Dermatitis, Radiation InducedANTAGELNCT07207889
Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy of Morphine Gel to Treat Pain Associated With Perineal RadioDermatitis
An observational study of Dermatitis, Radiation Induced, run by Institut Curie at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Retrospective study evaluating the efficacy of a pharmacy-prepared Morphine gel used in clinics for the treatment of pain associated with perineal radiodermatitis. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Morphine Gel (MG) in pain management. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Dermatitis, Radiation Induced
- What is being tested?
- morphine chlorhydrate in intrasite gel
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2024to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 17 patients who received Morphine gel for the treatment of pain associated with perineal radiodermatitis over a 20-month period between July 2022 and March 2024.
Who may be able to join
- Patients 18 years and older;
- Use of a local analgesic treatment based on Morphine gel for pain associated with perineal radiodermatitis.
- Patients not relieved by prescribed systemic treatments (per-os or intravenous)
- Patients treated with radiotherapy for a perineal tumor, whether or not associated with medical treatment such as chemotherapy.
- Minimum grade of radiodermatitis: Grade II
Who cannot join
- Patients who have not used the prescribed morphine gel
- Minor patients
- Patients using morphine gel for wounds other than radiodermatitis
- Patients who object to the re-use of their data
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy of Morphine Gel (MG) for the Treatment of Pain Associated With RadioDermatitis (RD) More Than Grade II
Retrospective study evaluating the efficacy of a pharmacy-prepared Morphine gel used in clinics for the treatment of pain associated with perineal radiodermatitis. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Morphine Gel (MG) in pain management.
Read the detailed description
Radiotherapy (RT) can induce acute side effects or toxicities, known as radiodermatitis (RD). Technological and technical advances have made it possible to reduce these toxicities (1), although certain organs such as the skin and mucous membranes remain vulnerable, particularly when the tumor is located nearby.
Skin exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) during the treatment of tumors close to the cutaneous surface is no longer able to renew itself due to an alteration in the basal cell mitotic process, leading to suppression of skin cell renewal. IR also induces senescence of epidermal keratinocytes, responsible for exacerbated inflammatory activity and structural dysfunction of the epidermal barrier, through disruption of the keratinization and cornification process. (2).
RD usually heals ad integrum. They are classified into 5 grades according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 (3), presenting different clinical aspects ranging from grade I to V.
Grade II and III RDs are frequently observed in patients undergoing perineal RT, especially as medical treatment is associated.
In addition to the tumor's proximity to the skin, several anatomical factors specific to the perineal region contribute to the occurrence of these RDs: a wetter area, with skin folds, subject to friction and the presence of the urinary and anal orifices, potential sources of irritation by the elimination of urine and feces.
These RD are painful and have a significant impact on patients' quality of life (4,5,6). Pain intensity is often underestimated prior to treatment (7). The discomfort and pain experienced during RT intensify over the course of the sessions (8). Although RD is a frequent acute toxicity in patients treated for perineal tumors, there are few studies describing the impact of RD-related pain. The treatment of pain in RT must be rigorously assessed, and appropriate systemic or local therapy proposed (9). The challenge in treating pain in perineal radiodermatitis (PDR) is to ensure the full administration of the initial RT treatment regimen, which in the event of long interruption or premature discontinuation would expose the patient to a greater risk of recurrence (10-12).
Despite the studies carried out, there is no consensus on local care for the prevention or treatment of DR. However, the topicals used should not compromise the efficacy of RT, and should optimize healing, with gels being the preferred form.
This is why a dedicated care circuit has been set up at the Institut Curie to optimize preventive skin care and monitoring of tolerance to ROP. This system enables the early detection of painful ROP refractory to the prescribed systemic treatment.
In case of painful RD: patients are offered a hydrogel preparation mixed with morphine for local relief. Patients apply this preparation themselves during the day.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of morphine gel (GM) in the treatment of pain in PRD. The primary endpoint is the patient's self-reported reduction in pain. Secondary objectives include evaluation of systemic analgesic prescription and analysis of treatment interruptions attributable to DR.
- Conditions
- Dermatitis, Radiation Induced
- Being tested
- morphine chlorhydrate in intrasite gel
- Keywords
- morphine gel, cutaneous toxicity
- Medical subject headings
- Radiodermatitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
morphine chlorhydrate in intrasite gelDrug
The use of Morphine gel to treat painfull perineal radiodermatitis is new. None clinical study was conducted to explore the efficacy of the morphine gel as local analgesic for these cutaneous toxicity due to radiotherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients using morphine gel | patients who received morphine gel to treat pain due to perineal radiodermatitis Receives: Drug: morphine chlorhydrate in intrasite gel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy of morphine gel (GM) in the treatment of pain in perineal radiodermatitis
Reduced pain as assessed by the patient. Verbal scale to qualify the evolution of the pain (decreased - stable - increased)
Measured: between baseline and day2 to day21
Secondary outcomes (2)
Assessment of systemic analgesic prescribed
Difference of type of non-opoïd and opioïd treatment prescribed from baseline to D2 to D21.
Measured: between baseline and day2 to day 21
Interruption of radiotherapy treatment in connection with radiodermatitis
Number of radiotherapy treatment breaks or discontinuation
Measured: during 5 weeks from first day of radiotherapy (throught radiotherapy completion)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Oct 2025
- Study start1 Dec 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024
- Study completion31 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Dermatitis, Radiation InducedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institut Curie
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Elodie LABEDADE, Principal investigator, Institut Curie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07207889
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DATA240316 ANTAGEL
- Acronym
- ANTAGEL
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 29 Aug 2025
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy of Morphine Gel (MG) for the Treatment of Pain Associated With RadioDermatitis (RD) More Than Grade II
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07207889
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ANTAGEL / DATA240316 ANTAGEL
- Conditions
- Dermatitis, Radiation Induced
- Keywords
- morphine gel, cutaneous toxicity
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut CurieUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Retrospective study evaluating the efficacy of a pharmacy-prepared Morphine gel used in clinics for the treatment of pain associated with perineal radiodermatitis. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Morphine Gel (MG) in pain management.
Detailed description
Radiotherapy (RT) can induce acute side effects or toxicities, known as radiodermatitis (RD). Technological and technical advances have made it possible to reduce these toxicities (1), although certain organs such as the skin and mucous membranes remain vulnerable, particularly when the tumor is located nearby.
Skin exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) during the treatment of tumors close to the cutaneous surface is no longer able to renew itself due to an alteration in the basal cell mitotic process, leading to suppression of skin cell renewal. IR also induces senescence of epidermal keratinocytes, responsible for exacerbated inflammatory activity and structural dysfunction of the epidermal barrier, through disruption of the keratinization and cornification process. (2).
RD usually heals ad integrum. They are classified into 5 grades according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 (3), presenting different clinical aspects ranging from grade I to V.
Grade II and III RDs are frequently observed in patients undergoing perineal RT, especially as medical treatment is associated.
In addition to the tumor's proximity to the skin, several anatomical factors specific to the perineal region contribute to the occurrence of these RDs: a wetter area, with skin folds, subject to friction and the presence of the urinary and anal orifices, potential sources of irritation by the elimination of urine and feces.
These RD are painful and have a significant impact on patients' quality of life (4,5,6). Pain intensity is often underestimated prior to treatment (7). The discomfort and pain experienced during RT intensify over the course of the sessions (8). Although RD is a frequent acute toxicity in patients treated for perineal tumors, there are few studies describing the impact of RD-related pain. The treatment of pain in RT must be rigorously assessed, and appropriate systemic or local therapy proposed (9). The challenge in treating pain in perineal radiodermatitis (PDR) is to ensure the full administration of the initial RT treatment regimen, which in the event of long interruption or premature discontinuation would expose the patient to a greater risk of recurrence (10-12).
Despite the studies carried out, there is no consensus on local care for the prevention or treatment of DR. However, the topicals used should not compromise the efficacy of RT, and should optimize healing, with gels being the preferred form.
This is why a dedicated care circuit has been set up at the Institut Curie to optimize preventive skin care and monitoring of tolerance to ROP. This system enables the early detection of painful ROP refractory to the prescribed systemic treatment.
In case of painful RD: patients are offered a hydrogel preparation mixed with morphine for local relief. Patients apply this preparation themselves during the day.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of morphine gel (GM) in the treatment of pain in PRD. The primary endpoint is the patient's self-reported reduction in pain. Secondary objectives include evaluation of systemic analgesic prescription and analysis of treatment interruptions attributable to DR.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients using morphine gel | – | Drug: morphine chlorhydrate in intrasite gelpatients who received morphine gel to treat pain due to perineal radiodermatitis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 17 patients who received Morphine gel for the treatment of pain associated with perineal radiodermatitis over a 20-month period between July 2022 and March 2024.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients 18 years and older;
- Use of a local analgesic treatment based on Morphine gel for pain associated with perineal radiodermatitis.
- Patients not relieved by prescribed systemic treatments (per-os or intravenous)
- Patients treated with radiotherapy for a perineal tumor, whether or not associated with medical treatment such as chemotherapy.
- Minimum grade of radiodermatitis: Grade II
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients who have not used the prescribed morphine gel
- Minor patients
- Patients using morphine gel for wounds other than radiodermatitis
- Patients who object to the re-use of their data
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| morphine chlorhydrate in intrasite gelThe use of Morphine gel to treat painfull perineal radiodermatitis is new. None clinical study was conducted to explore the efficacy of the morphine gel as local analgesic for these cutaneous toxicity due to radiotherapy | Drug | Patients using morphine gel |
Primary outcome
Efficacy of morphine gel (GM) in the treatment of pain in perineal radiodermatitis
Time frame: between baseline and day2 to day21
Reduced pain as assessed by the patient. Verbal scale to qualify the evolution of the pain (decreased - stable - increased)
2 secondary outcomes
Assessment of systemic analgesic prescribed
Time frame: between baseline and day2 to day 21
Interruption of radiotherapy treatment in connection with radiodermatitis
Time frame: during 5 weeks from first day of radiotherapy (throught radiotherapy completion)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2025.
Related trials for Dermatitis, Radiation Induced
RecruitingPhase 2
Superoxide Dismutase Skin Spray for the Prevention of Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Head and Neck Cancer
Radiation-induced Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Determinants of Radiation Dermatitis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Preventive Photobiomodulation
Head and Neck Neoplasms, Radiodermatitis
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Adapalene Gel for Acute Radiation-Induced Skin Injury
Radiation Dermatitis
Active, not recruiting
Photobiomodulation for the Prevention of Radiation Induced Oral Mucositis
Mucositis Oral, Head and Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Akkermansia Muciniphila (AKK) for Radiation-Induced Skin Injury
Radiation-Induced Skin Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elodie LABEDADE principal investigator
Institut Curie
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Dermatitis, Radiation Induced, run by Institut Curie at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy of morphine gel (GM) in the treatment of pain in perineal radiodermatitis (time frame: between baseline and day2 to day21). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2025.