Shoulder PainRESPECTNCT07235969
New Therapeutic Interventions and Imaging Techniques for Prolonged Shoulder Disorders
A study testing Tendon-Specific Exercise Program (TSEP), Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT) and Occupational health care led physiotherapy in people with Shoulder Pain and Pain Management, run by University of Oulu at 1 site in Finland.
Trial summary
The RESPECT study compares three types of physical therapy for adults aged 20-60 years with prolonged shoulder disorders, aiming to find better ways to help people recover and improve daily function. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Shoulder Pain, Pain Management, Physical Therapy
- What is being tested?
- Tendon-Specific Exercise Program (TSEP), Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT) and Occupational health care led physiotherapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFinland
- Study dates
- Sep 2026to Sep 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age of 20-60 years
- Active participation in the workforce (employed or entrepreneur)
- Active occupational health care services available
- Daily unilateral shoulder pain for at least four consecutive weeks
- Willingness to participate in independent rehabilitation and PT visits
Who cannot join
- Bilateral shoulder pain
- Previous humerus fracture or current acute upper limb injury
- Prolonged dysfunction or pain of the upper limb attributable to trauma, neurologic disease or cervical spine disorders
- Diagnosed musculoskeletal disorders affecting the upper limb (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis)
- Severe disability, mental or memory disorder
- Advanced cancer
Show all 12Show fewer
- History of shoulder PT or corticosteroid injection in the last six months
- Previous or planned shoulder surgery
- Confirmed or possible pregnancy
- Contraindications to MRI
- Severe chronic kidney disease
- Evidence unaccounted malignancy or other exclusionary findings in the initial eligibility assessment on either side
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Finland1 site
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu, 90220
Research nurse, +358405087506, anne.kukkonen@pohde.fi
Antti Kemppainen, Dr.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy, Tendon-specific Exercise Program and Routine Physical Therapy in Prolonged Unilateral Shoulder Pain and Symptom Correlations With Imaging: a Single-center, Randomized, Parallel-group, Three-arm Study (RESPECT)
The RESPECT study compares three types of physical therapy for adults aged 20-60 years with prolonged shoulder disorders, aiming to find better ways to help people recover and improve daily function. The study also examines modern imaging tests (X-ray, ultrasound, MRI) to see how well imaging findings match real symptoms, and tests new imaging technologies that may provide a more accurate diagnosis. The study improves future shoulder pain care by addressing both physical and psychological factors and advancing diagnostic imaging.
Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups:
Read more
- Routine physical therapy (usual occupational care),
- Tendon-Specific Exercise Program (TSEP): targeted exercises to build shoulder strength and
- Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT): combining physical rehabilitation with advice and emotional support.
All participants get complete imaging of both shoulders and a clinical evaluation by a physiotherapist at the start of the study. Complete imaging is also done for all participants after twelve and thirty-six months. Surveys about pain, movement, mood, sleep, and quality of life are collected electronically at the start of the study, and at three, six, twelve, and 36 months. The main outcome is how well each person resumes everyday activities affected by shoulder pain (Patient-Specific Functional Scale, PSFS).
Group 1 will receive routine occupationally led physiotherapy, and groups 2 and 3 will receive five physiotherapist-guided sessions during the first six month-period. Advanced imaging techniques will deployed in conjunction with standard imaging methods and compared to see whether new technologies help explain symptoms or guide care.
To join, participants must have had prolonged shoulder disorders in one shoulder for at least four consecutive weeks, be employed or self-employed, and be willing to take part in rehabilitation activities. Certain medical conditions, prior surgery, and pregnancy are exclusion criteria. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are systematically reviewed in a structured phone interview at the start of the study. Baseline imaging is also viewed preliminarily for certain conditions which would require urgent medical care. If necessary, participants are contacted, informed and subsequently excluded from the study.
The trial takes place at Oulu University Hospital, Finland. Approximately 300 people are recruited to the study through local occupational health care providers. Informed consent is required for the study, and participants can withdraw at any time. All procedures meet ethical standards.
This study will help determine:
- Which therapy works best overall
- Whether some people benefit more from certain therapies
- If imaging findings help predict outcomes or aid treatment decisions
- Whether new imaging technology improves diagnosis
Read the detailed description
Shoulder complaints are one of the most common musculoskeletal ailments in general practice and a leading cause of work absence. While imaging findings are common in both symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders, patient-specific characteristics such as obesity, depression and physical labor are risk factors for reported shoulder symptoms. Usually, general exercises have been considered useful in treating patients with shoulder symptoms, with the lack of evidence of specific tendon exercises. Biopsychosocial model is recommended in treatment of disabling musculoskeletal pain and to enhance self-management. Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT) considers biopsychosocial framework in patient management, but it has not extensively been studied among patients with shoulder symptoms.
The RESPECT study is a single-center randomized longitudinal parallel-group superiority study that aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine and specific physical therapy interventions, focusing on tendon and biopsychosocial rehabilitation. In total, 300 study participants will be recruited from the North Ostrobothnia region through local occupational health care providers. The initial eligibility assessment will be done using a structured telephone interview, where potential participants will be evaluated against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the written information of the study will be distributed. The study includes diagnostic imaging at baseline and at 12 and 36 months, a baseline clinical PT visit for all participants and either routine occupationally led PT or five PT-guided sessions for the two interventional groups during the first six month-period, in three similar-sized groups. Electronic surveys will be asked to be filled at baseline prior to clinical visit as well as at three, six, twelve- and 36-months follow-up time points. Before the clinical visit, baseline imaging and patient records are preliminarily reviewed for exclusion criteria and, where applicable, participants are contacted and removed from the study.
The surveys cover a wide range of questions related to general health, details of employment, illnesses and medications, shoulder as well as generalized pain, demographic and socioeconomic factors, lifestyle, fear of pain and functional capacity. The electronic surveys also include validated Finnish versions of several structured questionnaires. Surveys are filled in and study data will be collected using an electronic data collection system (REDCap). In the baseline survey, participants are also instructed to fill in a traditional pain drawing. Follow-up surveys have additional questions regarding trauma, upper limb fractures and dislocations and newly diagnosed illnesses as well as their respective potentially caused shoulder dysfunction, planned or performed procedures of the upper limb and their nature, and confirmed or possible pregnancy. The personal participant-named activities in the PSFS will be carried over from the baseline questionnaire to the follow-up surveys, and the PSFS acts as the primary outcome of the study. Follow-up surveys also ask participants to check and report their prior PT, physician and other healthcare professional visits regarding shoulder symptoms as well as prior shoulder imaging from their respective occupational health care mobile applications, which are widely available in the Finnish occupational health care system.
Bilateral shoulder imaging using conventional radiographs (CRs), multiparametric US and contrast-enhanced MRI will be conducted for inter-modality comparison as well as correlative studies between imaging findings, symptoms and effectiveness of different rehabilitation interventions. The added diagnostic capability of modern US and MRI technological advances will also be tested, focusing on RC structures, against conventional US and MRI. Bilateral shoulder CRs will be imaged in three projections. From the CRs, shoulder anatomy, glenohumeral and acromioclavicular degeneration, indirect signs of RC tears as well as potential calcium deposits will be evaluated. Osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint will be graded according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification (grades 0 to 4), and osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint will be graded according to Petersson classification (grades 0-3). Bilateral static and dynamic shoulder US will be imaged using high-end US machines with high frequency linear probes by highly experienced sonographers with at least 10 years of experience in musculoskeletal US. US will be done following the musculoskeletal US technical guidelines published by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology, and shear wave elastography and superb microvascular imaging techniques will be implemented during the US examination. Bilateral contrast-enhanced shoulder MRI will be imaged using a 3T scanner and a dedicated shoulder coil. Non-contrast MRI sequences including Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting will be imaged first for both shoulders, after which contrast enhanced sequences will be imaged in succession, starting with the symptomatic shoulder.
The number of individuals assessed for eligibility will be recorded and reported in published results. The projected progress of all enrolled participants will be scheduled at the time of recruitment to ensure the timely preliminary evaluation of imaging studies, rehabilitation and electronic surveys. The preliminary review of participant imaging, electronic surveys and patient records will be done by the primary investigator, a musculoskeletal radiology fellow, with available consultation from a board-certified musculoskeletal radiologist with eleven of years of experience and a physiatrist with ten years of experience. Considering the biopsychosocial concept of pain, information about imaging findings is not given to the participants during the study, however, participants are ensured that they are informed of all imaging findings requiring urgent medical attention, followed by exclusion from the study if applicable. This information is separately highlighted in the consent form. Participant retention will be improved and drop-out reduced by electronic reminders of surveys, PT sessions and follow-up imaging. Every reasonable effort to schedule sessions at participant-compatible times will be made and possibilities for rescheduling will be offered. In case of no-show, a request to schedule a new appointment will be sent.
- Conditions
- Shoulder Pain, Pain Management, Physical Therapy
- Being tested
- Tendon-Specific Exercise Program (TSEP), Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT), Occupational health care led physiotherapy
- Keywords
- Pain Management, Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy, Magnetic resonance fingerprinting, Diagnostic Imaging, Microvascular Flow Imaging, Tendon-Specific Exercise Program, Shear Wave Elastography
- Medical subject headings
- Shoulder Pain, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tendon-Specific Exercise Program (TSEP)Other
The aims of the TSEP are to improve RC muscle strength and increase tendon stiffness. The principles of exercise intervention are based on High-Loading Tendon Exercise (HLTE) and Heavy Slow Resistance (HSR) Training programs, and the Pain Monitoring Model (PMM).
Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT)Other
The aims of PIPT are biopsychosocial framework, patient-centered care and communication, good patient-therapist relationship, and consideration of patient's beliefs, fears and attitudes, behavior change, and guided self-management.
Occupational health care led physiotherapyOther
Subjects will be advised to contact the occupational health care to receive routine physiotherapy for their shoulder symptoms.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Occupational physiotherapy (control group) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Occupational health care led physiotherapy |
| Physiotherapist-guided Tendon-Specific Exercise Program (TSEP) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Tendon-Specific Exercise Program (TSEP) |
| Physiotherapist-guided Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient-Specific Functional Scale
The personal participant-named activities in the structured Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) form at baseline will be carried over to the follow-up surveys, against which patients will do the scoring. (scale from 0 to 10 (0 = unable, 10 = able to perform normally))
Measured: From baseline to the end of the follow-up at 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Nov 2025
- Study startSep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionSep 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Shoulder PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oulu
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Antti Kemppainen, Dr., Principal investigator, University of Oulu
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07235969
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 151/2025
- Acronym
- RESPECT
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 10 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data that underlie results in a publication, upon reasonable request and in compliance with EU's GDPR and Finland's Secondary Use Act
Publications
Kemppainen A, Maatta J, Heikkala E, Lausmaa M, Tarnanen S, Booth N, Takatalo J, Nevalainen MT. Effectiveness of psychologically informed physical therapy, tendon-specific exercise program and routine physical therapy in prolonged unilateral shoulder pain and symptom correlations with imaging: a single-center, randomized, parallel-group, three-arm study (RESPECT). Contemp Clin Trials. 2026 Aug 21;169:108444. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108444. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42628788
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy, Tendon-specific Exercise Program and Routine Physical Therapy in Prolonged Unilateral Shoulder Pain and Symptom Correlations With Imaging: a Single-center, Randomized, Parallel-group, Three-arm Study (RESPECT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07235969
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RESPECT / 151/2025
- Conditions
- Shoulder Pain, Pain Management, Physical Therapy
- Keywords
- Pain Management, Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy, Magnetic resonance fingerprinting, Diagnostic Imaging, Microvascular Flow Imaging, Tendon-Specific Exercise Program, Shear Wave Elastography
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OuluUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The RESPECT study compares three types of physical therapy for adults aged 20-60 years with prolonged shoulder disorders, aiming to find better ways to help people recover and improve daily function. The study also examines modern imaging tests (X-ray, ultrasound, MRI) to see how well imaging findings match real symptoms, and tests new imaging technologies that may provide a more accurate diagnosis. The study improves future shoulder pain care by addressing both physical and psychological factors and advancing diagnostic imaging.
Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups:
- Routine physical therapy (usual occupational care),
- Tendon-Specific Exercise Program (TSEP): targeted exercises to build shoulder strength and
- Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT): combining physical rehabilitation with advice and emotional support.
All participants get complete imaging of both shoulders and a clinical evaluation by a physiotherapist at the start of the study. Complete imaging is also done for all participants after twelve and thirty-six months. Surveys about pain, movement, mood, sleep, and quality of life are collected electronically at the start of the study, and at three, six, twelve, and 36 months. The main outcome is how well each person resumes everyday activities affected by shoulder pain (Patient-Specific Functional Scale, PSFS).
Group 1 will receive routine occupationally led physiotherapy, and groups 2 and 3 will receive five physiotherapist-guided sessions during the first six month-period. Advanced imaging techniques will deployed in conjunction with standard imaging methods and compared to see whether new technologies help explain symptoms or guide care.
To join, participants must have had prolonged shoulder disorders in one shoulder for at least four consecutive weeks, be employed or self-employed, and be willing to take part in rehabilitation activities. Certain medical conditions, prior surgery, and pregnancy are exclusion criteria. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are systematically reviewed in a structured phone interview at the start of the study. Baseline imaging is also viewed preliminarily for certain conditions which would require urgent medical care. If necessary, participants are contacted, informed and subsequently excluded from the study.
The trial takes place at Oulu University Hospital, Finland. Approximately 300 people are recruited to the study through local occupational health care providers. Informed consent is required for the study, and participants can withdraw at any time. All procedures meet ethical standards.
This study will help determine:
- Which therapy works best overall
- Whether some people benefit more from certain therapies
- If imaging findings help predict outcomes or aid treatment decisions
- Whether new imaging technology improves diagnosis
Detailed description
Shoulder complaints are one of the most common musculoskeletal ailments in general practice and a leading cause of work absence. While imaging findings are common in both symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders, patient-specific characteristics such as obesity, depression and physical labor are risk factors for reported shoulder symptoms. Usually, general exercises have been considered useful in treating patients with shoulder symptoms, with the lack of evidence of specific tendon exercises. Biopsychosocial model is recommended in treatment of disabling musculoskeletal pain and to enhance self-management. Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT) considers biopsychosocial framework in patient management, but it has not extensively been studied among patients with shoulder symptoms.
The RESPECT study is a single-center randomized longitudinal parallel-group superiority study that aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine and specific physical therapy interventions, focusing on tendon and biopsychosocial rehabilitation. In total, 300 study participants will be recruited from the North Ostrobothnia region through local occupational health care providers. The initial eligibility assessment will be done using a structured telephone interview, where potential participants will be evaluated against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the written information of the study will be distributed. The study includes diagnostic imaging at baseline and at 12 and 36 months, a baseline clinical PT visit for all participants and either routine occupationally led PT or five PT-guided sessions for the two interventional groups during the first six month-period, in three similar-sized groups. Electronic surveys will be asked to be filled at baseline prior to clinical visit as well as at three, six, twelve- and 36-months follow-up time points. Before the clinical visit, baseline imaging and patient records are preliminarily reviewed for exclusion criteria and, where applicable, participants are contacted and removed from the study.
The surveys cover a wide range of questions related to general health, details of employment, illnesses and medications, shoulder as well as generalized pain, demographic and socioeconomic factors, lifestyle, fear of pain and functional capacity. The electronic surveys also include validated Finnish versions of several structured questionnaires. Surveys are filled in and study data will be collected using an electronic data collection system (REDCap). In the baseline survey, participants are also instructed to fill in a traditional pain drawing. Follow-up surveys have additional questions regarding trauma, upper limb fractures and dislocations and newly diagnosed illnesses as well as their respective potentially caused shoulder dysfunction, planned or performed procedures of the upper limb and their nature, and confirmed or possible pregnancy. The personal participant-named activities in the PSFS will be carried over from the baseline questionnaire to the follow-up surveys, and the PSFS acts as the primary outcome of the study. Follow-up surveys also ask participants to check and report their prior PT, physician and other healthcare professional visits regarding shoulder symptoms as well as prior shoulder imaging from their respective occupational health care mobile applications, which are widely available in the Finnish occupational health care system.
Bilateral shoulder imaging using conventional radiographs (CRs), multiparametric US and contrast-enhanced MRI will be conducted for inter-modality comparison as well as correlative studies between imaging findings, symptoms and effectiveness of different rehabilitation interventions. The added diagnostic capability of modern US and MRI technological advances will also be tested, focusing on RC structures, against conventional US and MRI. Bilateral shoulder CRs will be imaged in three projections. From the CRs, shoulder anatomy, glenohumeral and acromioclavicular degeneration, indirect signs of RC tears as well as potential calcium deposits will be evaluated. Osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint will be graded according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification (grades 0 to 4), and osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint will be graded according to Petersson classification (grades 0-3). Bilateral static and dynamic shoulder US will be imaged using high-end US machines with high frequency linear probes by highly experienced sonographers with at least 10 years of experience in musculoskeletal US. US will be done following the musculoskeletal US technical guidelines published by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology, and shear wave elastography and superb microvascular imaging techniques will be implemented during the US examination. Bilateral contrast-enhanced shoulder MRI will be imaged using a 3T scanner and a dedicated shoulder coil. Non-contrast MRI sequences including Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting will be imaged first for both shoulders, after which contrast enhanced sequences will be imaged in succession, starting with the symptomatic shoulder.
The number of individuals assessed for eligibility will be recorded and reported in published results. The projected progress of all enrolled participants will be scheduled at the time of recruitment to ensure the timely preliminary evaluation of imaging studies, rehabilitation and electronic surveys. The preliminary review of participant imaging, electronic surveys and patient records will be done by the primary investigator, a musculoskeletal radiology fellow, with available consultation from a board-certified musculoskeletal radiologist with eleven of years of experience and a physiatrist with ten years of experience. Considering the biopsychosocial concept of pain, information about imaging findings is not given to the participants during the study, however, participants are ensured that they are informed of all imaging findings requiring urgent medical attention, followed by exclusion from the study if applicable. This information is separately highlighted in the consent form. Participant retention will be improved and drop-out reduced by electronic reminders of surveys, PT sessions and follow-up imaging. Every reasonable effort to schedule sessions at participant-compatible times will be made and possibilities for rescheduling will be offered. In case of no-show, a request to schedule a new appointment will be sent.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Occupational physiotherapy (control group) | Active comparator | Other: Occupational health care led physiotherapy |
| Physiotherapist-guided Tendon-Specific Exercise Program (TSEP) | Experimental | Other: Tendon-Specific Exercise Program (TSEP) |
| Physiotherapist-guided Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT) | Experimental | Other: Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age of 20-60 years
- Active participation in the workforce (employed or entrepreneur)
- Active occupational health care services available
- Daily unilateral shoulder pain for at least four consecutive weeks
- Willingness to participate in independent rehabilitation and PT visits
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Bilateral shoulder pain
- Previous humerus fracture or current acute upper limb injury
- Prolonged dysfunction or pain of the upper limb attributable to trauma, neurologic disease or cervical spine disorders
- Diagnosed musculoskeletal disorders affecting the upper limb (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis)
- Severe disability, mental or memory disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tendon-Specific Exercise Program (TSEP)The aims of the TSEP are to improve RC muscle strength and increase tendon stiffness. The principles of exercise intervention are based on High-Loading Tendon Exercise (HLTE) and Heavy Slow Resistance (HSR) Training programs, and the Pain Monitoring Model (PMM). | Other | Physiotherapist-guided Tendon-Specific Exercise Program (TSEP) |
| Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT)The aims of PIPT are biopsychosocial framework, patient-centered care and communication, good patient-therapist relationship, and consideration of patient's beliefs, fears and attitudes, behavior change, and guided self-management. | Other | Physiotherapist-guided Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT) |
| Occupational health care led physiotherapySubjects will be advised to contact the occupational health care to receive routine physiotherapy for their shoulder symptoms. | Other | Occupational physiotherapy (control group) |
Primary outcome
Patient-Specific Functional Scale
Time frame: From baseline to the end of the follow-up at 36 months
The personal participant-named activities in the structured Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) form at baseline will be carried over to the follow-up surveys, against which patients will do the scoring. (scale from 0 to 10 (0 = unable, 10 = able to perform normally))
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Aug 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42628788Kemppainen A, Maatta J, Heikkala E, Lausmaa M, Tarnanen S, Booth N, Takatalo J, Nevalainen MT. Effectiveness of psychologically informed physical therapy, tendon-specific exercise program and routine physical therapy in prolonged unilateral shoulder pain and symptom correlations with imaging: a single-center, randomized, parallel-group, three-arm study (RESPECT). Contemp Clin Trials. 2026 Aug 21;169:108444. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108444. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data that underlie results in a publication, upon reasonable request and in compliance with EU's GDPR and Finland's Secondary Use Act
Related trials for Shoulder Pain
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of Cyriax Approach With and Without Mobilization With Movement in Shoulder Restriction With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotype and Response to Corticosteroid Injection in Patients With Subacromial Pain Syndrome (SAPS)
Subacromial Pain Syndrome, Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Nociplastic Pain in Patients Diagnosed With Subacromial Pain Syndrome (SAPS)
Subacromial Pain Syndrome, Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Different Kinesio Taping Methods in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Recruiting
Latissimus Dorsi Strengthening Exercises in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain, Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Antti Kemppainen, Dr. principal investigator
University of Oulu
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tendon-Specific Exercise Program (TSEP), Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy (PIPT) and Occupational health care led physiotherapy in people with Shoulder Pain and Pain Management, run by University of Oulu at 1 site in Finland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Research nurse (+358405087506, anne.kukkonen@pohde.fi), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient-Specific Functional Scale (time frame: From baseline to the end of the follow-up at 36 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07235969, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2026.