AzTrials
AzTrials

Back PainNCT07177001

Neck and Low Back Pain in Physical Therapy Students at The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica

A study testing Spine Exercise Program (Group B) in people with Back Pain and Low Back Pain, run by The University of The West Indies at 1 site in Jamaica.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of neck and low back pain among physical therapy students enrolled at The University of the West Indies, Mona. It also aims to assess students' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding spine health and to evaluate the effectiveness of an eight-week… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Back Pain, Low Back Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
What is being tested?
Spine Exercise Program (Group B)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteJamaica
Study dates
1 Apr 2026to 31 Mar 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All students enrolled in the Physical Therapy program at the University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, Jamaica during the period November 1, 2025 to October 31, 2026.
  • Individuals who express a willingness to consent to the study.
  • Individuals who express a willingness to adhere to the standardised exercise program for the stipulated period.

Who cannot join

  • Individuals with a history of having spine surgery.
  • Individuals who were previously diagnosed with spine pathology and currently receiving rehabilitation therapy.
  • Individuals who express an unwillingness to participate in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Paula UA Dawson, MBBS, Diplomate ABPMR contact

1-876-927-1297 ext. Ext. 8049

paula.dawson@uwimona.edu.jm

Jamaica1 site
  • Faculty of Medical Sciences Teaching and Research Complex, University of The West Indies-Mona Campus

    Kingston

    Paula U.A Dawson, MBBS, Diplomate ABPMR, 876-631-4000 or 876-927-1297 ext. 8049, paula.dawson@uwimona.edu.jm

    Shantelle B Peddlar, MBBS, 1-876-927-1297 ext. 8050, pmrphysiatryclinic@gmail.com

Other trials in Jamaica

About this study

Official title: The Prevalence of Neck and Low Back Pain With a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Spine-Specific and Non-Spine Specific Exercise Interventions in Physical Therapy Students at The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica: A Two-Phase Study

The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of neck and low back pain among physical therapy students enrolled at The University of the West Indies, Mona. It also aims to assess students' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding spine health and to evaluate the effectiveness of an eight-week standardised spine-specific exercise programme in reducing musculoskeletal pain and improving functional status among those reporting symptoms. The study will be conducted in two phases, beginning with a descriptive cross-sectional assessment of prevalence, followed by a prospective randomised controlled trial in which students experiencing neck and/or low back pain will be allocated to either a spine-specific exercise intervention group or a non-spine-specific exercise control group for comparative analysis of outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Neck and low back pain are among the most common musculoskeletal conditions worldwide, affecting individuals across a wide range of professions. Although often self-limiting, these conditions may become recurrent or chronic, leading to functional limitations, reduced productivity, and diminished quality of life. Occupational and training-related factors such as prolonged sitting, sustained computer use, awkward postures, repetitive spinal movements, and poor ergonomics are well-recognised contributors to spinal pain. It is estimated that approximately 37% of low back pain is occupation-related, with neck pain strongly associated with forward head posture, sustained flexion, and repetitive movements.

Physical therapy (PT) students represent a unique population at increased risk for musculoskeletal pain, with vulnerability beginning during their training years. The physical and academic demands of physiotherapy education expose students to multiple risk factors in both preclinical and clinical phases of training. During the preclinical phase, students spend prolonged hours attending lectures, studying, and completing assignments, frequently involving sustained sitting and extensive use of electronic devices. During clinical training, students are exposed to physically demanding tasks including prolonged standing, manual therapy techniques, therapeutic exercise demonstration, patient transfers, and assisted mobility activities. These repetitive and load-bearing activities may place significant stress on the cervical and lumbar spine.

International literature demonstrates a high prevalence of neck and low back pain among physical therapy students. Systematic reviews report low back pain prevalence rates ranging from 60-80% during training. Comparative studies suggest that physical therapy students may experience higher rates of low back pain than medical students, likely due to the physically demanding nature of manual therapy training and patient handling. Neck pain is also highly prevalent, with studies reporting rates between approximately 50-70%, often attributed to prolonged studying, suboptimal posture, electronic device use, and psychosocial stress. Identified risk factors are multifactorial and include poor ergonomics, repetitive manual techniques, prolonged standing, sedentary behaviours during study periods, elevated academic stress, and variable personal exercise habits.

Despite this growing body of international evidence, there is currently no published research examining the prevalence of neck and low back pain among physical therapy students in Jamaica or the wider Caribbean. At The University of the West Indies (UWI), Mona, approximately 120 physical therapy students are enrolled across three years of training, with an estimated 40 students per cohort. Understanding the burden of musculoskeletal pain within this population is essential, particularly given their future professional role in musculoskeletal rehabilitation and injury prevention.

Exercise therapy is widely recognised as one of the most effective non-pharmacological interventions for both acute and chronic spinal pain. Evidence supports structured exercise programmes in improving muscular strength, flexibility, endurance, spinal stability, and functional outcomes, while reducing pain intensity. Targeted spine-specific and core-strengthening exercises enhance neuromuscular control and promote optimal spinal alignment, thereby reducing mechanical strain and risk of recurrent injury.

This study aims to determine the prevalence of neck and low back pain among physical therapy students at The University of the West Indies, Mona, and to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding spine health. It also seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of an eight-week standardised spine-specific exercise programme in reducing pain and improving functional status among students reporting musculoskeletal discomfort.

The study will be conducted in two phases using descriptive and experimental frameworks. In the first (descriptive) phase, a cross-sectional design will be used to assess the prevalence of neck and low back pain among all enrolled PT students. Participants will complete questionnaires assessing musculoskeletal discomfort, as well as knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to spine health.

In the second (experimental) phase, students who report neck and/or low back pain will be prospectively randomised into either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will participate in an eight-week standardised spine-specific exercise programme, while the control group will receive a non-spine-specific exercise programme administered in parallel to minimise placebo effects. Outcome measures will include the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ), and structured questionnaires assessing functional status and spine-health knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Participant confidentiality will be strictly maintained. Each participant will be assigned a unique study identification number, and only demographic, occupational, clinical, and outcome data relevant to the study will be recorded. All data will be securely managed using REDCap, a password-protected web-based platform compliant with national data protection standards. Statistical analysis will be conducted using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), and all study records will be securely stored and destroyed three years after study completion.

Being tested
Clinical Control Group (Group A), Spine Exercise Program (Group B)
Keywords
lower back pain, low back pain, neck pain, musculoskeletal pain, spine health, physical therapy students, physiotherapy students, rehabilitation
Medical subject headings
Back Pain, Low Back Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain, Neck Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Clinical Control Group (Group A)Behavioural

    The participants who reported the presence of neck or low back pain and were assigned to the clinical control group (Group A) after randomisation will receive a non-spine specific exercise program provided in a handout. The interventional group (Group B) will be asked to keep the standardised spine-specific exercise program confidential and not share with the control group (Group A). After eight (8) weeks, Group A participants will receive: the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires (CMDQ) to assess for changes in the frequency, discomfort and interference with work due to musculoskeletal pain; a Questionnaire B, to ascertain any changes in their pain level using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS); as well as their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back pain.

  • Spine Exercise Program (Group B)Behavioural

    The standardised spine-specific exercise program will be provided in a handout and given only to the intervention group (Group B), and will include specific spine basic neck or low back exercises to be done three (3) times per week, as well as brief stretching exercises, to be done during periods of sitting for greater than sixty (60) minutes. The selected participants will be asked to comply with instructions on the handout. Participants who experience worsening of their symptoms, or who develop new symptoms will be assessed as having an adverse outcome and will be withdrawn from the study and referred for evaluation and treatment if necessary.

Study groups in NCT07177001
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Clinical Control (Group A)ExperimentalAll participants will complete the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires (CMDQ) to assess the frequency, discomfort and interference with work due to musculoskeletal pain; the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to assess for perceived pain; as well as Questionnaire A to assess their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of neck or low back pain. Participants who are found to have neck or low back pain will be randomised into two (2) groups: a clinical control group (Group A) and an intervention group (Group B). Group A will be given a non-spine specific exercise program over an eight (8) week period after which time, participants will be reassessed using the CMDQ and NRS, as well as a Questionnaire B to evaluate for changes in their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back pain.
Receives: Behavioral: Clinical Control Group (Group A)
Spine Exercise Program (Group B)ExperimentalAll participants will complete the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires (CMDQ) to assess the frequency, discomfort and interference with work due to musculoskeletal pain; the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to assess for perceived pain; as well as Questionnaire A to assess their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of neck or low back pain. Participants who are found to have neck or low back pain will be randomised into two (2) groups: a clinical control group (Group A) and an intervention group (Group B). Group B will be given a standardised spine-specific exercise program over an eight (8) week period, after which time they will be be reassessed using the CMDQ and NRS, as well as Questionnaire B to evaluate for changes in their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back pain, having received the intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: Spine Exercise Program (Group B)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from Baseline in the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ)

    The Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire measures the frequency, discomfort and interference with work due to musculoskeletal pain, as reported by participants. The individually reported frequency score is then multiplied by the discomfort score and by the interference score to determine overall severity of pain experienced. This tallied score is then classified by severity into: no discomfort (0), mild (1 to 4.5), moderate (5 to 14), severe (15 - 45) and very severe (45 or higher). All participants will complete this assessment upon enrollment, as well as after an eight (8) week period of treatment, to evaluate any changes in their reported scores.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at eight (8) weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Musculoskeletal Problems of Neck and Low back Pain (Questionnaire A)

    Questionnaire A is a self-administered general questionnaire used to evaluate participants' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back. Knowledge is scored on a scale of 0-5, with 0-1 indicating poor or inadequate knowledge, 2-3 indicating moderate knowledge, and 4-5 indicating good or adequate knowledge. Attitude is scored 0-4, with 0-1 representing poor attitude, 2-3 moderate attitude, and 4 good attitude. Practice is scored 0-56, based on 12 questions, with 0-12 indicating poor or inadequate practices, 13-24 below average or fair, 25-32 average or moderate, 33-43 above average or good, and 44-56 excellent practices. Higher scores indicate better knowledge, more positive attitudes, and healthier practices related to neck and low back musculoskeletal problems. The questionnaire is administered at baseline (time of enrolment), and each domain will be analysed separately.

    Measured: Done at the time of enrollment (Baseline)

  2. Change from Baseline in Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Towards Musculoskeletal Problems of Neck and Low Back Pain (Questionnaire B)

    Questionnaire B is a self-administered general questionnaire used to evaluate participants' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back. Knowledge is scored on a scale of 0-5, with 0-1 indicating poor or inadequate knowledge, 2-3 indicating moderate knowledge, and 4-5 indicating good or adequate knowledge. Attitude is scored 0-4, with 0-1 representing poor attitude, 2-3 moderate attitude, and 4 good attitude. Practice is scored 0-56, based on 12 questions, with 0-12 indicating poor or inadequate practices, 13-24 below average or fair, 25-32 average or moderate, 33-43 above average or good, and 44-56 excellent practices. Higher scores indicate better knowledge, more positive attitudes, and healthier practices related to neck and low back musculoskeletal problems. The questionnaire is administered at the end of treatment at 8 weeks, and each domain will be analysed separately.

    Measured: From Enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

  3. Change from Baseline in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The Numeric Rating Scale is a reliable and valid, unidimensional 11-point scale used for patient self-reporting of perceived pain. Its scale uses integers which range from zero (0) to ten (10), where 0 represents no pain, and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. This is then categorised into mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-10). All participants will complete this assessment upon enrollment, as well as after an eight (8) week period of treatment, to evaluate any changes in their perceived pain. This scale is from public domains and as such, permission for its use is not required.

    Measured: From Enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Sep 2025
  2. Study start1 Apr 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07177001
Sponsor's protocol ID
CREC-MN.0228,2024/2025
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
9 Sep 2025
Last updated
24 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Ogunlana MO, Govender P, Oyewole OO. Prevalence and patterns of musculoskeletal pain among undergraduate students of occupational therapy and physiotherapy in a South African university. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2021 Jun;41(1):35-43. doi: 10.1142/S1013702521500037. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

    PubMed 34054255
  • Naing L, Nordin RB, Abdul Rahman H, Naing YT. Sample size calculation for prevalence studies using Scalex and ScalaR calculators. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01694-7.

    PubMed 35907796
  • Erdinc O, Hot K, Ozkaya M. Turkish version of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Work. 2011;39(3):251-60. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1173.

    PubMed 21709361
  • Ariens GA, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, Bouter LM, van der Wal G. Physical risk factors for neck pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000 Feb;26(1):7-19. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.504.

    PubMed 10744172
  • Standaert CJ, Herring SA. Expert opinion and controversies in musculoskeletal and sports medicine: core stabilization as a treatment for low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;88(12):1734-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.002.

    PubMed 18047895
  • Gordon R, Bloxham S. A Systematic Review of the Effects of Exercise and Physical Activity on Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain. Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Apr 25;4(2):22. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4020022.

    PubMed 27417610
  • O'Sullivan PB, Phyty GD, Twomey LT, Allison GT. Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24):2959-67. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00020.

    PubMed 9431633
  • Chou R, Huffman LH; American Pain Society; American College of Physicians. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):492-504. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00007.

    PubMed 17909210
  • Garcia L, Thompson J, Reed B. Low back pain in nursing students: Prevalence and risk factors. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2019;35(3):150-156.

  • Williams N, Garcia M, Robinson P. Musculoskeletal pain in healthcare students: A comparative analysis. J Allied Health Sci. 2021;37(4):210-222.

  • Khan F, Tariq H, Malik Z. The impact of poor posture on neck pain among undergraduate physiotherapy students. Pak J Rehabil. 2021;10(1):78-85.

  • Ali S, Hassan R, Ahmed M. Prevalence of neck among physiotherapy students in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Health Sci. 2020;9(2):45-51.

  • Brown P, Clark M, Adams T. Neck pain prevalence and associated risk factors among physiotherapy students. J Musculoskeletal Pain 2022;29(3):183-194.

  • Doe J, Smith L, Wilson H. Comparison of musculoskeletal disorders in physiotherapy and medical students. J Med Educ Res. 2019;40(2):115-124.

  • Johnson D, Miller K, Lee R. Low back pain among physiotherapy students: A cross sectional study. Physiother Res Int. 2021;28(1):e1872.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Spine Exercise Program (Group B) in people with Back Pain and Low Back Pain, run by The University of The West Indies at 1 site in Jamaica.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Jamaica. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Paula UA Dawson, MBBS, Diplomate ABPMR (1-876-927-1297 ext. Ext. 8049, paula.dawson@uwimona.edu.jm), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from Baseline in the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at eight (8) weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07177001, which also lists 25 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in