Wound - in Medical CareNCT07261488
Wound Assessment Accuracy and Treatment Efficiency
An observational study of Wound - in Medical Care, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Wound assessment is critical for developing effective treatment strategies, yet there is a scarcity of research on the assessment accuracy of clinical practitioners. An online questionnaire-based survey was conducted from March to April 2025. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Wound - in Medical Care
- How many people
- 553 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2025to 1 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: A total of 553 valid responses were collected
Who may be able to join
- being a wound therapist, specialized nurse, or physician in relevant departments;
- having completed systematic specialized wound training (provided by, but not limited to, EWMA, ICW, ET, the Chinese Nursing Association, the Wound Baihui online education platform, or other medical institutions)
Who cannot join
- Not applicable
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191
About this study
Official title: The Impact of Inaccurate Wound Assessment on Treatment Efficiency: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China
Wound assessment is critical for developing effective treatment strategies, yet there is a scarcity of research on the assessment accuracy of clinical practitioners. An online questionnaire-based survey was conducted from March to April 2025. It involved 118 wound specialists from 9 specialized wound care institutions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China, who evaluated 8 standardized wound cases. A total of 553 valid responses were collected.
- Conditions
- Wound - in Medical Care
- Keywords
- Wound Assessment, Wound healing, Accuracy, Efficacy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| wound care group | It involved 118 wound specialists from 9 specialized wound care institutions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The weighted overall accuracy of wound assessments
Compare the assessment answers given by wound specialist to determine the accuracy rate of the assessment of the wound practitioners surveyed
Measured: Baseline
Secondary outcomes (2)
The average accuracy for observational assessment items (e.g., wound size, types of wound bed tissue, wound exudate)
An assessment response was scored as correct if it was consistent with the standard answer. Calculate the accuracy for observational assessment items (e.g., wound size, types of wound bed tissue, wound exudate) .
Measured: Baseline
The average the accuracy of inferential assessment items (e.g., etiologic classification of wounds, healing capacity, wound characteristic analysis)
An assessment response was scored as correct if it was consistent with the standard answer. Calculated the average accuracy of inferential assessment items (e.g., etiologic classification of wounds, healing capacity, wound characteristic analysis)
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Dec 2025
- Study start1 Mar 2025
- Primary completion30 Apr 2025
- Study completion1 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Wound - in Medical CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking University Third HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 553 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Third Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Long Zhang, Peking University Third Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07261488
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Long2025-WC-wound assessment
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 1 Oct 2025
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Samaniego-Ruiz MJ, Llatas FP, Jimenez OS. Assessment of chronic wounds in adults: an integrative review. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018 Jun 25;52:e03315. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2016050903315. English, Spanish.
PubMed 29947700Koschwanez HE, Broadbent E. The use of wound healing assessment methods in psychological studies: a review and recommendations. Br J Health Psychol. 2011 Feb;16(Pt 1):1-32. doi: 10.1348/135910710X524633.
PubMed 21226781
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Impact of Inaccurate Wound Assessment on Treatment Efficiency: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07261488
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Long2025-WC-wound assessment
- Conditions
- Wound - in Medical Care
- Keywords
- Wound Assessment, Wound healing, Accuracy, Efficacy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 553 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Third HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Wound assessment is critical for developing effective treatment strategies, yet there is a scarcity of research on the assessment accuracy of clinical practitioners. An online questionnaire-based survey was conducted from March to April 2025. It involved 118 wound specialists from 9 specialized wound care institutions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China, who evaluated 8 standardized wound cases. A total of 553 valid responses were collected.
Study design
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| wound care group | – | –It involved 118 wound specialists from 9 specialized wound care institutions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- A total of 553 valid responses were collected
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- being a wound therapist, specialized nurse, or physician in relevant departments;
- having completed systematic specialized wound training (provided by, but not limited to, EWMA, ICW, ET, the Chinese Nursing Association, the Wound Baihui online education platform, or other medical institutions)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Not applicable
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
The weighted overall accuracy of wound assessments
Time frame: Baseline
Compare the assessment answers given by wound specialist to determine the accuracy rate of the assessment of the wound practitioners surveyed
2 secondary outcomes
The average accuracy for observational assessment items (e.g., wound size, types of wound bed tissue, wound exudate)
Time frame: Baseline
The average the accuracy of inferential assessment items (e.g., etiologic classification of wounds, healing capacity, wound characteristic analysis)
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 29947700Samaniego-Ruiz MJ, Llatas FP, Jimenez OS. Assessment of chronic wounds in adults: an integrative review. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018 Jun 25;52:e03315. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2016050903315. English, Spanish.
- Results publication: PubMed 21226781Koschwanez HE, Broadbent E. The use of wound healing assessment methods in psychological studies: a review and recommendations. Br J Health Psychol. 2011 Feb;16(Pt 1):1-32. doi: 10.1348/135910710X524633.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Wound - in Medical Care
Recruiting
Evaluation of a Switchable Acrylic Adhesive Drape for Safer Removal in Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Applications.
Frequency and Type of Medical Adhesive-Related Skin Injury, NPWT Drape Seal Effectiveness Rate (or Leak Incidence Rate)
RecruitingObservational study
Stability of Blood Clotting Products Stored in Emergency Ambulances Under Real-World Conditions
Exanguination, Trauma Coagulopathy
Not yet recruiting
Cohesive Bandage Fixation of Pulse Oximeter Probes and Skin Condition in Preterm Neonates
Skin Injury, Premature Birth
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of an Artificial Intelligence -Synthesized Nursing Care Bundle for Preventing Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries
Medical Device Related Pressure Ulcer (MDRPU), Pressure Injury
Recruiting
Comparative Effectiveness of SPARCS and Unified Protocol for Youth With Chronic Medical Conditions and Trauma-Related Distress
Trauma Exposure, Trauma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Wound - in Medical Care, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The weighted overall accuracy of wound assessments (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07261488, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2025.