Anxiety LiteracyNCT07316374
AI Chatbots for Anxiety Mental Health Literacy
A study testing AI Anxiety Literacy Education, AI Anxiety Friend Simulation and Text-Based Anxiety Psychoeducation in people with Anxiety Literacy and Anxiety Disorders, run by Peking University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to examine whether AI-based chatbots can improve anxiety-related mental health literacy in adults with varying levels of anxiety. The study aims to learn whether interactive AI chatbots can improve understanding of anxiety, attitudes toward anxiety, help-seeking intentions… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Anxiety Literacy, Anxiety Disorders, Mental Health Literacy
- What is being tested?
- AI Anxiety Literacy Education, AI Anxiety Friend Simulation and Text-Based Anxiety Psychoeducation
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2025to 30 Apr 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 18 and 65 years.
- Able to use digital devices (e.g., smartphone or computer) to complete AI-based conversations and questionnaires.
- Willing to participate in a one-week online intervention.
- Proficient in Chinese and able to understand study instructions and provide informed consent.
- Participants with varying levels of anxiety symptoms are eligible.
Who cannot join
- Self-reported history of severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder).
- Currently receiving psychological or psychiatric treatment.
- Severe mental health symptoms requiring immediate clinical intervention.
- Inability to use mobile or internet-enabled devices independently.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of AI-Based Chatbots for Improving Anxiety-Related Mental Health Literacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to examine whether AI-based chatbots can improve anxiety-related mental health literacy in adults with varying levels of anxiety. The study aims to learn whether interactive AI chatbots can improve understanding of anxiety, attitudes toward anxiety, help-seeking intentions, confidence in supporting others, and anxiety symptoms, compared with standard text-based educational materials.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Does an AI-based psychoeducation chatbot improve anxiety-related mental health literacy compared with text-based psychoeducation?
- Does adding interactive anxiety simulation conversations further improve mental health literacy and related outcomes compared with psychoeducation alone?
Researchers will compare participants who use an AI psychoeducation chatbot alone, participants who use an AI psychoeducation chatbot combined with anxiety simulation chatbots, and participants who receive text-based psychoeducation, to see whether the AI-based interventions lead to greater improvements in mental health literacy and related outcomes.
Participants will:
- Complete baseline questionnaires assessing anxiety-related knowledge, attitudes, and symptoms
- Be randomly assigned to one of three groups: AI psychoeducation chatbot, AI psychoeducation chatbot plus anxiety simulation chatbots, or text-based psychoeducation
- Use the assigned intervention over a one-week period
- Complete follow-up questionnaires immediately after the intervention and at later follow-up time points
- Conditions
- Anxiety Literacy, Anxiety Disorders, Mental Health Literacy
- Being tested
- AI Anxiety Literacy Education, AI Anxiety Friend Simulation, Text-Based Anxiety Psychoeducation
- Medical subject headings
- Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AI Anxiety Literacy EducationBehavioural
AI Anxiety Literacy Education is an AI-powered, psychologically informed chatbot designed to improve mental health literacy related to anxiety through conversational education.
The chatbot delivers structured modules covering the definition of anxiety, common cognitive, emotional, physical, and behavioral symptoms, contributing factors, treatment options, and practical self-help strategies.
Content is presented in non-clinical language and adapted to user responses through guided questions and feedback, encouraging users to reflect on their own experiences.
AI Anxiety Friend SimulationBehavioural
AI Anxiety Friend Simulation is an AI-powered conversational intervention designed to allow participants to practice recognizing and responding to anxiety-related experiences in a simulated interaction. The chatbot role-plays individuals experiencing different anxiety presentations and communicates in a natural, everyday manner that may include uncertainty, emotional reactions, or defensiveness.
Participants are guided to identify anxiety symptoms, explore causes, and propose supportive responses. The chatbot provides feedback and prompts reflection based on participants' responses. Participants access the simulation online and complete multiple simulated conversations over a one-week period.
Text-Based Anxiety PsychoeducationBehavioural
Text-Based Anxiety Psychoeducation consists of written educational materials providing information about anxiety in a non-clinical, accessible format. The materials cover the definition of anxiety, common cognitive, emotional, physical, and behavioral symptoms, contributing factors, and general coping and self-help strategies. Participants access the materials online and are instructed to review all content within a one-week period. The materials are static and do not provide interactive feedback or personalized responses.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AI Educator Only | Experimental | Participants will interact with the AI-powered psychoeducation chatbot for one week. The chatbot delivers structured conversational modules covering anxiety concepts, symptoms, causes, treatment options, and self-help strategies. Receives: Behavioral: AI Anxiety Literacy Education |
| AI Educator + AI Anxiety Friend Simulators | Experimental | Participants will first complete all AI Educator modules and then interact with five AI Anxiety Friend Simulators over one week. Each simulator represents a distinct anxiety presentation and prompts participants to identify symptoms, explore mechanisms, and propose support strategies. Receives: Behavioral: AI Anxiety Literacy Education; Behavioral: AI Anxiety Friend Simulation |
| Text-Based Psychoeducation | Active comparator | Participants will receive standard text-based psychoeducation materials about anxiety, including definitions, symptoms, causes, and coping strategies, to be completed within one week. Receives: Behavioral: Text-Based Anxiety Psychoeducation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Anxiety Literacy Scale (ALS)
The Anxiety Literacy Scale is a 22-item questionnaire designed to assess individuals' knowledge about anxiety. Each statement is answered using a binary response format (true or false). For each item, participants are also asked to rate their certainty in their response on a 5-point Likert scale. Correct responses are summed to produce a total knowledge score, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety-related mental health literacy. Certainty ratings are used to assess participants' confidence in their knowledge and to examine the calibration between knowledge accuracy and subjective certainty.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Anxiety Stigma Scale
The Anxiety Stigma Scale is designed to measure stigma associated with Anxiety. It has two subscales which measure two different types of stigma: personal and perceived. The Personal Stigma Subscale measures stigma in the respondents own attitudes towards anxiety by asking them to indicate how strongly they personally agree with ten statements about anxiety.
The Perceived Stigma Subscale measures the respondent's perception about the attitudes of others towards anxiety by asking them to indicate what they think most other people believe about the same ten statements.
Responses to each item are measured on a five-point scale (ranging from zero 'strongly disagree' to four 'strongly agree'). Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression stigma.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Adapted General Help-Seeking Questionnaire
The General Help-Seeking Questionnaire (GHSQ) in this study is an adapted 17-item version designed to fit Chinese cultural contexts. It assesses an individual's intentions to seek help for personal or emotional problems from both formal sources (e.g., mental health professionals, doctors) and informal sources (e.g., family, friends). Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("Extremely Unlikely") to 7 ("Extremely Likely"), with higher scores indicating a greater likelihood of seeking help.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Confidence in Helping Others
The Confidence in Helping Others Scale is a self-developed, 13-item questionnaire designed to measure participants' confidence in providing support to individuals experiencing mental health issues. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree"), with higher scores indicating greater confidence in recognizing symptoms, offering emotional support, and encouraging help-seeking.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Mental Health Self-efficacy Scale
The Mental Health Self-efficacy Scale is a 6-item questionnaire designed to measure participants' confidence in effectively manage stress, anxiety or depression about themself. Each item is rated on a 10-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("Not at all confident") to 10 ("Totally confident"), with higher scores indicating greater confidence in self-efficacy about mental health.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Bot Usability Scale
The Bot Usability Scale (BUS) in this study is an adapted 11-item version designed to assess the usability of AI-based chatbots. It evaluates participants' perceptions of the ease of use, effectiveness, efficiency, and overall user experience of the chatbots. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree"), with higher scores indicating better perceived usability. Participants will complete the adapted BUS separately for both the AI Educator and the AI Anxiety Friend Simulators. The adapted BUS maintains the core usability assessment principles of the original scale while being tailored for AI-driven conversational agents.
Measured: post-intervention (1-week)
Secondary outcomes (6)
General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a 7-item self-report questionnaire used to assess the severity of generalized anxiety symptoms over the past two weeks. Each item corresponds to common symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and is rated on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 3 ("Nearly every day"), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) consists of 9 items designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. Each item corresponds to one of the nine DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder and is rated on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 3 ("Nearly every day"), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale
Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale is designed to measure participants' attidudes about uncertaunty. It is a self-developed, 12-item questionnaire, ranging from 1 ("not at all characteristic for me")) to 5 ("entirely characteristic of me"), with higher scores indicating greater intolerance.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Negative Effects Scale, NES
Sometimes programs that aim to improve mental health can also have unwanted effects.The Negative Effects Scale (NES) is a 6-item self-report assessment tool designed to measure the participants' perceptions of unwanted experience. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (" Not at al") to 5 ("Extremely severe"), with higher scores indicating a greater negative Effects.
Measured: post-intervention (1-week)
Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A)
The Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A) is a 20-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess an individual's capacity for empathy, including both cognitive empathy (understanding others' emotions) and affective empathy (sharing others' emotions). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree"), with higher scores indicating greater empathy.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Mental Health Behavior
This questionnaire is self-conducted and assesses the frequency of various mental health-related behaviors over the past month. Participants rate each behavior based on how often they engaged in it, using a 5-point scale (0 = Never, 4 = More than 4 times per week). The results provide insight into individuals' proactive engagement in mental well-being practices.
Measured: pre-intervention, 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jan 2026
- Study start1 Dec 2025
- Primary completion1 Feb 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Anxiety LiteracyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07316374
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Anxiety Literacy AI Chatbot
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of AI-Based Chatbots for Improving Anxiety-Related Mental Health Literacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07316374
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Anxiety Literacy AI Chatbot
- Conditions
- Anxiety Literacy, Anxiety Disorders, Mental Health Literacy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to examine whether AI-based chatbots can improve anxiety-related mental health literacy in adults with varying levels of anxiety. The study aims to learn whether interactive AI chatbots can improve understanding of anxiety, attitudes toward anxiety, help-seeking intentions, confidence in supporting others, and anxiety symptoms, compared with standard text-based educational materials.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does an AI-based psychoeducation chatbot improve anxiety-related mental health literacy compared with text-based psychoeducation?
- Does adding interactive anxiety simulation conversations further improve mental health literacy and related outcomes compared with psychoeducation alone?
Researchers will compare participants who use an AI psychoeducation chatbot alone, participants who use an AI psychoeducation chatbot combined with anxiety simulation chatbots, and participants who receive text-based psychoeducation, to see whether the AI-based interventions lead to greater improvements in mental health literacy and related outcomes.
Participants will:
- Complete baseline questionnaires assessing anxiety-related knowledge, attitudes, and symptoms
- Be randomly assigned to one of three groups: AI psychoeducation chatbot, AI psychoeducation chatbot plus anxiety simulation chatbots, or text-based psychoeducation
- Use the assigned intervention over a one-week period
- Complete follow-up questionnaires immediately after the intervention and at later follow-up time points
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AI Educator Only | Experimental | Behavioral: AI Anxiety Literacy EducationParticipants will interact with the AI-powered psychoeducation chatbot for one week. The chatbot delivers structured conversational modules covering anxiety concepts, symptoms, causes, treatment options, and self-help strategies. |
| AI Educator + AI Anxiety Friend Simulators | Experimental | Behavioral: AI Anxiety Literacy Education, Behavioral: AI Anxiety Friend SimulationParticipants will first complete all AI Educator modules and then interact with five AI Anxiety Friend Simulators over one week. Each simulator represents a distinct anxiety presentation and prompts participants to identify symptoms, explore mechanisms, and propose support strategies. |
| Text-Based Psychoeducation | Active comparator | Behavioral: Text-Based Anxiety PsychoeducationParticipants will receive standard text-based psychoeducation materials about anxiety, including definitions, symptoms, causes, and coping strategies, to be completed within one week. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Aged between 18 and 65 years.
- Able to use digital devices (e.g., smartphone or computer) to complete AI-based conversations and questionnaires.
- Willing to participate in a one-week online intervention.
- Proficient in Chinese and able to understand study instructions and provide informed consent.
- Participants with varying levels of anxiety symptoms are eligible.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Self-reported history of severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder).
- Currently receiving psychological or psychiatric treatment.
- Severe mental health symptoms requiring immediate clinical intervention.
- Inability to use mobile or internet-enabled devices independently.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AI Anxiety Literacy EducationAI Anxiety Literacy Education is an AI-powered, psychologically informed chatbot designed to improve mental health literacy related to anxiety through conversational education. The chatbot delivers structured modules covering the definition of anxiety, common cognitive, emotional, physical, and behavioral symptoms, contributing factors, treatment options, and practical self-help strategies. Content is presented in non-clinical language and adapted to user responses through guided questions and feedback, encouraging users to reflect on their own experiences. | Behavioural | AI Educator + AI Anxiety Friend Simulators, AI Educator Only |
| AI Anxiety Friend SimulationAI Anxiety Friend Simulation is an AI-powered conversational intervention designed to allow participants to practice recognizing and responding to anxiety-related experiences in a simulated interaction. The chatbot role-plays individuals experiencing different anxiety presentations and communicates in a natural, everyday manner that may include uncertainty, emotional reactions, or defensiveness. Participants are guided to identify anxiety symptoms, explore causes, and propose supportive responses. The chatbot provides feedback and prompts reflection based on participants' responses. Participants access the simulation online and complete multiple simulated conversations over a one-week period. | Behavioural | AI Educator + AI Anxiety Friend Simulators |
| Text-Based Anxiety PsychoeducationText-Based Anxiety Psychoeducation consists of written educational materials providing information about anxiety in a non-clinical, accessible format. The materials cover the definition of anxiety, common cognitive, emotional, physical, and behavioral symptoms, contributing factors, and general coping and self-help strategies. Participants access the materials online and are instructed to review all content within a one-week period. The materials are static and do not provide interactive feedback or personalized responses. | Behavioural | Text-Based Psychoeducation |
Primary outcome
Anxiety Literacy Scale (ALS)
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
The Anxiety Literacy Scale is a 22-item questionnaire designed to assess individuals' knowledge about anxiety. Each statement is answered using a binary response format (true or false). For each item, participants are also asked to rate their certainty in their response on a 5-point Likert scale. Correct responses are summed to produce a total knowledge score, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety-related mental health literacy. Certainty ratings are used to assess participants' confidence in their knowledge and to examine the calibration between knowledge accuracy and subjective certainty.
Anxiety Stigma Scale
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
The Anxiety Stigma Scale is designed to measure stigma associated with Anxiety. It has two subscales which measure two different types of stigma: personal and perceived. The Personal Stigma Subscale measures stigma in the respondents own attitudes towards anxiety by asking them to indicate how strongly they personally agree with ten statements about anxiety. The Perceived Stigma Subscale measures the respondent's perception about the attitudes of others towards anxiety by asking them to indicate what they think most other people believe about the same ten statements. Responses to each item are measured on a five-point scale (ranging from zero 'strongly disagree' to four 'strongly agree'). Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression stigma.
Adapted General Help-Seeking Questionnaire
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
The General Help-Seeking Questionnaire (GHSQ) in this study is an adapted 17-item version designed to fit Chinese cultural contexts. It assesses an individual's intentions to seek help for personal or emotional problems from both formal sources (e.g., mental health professionals, doctors) and informal sources (e.g., family, friends). Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("Extremely Unlikely") to 7 ("Extremely Likely"), with higher scores indicating a greater likelihood of seeking help.
Confidence in Helping Others
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
The Confidence in Helping Others Scale is a self-developed, 13-item questionnaire designed to measure participants' confidence in providing support to individuals experiencing mental health issues. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree"), with higher scores indicating greater confidence in recognizing symptoms, offering emotional support, and encouraging help-seeking.
Mental Health Self-efficacy Scale
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
The Mental Health Self-efficacy Scale is a 6-item questionnaire designed to measure participants' confidence in effectively manage stress, anxiety or depression about themself. Each item is rated on a 10-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("Not at all confident") to 10 ("Totally confident"), with higher scores indicating greater confidence in self-efficacy about mental health.
Bot Usability Scale
Time frame: post-intervention (1-week)
The Bot Usability Scale (BUS) in this study is an adapted 11-item version designed to assess the usability of AI-based chatbots. It evaluates participants' perceptions of the ease of use, effectiveness, efficiency, and overall user experience of the chatbots. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree"), with higher scores indicating better perceived usability. Participants will complete the adapted BUS separately for both the AI Educator and the AI Anxiety Friend Simulators. The adapted BUS maintains the core usability assessment principles of the original scale while being tailored for AI-driven conversational agents.
6 secondary outcomes
General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Negative Effects Scale, NES
Time frame: post-intervention (1-week)
Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A)
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Mental Health Behavior
Time frame: pre-intervention, 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Anxiety Literacy
Active, not recruiting
CANCER SCREENING PROGRAM ON UNCERTAINTY, ANTİCİPATORY ANXIETY, CANCER AWARENESS, AND E-HEALTH LITERACY IN A STROKE PATIENTS
Cancer, Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Podcast-supported Education on Climate Change Awareness, Anxiety, and Health Literacy Levels in Nursing Students
Podcast, Nursing Students
RecruitingObservational study
Addressing Pregnant Women's First Trimester Worries and Information Needs With mHealth Solutions
Pregnancy Trimester, First, Anxiety
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Health Surveillance at Constructor University Bremen (CUB)
Social Isolation or Loneliness, Anxiety
Recruiting
A Financial Social Work Intervention for Families With Complex Financial Difficulties (FinSoc)
Financial Difficulties
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing AI Anxiety Literacy Education, AI Anxiety Friend Simulation and Text-Based Anxiety Psychoeducation in people with Anxiety Literacy and Anxiety Disorders, run by Peking University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Anxiety Literacy Scale (ALS) (time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (1-week), 4-week follow-up, 12-week follow-up). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2026.