Clinical TeachingNCT07305077
One-Minute Preceptor to Improve Bedside Teaching
A study testing One-Minute Preceptor (OMP) in people with Clinical Teaching and Bedside Teaching, run by Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy at 1 site in Vietnam.
Trial summary
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Model Description: Cluster-randomized by preceptor (30 clusters; 15 OMP/15 control). Outcomes at student level; 15 students per cluster. Adequate OMP exposure is defined a priori as ≥2 structured OMP feedback encounters (≥5 minutes each) delivered across ≥2 separate weeks of the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Clinical Teaching, Bedside Teaching, Medical Education
- What is being tested?
- One-Minute Preceptor (OMP)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 450 participants
- Where
- 1 siteVietnam
- Study dates
- 20 Aug 2025to 10 Apr 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A. Student participants (outcome level):
- Aged ≥18 years at enrollment.
- Enrolled Year 4-medical students assigned to one of the participating preceptor-led bedside teaching groups during the study period.
- Expected to attend the rotation for 8-12 weeks (or the site's standard rotation length).
- Able to provide informed consent (and agree to be observed/assessed via mini-CEX).
- B. Preceptor clusters (randomized units):
Show all 10Show fewer
- Resident physicians serving as bedside teaching preceptors in participating departments.
- Will supervise approximately 15 students during the study period.
- Agree not to cross over to teach students in the opposite trial arm during the trial period.
- Able to attend OMP training and permit fidelity observation (checklist) if allocated to the intervention.
Who cannot join
- A. Student participants:
- Prior exposure to formal OMP-based teaching within the past 6 months in the same department.
- Not expected to remain on the rotation long enough to be assessed (e.g., planned absence >2 weeks or early withdrawal).
- Declines or withdraws informed consent.
- Severe communication barrier that precludes valid assessment (e.g., language barrier without support).
- B. Preceptor clusters:
Show all 9Show fewer
- Formal OMP training within the past 12 months (to avoid contamination), or role as an OMP trainer for other faculty during the study period.
- Planned cross-coverage that would result in teaching students from both arms during the trial period.
- Anticipated extended leave making fidelity and outcome assessments infeasible.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Ngo contact
Vietnam1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Can Tho Children Hospital
Can Tho, Province, 900000
Quang C Ngo, 0789565090, ncquang@ctump.edu.vn
Bui
About this study
Official title: One-Minute Preceptor to Improve Bedside Teaching: a Cluster Randomized Trial in Residents
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Model Description: Cluster-randomized by preceptor (30 clusters; 15 OMP/15 control). Outcomes at student level; 15 students per cluster.
Adequate OMP exposure is defined a priori as ≥2 structured OMP feedback encounters (≥5 minutes each) delivered across ≥2 separate weeks of the rotation.
Masking: Outcomes Assessor
- Conditions
- Clinical Teaching, Bedside Teaching, Medical Education
- Being tested
- One-Minute Preceptor (OMP)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
One-Minute Preceptor (OMP)Behavioural
Also called OMP
Faculty development workshop (90 min), pocket card, coaching, audit with OMP 5-step fidelity checklist.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OMP | Experimental | One-Minute Preceptor training: 90-min workshop + pocket card + coaching + fidelity checklist. Receives: Behavioral: One-Minute Preceptor (OMP) |
| Control | No intervention | Usual bedside teaching; OMP offered after trial completion. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) Total Score
Total score on the mini-CEX, ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate better bedside teaching performance as rated by student participants. Measure Type: Continuous.
Measured: 8 - 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Student Satisfaction Score
Description: Student satisfaction with bedside teaching will be measured using a Likert-scale questionnaire specifically developed for this study. The total score ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the teaching encounter.
Measure Type: Continuous. Unit of Measure: Score (1-5)
Measured: 8-12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Dec 2025
- Study start20 Aug 2025
- Primary completion15 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Apr 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Clinical TeachingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Cluster-randomized by preceptor (n=30 clusters; 15 OMP vs 15 control); outcomes at student level
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Quang C Ngo, Study chair, Can Tho University Medicine and Pharmacy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07305077
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1925/QĐ-ĐHYDCT/07
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 26 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- One-Minute Preceptor to Improve Bedside Teaching: a Cluster Randomized Trial in Residents
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07305077
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1925/QĐ-ĐHYDCT/07
- Conditions
- Clinical Teaching, Bedside Teaching, Medical Education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Can Tho University of Medicine and PharmacyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Model Description: Cluster-randomized by preceptor (30 clusters; 15 OMP/15 control). Outcomes at student level; 15 students per cluster.
Adequate OMP exposure is defined a priori as ≥2 structured OMP feedback encounters (≥5 minutes each) delivered across ≥2 separate weeks of the rotation.
Masking: Outcomes Assessor
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Cluster-randomized by preceptor (n=30 clusters; 15 OMP vs 15 control); outcomes at student level
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OMP | Experimental | Behavioral: One-Minute Preceptor (OMP)One-Minute Preceptor training: 90-min workshop + pocket card + coaching + fidelity checklist. |
| Control | No intervention | –Usual bedside teaching; OMP offered after trial completion. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- A. Student participants (outcome level):
- Aged ≥18 years at enrollment.
- Enrolled Year 4-medical students assigned to one of the participating preceptor-led bedside teaching groups during the study period.
- Expected to attend the rotation for 8-12 weeks (or the site's standard rotation length).
- Able to provide informed consent (and agree to be observed/assessed via mini-CEX).
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- A. Student participants:
- Prior exposure to formal OMP-based teaching within the past 6 months in the same department.
- Not expected to remain on the rotation long enough to be assessed (e.g., planned absence >2 weeks or early withdrawal).
- Declines or withdraws informed consent.
- Severe communication barrier that precludes valid assessment (e.g., language barrier without support).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| One-Minute Preceptor (OMP)Also: OMPFaculty development workshop (90 min), pocket card, coaching, audit with OMP 5-step fidelity checklist. | Behavioural | OMP |
Primary outcome
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) Total Score
Time frame: 8 - 12 weeks
Total score on the mini-CEX, ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate better bedside teaching performance as rated by student participants. Measure Type: Continuous.
1 secondary outcome
Student Satisfaction Score
Time frame: 8-12 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Dec 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Clinical Teaching
Not yet recruiting
Manus AI-Assisted Orthodontic Education and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
Active, not recruiting
AI-Assisted Child Health Podcast Education for Nursing Students
Nursing Education
Not yet recruiting
Effects of EbeCast Digital Learning on Midwifery Students' Women's Health Skills
Midwifery Education, Clinical Skills Training
Not yet recruiting
AI Smart Glasses Feedback for Intubation Training in Medical Students
Intubation, Intratracheal, Medical Education
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"The Relationship Between Nursing Students' Perceptions of the Clinical Learning Environment and Their Person-Centered Care Competency"
Education Nursing
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ngo contact
Quang C Ngo study chair
Can Tho University Medicine and Pharmacy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing One-Minute Preceptor (OMP) in people with Clinical Teaching and Bedside Teaching, run by Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy at 1 site in Vietnam.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Quang Chi Ngo, Master Degree (+84789565090, ncquang@ctump.edu.vn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) Total Score (time frame: 8 - 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Dec 2025.