AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CancerNCT07219745

Transanal Irrigation for the Management of Early Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS)

A study testing Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit and LARS mobile application in people with Colorectal Cancer and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, run by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Transanal irrigation (TAI) has shown to improve fecal incontinence and increase quality of life in patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). This trial is a small study being conducted to determine whether a larger trial is feasible. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit and LARS mobile application
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2026to Nov 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults (≥18 years-old) patients who underwent a LAR for any indication via open, laparoscopic, robotic, or transanal total mesorectal excision, with creation of a diverting loop ileostomy,
  • have confirmed anastomotic healing demonstrated by flexible sigmoidoscopy and CT scan with rectally-administered water soluble contrast or gastrograffin enema,
  • are planned for an ileostomy closure operation, and
  • are in the first 12 months post-LAR operation

Who cannot join

  • Inability to comprehend English or Spanish or provide informed consent (Note: after the English documents are approved, the study team plans to obtain a Spanish consent and study documents),
  • ongoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and
  • ongoing anastomotic complication.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Marylise Boutros, MD contact

954-659-5278

CORSFLresearch@ccf.org

United States1 site
  • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Digestive Disease Institute Cleveland Clinic Florida

    Weston, Florida, 33331

    Marylise Boutros, MD

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Transanal Irrigation for the Management of Early Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Transanal irrigation (TAI) has shown to improve fecal incontinence and increase quality of life in patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). This trial is a small study being conducted to determine whether a larger trial is feasible. Investigators are also doing this research to see if TAI impacts quality of life and improves bowel function within the early post-operative period (1-12 months).

This treatment is designed for participants to have more control over their bowel movements and reduce the dependency on immediate access to the toilet.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the U.S. with 152,810 new cases estimated for 2024. Rectal cancer comprises one-third of all incident cases, with rising incidence among young individuals (1-2% rise/year). With advances in multidisciplinary management, the overall, 5-year survival has improved (68%), and for localized rectal cancers it is excellent (90%), creating a growing rectal cancer survivorship population (currently >450,000). Traditionally, surgery for rectal cancer required removal of the rectum and the anus, with the creation of a permanent ostomy. However, with recent advances in subspecialty training and technique, in combination with neoadjuvant radiation, surgeons can offer a cure while preserving the anal sphincter and restoring bowel continuity, via a newer technique called Low Anterior Resection (LAR). This technique, favored by surgeons and patients, aims to allow patients to have an option of remaining "close to normal", as opposed to having a permanent ostomy. While this technique has been successful in sparing the rectum, these advancements have not come without consequence. Bowel dysfunction post-LAR, known as Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), is perhaps the most prevalent and significant sequela, affecting up to 70-90% of rectal cancer survivors. LARS symptoms include fecal incontinence, urgency, increased frequency, stool fragmentation, and incomplete evacuation. These uncontrolled LARS symptoms have a devastating impact on patients' quality of life (QoL), and often persist indefinitely. Treatment for LARS focuses on symptom management, using diet, medications and pelvic floor physiotherapy, but these measures often fail leaving patients with significant symptoms. Consequently, many patients are unable to return to work in their prior roles and require long-term disability or early retirement. Patients also resort to lifestyle restrictions including skipping meals, restricting social and recreational activities, and avoiding travel and exercise, thereby further diminishing their QoL .

Transanal irrigation (TAI) is an established treatment used for fecal incontinence and constipation. TAI is designed to irrigate a large amount of water throughout the entire colon, allowing for scheduled and complete emptying of stool. As such, TAI has the potential to reduce the symptoms of LARS including difficulty emptying, incontinence, and frequent, unpredictable bowel movements. This single daily irrigation is designed to allow patients to be free of bowel movements during the day and reduce their dependency on immediate access to the toilet, thus decreasing the impact of LARS on their daily lives. Currently, TAI is not in wide clinical use for LARS in North America despite reports from small prospective European studies (15-37 patients) demonstrating benefits for LARS . The most recent and robust published study to date, included patients with late LARS (>1-year post-treatment) randomized to TAI (n=16) vs. control (n=22), and reported significant improvements in LARS and QoL at 1 year when using TAI.

Prior work: Investigators have conducted a multi-center, cross-over, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess TAI for late LARS (median 2 years post-treatment) at 7 Canadian institutions (NCT04469426). The trial has completed accrual (n=71). Patients were randomized (1:1 ratio) to start in either the TAI or control group, and then crossed over to the opposite group. Participants spent 3 months in each arm. Participants in the TAI arm received nursing instruction and online education for learning TAI using the "LARS-TAI" app. I created this web-based HIPAA-compliant, mobile app (iOS™ and Android™ compatible) to support patients with LARS using TAI. The LARS-TAI App is accessible on any device with internet access or cellular data, including smart phones, tablets, and computers. The app contains educational modules on LARS and TAI, a discussion forum, patient videos, and bowel diaries. Investigators are currently completing follow-up and data analysis for this study. This cross-over trial has provided invaluable practical knowledge on educating patients about TAI and has demonstrated a high level of acceptance for TAI as a treatment for LARS within the first North American sample. Furthermore, it has underscored the challenges associated with a cross-over study design, as many participants were hesitant to transition from TAI to the control group due to the marked improvements in LARS and QoL that they experienced with the intervention.

At CCF-FL, I have established a LARS Clinic, with a trained LARS nurse, and investigators have treated over 50 rectal cancer patients with LARS in 2024. Investigators have established a LARS registry and are routinely screening for LARS in our rectal cancer patients. Investigators have partnered with CCF-Ohio who have also started screening rectal cancer patients for LARS. Investigators have identified a high burden (75% major LARS) of LARS post-treatment in our rectal cancer patients.

The knowledge gap: While TAI shows promise for LARS management, the optimal timing for its use remains unclear. The first 6 months post-treatment pose significant challenges for LARS patients, with at least 58% experiencing major LARS and significantly decreased quality of life (QoL). Investigators observed that 54% of these patients with major LARS also experience financial distress, with most unable to return to work. Unfortunately, conservative measures often fail in this early phase, rendering patients in despair as they try to adapt to their altered bowel function. The potential for TAI to improve LARS in this early phase was proposed in a small German RCT (n=37) that demonstrated reduced bowel movements and improved LARS with no significant complications .

Overall, TAI has only been reported in 9 published studies (total n=204) all from outside of the US, including only 3 small RCTs (total n=102). Although these trials are somewhat limited in size and design, taken together they represent important evidence for the benefit of TAI in LARS and are the basis for pursuing a larger North American RCT. TAI is promising for decreasing LARS and improving QoL. Despite this available evidence on the potential benefits of TAI for LARS, TAI is currently not in standard clinical use for LARS in North America due to limited North American data. As such, TAI for the indication of LARS is not available to patients and current insurance plans (medicare/medicaid or private) do not cover its cost. This pilot trial aims to assess the feasibility of a larger trial that will build on the foundation of evidence that supports the use of TAI in rectal cancer patients with LARS. In this pilot and subsequent larger trial, investigators will gather North American data to support the use of TAI in a North American population, especially in the early post-treatment period.

Expected Results: Investigators hypothesize that TAI will decrease early LARS and positively impact quality of life for rectal cancer patients. Investigators aim to transition into a phase III study, with pilot study cases contributing to the larger sample. This strategy optimizes pilot study data use, maintains research momentum, and builds on initial findings. Successful pilot completion will yield data affirming TAI's feasibility and potential efficacy in managing LARS, bolstering our applications for extramural funding (NIH R01 Research Project Grant).

Impact: More than 450,000 rectal cancer patients in the US will enter survivorship for rectal cancer this year, with a rising number of younger patients of working age affected by rectal cancer. TAI may help patients significantly control their symptoms from the early post-operative period, allowing them to return to work and normal activities sooner and improve their QoL. The success of this pilot and consequently our larger trial will provide the necessary evidence to incorporate TAI into standard practice for LARS treatment.

Being tested
Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit, LARS mobile application
Keywords
Transanal irrigation, Peristeen Transanal Irrigation System, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, LARS
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Peristeen Plus Irrigation kitDevice

    Transanal irrigation TAI is performed by inserting an applicator into the anal canal, inflating a balloon to occlude passage of stool and then installing 500-1000 mL of tap water via an irrigation system to fill the rectum and distal colon, followed by evacuation of bowel contents.

    Participants in the TAI-intervention arm will receive in-person training to learn how to use TAI and will also be given weekly virtual or in-person follow-up appointments for the first 4 weeks to troubleshoot any issues with TAI.

    Participants will do TAI once per day for 3 months. Each session of TAI takes about 20-60 minutes, depending on the individual's experience and bowel response.

  • LARS mobile applicationOther

    Both arms will receive access to the LARS mobile application, which is a digital self-management tool. The app provides interactive educational content, personalized bowel function diaries, guided video tutorials, and peer testimonials, all designed to enhance engagement, promote self-efficacy, and support long-term self-management.

    The TAI-intervention arm will also receive access to a TAI Module on the LARS app that will offer comprehensive educational resources, including step-by-step guidance, animations, photographs, and participant videos to reinforce safe and confident use of the TAI system.

Study groups in NCT07219745
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Transanal Irrigation (TAI) - intervention armOtherParticipants in the TAI-intervention arm will receive TAI (using Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit), training of TAI administration, and access to the LARS app (including TAI module).
Receives: Device: Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit; Other: LARS mobile application
Continued conservative management - control arm.OtherParticipants in the control arm will receive conservative management and access to the LARS app (excluding the TAI module). Conservative management includes individualized combinations of dietary modifications, pharmacologic therapies, pelvic floor rehabilitation, and structured follow-up
Receives: Other: LARS mobile application

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at baseline

    PROMIS_GI Diarrhea with domains covering Frequency, urgency, burden. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse diarrhea

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at 1 month

    PROMIS_GI Diarrhea with domains covering Frequency, urgency, burden. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse diarrhea

    Measured: 1 month post randomization

  3. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at 2 months

    PROMIS_GI Diarrhea with domains covering Frequency, urgency, burden. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse diarrhea

    Measured: 2 months post randomization

  4. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at 3 months

    PROMIS_GI Diarrhea with domains covering Frequency, urgency, burden. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse diarrhea

    Measured: 3 months post randomization

  5. PROMIS-GI Fecal Incontinence at baseline

    PROMIS_GI Fecal Incontinence with domains covering Leakage, control, impact . T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse incontinence

    Measured: Baseline

  6. PROMIS-GI Fecal Incontinence at 1 month

    PROMIS_GI Fecal Incontinence with domains covering Leakage, control, impact . T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse incontinence

    Measured: 1 month post randomization

  7. PROMIS-GI Fecal Incontinence at 2 months

    PROMIS_GI Fecal Incontinence with domains covering Leakage, control, impact . T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse incontinence

    Measured: 2 months post randomization

  8. PROMIS-GI Fecal Incontinence at 3 months

    PROMIS_GI Fecal Incontinence with domains covering Leakage, control, impact . T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse incontinence

    Measured: 3 months post randomization

  9. Average monthly randomization rate

    Participants who report a LARS Score of ≥20-the threshold for moderate-to-severe LARS-will meet criteria for randomization. Score range: 0-42 (higher scores = more severe LARS; 0-20 = no LARS, 21-29 = minor, 30-42 = major)

    Measured: 3 months post ileostomy

Secondary outcomes (31)
  1. PROMIS Physical Function at baseline

    PROMIS_Physical Function with domains covering Physical capability, daily activity performance.T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better physical function

    Measured: Baseline

  2. PROMIS Physical Function at 1 month

    PROMIS_Physical Function with domains covering Physical capability, daily activity performance.T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better physical function

    Measured: 1 month post randomization

  3. PROMIS Physical Function at 2 months

    PROMIS_Physical Function with domains covering Physical capability, daily activity performance. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better physical function

    Measured: 2 months post randomization

  4. PROMIS Physical Function at 3 months

    PROMIS_Physical Function with domains covering Physical capability, daily activity performance.T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better physical function

    Measured: 3 months post randomization

  5. PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities at baseline

    PROMIS_Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities with domains covering Social, role functioning, engagement in daily life. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better social participation

    Measured: Baseline

  6. PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities at 1 month

    PROMIS_Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities with domains covering Social, role functioning, engagement in daily life. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better social participation

    Measured: 1 month post randomization

  7. PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities at 2 months

    PROMIS_Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities with domains covering Social, role functioning, engagement in daily life. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better social participation

    Measured: 2 months post randomization

  8. PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities at 3 months

    PROMIS_Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities with domains covering Social, role functioning, engagement in daily life. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better social participation

    Measured: 3 months post randomization

  9. PROMIS Anxiety at baseline

    PROMIS_anxiety with domains covering Anxiety symptoms. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more anxiety

    Measured: Baseline

  10. PROMIS Anxiety at 1 month

    PROMIS_anxiety with domains covering Anxiety symptoms. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more anxiety

    Measured: 1 month post randomization

  11. PROMIS Anxiety at 2 months

    PROMIS_anxiety with domains covering Anxiety symptoms. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more anxiety

    Measured: 2 months post randomization

  12. PROMIS Anxiety at 3 months

    PROMIS anxiety with domains covering Anxiety symptoms. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more anxiety

    Measured: 3 months post randomization

  13. PROMIS Depression at baseline

    PROMIS depression with domains covering Depressive symptoms .T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more depression

    Measured: Baseline

  14. PROMIS Depression at 1 month

    PROMIS depression with domains covering Depressive symptoms .T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more depression

    Measured: 1 month post randomization

  15. PROMIS Depression at 2 months

    PROMIS depression with domains covering Depressive symptoms .T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more depression

    Measured: 2 months post randomization

  16. PROMIS Depression at 3 months

    PROMIS depression with domains covering Depressive symptoms .T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more depression

    Measured: 3 months post randomization

  17. PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at baseline

    PROMIS Sleep Disturbance with domains covering Sleep quality, falling/ staying asleep, restfulness. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more sleep disturbance

    Measured: Baseline

  18. PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at 1 month

    PROMIS Sleep Disturbance with domains covering Sleep quality, falling/ staying asleep, restfulness. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more sleep disturbance

    Measured: 1 month post randomization

  19. PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at 2 months

    PROMIS Sleep Disturbance with domains covering Sleep quality, falling/ staying asleep, restfulness. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more sleep disturbance

    Measured: 2 months post randomization

  20. PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at 3 months

    PROMIS Sleep Disturbance with domains covering Sleep quality, falling/ staying asleep, restfulness. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more sleep disturbance

    Measured: 3 months post randomization

  21. PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles at baseline

    PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles, with domains covering Satisfaction with role \& social engagement. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater satisfaction

    Measured: Baseline

  22. PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles at 1 month

    PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles, with domains covering Satisfaction with role \& social engagement. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater satisfaction

    Measured: 1 month post randomization

  23. PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles at 2 months

    PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles, with domains covering Satisfaction with role \& social engagement. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater satisfaction

    Measured: 2 months post randomization

  24. PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles at 3 months

    PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles, with domains covering Satisfaction with role \& social engagement. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater satisfaction

    Measured: 3 months post randomization

  25. PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions at baseline

    PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions, with domains covering Satisfaction with Confidence in managing symptoms and health tasks. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater self-efficacy

    Measured: Baseline

  26. PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions at 1 month

    PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions, with domains covering Satisfaction with Confidence in managing symptoms and health tasks. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater self-efficacy

    Measured: 1 month post randomization

  27. PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions at 2 months

    PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions, with domains covering Satisfaction with Confidence in managing symptoms and health tasks. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater self-efficacy

    Measured: 2 months post randomization

  28. PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions at 3 months

    PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions, with domains covering Satisfaction with Confidence in managing symptoms and health tasks. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater self-efficacy

    Measured: 3 months post randomization

  29. Completeness

    Proportion of participants completing the 3-month outcome assessment.

    Measured: 3 months post randomization

  30. Treatment adherence rate

    Proportion of participants completing at least 80% of TAI sessions over 3-months

    Measured: 3 months post randomization

  31. Consent rates

    Proportion of participants undergoing ileostomy closure who provide informed consent.

    Measured: Post consenting, Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2025
  2. Study startOct 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionNov 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07219745
Sponsor's protocol ID
CASE3225
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
20 Oct 2025
Last updated
18 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit and LARS mobile application in people with Colorectal Cancer and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, run by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Marylise Boutros, MD (954-659-5278, CORSFLresearch@ccf.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at baseline (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in