StabilityNCT07288645
Enhancing Stability and Jumping Skills Through Combined Static and Dynamic Balance Training in Female Chinese University-Level Gymnastics Beginners
A study testing balance group in people with Stability and Jumping Performance, run by Yi Wang at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This study aims to investigate the effects of different balance training programs (dynamic, static, combined dynamic and static) on the stability, jumping skills, and gymnastic movement skills of female university students who are beginners in gymnastics. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 22 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Stability, Jumping Performance, Balance Training
- What is being tested?
- balance group
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 6 Nov 2025to 20 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 22 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Females
- Age ranged between 18 -22 years old, normal body mass index (BMI) (18.5 -25kg/m²).
- Undergraduate students of physical education at Beijing Sport University.
- No prior systematic gymnastics training (or with ≤ 1 year of systematic training experience), and no history of congenital diseases or musculoskeletal injuries.
Who cannot join
- Participants suffering from acute or chronic musculoskeletal injuries (lasting for 6 months or more), neurological disorders (such as epilepsy), or vestibular dysfunction.
- Ranked athletes or elite athletes.
- Participants with poor compliance (< 80%) who are unable to complete the 8 - week exercise intervention program.
- Individuals who have recently undergone or are scheduled to undergo surgery within three months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study aims to investigate the effects of different balance training programs (dynamic, static, combined dynamic and static) on the stability, jumping skills, and gymnastic movement skills of female university students who are beginners in gymnastics. Participants will be randomly divided into four groups: the first group will receive dynamic balance training (including exercises that maintain balance during movement); the second group will receive static balance training (including exercises that hold a fixed posture); the third group will receive combined dynamic and static balance training (including both static and dynamic balance exercises); and the fourth group will serve as a control group without additional balance training (or receive regular physical education classes as a control). The main outcomes to be measured before and after the training period are the participants' performance in specific stability tests, jumping tasks, and gymnastic movement skill assessments. The goal is to determine which balance training method (dynamic, static, or combined training) is most effective in improving the fundamental movement skills (including gymnastics-specific abilities) of gymnastics beginners.
- Conditions
- Stability, Jumping Performance, Balance Training, Gymnastics Injury, Motor Learning, Balance
- Being tested
- balance group
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
balance groupBehavioural
An 8-week supervised training program conducted 2 times per week. Each 15-30 minute session comprises a combination of static balance exercises , dynamic balance exercises and Combining training. The intensity and difficulty of the exercises will be progressively increased throughout the intervention period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Static balance group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: balance group |
| Dynamic balance group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: balance group |
| Static and Dynamic balance group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: balance group |
| Control group | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: balance group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The 8-point Star Offset (cm)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Jump Height (cm)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Peak Force (N)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Rate of Force Development (N·S)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Impulse (N·s)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Secondary outcomes (9)
Center of gravity deviation distance (mm)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Joint Angle variation (°)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Vertical Jump Efficiency (%)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Landing Impact Force (N)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Body Oscillation Amplitude (mm)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Rotation Smoothness Index (°)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Height (cm)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Weight (kg)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
BMI (kg/m2)
Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2025
- Study start6 Nov 2025
- Primary completion20 Jan 2026
- Study completion20 Jan 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StabilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yi Wang
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Yi Wang, Universiti Sains Malaysia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07288645
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- USM/JEPeM/KK/25070591
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 3 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Enhancing Stability and Jumping Skills Through Combined Static and Dynamic Balance Training in Female Chinese University-Level Gymnastics Beginners
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07288645
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- USM/JEPeM/KK/25070591
- Conditions
- Stability, Jumping Performance, Balance Training, Gymnastics Injury, Motor Learning, Balance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yi WangUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jan 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to investigate the effects of different balance training programs (dynamic, static, combined dynamic and static) on the stability, jumping skills, and gymnastic movement skills of female university students who are beginners in gymnastics. Participants will be randomly divided into four groups: the first group will receive dynamic balance training (including exercises that maintain balance during movement); the second group will receive static balance training (including exercises that hold a fixed posture); the third group will receive combined dynamic and static balance training (including both static and dynamic balance exercises); and the fourth group will serve as a control group without additional balance training (or receive regular physical education classes as a control). The main outcomes to be measured before and after the training period are the participants' performance in specific stability tests, jumping tasks, and gymnastic movement skill assessments. The goal is to determine which balance training method (dynamic, static, or combined training) is most effective in improving the fundamental movement skills (including gymnastics-specific abilities) of gymnastics beginners.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Static balance group | Experimental | Behavioral: balance group |
| Dynamic balance group | Experimental | Behavioral: balance group |
| Static and Dynamic balance group | Experimental | Behavioral: balance group |
| Control group | Active comparator | Behavioral: balance group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 22 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Females
- Age ranged between 18 -22 years old, normal body mass index (BMI) (18.5 -25kg/m²).
- Undergraduate students of physical education at Beijing Sport University.
- No prior systematic gymnastics training (or with ≤ 1 year of systematic training experience), and no history of congenital diseases or musculoskeletal injuries.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participants suffering from acute or chronic musculoskeletal injuries (lasting for 6 months or more), neurological disorders (such as epilepsy), or vestibular dysfunction.
- Ranked athletes or elite athletes.
- Participants with poor compliance (< 80%) who are unable to complete the 8 - week exercise intervention program.
- Individuals who have recently undergone or are scheduled to undergo surgery within three months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| balance groupAn 8-week supervised training program conducted 2 times per week. Each 15-30 minute session comprises a combination of static balance exercises , dynamic balance exercises and Combining training. The intensity and difficulty of the exercises will be progressively increased throughout the intervention period. | Behavioural | Control group, Dynamic balance group, Static and Dynamic balance group, Static balance group |
Primary outcome
The 8-point Star Offset (cm)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Jump Height (cm)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Peak Force (N)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Rate of Force Development (N·S)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Impulse (N·s)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
9 secondary outcomes
Center of gravity deviation distance (mm)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Joint Angle variation (°)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Vertical Jump Efficiency (%)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Landing Impact Force (N)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Body Oscillation Amplitude (mm)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Rotation Smoothness Index (°)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Height (cm)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Weight (kg)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
BMI (kg/m2)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Stability
Recruiting
Multivessel Balloon Occlusion to Investigate Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and aNgina
Stable Angina, Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adverse Events During Physical Therapy in Neurocritical ICU Patients
Critical Illness, Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Entecavir ODT Conversion in Stable Liver Transplant Patients
Hepatitis B Virus, Liver Transplant
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of a Novel Quantum-Inspired Intervention (QII) for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Global Confirmatory Study
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD
RecruitingPhase 2
Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab and Porustobart in Resectable pMMR/MSS Colon Cancer
Colon Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing balance group in people with Stability and Jumping Performance, run by Yi Wang at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The 8-point Star Offset (cm) (time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2026.