AzTrials
AzTrials

Celiac Disease in ChildrenDIGITALNCT07192874

Dietary Intervention Using a Gluten-free App to Improve Tracking, Adherence, and Learning(DIGITAL) Study

A study testing MyMedDiary and Feedback on Gluten Exposure in people with Celiac Disease in Children, run by Boston Children's Hospital.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

With rising incidence of celiac disease(CeD) (3% of population), there is an urgent need for practical, efficient and usable application that can feedback to families and providers about their ultra-processed gluten-free food (UPGFF) consumption as well as to help families identify where they may be having… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Celiac Disease in Children
What is being tested?
MyMedDiary and Feedback on Gluten Exposure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2026to Sep 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Children (2-18 years of age) with a new diagnosis of celiac disease

Who cannot join

  • Children allergic to more than 2 of the top 8 food allergens and/or with co-morbid conditions treated with dietary modifications will be excluded

About this study

Official title: DIGITAL Study: Evaluating "MyMedDiary" as a Tool for Improving Gluten-Free Diet Adherence and Knowledge in Children With Newly Diagnosed Celiac Disease

With rising incidence of celiac disease(CeD) (3% of population), there is an urgent need for practical, efficient and usable application that can feedback to families and providers about their ultra-processed gluten-free food (UPGFF) consumption as well as to help families identify where they may be having unintentional gluten exposure. The investigators propose to use MyMedDiary, a researcher driven platform dedicated to streamline and enhance dietary data collection, to first validate that it can accurately and efficiently identify gluten-free foods which are ultra-processed. The investigators aim to provide feedback to families on potential sources of gluten exposure as they transition to a gluten-free diet(GFD).

Being tested
MyMedDiary, Feedback on Gluten Exposure
Keywords
CELIAC
Medical subject headings
Celiac Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MyMedDiaryOther

    myMedDiary is a HIPAA-compliant, researcher-configurable mobile and web-based application designed for real-time dietary, symptom and lifestyle data collection. It was utilized to collect dietary data in an IRB-approved study at Seattle Children's Hospital evaluating the dietary cost burden of gluten-free foods in pediatric patients with celiac disease (submitted for publication). The application enables participants to log meals using barcode scanning, keyword search, and manual entry, including recipe-level data. The backend system stores encrypted data securely in Microsoft Azure, and dietary entries are automatically converted to nutrient data using a standardized reference system. Researchers access de-identified participant data and analytics through a secure online dashboard. The system supports multicenter trials.

  • Feedback on Gluten ExposureOther

    The MyMedDiary Application will provide feedback on potential gluten exposure when participants input dietary record information into the application.

Study groups in NCT07192874
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
With Feedback on Gluten-Free DietExperimentalParticipants will get feedback from the application as to whether they may have had a potential gluten exposure or that their food that they inputted in may have gluten in it. The investigators and research team will counsel patients on the possibility of the application occasionally not being able to accurately always identify gluten-free foods during the informed consent process, and it will be made clear that the families should be reading and understanding the gluten-free labels independently of the application as well(as it is the current clinical standard of care at BCH). The investigators and research team will also provide a reminder when starting the application, that while the application tries to be 100% updated, if families are concerned about gluten exposure, they should still independently read the labels as well.
Receives: Other: MyMedDiary; Other: Feedback on Gluten Exposure
No feedback on potential gluten exposureOtherThis group will still use the MyMedDiary application to input 3-day dietary recall, however there will not be feedback on whether they may have had a potential gluten exposure or if the food that they inputted in may have gluten in it.
Receives: Other: MyMedDiary

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Differences in mean percentage estimates of ultra-processed foods within the overall diet(via the NOVA classification of ultraprocessed foods)

    Estimates of the dietary relative contributions of each NOVA groups(this is an ultraprocessing food score system from 1-4) will be obtained by MyMedDiary with parallel paper based manual recall and manual dietary classification at 4 different time point (at initial entry, 2-month, 4-month and 6-month). The primary outcome will be differences in calculating mean contributions of ultra-processed foods at 6 month.

    Measured: 6 MONTHS on a GFD

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Differences in mean percentage estimates of ultra-processed foods within the overall diet at diagnostic endoscopy, 2 months and 4 months between MyMedDiary and Paper Dietary Recall

    Estimates of the dietary relative contributions of NOVA groups will be obtained by MyMedDiary with parallel paper based manual recall and manual dietary classification at 4 different time point (at initial entry/diagnostic endoscopy, 2-month, 4-month and 6-month).

    Measured: Diagnostic endoscopy/initial entry, 2 months on a GFD, and 4 months on a GFD

  2. Differences in GFD adherence scores via Celiac Dietary Adherence Test (CDAT)

    Differences in GFD Adherence scores in families who received feedback on potential gluten exposure in diet compared to families who did not receive feedback. The CDAT questionnaire consists of 7 items on a 5-point Likert scale, and the sum of the numeric values assigned to the answers provides a score ranging from 7 to 35 points. The interpretation was as following: 7 points-excellent GFD adherence; 8-12 points-very good GFD adherence; 13-17 points-insufficient/inadequate GFD adherence, and >17 points-poor GFD adherence

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Differences in GFD Knowledge scores via GFD Knowledge Scale

    Differences in GFD knowledge scores in families who received feedback on potential gluten exposure in diet compared to families who did not receive feedback. The Gluten-Free Diet Knowledge Scale, a standardized and reliable questionnaire where participants categorize 17 listed foods as either "allowed", "foods to question" or "not allowed" in the gluten free diet, will be used to quantify the participants' knowledge about GFD. One point is award for each correct answer for a maximum total score of 17, thus higher scores suggest greater knowledge.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2025
  2. Study startJan 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07192874
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB-P00051858
Acronym
DIGITAL
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
2 Sep 2025
Last updated
29 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MyMedDiary and Feedback on Gluten Exposure in people with Celiac Disease in Children, run by Boston Children's Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Differences in mean percentage estimates of ultra-processed foods within the overall diet(via the NOVA classification of ultraprocessed foods) (time frame: 6 MONTHS on a GFD). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in