Neurologic FindingsNCT07223827
Handheld Point of Care Electro-Diagnostic Device
A study testing POC EEG in people with Neurologic Findings, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
There are currently several products offering POC EEG, intended to be deployed on each patient individually and continuously. The investigators propose studying a different approach by using a migrating POC electrodiagnostic device that is deployed directly by the onsite provider and is actively used, like other POC… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neurologic Findings
- What is being tested?
- POC EEG
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Jan 2026to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients 18 years old or above
- Seen inpatient or in outpatient service at IU Health facilities - Methodist Hospital, and the Neuroscience Center, by a Neurology and/or Neurosurgery consultant as part of their SOC.
- The participant has capacity to sign consent or has an assigned LAR (Legally Authorized Representative - Spouse, parent, sibling, etc.) able to consent on their behalf.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant woman
- PI unblinded by participant or LAR regarding indication or clinical data
- Burns or extensive skin lesions
- Implanted stimulation devices (any)
- Participant without standard imaging and, or other paraclinical SOC investigations to be comparable to the POC investigational device acquired data.
- Significant acute or chronic medical, neurologic, or other illness in the patient that, in the judgment of the PI, could compromise subject safety, limit the ability to complete the study, and/or compromise the objectives of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Indiana University Health
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Sergiu Abramovici, MD, 3172788090, sabramov@iu.edu
About this study
There are currently several products offering POC EEG, intended to be deployed on each patient individually and continuously. The investigators propose studying a different approach by using a migrating POC electrodiagnostic device that is deployed directly by the onsite provider and is actively used, like other POC devices, to acquire real-time diagnostic insight and facilitate immediate medical decision making. This can significantly shorten time to treatment which in several neurological and neurosurgical conditions, and thus, can significantly improve patient outcome.
The investigational POC investigational device is based on a handheld limited electrode array, complemented by various stimulation modalities such as SSEP, VEP and BAEP, and potentially other sensors. For this study, the investigators intend to use readily available industry standard stimulators and only use the proposed POC investigational device to acquire and analyze the data. The POC investigational electrodiagnostic prototype was assembled using OpenBCI8 electronic board and electrodes, based on ADS 129X chip by Texas Instruments, that was shown to provide an adequate low-cost solution for electrodiagnostic data acquisition.
- Conditions
- Neurologic Findings
- Being tested
- POC EEG
- Medical subject headings
- Neurologic Manifestations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
POC EEGDiagnostic test
The PI will apply the POC investigational device dry electrodes, as well as SOC SSEP stimulator to the participant and run a standardized diagnostic testing sequence, to cover all 4 limbs, spine, and head. The device connects to a laptop via Bluetooth, and the acquired electrodiagnostic data is visualized on the screen. The PI will analyze the acquired data and determine lateralization, localization, and presumed nature of the lesion or pathology causing the patient's symptoms. The direct contact with the participant should take10-20 minutes. The inferred lateralization, localization, and nature of the presumed lesion, will be then documented, to be compared to the diagnostic insight of using SOC diagnostic methods such as CT, MRI, EEG, SSEP, etc. The participant will receive their regular SOC management and a single, brief evaluation using the POC investigational device.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Arm | Experimental | Participants will be evaluated using the handheld POC device to compare diagnostic data collected vs. clinical diagnostic data Receives: Diagnostic Test: POC EEG |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Outcome 1
The diagnostic insights acquired using the POC investigation device regarding lateralization (left/right), localization (cerebral - frontal, temporal, parieto-occipital; spinal - cervical, thoracal, lumbosacral; or radicular), and presumed nature of lesion (i.e. ischemia, hemorrhage, space-occupying lesion), are significantly comparable to, and congruent with, the SOC diagnostic insight regarding same parameters (lateralization, localization and presumed etiology) acquired using SOC techniques such as MRI, 10-20 (standard ubiquity used electrode montage) EEG systems, SSEP, etc. The PI will be the only POC investigational device operator, and will be blinded to patient examination, symptoms and SOC investigation results. The PI will be blinded to all EMR data. The investigator then plans to compare the clinical insight obtained by using the POC investigational device, to SOC.
Measured: Day 0
Outcome 2
The diagnostic insights acquired using the POC investigation device regarding localization (cerebral - frontal, temporal, parieto-occipital; spinal - cervical, thoracal, lumbosacral; or radicular),are significantly comparable to, and congruent with, the SOC diagnostic insight regarding same parameters (lateralization, localization and presumed etiology) acquired using SOC techniques such as MRI, 10-20 (standard ubiquity used electrode montage) EEG systems, SSEP, etc.
Measured: Day 0
Outcome 3
The diagnostic insights acquired using the POC investigation device regarding the presumed nature of lesion (i.e. ischemia, hemorrhage, space-occupying lesion), are significantly comparable to, and congruent with, the SOC diagnostic insight regarding same parameters (lateralization, localization and presumed etiology) acquired using SOC techniques such as MRI, 10-20 (standard ubiquity used electrode montage) EEG systems, SSEP, etc.
Measured: Day 0
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Nov 2025
- Study start10 Jan 2026
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Neurologic FindingsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Indiana UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sergiu Abramovici, Indiana University
- Investigators
- Sergiu Abramovici, MD, Principal investigator, Indiana University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07223827
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 28589
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2025
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Handheld Point of Care Electro-Diagnostic Device
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07223827
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 28589
- Conditions
- Neurologic Findings
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There are currently several products offering POC EEG, intended to be deployed on each patient individually and continuously. The investigators propose studying a different approach by using a migrating POC electrodiagnostic device that is deployed directly by the onsite provider and is actively used, like other POC devices, to acquire real-time diagnostic insight and facilitate immediate medical decision making. This can significantly shorten time to treatment which in several neurological and neurosurgical conditions, and thus, can significantly improve patient outcome.
The investigational POC investigational device is based on a handheld limited electrode array, complemented by various stimulation modalities such as SSEP, VEP and BAEP, and potentially other sensors. For this study, the investigators intend to use readily available industry standard stimulators and only use the proposed POC investigational device to acquire and analyze the data. The POC investigational electrodiagnostic prototype was assembled using OpenBCI8 electronic board and electrodes, based on ADS 129X chip by Texas Instruments, that was shown to provide an adequate low-cost solution for electrodiagnostic data acquisition.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Arm | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: POC EEGParticipants will be evaluated using the handheld POC device to compare diagnostic data collected vs. clinical diagnostic data |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients 18 years old or above
- Seen inpatient or in outpatient service at IU Health facilities - Methodist Hospital, and the Neuroscience Center, by a Neurology and/or Neurosurgery consultant as part of their SOC.
- The participant has capacity to sign consent or has an assigned LAR (Legally Authorized Representative - Spouse, parent, sibling, etc.) able to consent on their behalf.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Pregnant woman
- PI unblinded by participant or LAR regarding indication or clinical data
- Burns or extensive skin lesions
- Implanted stimulation devices (any)
- Participant without standard imaging and, or other paraclinical SOC investigations to be comparable to the POC investigational device acquired data.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| POC EEGThe PI will apply the POC investigational device dry electrodes, as well as SOC SSEP stimulator to the participant and run a standardized diagnostic testing sequence, to cover all 4 limbs, spine, and head. The device connects to a laptop via Bluetooth, and the acquired electrodiagnostic data is visualized on the screen. The PI will analyze the acquired data and determine lateralization, localization, and presumed nature of the lesion or pathology causing the patient's symptoms. The direct contact with the participant should take10-20 minutes. The inferred lateralization, localization, and nature of the presumed lesion, will be then documented, to be compared to the diagnostic insight of using SOC diagnostic methods such as CT, MRI, EEG, SSEP, etc. The participant will receive their regular SOC management and a single, brief evaluation using the POC investigational device. | Diagnostic test | Treatment Arm |
Primary outcome
Outcome 1
Time frame: Day 0
The diagnostic insights acquired using the POC investigation device regarding lateralization (left/right), localization (cerebral - frontal, temporal, parieto-occipital; spinal - cervical, thoracal, lumbosacral; or radicular), and presumed nature of lesion (i.e. ischemia, hemorrhage, space-occupying lesion), are significantly comparable to, and congruent with, the SOC diagnostic insight regarding same parameters (lateralization, localization and presumed etiology) acquired using SOC techniques such as MRI, 10-20 (standard ubiquity used electrode montage) EEG systems, SSEP, etc. The PI will be the only POC investigational device operator, and will be blinded to patient examination, symptoms and SOC investigation results. The PI will be blinded to all EMR data. The investigator then plans to compare the clinical insight obtained by using the POC investigational device, to SOC.
Outcome 2
Time frame: Day 0
The diagnostic insights acquired using the POC investigation device regarding localization (cerebral - frontal, temporal, parieto-occipital; spinal - cervical, thoracal, lumbosacral; or radicular),are significantly comparable to, and congruent with, the SOC diagnostic insight regarding same parameters (lateralization, localization and presumed etiology) acquired using SOC techniques such as MRI, 10-20 (standard ubiquity used electrode montage) EEG systems, SSEP, etc.
Outcome 3
Time frame: Day 0
The diagnostic insights acquired using the POC investigation device regarding the presumed nature of lesion (i.e. ischemia, hemorrhage, space-occupying lesion), are significantly comparable to, and congruent with, the SOC diagnostic insight regarding same parameters (lateralization, localization and presumed etiology) acquired using SOC techniques such as MRI, 10-20 (standard ubiquity used electrode montage) EEG systems, SSEP, etc.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neurologic Findings
RecruitingPhase 4
Analgesic Efficacy and Obstetric Effects of Tramadol, Paracetamol and Placebo in Active Labor
Labor Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Virtually Simulated Intervention for Patients Having Stuttering
Stuttering
Recruiting
Effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and a Modified Lumbopelvic Belt on Pain, Kinesiophobia, and Functional Status in Pregnant Women With Symphysis Pubis Pain
Symphysis Pubis Dysfunction, Pregnancy
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating Complex Neurodegenerative Disorders Related to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia
Frontotemporal Dementia, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study: Clinical Trial of Ultrasound Guiding Pharmacopuncture Therapy for Acute Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain (LBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Sergiu Abramovici, MD principal investigator
Indiana University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing POC EEG in people with Neurologic Findings, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sergiu Abramovici, MD (3172788090, sabramov@iu.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Outcome 1 (time frame: Day 0). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2026.