AzTrials
AzTrials

GlaucomaNCT07285616

Optimizing Graft Selection in Glaucoma Surgery: A Comparative Study of Sclera, Pericardium, and Corneal Tissue

A study testing MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft, MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft and MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft in people with Glaucoma, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Glaucoma refers to a group of progressive optic neuropathies that lead to permanent vision loss. Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally. In 2020, it was estimated to affect 76 million individuals worldwide, with projections indicating this number will rise to 111.8 million by 2040. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 110 years
Conditions the study is for
Glaucoma
What is being tested?
MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft, MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft and MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
180 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
15 Sep 2026to 30 Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 110 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years and older
  • Patients selected for PreserFlo microshunt surgery and XEN stent alone or in combination with cataract surgery.
  • Ability to comprehend the study procedures

Who cannot join

  • Unwilling or unable to give consent
  • Unable to come for scheduled post-operative visits
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Previous cyclodestructive procedures, scleral buckling procedures, or presence of silicone oil
  • Conjunctival scarring precluding a glaucoma surgery superiorly
  • Active iris neovascularization or active proliferative retinopathy
  • Vitreous in the anterior chamber for which a vitrectomy is anticipated.
  • Previous trabeculectomy, tube-shunt implantation, or surgeries that shunt aqueous outflow into the subconjunctival space

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Paige Campbell, MD contact

14039695473

pcampbe1@ualberta.ca

Canada1 site
  • The Royal Alexandra Hospital

    Edmonton, Alberta, T5H 3V9

    Paige Campbell, MD, 4039695473, pcampbe1@ualberta.ca

    Mathew Palakkamanil, MD

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Optimizing Graft Selection in Glaucoma Surgery

Glaucoma refers to a group of progressive optic neuropathies that lead to permanent vision loss. Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally. In 2020, it was estimated to affect 76 million individuals worldwide, with projections indicating this number will rise to 111.8 million by 2040. In Canada, glaucoma affects an estimated 2.7-7.5% of individuals over the age of 50, contributing substantially to the national disease burden. This condition is linked to damage of the optic nerve due to elevated intraocular pressure (IOP; raised eye pressure), which results in the loss of retinal ganglion cells. Therefore, most of the treatments are guided towards reducing the IOP either via using laser, medications or surgery.

Glaucoma surgery is typically reserved for cases where IOP remains uncontrolled while on maximum tolerated medical therapy and/or where glaucoma progression warrants surgery. The goal of many glaucoma surgeries is to divert aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space, therefore reducing intraocular pressure. The device used for this purpose are the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt (Glaukos Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA, USA) (the documents will interchangeably use terms "stent" and "shunt" to refer to these devices in the text below). The device is implanted using the ab externo approach to channel fluid from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival/subtenon space. To reduce postoperative fibrosis and inhibit fibroblast activity that could obstruct flow and lead to device failure, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or mitomycin C (MMC) are administered. Additionally, a double-layered closure of conjunctiva and Tenon's is performed to minimize Tenon's migration and blockage of tenon the stents. Despite these measures, stent encapsulation and failure are still too common requiring revisions and bleb needling in 2-20% of cases within the first 12 months of follow-up.

Read more

This project will involve a series of studies evaluating graft selection in PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation, focusing on donor sclera, cornea, and pericardium as patch graft materials. First, the investigators will conduct a prospective, randomized study comparing clinical outcomes between these graft types. Outcomes of interest will include surgical success rates, post-operative hypotony, tube erosion, conjunctival complications, infection, and overall device longevity. Donor sclera has long been used as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage device surgery and is associated with low erosion rates and reliable long-term results. Corneal tissue is increasingly used due to its transparency and availability through eye banks, with demonstrated safety in ocular surface reconstruction and tube coverage. Pericardium is another durable, biocompatible option, historically applied in both cardiovascular and ocular surgery, and has shown effectiveness as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage implants. This comparison will extend to both primary implantation and revision surgeries, recognizing the high clinical relevance of graft performance in complex cases.

Building on these results, the investigators will then perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of graft strategies, incorporating surgical time, post-operative management, complication rates, and need for re-operation. An economic model will be developed to evaluate costs and resource utilization associated with each material, providing valuable data for policy and surgical decision-making. Finally, the investigators will conduct a patient-reported outcome (PRO) study to assess patient comfort and satisfaction with different grafts. Surveys will evaluate domains such as foreign body sensation, cosmesis, and overall satisfaction at key time points (immediate post-operative period, 1 week, 3 weeks, and 3 months). These results will highlight the patient perspective, an often underrepresented but critical factor in surgical innovation.

Together, these studies will comprehensively assess graft selection from surgical, economic, and patient-centered perspectives, informing evidence-based practice in glaucoma care.

Conditions
Glaucoma
Being tested
MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft, MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft, MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft
Keywords
PRESERFLO, surgery, MicroShunt
Medical subject headings
Glaucoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MicroShunt with Scleral Patch GraftProcedure or surgery

    Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor scleral patch graft to cover the tube.

  • MicroShunt with Corneal Patch GraftProcedure or surgery

    Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor corneal patch graft to cover the tube.

  • MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch GraftProcedure or surgery

    Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with pericardial patch graft to cover the tube.

Study groups in NCT07285616
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PreserFlo with Donor Scleral Patch GraftExperimentalParticipants undergo PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation with a donor scleral patch graft covering the tube. Standard perioperative care (e.g., MMC/5-FU per site protocol) and scheduled follow-up (day 1; week 1-2; months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12). Outcomes include IOP, hypotony, tube erosion, conjunctival complications, infection, reoperations, device longevity, patient-reported comfort/cosmesis, and resource use. Primary and revision cases are included per stratified randomization.
Receives: Procedure: MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft
PreserFlo with Corneal Patch GraftExperimentalParticipants undergo PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation with a donor corneal patch graft covering the tube. Standard perioperative care and identical follow-up schedule. Outcomes as above: IOP control, complications (including erosion and hypotony), reoperations, longevity, patient-reported outcomes, and resource use. Primary and revision cases are included per stratified randomization.
Receives: Procedure: MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft
PreserFlo with Pericardial Patch GraftExperimentalParticipants undergo PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation with a pericardial patch graft covering the tube. Standard perioperative care and identical follow-up schedule. Outcomes as above: IOP control, complication profile, reoperations, longevity, patient-reported outcomes, and resource use. Primary and revision cases are included per stratified randomization.
Receives: Procedure: MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) from Baseline to 12 Months

    IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (mmHg) at baseline, post-operative Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12. The primary endpoint will be the mean change at 12 months.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Surgical Success Rate at 12 Months

    Proportion of eyes achieving target IOP (≤18 mmHg or ≥20% reduction from baseline) without additional glaucoma surgery, vision-threatening complication, or device removal.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Glaucoma medication burden

    Number of glaucoma medications used per patient, counted from the medication list at each follow-up (baseline, Month 3, 6, 12). Outcome reported as: Mean change in number of medications.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Need for re-operation

    Number and percentage of eyes requiring any additional glaucoma or device-related surgery during the study period.

    Outcome reported as: Count and proportion of eyes re-operated.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Bleb needling rate

    Number and proportion of eyes requiring bleb needling postoperatively to maintain or restore filtration.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Tube/patch graft exposure or erosion

    Clinically confirmed exposure or erosion of tube or patch graft, as documented on slit-lamp exam.

    Outcome reported as: Number and percentage of affected eyes.

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Hypotony

    IOP < 5 mmHg on two consecutive visits measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (mmHg).

    Outcome reported as: Number and percentage of eyes meeting the definition.

    Measured: 12 months

  6. Infection

    Any endophthalmitis, blebitis, or wound infection confirmed on clinical exam. Outcome reported as: Number and percentage of eyes with infection.

    Measured: 12 months

  7. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change

    BCVA measured using a standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at 4 m (logMAR scale).

    Outcome reported as: Mean change in logMAR from baseline to 12 months (lower values = better vision).

    Measured: 12 months

  8. Device survival (time to failure)

    Time from surgery to defined surgical failure (loss of pressure control, device removal, or re-operation).

    Outcome reported as: Kaplan-Meier survival curve; median time to failure.

    Measured: Up to 12 months

  9. Patient-reported comfort

    Measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10) where 0 = no discomfort and 10 = worst possible discomfort.

    Assessment points: Post-op Day 1, Week 1, Week 3, and Month 3. Outcome reported as: Mean ± SD at each time point.

    Measured: Immediate postop (day 1), 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 months.

  10. Foreign body sensation

    Evaluated using a Likert scale (1-5) where 1 = none and 5 = severe sensation. Assessment points: Day 1, Week 1, Week 3, Month 3. Outcome reported as: Mean ± SD and proportion reporting moderate-to-severe sensation (≥4).

    Measured: Day 1, 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 months.

  11. Cosmesis/satisfaction

    Measured with a 5-point Likert scale assessing satisfaction with postoperative appearance (1 = very dissatisfied; 5 = very satisfied).

    Assessment points: Week 3 and Month 3. Outcome reported as: Mean ± SD; higher scores = greater satisfaction.

    Measured: 3 weeks and 3 months.

  12. Health care resource use

    Number of postoperative visits, additional procedures, and unscheduled urgent encounters recorded per participant from the medical record.

    Outcome reported as: Mean count per participant and associated cost estimate (CAD).

    Measured: 12 months

  13. Cost-utility

    Calculated using trial-based costs and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) estimates derived from EQ-5D-5L utility weights.

    Outcome reported as: Incremental cost per QALY gained by graft type.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2025
  2. Study start15 Sep 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
180 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07285616
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00157655
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
9 Dec 2025
Last updated
24 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft, MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft and MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft in people with Glaucoma, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Paige Campbell, MD (14039695473, pcampbe1@ualberta.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) from Baseline to 12 Months (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in