
Receives: Other: Hydroxyapatite

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. RVG

    Radiovisiography will be used to assess bone regeneration achieved post operatively

    Measured: 3months & 6months

  2. Probing Depth

    Measured: 3 months & 6months

  3. Clinical Attachment Level

    Measured: 3 months & 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Full mouth Plaque index

    Full mouth plaque index was measured using Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Index at baseline, 3 months and 6 months

    Measured: 3 months & 6 months

  2. Full mouth Gingival index

    Full mouth gingival index was measured using Loe \& Silness Index at baseline, 3 months and 6 months

    Measured: 3 months & 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Sep 2025
  2. Study start22 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion13 Aug 2024
  4. Study completion27 Mar 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07160101
Sponsor's protocol ID
SVSIDS/PERIO/1/2022
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
30 Aug 2025
Last updated
15 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Eggshell derived nano hydroxyapatite and Hydroxyapatite in people with Periodontal Intrabony Defects and Bone Regeneration, run by Dr R Viswa Chandra at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

RVG (time frame: 3months & 6months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in