AzTrials
AzTrials

StutteringNCT07222163

Stuttering and Neuromodulation

A study testing Soterix Medical 1x1 tDCS system and Speech therapy sessions in people with Stuttering, run by NYU Langone Health at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to collect preliminary data on the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with traditional behavioral techniques to reduce stuttering severity and negative impact in adults who stutter. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Stuttering
What is being tested?
Soterix Medical 1x1 tDCS system and Speech therapy sessions
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
16 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
4 Sep 2025to 31 Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged 18 to 65 years.
  • Diagnosis of developmental stuttering, verified by a licensed speech-language pathologist.
  • Mild-to-moderate or greater stuttering severity, defined as a score of 20 or higher on the Stuttering Severity Instrument-Fourth Edition (SSI-4).
  • English as a primary language.
  • Right-handedness (to minimize variability in neural lateralization).
  • Willing and able to attend all study sessions and follow study procedures.

Who cannot join

  • Have a history of neurological, psychiatric, or medical conditions that are contraindicated for tDCS.
  • Are currently taking medications known to affect cortical excitability.
  • Have a history of seizures or epilepsy.
  • Are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study period.
  • Have metal implants in the head (excluding dental work) or other contraindications to electrical brain stimulation.
  • Any skin disorder or skin sensitive area near stimulation locations.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Eric S. Jackson contact

212-992-9470

Ej34@nyu.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • NYU Langone Health

    New York, New York, 10016

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to collect preliminary data on the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with traditional behavioral techniques to reduce stuttering severity and negative impact in adults who stutter. The study also aims to explore neuroplastic changes (i.e., regional activation and functional connectivity) resulting from combined tDCS + speech therapy.

Conditions
Stuttering
Being tested
Soterix Medical 1x1 tDCS system, Speech therapy sessions
Keywords
tDCS
Medical subject headings
Stuttering

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Soterix Medical 1x1 tDCS systemDevice

    Stimulation (2.0 mA for 30 minutes) will occur during speech therapy sessions focused on practicing speech techniques. Sham stimulation will mimic the physical sensation without active current.

  • Speech therapy sessionsBehavioural

    Each of the ten weekly sessions will begin with 15 minutes of strategy practice, providing participants with the opportunity to rehearse light contact and easy onset techniques prior to the tDCS-enhanced speaking task.

Study groups in NCT07222163
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Behavioral speech therapy combined with active tDCSExperimentalEach participant will complete ten treatment sessions over approximately ten weeks. In each session, participants will receive active tDCS for 30 minutes while concurrently engaging in behavioral speech therapy. Active stimulation will include a 30-second ramp-up to 2.0 mA, 30 minutes of continuous stimulation, and a 30-second ramp-down.
Receives: Device: Soterix Medical 1x1 tDCS system; Behavioral: Speech therapy sessions
Behavioral speech therapy combined with sham tDCSSham comparatorEach participant will complete ten treatment sessions over approximately ten weeks. In each session, participants will receive sham tDCS for 30 minutes while concurrently engaging in behavioral speech therapy. Sham stimulation will involve the same ramp-up and ramp-down but with no current delivered during the 30-minute period to maintain blinding.
Receives: Device: Soterix Medical 1x1 tDCS system; Behavioral: Speech therapy sessions

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Stuttering Severity Instrument - 4th Edition (SSI-4) total score

    The Stuttering Severity Instrument-4th Edition (SSI-4) provides a total score that is compared to age-specific norms to determine severity, with ranges for "Very Mild" to "Very Severe". The SSI-4 calculates individual scores for frequency (2-18), duration (2-18), and physical concomitants (0-20). These individual scores are combined to create a total score, which is then ranked against norms to provide a verbal severity descriptor, such as mild, moderate, severe, or very severe.

    Measured: Baseline, Visit 15 (~1-2 weeks post-intervention)

  2. Change in the Wright and Ayre Stuttering Self-Rating Profile (WASSP) score

    The WASSP produces a profile of scores across five subscales. There is a total of 26 items each scored on a seven-point Likert-type scale. A score of '1' represents the least severe/negative perception, while a '7' represents the most severe/negative perception on each scale. Total scores range from 26-182, with higher scores indicating a greater negative impact of stuttering on their life.

    Measured: Baseline, Visit 15 (~1-2 weeks post-intervention)

  3. Stuttering impact as assessed by the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering - Adults (OASES-A)

    The OASES-A is a tool used by speech-language pathologists to measure the adverse impact of stuttering on an adult's life. It consists of 100 questions rated on a 5-point scale (1-5). The scores from individual questions are added together to create an overall score. The total score is then used to determine the "Impact Rating" on a scale from mild to severe. Higher scores indicate higher levels of negative impact.

    Measured: Baseline, Visit 15 (~1-2 weeks post-intervention)

  4. Change in the Brief Version of the Unhelpful Thoughts and Beliefs About Stuttering Scales (UTBAS-6) total score

    The UTBAS-6 is a six-item screening questionnaire for adults who stutter to measure unhelpful thoughts and beliefs associated with speech anxiety. The UTBAS-6 has a subscale score range of 6 to 30 and a total score range of 18 to 90. A higher score indicates more frequent unhelpful thoughts and greater anxiety related to stuttering.

    Measured: Baseline, Visit 15 (~1-2 weeks post-intervention)

  5. Change in Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation (BFNE-S) Scale total score

    The BFNE-S consists of 8 items that are rated on a five-point likert scale from 1 (not at all characteristic) to 4 (extremely characteristic). Scores range from 0 to 32. A score of 25 or higher may indicate clinically significant social anxiety.

    Measured: Baseline, Visit 15 (~1-2 weeks post-intervention)

  6. Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS)

    The SIAS is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that measures the severity of social anxiety. Each item is rated from 0 (not at all characteristic or true of me) to 4 (extremely characteristic or ture of me). Scores can range from 0 (no social anxiety) to 80 (maximum social anxiety). A score of 36 or higher is often considered clinically significant, suggesting the presence of social anxiety.

    Measured: Baseline, Visit 15 (~1-2 weeks post-intervention)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change in regional activation in/between cognitive control and speech motor areas during a delayed-naming task

    Neuroplastic changes will be assessed using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure cortical activation patterns (i.e., regional activation, functional connectivity) in/between cognitive control and speech motor areas during a delayed-naming task (pre- and post-intervention).

    Measured: Baseline, Visit 15 (~1-2 weeks post-intervention)

  2. Change in functional connectivity in/between cognitive control and speech motor areas during a delayed-naming task

    Neuroplastic changes will be assessed using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure cortical activation patterns (i.e., regional activation, functional connectivity) in/between cognitive control and speech motor areas during a delayed-naming task (pre- and post-intervention).

    Measured: Baseline, Visit 15 (~1-2 weeks post-intervention)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Oct 2025
  2. Study start4 Sep 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
16 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07222163
Sponsor's protocol ID
25-00866
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
28 Oct 2025
Last updated
2 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: The de-identified participant data from the final research dataset will be shared upon reasonable request beginning 9 to 36 months after publication or as required by a condition of awards or supporting agreements, provided the requesting researcher provide a methodologically sound proposal and executes a data use agreement with NYU Langone Health. This instance of data sharing will also require separate IRB review as well as review from NYU Langone's Data Sharing Strategy Board (DSSB). Requests should be directed to: Ej34@nyu.edu. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be posted on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or supporting awards and agreements.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in