Robotic SurgeryVIOLETNCT07277244
Low-Intensity Mechanical Ventilation in the Operating Room: a Pilot Study
A study testing Low Intensity Mechanical Ventilation in people with Robotic Surgery and Post Operative Pulmonary Complications, run by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to assess whether a bundle of protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation interventions reduces perioperative atelectasis and postoperative pulmonary complications, compared with standard care in a robot-assisted surgical setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Robotic Surgery, Post Operative Pulmonary Complications
- What is being tested?
- Low Intensity Mechanical Ventilation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 8 Apr 2026to 23 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients undergoing non-emergent intra-abdominal or pelvic robot-assisted surgery with an expected duration of at least 2 hours, under general anesthesia with planned extubation at the end of the procedure
Who cannot join
- Known pregnancy
- Pre-existing intubation or tracheostomy
- Contraindications for esophageal manometry: severe midface trauma or recent nasal surgery, esophageal varices, recent gastric or esophageal surgery
- Contraindications for electrical impedance tomography (EIT): inability to place EIT belt, presence of an active electronic implantable device (e.g., pacemaker, ICD)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
The aim of the study is to assess whether a bundle of protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation interventions reduces perioperative atelectasis and postoperative pulmonary complications, compared with standard care in a robot-assisted surgical setting. The feasibility of this ventilation bundle will also be assessed.
Read the detailed description
The investigators hypothesize that protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation during robot-assisted surgery reduces perioperative atelectasis and postoperative pulmonary complications.
- Being tested
- Low Intensity Mechanical Ventilation
- Keywords
- Lung protective ventilation, Electric Impedance Tomography (EIT)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Low Intensity Mechanical VentilationDevice
A bundle of protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation strategies will be applied throughout the procedure:
- Recruitment maneuver
- Tidal volume set to 8 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) and stepwise adjustment to achieve a driving pressure (Plateau pressure - PEEP) < 13 cmH2O with a minimum tidal volume of 5ml/kg PBW
- Respiratory rate adjustment to maintain a target end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration (etCO₂) between 45 and 55 mmHg.
- Reassessment and adaptation after Trendelenburg positioning and pneumoperitoneum.
- Re-adjustment of Tidal Volume and PEEP ventilator settings to (2.) after exsufflation and return to the supine position. FiO₂ set to 70% during the washout phase of the inhalational anesthetic until extubation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | A guided standard of care protocol will be applied in the control group. This includes a PEEP of 5 cmH₂O, with adjustment by the anesthesia provider if SpO₂ falls below 96% or whenever deemed clinically necessary, a tidal volume of 6-10 mL/kg predicted body weight, and a respiratory rate adjusted to maintain end-tidal CO₂ between 35 and 45 mmHg throughout anesthesia. FiO₂ will be set to 100% during the washout phase at the end of surgery to limit resorption atelectasis. |
| Intervention | Experimental | A bundle of protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation strategies will be applied throughout the procedure. All interventions consist of modification of ventilator settings. Receives: Device: Low Intensity Mechanical Ventilation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
ΔEELV between baseline and after extubation before leaving the operating room.
Change in end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), measured using electrical impedance tomography between baseline and after extubation before leaving the operating room.
Measured: Perioperative Day 0: From pre-intubation baseline in the operating room (prior to induction of anesthesia) to the first post-extubation EIT assessment (within 10 min after extubation on Day 0).
Secondary outcomes (15)
Proportion of patients with postoperative pulmonary complications at day 7
Re-intubation, hypoxemia requiring oxygen therapy, pleural effusion, pneumonia, atelectasis or emergency non-invasive ventilation
Measured: This secondary outcome will be assessed in the time between day of surgery until 7 days after the day of surgery
Recruitment rate
Proportion of patients enrolled in the study-defined as those who provided acceptance and signed informed consent-relative to all patients approached.
Measured: Day 0
Intervention deliverability
proportion of patients in the intervention arm in whom the full bundle of protective low-intensity ventilation strategies is delivered as planned across all predefined intraoperative phases.
Measured: From intubation to extubation at Day 0
EELV
End-expiratory lung volume measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography in mL
Measured: Perioperative Day 0: before anesthesia, after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation, after extubation, after PACU admission and 60min after PACU admission
COV
Center of ventilation measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography in percentage
Measured: Perioperative Day 0: before anesthesia, after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation, after extubation, after PACU admission and 60min after PACU admission
RVDI
Regional ventilation delay inhomogeneity measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography (unitless)
Measured: Perioperative Day 0: before anesthesia, after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation, after extubation, after PACU admission and 60min after PACU admission
GI
Global inhomogeneity index measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography (unitless)
Measured: Perioperative Day 0: before anesthesia, after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation, after extubation, after PACU admission and 60min after PACU admission
Dorsal ROI
Maximum dorsal ratio of impedance measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography (unitless)
Measured: Perioperative Day 0: before anesthesia, after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation, after extubation, after PACU admission and 60min after PACU admission
EEPL
End-expiratory transpulmonary pressure, calculated as airway pressure minus esophageal pressure (cmH₂O)
Measured: Perioperative Day 0: after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation
EIPL
End-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure, calculated as airway pressure minus esophageal pressure (cmH₂O)
Measured: Perioperative Day 0: after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation
Relationship between body mass index with optimal PEEP
Correlation between BMI (kg/m²) and the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP, cmH₂O) determined after pneumoperitoneum insufflation and patient positioning for surgery.
Measured: Intraoperative Day 0: after insufflation of pneumoperitoneum and positioning the patient for surgery
Relationship of the degree of Trendelenburg inclination with optimal PEEP
Correlation between the degree of Trendelenburg inclination (in degree) and the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP, cmH₂O) determined after pneumoperitoneum insufflation and patient positioning for surgery.
Measured: Intraoperative Day 0: after insufflation of pneumoperitoneum and positioning the patient for surgery
Relationship of the pneumoperitoneum (insufflation) with optimal PEEP
Correlation between the pneumoperitoneum (insufflation in cmH2O) and the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP, cmH₂O) determined after pneumoperitoneum insufflation and patient positioning for surgery.
Measured: Intraoperative Day 0: after insufflation of pneumoperitoneum and positioning the patient for surgery
Intraoperative oxygenation
Intraoperative peripheral pulsed oxygen saturation (SpO2)
Measured: Perioperative Day 0: before anesthesia, after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation, after extubation
Postoperative oxygenation
Postoperative peripheral pulsed oxygen saturation (SpO2)
Measured: Postoperative Day 0: after PACU admission and 60min after PACU admission
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2025
- Study start8 Apr 2026
- Primary completion16 Sep 2026
- Study completion23 Sep 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Robotic SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maximilian S Schaefer, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07277244
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025P000986
- Acronym
- VIOLET
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Schaefer MS, Treschan TA, Gauch J, Neukirchen M, Kienbaum P. Influence of xenon on pulmonary mechanics and lung aeration in patients with healthy lungs. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jun;120(6):1394-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.064. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
PubMed 29793604Schaefer MS, Wania V, Bastin B, Schmalz U, Kienbaum P, Beiderlinden M, Treschan TA. Electrical impedance tomography during major open upper abdominal surgery: a pilot-study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul 5;14:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-51. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25018668
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Low-Intensity Mechanical Ventilation in the Operating Room: a Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07277244
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VIOLET / 2025P000986
- Keywords
- Lung protective ventilation, Electric Impedance Tomography (EIT)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Sep 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to assess whether a bundle of protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation interventions reduces perioperative atelectasis and postoperative pulmonary complications, compared with standard care in a robot-assisted surgical setting. The feasibility of this ventilation bundle will also be assessed.
Detailed description
The investigators hypothesize that protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation during robot-assisted surgery reduces perioperative atelectasis and postoperative pulmonary complications.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –A guided standard of care protocol will be applied in the control group. This includes a PEEP of 5 cmH₂O, with adjustment by the anesthesia provider if SpO₂ falls below 96% or whenever deemed clinically necessary, a tidal volume of 6-10 mL/kg predicted body weight, and a respiratory rate adjusted to maintain end-tidal CO₂ between 35 and 45 mmHg throughout anesthesia. FiO₂ will be set to 100% during the washout phase at the end of surgery to limit resorption atelectasis. |
| Intervention | Experimental | Device: Low Intensity Mechanical VentilationA bundle of protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation strategies will be applied throughout the procedure. All interventions consist of modification of ventilator settings. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult patients undergoing non-emergent intra-abdominal or pelvic robot-assisted surgery with an expected duration of at least 2 hours, under general anesthesia with planned extubation at the end of the procedure
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Known pregnancy
- Pre-existing intubation or tracheostomy
- Contraindications for esophageal manometry: severe midface trauma or recent nasal surgery, esophageal varices, recent gastric or esophageal surgery
- Contraindications for electrical impedance tomography (EIT): inability to place EIT belt, presence of an active electronic implantable device (e.g., pacemaker, ICD)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Low Intensity Mechanical VentilationA bundle of protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation strategies will be applied throughout the procedure: 1. Recruitment maneuver 2. Tidal volume set to 8 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) and stepwise adjustment to achieve a driving pressure (Plateau pressure - PEEP) < 13 cmH2O with a minimum tidal volume of 5ml/kg PBW 3. Respiratory rate adjustment to maintain a target end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration (etCO₂) between 45 and 55 mmHg. 4. Reassessment and adaptation after Trendelenburg positioning and pneumoperitoneum. 5. Re-adjustment of Tidal Volume and PEEP ventilator settings to (2.) after exsufflation and return to the supine position. FiO₂ set to 70% during the washout phase of the inhalational anesthetic until extubation. | Device | Intervention |
Primary outcome
ΔEELV between baseline and after extubation before leaving the operating room.
Time frame: Perioperative Day 0: From pre-intubation baseline in the operating room (prior to induction of anesthesia) to the first post-extubation EIT assessment (within 10 min after extubation on Day 0).
Change in end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), measured using electrical impedance tomography between baseline and after extubation before leaving the operating room.
15 secondary outcomes
Proportion of patients with postoperative pulmonary complications at day 7
Time frame: This secondary outcome will be assessed in the time between day of surgery until 7 days after the day of surgery
Recruitment rate
Time frame: Day 0
Intervention deliverability
Time frame: From intubation to extubation at Day 0
EELV
Time frame: Perioperative Day 0: before anesthesia, after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation, after extubation, after PACU admission and 60min after PACU admission
COV
Time frame: Perioperative Day 0: before anesthesia, after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation, after extubation, after PACU admission and 60min after PACU admission
RVDI
Time frame: Perioperative Day 0: before anesthesia, after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation, after extubation, after PACU admission and 60min after PACU admission
GI
Time frame: Perioperative Day 0: before anesthesia, after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation, after extubation, after PACU admission and 60min after PACU admission
Dorsal ROI
Time frame: Perioperative Day 0: before anesthesia, after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation, after extubation, after PACU admission and 60min after PACU admission
EEPL
Time frame: Perioperative Day 0: after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation
EIPL
Time frame: Perioperative Day 0: after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation
Relationship between body mass index with optimal PEEP
Time frame: Intraoperative Day 0: after insufflation of pneumoperitoneum and positioning the patient for surgery
Relationship of the degree of Trendelenburg inclination with optimal PEEP
Time frame: Intraoperative Day 0: after insufflation of pneumoperitoneum and positioning the patient for surgery
Relationship of the pneumoperitoneum (insufflation) with optimal PEEP
Time frame: Intraoperative Day 0: after insufflation of pneumoperitoneum and positioning the patient for surgery
Intraoperative oxygenation
Time frame: Perioperative Day 0: before anesthesia, after intubation, after PEEP/TV/RR titration, after insufflation and positioning, after PEEP/TV/RR reassessment, just before extubation, after extubation
Postoperative oxygenation
Time frame: Postoperative Day 0: after PACU admission and 60min after PACU admission
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 29793604Schaefer MS, Treschan TA, Gauch J, Neukirchen M, Kienbaum P. Influence of xenon on pulmonary mechanics and lung aeration in patients with healthy lungs. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jun;120(6):1394-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.064. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 25018668Schaefer MS, Wania V, Bastin B, Schmalz U, Kienbaum P, Beiderlinden M, Treschan TA. Electrical impedance tomography during major open upper abdominal surgery: a pilot-study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul 5;14:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-51. eCollection 2014.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Robotic Surgery
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hugo™ RAS Urology Post-Market Clinical Study
Prostatectomy, Cystectomy
Not yet recruiting
Total Hip Replacement: an Investigation of Robotic-assisted Versus conVentional Surgery and Patient-centred outcomEs
Osteo Arthritis Knee and Hip
Recruiting
Supervised Endoscopic Tele-controlled Intelligent Lithotripsy
Renal Stone
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Shortened Course Adjuvant Radiotherapy Following TORS
HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruiting
Remote Robotic Surgery for Gynecologic Cancer: A Safety and Effectiveness Study
Endometrial Cancer, Cervical Cancer (Early Detection)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Low Intensity Mechanical Ventilation in people with Robotic Surgery and Post Operative Pulmonary Complications, run by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
ΔEELV between baseline and after extubation before leaving the operating room. (time frame: Perioperative Day 0: From pre-intubation baseline in the operating room (prior to induction of anesthesia) to the first post-extubation EIT assessment (within 10 min after extubation on Day 0).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07277244, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2026.