GlaucomaNCT07285616
Optimizing Graft Selection in Glaucoma Surgery: A Comparative Study of Sclera, Pericardium, and Corneal Tissue
A study testing MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft, MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft and MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft in people with Glaucoma, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Glaucoma refers to a group of progressive optic neuropathies that lead to permanent vision loss. Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally. In 2020, it was estimated to affect 76 million individuals worldwide, with projections indicating this number will rise to 111.8 million by 2040. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 110 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Glaucoma
- What is being tested?
- MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft, MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft and MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 15 Sep 2026to 30 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 110 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years and older
- Patients selected for PreserFlo microshunt surgery and XEN stent alone or in combination with cataract surgery.
- Ability to comprehend the study procedures
Who cannot join
- Unwilling or unable to give consent
- Unable to come for scheduled post-operative visits
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Previous cyclodestructive procedures, scleral buckling procedures, or presence of silicone oil
- Conjunctival scarring precluding a glaucoma surgery superiorly
- Active iris neovascularization or active proliferative retinopathy
- Vitreous in the anterior chamber for which a vitrectomy is anticipated.
- Previous trabeculectomy, tube-shunt implantation, or surgeries that shunt aqueous outflow into the subconjunctival space
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada1 site
The Royal Alexandra Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T5H 3V9
Paige Campbell, MD, 4039695473, pcampbe1@ualberta.ca
Mathew Palakkamanil, MD
About this study
Official title: Optimizing Graft Selection in Glaucoma Surgery
Glaucoma refers to a group of progressive optic neuropathies that lead to permanent vision loss. Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally. In 2020, it was estimated to affect 76 million individuals worldwide, with projections indicating this number will rise to 111.8 million by 2040. In Canada, glaucoma affects an estimated 2.7-7.5% of individuals over the age of 50, contributing substantially to the national disease burden. This condition is linked to damage of the optic nerve due to elevated intraocular pressure (IOP; raised eye pressure), which results in the loss of retinal ganglion cells. Therefore, most of the treatments are guided towards reducing the IOP either via using laser, medications or surgery.
Glaucoma surgery is typically reserved for cases where IOP remains uncontrolled while on maximum tolerated medical therapy and/or where glaucoma progression warrants surgery. The goal of many glaucoma surgeries is to divert aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space, therefore reducing intraocular pressure. The device used for this purpose are the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt (Glaukos Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA, USA) (the documents will interchangeably use terms "stent" and "shunt" to refer to these devices in the text below). The device is implanted using the ab externo approach to channel fluid from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival/subtenon space. To reduce postoperative fibrosis and inhibit fibroblast activity that could obstruct flow and lead to device failure, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or mitomycin C (MMC) are administered. Additionally, a double-layered closure of conjunctiva and Tenon's is performed to minimize Tenon's migration and blockage of tenon the stents. Despite these measures, stent encapsulation and failure are still too common requiring revisions and bleb needling in 2-20% of cases within the first 12 months of follow-up.
Read more
This project will involve a series of studies evaluating graft selection in PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation, focusing on donor sclera, cornea, and pericardium as patch graft materials. First, the investigators will conduct a prospective, randomized study comparing clinical outcomes between these graft types. Outcomes of interest will include surgical success rates, post-operative hypotony, tube erosion, conjunctival complications, infection, and overall device longevity. Donor sclera has long been used as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage device surgery and is associated with low erosion rates and reliable long-term results. Corneal tissue is increasingly used due to its transparency and availability through eye banks, with demonstrated safety in ocular surface reconstruction and tube coverage. Pericardium is another durable, biocompatible option, historically applied in both cardiovascular and ocular surgery, and has shown effectiveness as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage implants. This comparison will extend to both primary implantation and revision surgeries, recognizing the high clinical relevance of graft performance in complex cases.
Building on these results, the investigators will then perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of graft strategies, incorporating surgical time, post-operative management, complication rates, and need for re-operation. An economic model will be developed to evaluate costs and resource utilization associated with each material, providing valuable data for policy and surgical decision-making. Finally, the investigators will conduct a patient-reported outcome (PRO) study to assess patient comfort and satisfaction with different grafts. Surveys will evaluate domains such as foreign body sensation, cosmesis, and overall satisfaction at key time points (immediate post-operative period, 1 week, 3 weeks, and 3 months). These results will highlight the patient perspective, an often underrepresented but critical factor in surgical innovation.
Together, these studies will comprehensively assess graft selection from surgical, economic, and patient-centered perspectives, informing evidence-based practice in glaucoma care.
- Conditions
- Glaucoma
- Being tested
- MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft, MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft, MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft
- Keywords
- PRESERFLO, surgery, MicroShunt
- Medical subject headings
- Glaucoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MicroShunt with Scleral Patch GraftProcedure or surgery
Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor scleral patch graft to cover the tube.
MicroShunt with Corneal Patch GraftProcedure or surgery
Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor corneal patch graft to cover the tube.
MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch GraftProcedure or surgery
Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with pericardial patch graft to cover the tube.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PreserFlo with Donor Scleral Patch Graft | Experimental | Participants undergo PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation with a donor scleral patch graft covering the tube. Standard perioperative care (e.g., MMC/5-FU per site protocol) and scheduled follow-up (day 1; week 1-2; months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12). Outcomes include IOP, hypotony, tube erosion, conjunctival complications, infection, reoperations, device longevity, patient-reported comfort/cosmesis, and resource use. Primary and revision cases are included per stratified randomization. Receives: Procedure: MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft |
| PreserFlo with Corneal Patch Graft | Experimental | Participants undergo PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation with a donor corneal patch graft covering the tube. Standard perioperative care and identical follow-up schedule. Outcomes as above: IOP control, complications (including erosion and hypotony), reoperations, longevity, patient-reported outcomes, and resource use. Primary and revision cases are included per stratified randomization. Receives: Procedure: MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft |
| PreserFlo with Pericardial Patch Graft | Experimental | Participants undergo PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation with a pericardial patch graft covering the tube. Standard perioperative care and identical follow-up schedule. Outcomes as above: IOP control, complication profile, reoperations, longevity, patient-reported outcomes, and resource use. Primary and revision cases are included per stratified randomization. Receives: Procedure: MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) from Baseline to 12 Months
IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (mmHg) at baseline, post-operative Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12. The primary endpoint will be the mean change at 12 months.
Measured: 12 months
Surgical Success Rate at 12 Months
Proportion of eyes achieving target IOP (≤18 mmHg or ≥20% reduction from baseline) without additional glaucoma surgery, vision-threatening complication, or device removal.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (13)
Glaucoma medication burden
Number of glaucoma medications used per patient, counted from the medication list at each follow-up (baseline, Month 3, 6, 12). Outcome reported as: Mean change in number of medications.
Measured: 12 months
Need for re-operation
Number and percentage of eyes requiring any additional glaucoma or device-related surgery during the study period.
Outcome reported as: Count and proportion of eyes re-operated.
Measured: 12 months
Bleb needling rate
Number and proportion of eyes requiring bleb needling postoperatively to maintain or restore filtration.
Measured: 12 months
Tube/patch graft exposure or erosion
Clinically confirmed exposure or erosion of tube or patch graft, as documented on slit-lamp exam.
Outcome reported as: Number and percentage of affected eyes.
Measured: 12 months
Hypotony
IOP < 5 mmHg on two consecutive visits measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (mmHg).
Outcome reported as: Number and percentage of eyes meeting the definition.
Measured: 12 months
Infection
Any endophthalmitis, blebitis, or wound infection confirmed on clinical exam. Outcome reported as: Number and percentage of eyes with infection.
Measured: 12 months
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change
BCVA measured using a standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at 4 m (logMAR scale).
Outcome reported as: Mean change in logMAR from baseline to 12 months (lower values = better vision).
Measured: 12 months
Device survival (time to failure)
Time from surgery to defined surgical failure (loss of pressure control, device removal, or re-operation).
Outcome reported as: Kaplan-Meier survival curve; median time to failure.
Measured: Up to 12 months
Patient-reported comfort
Measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10) where 0 = no discomfort and 10 = worst possible discomfort.
Assessment points: Post-op Day 1, Week 1, Week 3, and Month 3. Outcome reported as: Mean ± SD at each time point.
Measured: Immediate postop (day 1), 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 months.
Foreign body sensation
Evaluated using a Likert scale (1-5) where 1 = none and 5 = severe sensation. Assessment points: Day 1, Week 1, Week 3, Month 3. Outcome reported as: Mean ± SD and proportion reporting moderate-to-severe sensation (≥4).
Measured: Day 1, 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 months.
Cosmesis/satisfaction
Measured with a 5-point Likert scale assessing satisfaction with postoperative appearance (1 = very dissatisfied; 5 = very satisfied).
Assessment points: Week 3 and Month 3. Outcome reported as: Mean ± SD; higher scores = greater satisfaction.
Measured: 3 weeks and 3 months.
Health care resource use
Number of postoperative visits, additional procedures, and unscheduled urgent encounters recorded per participant from the medical record.
Outcome reported as: Mean count per participant and associated cost estimate (CAD).
Measured: 12 months
Cost-utility
Calculated using trial-based costs and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) estimates derived from EQ-5D-5L utility weights.
Outcome reported as: Incremental cost per QALY gained by graft type.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Dec 2025
- Study start15 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for GlaucomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AlbertaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07285616
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00157655
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 24 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimizing Graft Selection in Glaucoma Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07285616
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00157655
- Conditions
- Glaucoma
- Keywords
- PRESERFLO, surgery, MicroShunt
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Glaucoma refers to a group of progressive optic neuropathies that lead to permanent vision loss. Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally. In 2020, it was estimated to affect 76 million individuals worldwide, with projections indicating this number will rise to 111.8 million by 2040. In Canada, glaucoma affects an estimated 2.7-7.5% of individuals over the age of 50, contributing substantially to the national disease burden. This condition is linked to damage of the optic nerve due to elevated intraocular pressure (IOP; raised eye pressure), which results in the loss of retinal ganglion cells. Therefore, most of the treatments are guided towards reducing the IOP either via using laser, medications or surgery.
Glaucoma surgery is typically reserved for cases where IOP remains uncontrolled while on maximum tolerated medical therapy and/or where glaucoma progression warrants surgery. The goal of many glaucoma surgeries is to divert aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space, therefore reducing intraocular pressure. The device used for this purpose are the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt (Glaukos Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA, USA) (the documents will interchangeably use terms "stent" and "shunt" to refer to these devices in the text below). The device is implanted using the ab externo approach to channel fluid from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival/subtenon space. To reduce postoperative fibrosis and inhibit fibroblast activity that could obstruct flow and lead to device failure, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or mitomycin C (MMC) are administered. Additionally, a double-layered closure of conjunctiva and Tenon's is performed to minimize Tenon's migration and blockage of tenon the stents. Despite these measures, stent encapsulation and failure are still too common requiring revisions and bleb needling in 2-20% of cases within the first 12 months of follow-up.
This project will involve a series of studies evaluating graft selection in PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation, focusing on donor sclera, cornea, and pericardium as patch graft materials. First, the investigators will conduct a prospective, randomized study comparing clinical outcomes between these graft types. Outcomes of interest will include surgical success rates, post-operative hypotony, tube erosion, conjunctival complications, infection, and overall device longevity. Donor sclera has long been used as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage device surgery and is associated with low erosion rates and reliable long-term results. Corneal tissue is increasingly used due to its transparency and availability through eye banks, with demonstrated safety in ocular surface reconstruction and tube coverage. Pericardium is another durable, biocompatible option, historically applied in both cardiovascular and ocular surgery, and has shown effectiveness as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage implants. This comparison will extend to both primary implantation and revision surgeries, recognizing the high clinical relevance of graft performance in complex cases.
Building on these results, the investigators will then perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of graft strategies, incorporating surgical time, post-operative management, complication rates, and need for re-operation. An economic model will be developed to evaluate costs and resource utilization associated with each material, providing valuable data for policy and surgical decision-making. Finally, the investigators will conduct a patient-reported outcome (PRO) study to assess patient comfort and satisfaction with different grafts. Surveys will evaluate domains such as foreign body sensation, cosmesis, and overall satisfaction at key time points (immediate post-operative period, 1 week, 3 weeks, and 3 months). These results will highlight the patient perspective, an often underrepresented but critical factor in surgical innovation.
Together, these studies will comprehensively assess graft selection from surgical, economic, and patient-centered perspectives, informing evidence-based practice in glaucoma care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PreserFlo with Donor Scleral Patch Graft | Experimental | Procedure: MicroShunt with Scleral Patch GraftParticipants undergo PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation with a donor scleral patch graft covering the tube. Standard perioperative care (e.g., MMC/5-FU per site protocol) and scheduled follow-up (day 1; week 1-2; months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12). Outcomes include IOP, hypotony, tube erosion, conjunctival complications, infection, reoperations, device longevity, patient-reported comfort/cosmesis, and resource use. Primary and revision cases are included per stratified randomization. |
| PreserFlo with Corneal Patch Graft | Experimental | Procedure: MicroShunt with Corneal Patch GraftParticipants undergo PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation with a donor corneal patch graft covering the tube. Standard perioperative care and identical follow-up schedule. Outcomes as above: IOP control, complications (including erosion and hypotony), reoperations, longevity, patient-reported outcomes, and resource use. Primary and revision cases are included per stratified randomization. |
| PreserFlo with Pericardial Patch Graft | Experimental | Procedure: MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch GraftParticipants undergo PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation with a pericardial patch graft covering the tube. Standard perioperative care and identical follow-up schedule. Outcomes as above: IOP control, complication profile, reoperations, longevity, patient-reported outcomes, and resource use. Primary and revision cases are included per stratified randomization. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 110 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 18 years and older
- Patients selected for PreserFlo microshunt surgery and XEN stent alone or in combination with cataract surgery.
- Ability to comprehend the study procedures
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Unwilling or unable to give consent
- Unable to come for scheduled post-operative visits
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Previous cyclodestructive procedures, scleral buckling procedures, or presence of silicone oil
- Conjunctival scarring precluding a glaucoma surgery superiorly
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MicroShunt with Scleral Patch GraftPlacement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor scleral patch graft to cover the tube. | Procedure or surgery | PreserFlo with Donor Scleral Patch Graft |
| MicroShunt with Corneal Patch GraftPlacement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor corneal patch graft to cover the tube. | Procedure or surgery | PreserFlo with Corneal Patch Graft |
| MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch GraftPlacement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with pericardial patch graft to cover the tube. | Procedure or surgery | PreserFlo with Pericardial Patch Graft |
Primary outcome
Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) from Baseline to 12 Months
Time frame: 12 months
IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (mmHg) at baseline, post-operative Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12. The primary endpoint will be the mean change at 12 months.
Surgical Success Rate at 12 Months
Time frame: 12 months
Proportion of eyes achieving target IOP (≤18 mmHg or ≥20% reduction from baseline) without additional glaucoma surgery, vision-threatening complication, or device removal.
13 secondary outcomes
Glaucoma medication burden
Time frame: 12 months
Need for re-operation
Time frame: 12 months
Bleb needling rate
Time frame: 12 months
Tube/patch graft exposure or erosion
Time frame: 12 months
Hypotony
Time frame: 12 months
Infection
Time frame: 12 months
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change
Time frame: 12 months
Device survival (time to failure)
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Patient-reported comfort
Time frame: Immediate postop (day 1), 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 months.
Foreign body sensation
Time frame: Day 1, 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 months.
Cosmesis/satisfaction
Time frame: 3 weeks and 3 months.
Health care resource use
Time frame: 12 months
Cost-utility
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jul 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Glaucoma
Not yet recruiting
PAUL® Glaucoma Implant Safety and Effectiveness Study
Refractory Glaucoma
Not yet recruiting
Glaucoma Drop Aids Part 2
Glaucoma, Intraocular Pressure
RecruitingObservational study
Anterior Segment Anatomy Assessed by Swept-Source OCT in Ocular Surgery Patients
Cataract, Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma
Recruiting
The Acute Effect of Exercise Type And Timing on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Intra-Ocular Pressure in Individuals With Glaucoma (The ACHIEVE-project).
Glaucoma Open-Angle Primary, Hypertension
RecruitingObservational study
PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt XI Observational PMCF Study With no Control Group
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft, MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft and MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft in people with Glaucoma, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Paige Campbell, MD (14039695473, pcampbe1@ualberta.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) from Baseline to 12 Months (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2026.