Multiple SclerosisTelerehabNCT07178834
Impact of a Tele-rehabilitation Program on People With Multiple Sclerosis
A study testing Telerehab in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to assessing safety and the occurrence of adverse effects during tele-rehabilitation (TRHB) in people with multiple sclerosis with an EDSS score of 6.5 or lower. The main questions it aims to answer are: Intervention using TRHB is considered safe and without adverse effects. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Sclerosis
- What is being tested?
- Telerehab
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 10 Feb 2025to 30 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis confirmed using the 2017 McDonald criteria.
- Patients who have the technological means to conduct online sessions and the autonomy to do so.
- Patients with cognitive capacity that allows them to sign the informed consent form.
- Patients with an internet connection and a device compatible with the Rehub tele-rehabilitation platform (desktop computer, laptop, or tablet).
- EDSS level less than or equal to 6.5.
Who cannot join
- Participants who are currently undergoing RHB at a center.
- Participants who have undergone RHB during the two months prior to the start of the program.
- Patients with physical or mental comorbidities that may limit their participation in the rehabilitation program.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Impact of a Tele-rehabilitation Program on People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-blind Study.
The goal of this clinical trial is to assessing safety and the occurrence of adverse effects during tele-rehabilitation (TRHB) in people with multiple sclerosis with an EDSS score of 6.5 or lower. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Intervention using TRHB is considered safe and without adverse effects.
- Intervention using TRHB has a high degree of self-adherence, an impact on physical activity levels and self-efficacy in exercise, and a positive effect on quality of life, mood, and perception of fatigue.
Read more
Researchers will compare the tele-rehabilitation with rehabilitation based solely on physical activity recommendations.
Participants will complete three weekly online rehabilitation sessions and must attend three follow-up visits.
Read the detailed description
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) often entails a series of difficulties that cause some people to have high rates of absenteeism or even prevent them from benefiting from in-person rehabilitation treatments. The onset of the disease at a very young age, when the person is actively working or studying, the difficulty of balancing work and family life, mobility issues and lack of transportation, and geographical dispersion are some of the reasons why people with MS are not always able to access a neurorehabilitation center. Scientific evidence shows that functional and social barriers are the most common reasons why people do not adhere to rehabilitation. Home-based tele-rehabilitation (TRHB) is an alternative to rehabilitation in centers, allowing for remote supervision and the elimination of barriers. In addition, TRHB provides affected individuals and their families/caregivers with greater support in terms of care, mobility, and access to these services, and according to the World Health Organization (WHO), this type of assistance improves access to the healthcare system. There is a gap in research to identify the main adverse events related to tele-rehabilitation, and it is important to understand how adverse events, such as falls during physical therapy, are associated with the delivery of tele-rehabilitation.
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Being tested
- Telerehab
- Keywords
- Telerehabilitation, Rehabilitatiton, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TelerehabBehavioural
Also called Telerehabilitation, Intervention group
Adverse events are observed during online rehabilitation with computer vision technology in patients with MS.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group: tele-rehabilitation | Experimental | This group will do online rehabilitation three times a week. Every two weeks, an assessment will be made to determine whether to increase the intensity of the exercise Receives: Behavioral: Telerehab |
| Control group: physical activity recommendations | No intervention | This group will only have access to basic recommendations for physical activity. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adverse events
Adverse events such as falls, pain, fatigue, and others that may occur.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment in week 8
Secondary outcomes (4)
Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life 54
Quality of life scale (Min.0; Max.100). The higher the score, the better.
Measured: (T1) baseline, (T2) after the 8 week, (T3) at 16 week.
10 meters walking test
The scale measures walking speed. There are no minimum or maximum measurements. The higher the reading, the better.
Measured: (T1) baseline, (T2) after the 8 week, (T3) at 16 week.
6 minute walking test
The scale measures capacity for effort. There are no minimum or maximum measurements. The higher the score, the better.
Measured: (T1) baseline, (T2) after the 8 week, (T3) at 16 week.
Berg Balance Scale
The scale measures the level of balance. Minimum measurement 0; maximum 56. The higher the reading, the better.
Measured: (T1) baseline, (T2) after the 8 week, (T3) at 16 week.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Sep 2025
- Study start10 Feb 2025
- Primary completion30 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Edwin Roger Meza Murillo, Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia
- Investigators
- Edwin R Meza Murillo, Dr, Principal investigator, Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07178834
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PR(AG)498/2024
- Acronym
- Telerehab
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Jul 2025
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Yau T, McIntyre M, Chan J, Bhogal D, Andreoli A, Bayley M, Leochico CFD, Kua A, Guo M, Munce S. Adverse events associated with the delivery of telerehabilitation: A scoping review protocol. PLoS One. 2024 Feb 21;19(2):e0297908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297908. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 38381732Doherty F, Lynch P, Powell P, Monaghan K. Feasibility and effectiveness of telerehabilitation on mobility and balance function in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2024 Nov 15;466:123214. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123214. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
PubMed 39270413Xiang XM, Bernard J. Telehealth in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021 Feb 28;21(4):14. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01103-4.
PubMed 33646409Harkey LC, Jung SM, Newton ER, Patterson A. Satisfacció del pacient amb la telesalud en entorns rurals: una revisió sistemàtica. Revista Internacional de Telerehabilitació. 2020;12(2):53-64. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2020.6303
Fjeldstad-Pardo C, Thiessen A, Pardo G. Telerehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis: Results of a Randomized Feasibility and Efficacy Pilot Study. Int J Telerehabil. 2018 Dec 11;10(2):55-64. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2018.6256. eCollection 2018 Fall.
PubMed 30588276
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of a Tele-rehabilitation Program on People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-blind Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07178834
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Telerehab / PR(AG)498/2024
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Keywords
- Telerehabilitation, Rehabilitatiton, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Multiple Sclerosis Center of CataloniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to assessing safety and the occurrence of adverse effects during tele-rehabilitation (TRHB) in people with multiple sclerosis with an EDSS score of 6.5 or lower. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Intervention using TRHB is considered safe and without adverse effects.
- Intervention using TRHB has a high degree of self-adherence, an impact on physical activity levels and self-efficacy in exercise, and a positive effect on quality of life, mood, and perception of fatigue.
Researchers will compare the tele-rehabilitation with rehabilitation based solely on physical activity recommendations.
Participants will complete three weekly online rehabilitation sessions and must attend three follow-up visits.
Detailed description
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) often entails a series of difficulties that cause some people to have high rates of absenteeism or even prevent them from benefiting from in-person rehabilitation treatments. The onset of the disease at a very young age, when the person is actively working or studying, the difficulty of balancing work and family life, mobility issues and lack of transportation, and geographical dispersion are some of the reasons why people with MS are not always able to access a neurorehabilitation center. Scientific evidence shows that functional and social barriers are the most common reasons why people do not adhere to rehabilitation. Home-based tele-rehabilitation (TRHB) is an alternative to rehabilitation in centers, allowing for remote supervision and the elimination of barriers. In addition, TRHB provides affected individuals and their families/caregivers with greater support in terms of care, mobility, and access to these services, and according to the World Health Organization (WHO), this type of assistance improves access to the healthcare system. There is a gap in research to identify the main adverse events related to tele-rehabilitation, and it is important to understand how adverse events, such as falls during physical therapy, are associated with the delivery of tele-rehabilitation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group: tele-rehabilitation | Experimental | Behavioral: TelerehabThis group will do online rehabilitation three times a week. Every two weeks, an assessment will be made to determine whether to increase the intensity of the exercise |
| Control group: physical activity recommendations | No intervention | –This group will only have access to basic recommendations for physical activity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis confirmed using the 2017 McDonald criteria.
- Patients who have the technological means to conduct online sessions and the autonomy to do so.
- Patients with cognitive capacity that allows them to sign the informed consent form.
- Patients with an internet connection and a device compatible with the Rehub tele-rehabilitation platform (desktop computer, laptop, or tablet).
- EDSS level less than or equal to 6.5.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Participants who are currently undergoing RHB at a center.
- Participants who have undergone RHB during the two months prior to the start of the program.
- Patients with physical or mental comorbidities that may limit their participation in the rehabilitation program.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TelerehabAlso: Telerehabilitation, Intervention groupAdverse events are observed during online rehabilitation with computer vision technology in patients with MS. | Behavioural | Intervention group: tele-rehabilitation |
Primary outcome
Adverse events
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment in week 8
Adverse events such as falls, pain, fatigue, and others that may occur.
4 secondary outcomes
Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life 54
Time frame: (T1) baseline, (T2) after the 8 week, (T3) at 16 week.
10 meters walking test
Time frame: (T1) baseline, (T2) after the 8 week, (T3) at 16 week.
6 minute walking test
Time frame: (T1) baseline, (T2) after the 8 week, (T3) at 16 week.
Berg Balance Scale
Time frame: (T1) baseline, (T2) after the 8 week, (T3) at 16 week.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Sep 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 38381732Yau T, McIntyre M, Chan J, Bhogal D, Andreoli A, Bayley M, Leochico CFD, Kua A, Guo M, Munce S. Adverse events associated with the delivery of telerehabilitation: A scoping review protocol. PLoS One. 2024 Feb 21;19(2):e0297908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297908. eCollection 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 39270413Doherty F, Lynch P, Powell P, Monaghan K. Feasibility and effectiveness of telerehabilitation on mobility and balance function in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2024 Nov 15;466:123214. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123214. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 33646409Xiang XM, Bernard J. Telehealth in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021 Feb 28;21(4):14. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01103-4.
- Results publicationHarkey LC, Jung SM, Newton ER, Patterson A. Satisfacció del pacient amb la telesalud en entorns rurals: una revisió sistemàtica. Revista Internacional de Telerehabilitació. 2020;12(2):53-64. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2020.6303
- Results publication: PubMed 30588276Fjeldstad-Pardo C, Thiessen A, Pardo G. Telerehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis: Results of a Randomized Feasibility and Efficacy Pilot Study. Int J Telerehabil. 2018 Dec 11;10(2):55-64. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2018.6256. eCollection 2018 Fall.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Metformin as an add-on or Monotherapy in Treatment of Aging People With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
Dalfampridine Combined With Physical Therapy for Mobility Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Targeting Agonists of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor for Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Edwin R Meza Murillo, Dr principal investigator
Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Telerehab in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adverse events (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment in week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07178834, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2025.