Poor Ovarian ReservePRPNCT07199868
The Role of Ovarian PRP Therapy in Poseidon Poor Responders Women Undergoing ICSI Cycle
A study testing During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle. in people with Poor Ovarian Reserve and Platelet Derived Growth Factor, run by Karbala University at 2 sites in Iraq.
Trial summary
Objective : This study aims to evaluate the impact of ovarian PRP therapy compared to control in Poseidon females undergoing ICSI cycles. Material and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from Jan 2024 to Feb 2025, involving 102 Poseidon women, Participants were divided into a PRP group (n=50), who… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 49 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Poor Ovarian Reserve, Platelet Derived Growth Factor
- What is being tested?
- During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle.
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesIraq
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2024to 28 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 49 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 1 - infertile Poseidon groups 2, 3, 4 women 2- no history of chronic illness or pelvic pathology. 3- All male partners were either normozoospermic or had mild OAT delivered fresh ejaculated samples for ICSI.
Who cannot join
- 1 - ovarian failure due to sex chromosome abnormalities, 2- current use of anticoagulants 3- history of bleeding disorders.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: PRP Group & Control Group in Poseidon Poor Responders
Objective : This study aims to evaluate the impact of ovarian PRP therapy compared to control in Poseidon females undergoing ICSI cycles.
Material and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from Jan 2024 to Feb 2025, involving 102 Poseidon women, Participants were divided into a PRP group (n=50), who received ovarian PRP injections and a control group (n=52), who received no PRP. All participants underwent ICSI cycles, embryological and pregnancy outcomes were compared between both groups within each Poseidon group.
Read the detailed description
- Materials And Methods 2.1. Study design This study was conducted at a private fertility center in Karbala, Iraq, from Jan 2024 to Feb 2025. All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment, and ethical approval was obtained from the College of Medicine, Karbala University (reference number 25-8).
2.2. Participants A total of 102 Poseidon POR women were enrolled where Inclusion criteria were infertile Poseidon groups 2, 3, 4 women with no history of chronic illness or pelvic pathology. All male partners were either normozoospermic or had mild OAT delivered fresh ejaculated samples for ICSI.
Exclusion criteria were ovarian failure due to sex chromosome abnormalities, current use of anticoagulants and history of bleeding disorders. Participants were assigned into two groups: Study group (n=50), who underwent ovarian PRP injections once or twice times within six months prior to ICSI cycle, and control group (n=52), who did not receive PRP therapy.
2.3. PRP preparation and injection Twenty mL of peripheral blood was drawing under sterile conditions using Lora PRP tubes (Modern Technology Company). Frist the blood was centrifuged at 1600 rpm for 10 minutes (soft spin). Then the plasma and superficial buffy coat were transferred into a sterile tube containing no anticoagulant and centrifuged again at 3500 rpm for 5 minutes (hard spin). The upper 2/3rd (platelet-poor plasma, PPP) were discarded, and the platelet pellets were homogenized in the lower 1/3rd of plasma to create 3 mL of platelets concentrate of 3-5 times higher than basal and injected within one hour of preparation (11). During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle. A second PRP injection was administered when subsequent ORTs (AMH,AFC) and hormone levels (FSH, LH, E2) showed suboptimal results in patient's next menstrual cycles.
2.4. ICSI cycle outcomes All patients starting same COS protocol began on CD3 using (300-450 iu) of Gonal-F (r-FSH); Merck ± (u-HMG);LG in flexible antagonist protocol, (Cetrotide); Merck. Final oocyte maturation was triggered by 250 mcg r-hCG (Ovitrelle; Serono) ± 0.2 mg GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl; Merck) 35 hours before oocyte retrieval when dominant follicles reached (17-18) mm. Embryological outcomes including; MII oocytes, embryos quantity and quality were compared in both group. In all embryo transfer cycles, 2-4 embryos grade A± B of age 2-5 day were transferred. The clinical outcomes included pregnancy rate (serum β-HCG ≥100 mIU/mL), miscarriage rate (the loss of a pregnancy before 24 weeks), Live Birth rates (delivery of a living baby after 24 weeks) and overall cycle outcomes were compared in both groups.
- Being tested
- During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle.
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle.Procedure or surgery
During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ovarian PRP injection in poor responders | Experimental | During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle. Receives: Procedure: During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
numbers of Meta phase II oocytes and embryos post ovarian PRP
Primary embryological outcomes including; metaphase II oocytes and embryos numbers in addition to their quality post ovarian PRP were compared in both study \& control groups
Measured: one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Sep 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2024
- Primary completion28 Feb 2025
- Study completion28 Feb 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Poor Ovarian ReserveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karbala University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Itlal Asadi, Karbala University
- Investigators
- Itlal J AL Asadi, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, Karbala University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07199868
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0009-0007-1354-0259
- Other IDs
- non
- Acronym
- PRP
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: on request only
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PRP Group & Control Group in Poseidon Poor Responders
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07199868
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRP / 0009-0007-1354-0259
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Karbala UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective : This study aims to evaluate the impact of ovarian PRP therapy compared to control in Poseidon females undergoing ICSI cycles.
Material and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from Jan 2024 to Feb 2025, involving 102 Poseidon women, Participants were divided into a PRP group (n=50), who received ovarian PRP injections and a control group (n=52), who received no PRP. All participants underwent ICSI cycles, embryological and pregnancy outcomes were compared between both groups within each Poseidon group.
Detailed description
- Materials And Methods 2.1. Study design This study was conducted at a private fertility center in Karbala, Iraq, from Jan 2024 to Feb 2025. All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment, and ethical approval was obtained from the College of Medicine, Karbala University (reference number 25-8).
2.2. Participants A total of 102 Poseidon POR women were enrolled where Inclusion criteria were infertile Poseidon groups 2, 3, 4 women with no history of chronic illness or pelvic pathology. All male partners were either normozoospermic or had mild OAT delivered fresh ejaculated samples for ICSI.
Exclusion criteria were ovarian failure due to sex chromosome abnormalities, current use of anticoagulants and history of bleeding disorders. Participants were assigned into two groups: Study group (n=50), who underwent ovarian PRP injections once or twice times within six months prior to ICSI cycle, and control group (n=52), who did not receive PRP therapy.
2.3. PRP preparation and injection Twenty mL of peripheral blood was drawing under sterile conditions using Lora PRP tubes (Modern Technology Company). Frist the blood was centrifuged at 1600 rpm for 10 minutes (soft spin). Then the plasma and superficial buffy coat were transferred into a sterile tube containing no anticoagulant and centrifuged again at 3500 rpm for 5 minutes (hard spin). The upper 2/3rd (platelet-poor plasma, PPP) were discarded, and the platelet pellets were homogenized in the lower 1/3rd of plasma to create 3 mL of platelets concentrate of 3-5 times higher than basal and injected within one hour of preparation (11). During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle. A second PRP injection was administered when subsequent ORTs (AMH,AFC) and hormone levels (FSH, LH, E2) showed suboptimal results in patient's next menstrual cycles.
2.4. ICSI cycle outcomes All patients starting same COS protocol began on CD3 using (300-450 iu) of Gonal-F (r-FSH); Merck ± (u-HMG);LG in flexible antagonist protocol, (Cetrotide); Merck. Final oocyte maturation was triggered by 250 mcg r-hCG (Ovitrelle; Serono) ± 0.2 mg GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl; Merck) 35 hours before oocyte retrieval when dominant follicles reached (17-18) mm. Embryological outcomes including; MII oocytes, embryos quantity and quality were compared in both group. In all embryo transfer cycles, 2-4 embryos grade A± B of age 2-5 day were transferred. The clinical outcomes included pregnancy rate (serum β-HCG ≥100 mIU/mL), miscarriage rate (the loss of a pregnancy before 24 weeks), Live Birth rates (delivery of a living baby after 24 weeks) and overall cycle outcomes were compared in both groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ovarian PRP injection in poor responders | Experimental | Procedure: During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle.During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 49 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1 - infertile Poseidon groups 2, 3, 4 women 2- no history of chronic illness or pelvic pathology. 3- All male partners were either normozoospermic or had mild OAT delivered fresh ejaculated samples for ICSI.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1 - ovarian failure due to sex chromosome abnormalities, 2- current use of anticoagulants 3- history of bleeding disorders.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle.During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle. | Procedure or surgery | ovarian PRP injection in poor responders |
Primary outcome
numbers of Meta phase II oocytes and embryos post ovarian PRP
Time frame: one year
Primary embryological outcomes including; metaphase II oocytes and embryos numbers in addition to their quality post ovarian PRP were compared in both study \& control groups
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. on request only
Related trials for Poor Ovarian Reserve
RecruitingPhase 3
Ovulation Trigger Strategies in Low Ovarian Reserve (TRIGGERBEST)
Low Ovarian Reserve, Poor Ovarian Response
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Drospirenone-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Versus GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing Freeze-All IVF/ICSI
Poor Ovarian Reserve, Infertility (IVF Patients)
Recruiting
Ovarian PRP Injections for Improved Embryo Quality Using Embryo Quality Score
Infertility, Poor Ovarian Reserve
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Itlal J AL Asadi, MD principal investigator
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, Karbala University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing During early-mid follicular phase, using TV-US guidance and conscious sedation, 1.5 ml of PRP was injected into each ovary's subcortical layer using a 17-gauge ovum pick-up needle. in people with Poor Ovarian Reserve and Platelet Derived Growth Factor, run by Karbala University at 2 sites in Iraq.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Iraq. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
numbers of Meta phase II oocytes and embryos post ovarian PRP (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2025.