Disorder of ConsciousnessSPARCNCT07213869
Alpha tACS for Disorders of Consciousness : a Single Case Experimental Design
A study testing Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in people with Disorder of Consciousness, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
BRIEF SUMMARY * (Include a statement of the study hypothesis) Avoid all personal pronouns (Limit: 5000 characters) Disorders of consciousness (DoC) following a severe traumatic brain injury represent a major medical challenge, with very limited therapeutic options and many patients remaining in a minimally conscious… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Disorder of Consciousness
- What is being tested?
- Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2026to 1 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 to 70 years
- Persistent disorder of consciousness (vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or minimally conscious state) according to the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R), lasting 3 to 12 months after traumatic brain injury at the time of the inclusion
- No evidence of exit from minimally conscious state (eMCS) according to Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)
Who cannot join
- Active epilepsy or major pre-existing central nervous system disorders
- Craniectomy without bone flap replacement, non-healed scalp lesions, intracerebral metallic implants (except titanium), or implanted electronic devices (e.g., pacemaker)
- Contraindications to MRI (non-compatible devices, metallic fragments, recent tattoos, etc.)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Persons deprived of liberty, under psychiatric care, or not affiliated with a social security/health insurance system
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France1 site
Post-Intensive Care Neurorehabilitation Unit (Service de Reeducation Post-Reanimation) in Pierre Wertheimer Neurologic Hospital
Bron, 69029
Caroline HERAULT, Dr, 04 72 35 78 95 ext. +33, caroline.herault01@chu-lyon.fr
About this study
Official title: Study of Personalized Alpha tACS for the Recovery of Disorders of Consciousness : Controlled Evaluation With a Single Case Experimental Design
BRIEF SUMMARY * (Include a statement of the study hypothesis) Avoid all personal pronouns (Limit: 5000 characters) Disorders of consciousness (DoC) following a severe traumatic brain injury represent a major medical challenge, with very limited therapeutic options and many patients remaining in a minimally conscious state or vegetative/unresponsive wakefulness state for months. To date, only two pharmacological treatments (amantadine and zolpidem) have shown partial benefits. Non-invasive neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have produced modest but encouraging results.
Recent advances in transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) have demonstrated its ability to modulate brain oscillations, particularly in the alpha frequency range (8-12 Hz), which plays a central role in large-scale functional connectivity, especially within the default mode network (DMN). Neuroimaging studies suggest alpha activity and DMN connectivity are major correlate of the level of consciousness in DoC. Yet experimental evidence suggests that alpha tACS can enhance alpha power and antero-posterior connectivity in healthy subjects, as well as connectivity within the default mode network (DMN). However, no controlled study has yet evaluated its therapeutic potential in patients with DoC.
Read more
The present study (SPARC) is a single-center clinical investigation aiming to assess the clinical efficacy of alpha tACS in patients with DoC after traumatic brain injury. The primary hypothesis is that repeated sessions of alpha tACS will improve the level of consciousness, compared to baseline and non-stimulation periods, by reinforcing power and functional connectivity in the alpha band.
This trial adopts a Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED), a robust methodology particularly suited to rare and heterogeneous clinical populations such as DoC. Five adult patients (aged 18-70 years) with DoC persisting for 3-12 months post-trauma will be included. Each participant will undergo six consecutive phases over three months: three non-stimulation (baseline/washout) periods and three stimulation periods, each period lasting two weeks, in an A-B-A-B-A-B sequence. This intra-subject design allows each patient to serve as their own control, maximizing sensitivity to individual changes and limiting confounding by clinical heterogeneity.
The primary outcome measure is the change in the Simplified Evaluation of Consciousness Disorders (SECONDS) score, a validated clinical scale routinely used in DoC assessment. SECONDS will be measured three times weekly throughout the study. Secondary outcomes include: (1) EEG-based classification of consciousness state using an established machine-learning algorithm, (2) spectral power and functional connectivity changes in the alpha band, and (3) resting-state fMRI measures of DMN connectivity. These multimodal assessments aim both to provide objective evidence of clinical improvement and to explore the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms of tACS.
Safety and tolerability are monitored. Previous studies confirm that tACS is safe and well-tolerated, with only minor, transient side effects (tingling, scalp redness, phosphene perception). The study also involves EEG and MRI recordings, both of which are non-invasive and carry only minimal risks.
This study, although limited to five patients, is designed to provide rigorous individual-level evidence of efficacy and mechanistic plausibility. If results demonstrate consistent clinical and neurophysiological improvements, they will justify the design of a larger confirmatory trial and contribute to the development of novel therapeutic approaches for this severely disabled population.
- Conditions
- Disorder of Consciousness
- Being tested
- Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
- Keywords
- disorders of consciousness, tACS, tES, transcranial electric stimulation, traumatic brain injury
- Medical subject headings
- Consciousness Disorders, Brain Injuries, Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)Device
Alpha tACS daily, in repeated sessions delivered during three 2-week stimulation periods, alternating with three 2-week no-stimulation (baseline) periods, for a total duration of approximately three months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha tACS | Experimental | Participants receive Alpha tACS daily, in repeated sessions delivered during three 2-week stimulation periods, alternating with three 2-week no-stimulation (baseline) periods, for a total duration of approximately three months. Receives: Device: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in SECONDS score (Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders) during tACS vs. non-stimulation phases
The primary endpoint is the evolution of the SECONDS score, a standardized and validated clinical scale (range 1-8) routinely used in disorders of consciousness.
Each participant is analyzed individually (single-case time series). Scores during three active stimulation phases will be compared with scores during three non-stimulation phases.
Measured: Assessed 3 times per week throughout the 12-week protocol (across six phases: three stimulation and three non-stimulation periods).
Secondary outcomes (3)
EEG-based classification of consciousness state (SVM algorithm)
Change in the EEG-derived classification score using a validated support vector machine algorithm (Sitt et al. 2014), which estimates probability of being in vegetative state vs. minimally conscious state.
Each participant is analyzed individually (single-case time series). We will compare the variation of this score between stimulation and non-stimulation phases.
Measured: Baseline and end of each stimulation and non-stimulation phase (8 EEG recordings per participant over 12 weeks, plus 1-month follow-up).
Change in alpha spectral power and antero-posterior functional connectivity (EEG)
Evolution of alpha-band (8-12 Hz) spectral power and antero-posterior functional connectivity measured by EEG, analyzed for changes between stimulation and non-stimulation periods.
Each participant is analyzed individually (single-case time series).
Measured: Baseline and end of each stimulation and non-stimulation phase (8 EEG recordings per participant over 12 weeks, plus 1-month follow-up).
Resting-state fMRI connectivity within the Default Mode Network (DMN)
Change in functional connectivity within the default mode network (seed-based resting-state fMRI analysis) between baseline, post-non-stimulation, and post-stimulation phases, and association with clinical response to tACS.
Measured: At study start, after 2 weeks without stimulation, and after 2 weeks of stimulation (3 MRI scans per participant).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Oct 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Disorder of ConsciousnessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospices Civils de LyonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED, A-B-A-B-A-B): Each participant serves as their own control and undergoes six consecutive phases over approximately three months, alternating between baseline (no stimulation) and active stimulation periods (two weeks each). This intra-subject design maximizes sensitivity to individual changes while limiting confounding from clinical heterogeneity.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Caroline HERAULT, Dr, Study chair, Hospices Civils de Lyon
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07213869
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 69HCL24_0976
- Other IDs
- 2025-A02086-43
- Acronym
- SPARC
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2025
- Last updated
- 9 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study of Personalized Alpha tACS for the Recovery of Disorders of Consciousness : Controlled Evaluation With a Single Case Experimental Design
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07213869
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPARC / 69HCL24_0976
- Conditions
- Disorder of Consciousness
- Keywords
- disorders of consciousness, tACS, tES, transcranial electric stimulation, traumatic brain injury
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de LyonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
BRIEF SUMMARY * (Include a statement of the study hypothesis) Avoid all personal pronouns (Limit: 5000 characters) Disorders of consciousness (DoC) following a severe traumatic brain injury represent a major medical challenge, with very limited therapeutic options and many patients remaining in a minimally conscious state or vegetative/unresponsive wakefulness state for months. To date, only two pharmacological treatments (amantadine and zolpidem) have shown partial benefits. Non-invasive neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have produced modest but encouraging results.
Recent advances in transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) have demonstrated its ability to modulate brain oscillations, particularly in the alpha frequency range (8-12 Hz), which plays a central role in large-scale functional connectivity, especially within the default mode network (DMN). Neuroimaging studies suggest alpha activity and DMN connectivity are major correlate of the level of consciousness in DoC. Yet experimental evidence suggests that alpha tACS can enhance alpha power and antero-posterior connectivity in healthy subjects, as well as connectivity within the default mode network (DMN). However, no controlled study has yet evaluated its therapeutic potential in patients with DoC.
The present study (SPARC) is a single-center clinical investigation aiming to assess the clinical efficacy of alpha tACS in patients with DoC after traumatic brain injury. The primary hypothesis is that repeated sessions of alpha tACS will improve the level of consciousness, compared to baseline and non-stimulation periods, by reinforcing power and functional connectivity in the alpha band.
This trial adopts a Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED), a robust methodology particularly suited to rare and heterogeneous clinical populations such as DoC. Five adult patients (aged 18-70 years) with DoC persisting for 3-12 months post-trauma will be included. Each participant will undergo six consecutive phases over three months: three non-stimulation (baseline/washout) periods and three stimulation periods, each period lasting two weeks, in an A-B-A-B-A-B sequence. This intra-subject design allows each patient to serve as their own control, maximizing sensitivity to individual changes and limiting confounding by clinical heterogeneity.
The primary outcome measure is the change in the Simplified Evaluation of Consciousness Disorders (SECONDS) score, a validated clinical scale routinely used in DoC assessment. SECONDS will be measured three times weekly throughout the study. Secondary outcomes include: (1) EEG-based classification of consciousness state using an established machine-learning algorithm, (2) spectral power and functional connectivity changes in the alpha band, and (3) resting-state fMRI measures of DMN connectivity. These multimodal assessments aim both to provide objective evidence of clinical improvement and to explore the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms of tACS.
Safety and tolerability are monitored. Previous studies confirm that tACS is safe and well-tolerated, with only minor, transient side effects (tingling, scalp redness, phosphene perception). The study also involves EEG and MRI recordings, both of which are non-invasive and carry only minimal risks.
This study, although limited to five patients, is designed to provide rigorous individual-level evidence of efficacy and mechanistic plausibility. If results demonstrate consistent clinical and neurophysiological improvements, they will justify the design of a larger confirmatory trial and contribute to the development of novel therapeutic approaches for this severely disabled population.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED, A-B-A-B-A-B): Each participant serves as their own control and undergoes six consecutive phases over approximately three months, alternating between baseline (no stimulation) and active stimulation periods (two weeks each). This intra-subject design maximizes sensitivity to individual changes while limiting confounding from clinical heterogeneity.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha tACS | Experimental | Device: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)Participants receive Alpha tACS daily, in repeated sessions delivered during three 2-week stimulation periods, alternating with three 2-week no-stimulation (baseline) periods, for a total duration of approximately three months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 18 to 70 years
- Persistent disorder of consciousness (vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or minimally conscious state) according to the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R), lasting 3 to 12 months after traumatic brain injury at the time of the inclusion
- No evidence of exit from minimally conscious state (eMCS) according to Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Active epilepsy or major pre-existing central nervous system disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)Alpha tACS daily, in repeated sessions delivered during three 2-week stimulation periods, alternating with three 2-week no-stimulation (baseline) periods, for a total duration of approximately three months | Device | Alpha tACS |
Primary outcome
Change in SECONDS score (Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders) during tACS vs. non-stimulation phases
Time frame: Assessed 3 times per week throughout the 12-week protocol (across six phases: three stimulation and three non-stimulation periods).
The primary endpoint is the evolution of the SECONDS score, a standardized and validated clinical scale (range 1-8) routinely used in disorders of consciousness. Each participant is analyzed individually (single-case time series). Scores during three active stimulation phases will be compared with scores during three non-stimulation phases.
3 secondary outcomes
EEG-based classification of consciousness state (SVM algorithm)
Time frame: Baseline and end of each stimulation and non-stimulation phase (8 EEG recordings per participant over 12 weeks, plus 1-month follow-up).
Change in alpha spectral power and antero-posterior functional connectivity (EEG)
Time frame: Baseline and end of each stimulation and non-stimulation phase (8 EEG recordings per participant over 12 weeks, plus 1-month follow-up).
Resting-state fMRI connectivity within the Default Mode Network (DMN)
Time frame: At study start, after 2 weeks without stimulation, and after 2 weeks of stimulation (3 MRI scans per participant).
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Oct 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Disorder of Consciousness
Not yet recruiting
Miniature In-line Respirator
Brain Death, Respiration, Artificial
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures FOCUS-1
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Restoring Awareness
Vegetative State, Minimally Conscious State
RecruitingObservational study
Smartphone Enabled Detection of Cognitive Motor Dissociation in the ICU
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients, Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Caroline HERAULT, Dr study chair
Hospices Civils de Lyon
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in people with Disorder of Consciousness, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Caroline HERAULT, DR (04 72 35 78 95 ext. +33, caroline.herault01@chu-lyon.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in SECONDS score (Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders) during tACS vs. non-stimulation phases (time frame: Assessed 3 times per week throughout the 12-week protocol (across six phases: three stimulation and three non-stimulation periods).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2025.