Obesity, MildNCT07186959
EGPSS for Weight Management in an in Vivo Human Model
A study testing endoscopic gastric purse-string suturing in people with Obesity, Mild, run by Liu Yan at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
ndoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) have introduced more convenient, minimally invasive, and safe approaches to weight management. Mucosal ablation of the gastric fundus has been reported to limit fundic expansion and promote satiety; however, ablation can cause perforation, infection, bleeding, and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity, Mild
- What is being tested?
- endoscopic gastric purse-string suturing
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2024to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 24-35 kg / m²;
- Patients accepted Lifestyle modifications, pharmacological interventions for weight loss which were unsuccessful or experienced a weight rebound;
- Patients willing to loss weight;
- Obese patients with metabolic disorders.
Who cannot join
- Women who are planning to conceive, pregnant, or breastfeeding;
- Patients who are suffering from severe organ failure requiring hospitalization;
- Patients who have undergone gastrectomy;
- Patients allergic to anesthetics.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site
The fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100071
About this study
Official title: A Novel Endoscopic Gastric Purse-string Suture Device for Weight Management in an in Vivo Human Model
ndoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) have introduced more convenient, minimally invasive, and safe approaches to weight management. Mucosal ablation of the gastric fundus has been reported to limit fundic expansion and promote satiety; however, ablation can cause perforation, infection, bleeding, and other complications. To restrain fundic expansion while minimizing surgical trauma and preserving reversibility, an endoscopic gastric purse-string suturing (EGPSS) technique was developed to reduce gastric volume. This procedure may be suitable for short-term weight management. Safety and feasibility were demonstrated in a porcine model. The present study will evaluate the feasibility of EGPSS in participants with obesity and assess histological and physiological outcomes.
Read the detailed description
The global prevalence of obesity has increased over the past five decades. Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) have introduced more convenient, minimally invasive, and safe approaches to weight management and have emerged as promising alternatives for treating obesity and related metabolic disorders (including type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease). Christopher et al. reported that ablation of the gastric fundus mucosa induces mucosal fibrosis; the resulting fibrotic tissue impedes fundic expansion and promotes satiety. However, fundic mucosal ablation may cause extensive and irreversible injury, increasing the risks of perforation, infection, bleeding, and other complications. A minimally invasive endoscopic therapy that inhibits fundic expansion while minimizing surgical trauma and preserving reversibility is therefore desirable.
Based on this rationale, an endoscopic gastric purse-string suturing (EGPSS) technique was developed to reduce the volume of the gastric fundus. EGPSS employs a specially designed endoclip in combination with an endoloop to appose the fundic mucosa and restrict fundic expansion. This procedure may be suitable for short-term weight management. Safety and feasibility have been demonstrated in a porcine model. The present study will evaluate the feasibility of EGPSS in participants with obesity and assess histological and physiological outcomes.
- Conditions
- Obesity, Mild
- Being tested
- endoscopic gastric purse-string suturing
- Keywords
- obesity, endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapy, bariatric surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Lymphoma, Follicular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
endoscopic gastric purse-string suturingProcedure or surgery
A dual-tail endoloop will be introduced into the stomach with endoscopic forceps, and will be secured to the gastric wall using endoscopic clips. An endoscope hook was used to tighten both tails of the endoloop until all the clips converged.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Operation group | Experimental | Patients will undergo endoscopic gastric purse-string suturing procedure under endoscope by skilled endoscopist Receives: Procedure: endoscopic gastric purse-string suturing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Total Weight Loss (%TWL) measured by calibrated digital scale
Body weight recorded using a calibrated digital scale (kg). %TWL calculated as (baselineweight-follow-upweight)÷baselineweight × 100%. Measurements obtained under fasting conditions, light clothing, no shoes.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months post-procedure
Secondary outcomes (6)
Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) measured by calibrated digital scale
%EWL calculated as (baselineweight-follow-upweight)÷(baselineweight-idealweightatBMI25kg/m
) × 100%.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Satiety score (100-mm Visual Analog Scale, VAS) after standardized liquid meal
Satiety assessed using a 100-mm VAS (0 = not at all, 100 = extremely) at 0, 15, 30, 60 minutes after a 400-kcal standardized liquid meal; area under the curve (AUC) computed.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Gastric fundus volume (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI)
Fundic volume quantified by MRI volumetry during a standardized water-challenge protocol; primary read by a blinded radiologist; volume reported in mL and Δ from baseline.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Fasting plasma ghrelin and leptin (ELISA)
Morning fasting venous samples analyzed by validated ELISA; concentrations reported in pg/mL (ghrelin) and ng/mL (leptin).
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)
HOMA-IR calculated from fasting glucose (mmol/L) and insulin (µU/mL): insulin × glucose ÷ 22.5.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Procedure-related adverse events (ASGE lexicon severity grading)
All adverse events captured and coded using the ASGE lexicon with severity grade and relatedness adjudicated by the safety monitor.
Measured: Day 0 to Month 3
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2025
- Study start1 Jul 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obesity, MildStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Liu Yan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Liu Yan, Beijing 302 Hospital
- Investigators
- Yan Liu, Principal investigator, Beijing 302 Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07186959
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EGPSS for weight management
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 22 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bluher M. Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019 May;15(5):288-298. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0176-8.
PubMed 30814686Maselli DB, Donnangelo LL, Coan B, McGowan CE. How to establish an endoscopic bariatric practice. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Apr 16;16(4):178-186. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i4.178.
PubMed 38680199Simons M, Sharaiha RZ. Updates in metabolic bariatric endoscopy. Dig Endosc. 2024 Feb;36(2):107-115. doi: 10.1111/den.14633. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
PubMed 37405807Vargas EJ, Rizk M, Gomez-Villa J, Edwards PK, Jaruvongvanich V, Storm AC, Acosta A, Lake D, Fidler J, Bharucha AE, Camilleri M, Abu Dayyeh BK. Effect of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty on gastric emptying, motility and hormones: a comparative prospective study. Gut. 2023 Jun;72(6):1073-1080. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327816. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
PubMed 36241388
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Novel Endoscopic Gastric Purse-string Suture Device for Weight Management in an in Vivo Human Model
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07186959
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EGPSS for weight management
- Conditions
- Obesity, Mild
- Keywords
- obesity, endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapy, bariatric surgery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Liu YanUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
ndoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) have introduced more convenient, minimally invasive, and safe approaches to weight management. Mucosal ablation of the gastric fundus has been reported to limit fundic expansion and promote satiety; however, ablation can cause perforation, infection, bleeding, and other complications. To restrain fundic expansion while minimizing surgical trauma and preserving reversibility, an endoscopic gastric purse-string suturing (EGPSS) technique was developed to reduce gastric volume. This procedure may be suitable for short-term weight management. Safety and feasibility were demonstrated in a porcine model. The present study will evaluate the feasibility of EGPSS in participants with obesity and assess histological and physiological outcomes.
Detailed description
The global prevalence of obesity has increased over the past five decades. Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) have introduced more convenient, minimally invasive, and safe approaches to weight management and have emerged as promising alternatives for treating obesity and related metabolic disorders (including type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease). Christopher et al. reported that ablation of the gastric fundus mucosa induces mucosal fibrosis; the resulting fibrotic tissue impedes fundic expansion and promotes satiety. However, fundic mucosal ablation may cause extensive and irreversible injury, increasing the risks of perforation, infection, bleeding, and other complications. A minimally invasive endoscopic therapy that inhibits fundic expansion while minimizing surgical trauma and preserving reversibility is therefore desirable.
Based on this rationale, an endoscopic gastric purse-string suturing (EGPSS) technique was developed to reduce the volume of the gastric fundus. EGPSS employs a specially designed endoclip in combination with an endoloop to appose the fundic mucosa and restrict fundic expansion. This procedure may be suitable for short-term weight management. Safety and feasibility have been demonstrated in a porcine model. The present study will evaluate the feasibility of EGPSS in participants with obesity and assess histological and physiological outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Operation group | Experimental | Procedure: endoscopic gastric purse-string suturingPatients will undergo endoscopic gastric purse-string suturing procedure under endoscope by skilled endoscopist |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 24-35 kg / m²;
- Patients accepted Lifestyle modifications, pharmacological interventions for weight loss which were unsuccessful or experienced a weight rebound;
- Patients willing to loss weight;
- Obese patients with metabolic disorders.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Women who are planning to conceive, pregnant, or breastfeeding;
- Patients who are suffering from severe organ failure requiring hospitalization;
- Patients who have undergone gastrectomy;
- Patients allergic to anesthetics.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| endoscopic gastric purse-string suturingA dual-tail endoloop will be introduced into the stomach with endoscopic forceps, and will be secured to the gastric wall using endoscopic clips. An endoscope hook was used to tighten both tails of the endoloop until all the clips converged. | Procedure or surgery | Operation group |
Primary outcome
Percent Total Weight Loss (%TWL) measured by calibrated digital scale
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post-procedure
Body weight recorded using a calibrated digital scale (kg). %TWL calculated as (baselineweight-follow-upweight)÷baselineweight × 100%. Measurements obtained under fasting conditions, light clothing, no shoes.
6 secondary outcomes
Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) measured by calibrated digital scale
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Satiety score (100-mm Visual Analog Scale, VAS) after standardized liquid meal
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Gastric fundus volume (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI)
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Fasting plasma ghrelin and leptin (ELISA)
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Procedure-related adverse events (ASGE lexicon severity grading)
Time frame: Day 0 to Month 3
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Sep 2025.
- Background: PubMed 30814686Bluher M. Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019 May;15(5):288-298. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0176-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 38680199Maselli DB, Donnangelo LL, Coan B, McGowan CE. How to establish an endoscopic bariatric practice. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Apr 16;16(4):178-186. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i4.178.
- Results publication: PubMed 37405807Simons M, Sharaiha RZ. Updates in metabolic bariatric endoscopy. Dig Endosc. 2024 Feb;36(2):107-115. doi: 10.1111/den.14633. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 36241388Vargas EJ, Rizk M, Gomez-Villa J, Edwards PK, Jaruvongvanich V, Storm AC, Acosta A, Lake D, Fidler J, Bharucha AE, Camilleri M, Abu Dayyeh BK. Effect of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty on gastric emptying, motility and hormones: a comparative prospective study. Gut. 2023 Jun;72(6):1073-1080. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327816. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Obesity, Mild
RecruitingPhase 3
Maridebart Cafraglutide in Heart Failure With Preserved or Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction and Obesity
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction
Recruiting
iWAIST Trial: ERCG (Endoscopic Radial Compression Gastroplasty) +Optimized Lifestyle Intervention (OLI) vs Sham + OLI for Weight Loss
Overweight and/or Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Semaglutide, Weight Loss, and LNG-IUD for Conservative Treatment of Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia and Grade 1 Endometrial Cancer
Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia, Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia/Endometrioid Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Tirzepatide in Women With Obesity and Endometrial Intra-epithelial Neoplasia or Grade 1 Endometrial Cancer
Endometrial Cancer, Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of IBI362 in Subjects With HFpEF or HFmrEF Combined With Obesity
Obesity, Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFPEF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Yan Liu principal investigator
Beijing 302 Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing endoscopic gastric purse-string suturing in people with Obesity, Mild, run by Liu Yan at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Total Weight Loss (%TWL) measured by calibrated digital scale (time frame: Baseline and 3 months post-procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07186959, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2025.