AzTrials
AzTrials

Stomach CancerNEOTOGASNCT07323186

Evaluation of the NEOmom® Gastric Video Capsule for Gastric Cancer Screening

A study of Stomach Cancer and Diagnosis, run by Nantes University Hospital at 1 site in France.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Gastric cancer remains a major public health concern, with approximately 6,600 new cases diagnosed each year in France. Despite therapeutic progress, its overall prognosis is still poor: the 5-year survival rate across all stages remains below 30%. This survival is closely linked to the stage at diagnosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 74 years
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
15 Dec 2025to 7 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 74 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female patient,
  • Aged between 50 and 74 inclusive with a life expectancy of at least 10 years,
  • Undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy (for colorectal cancer or polyps)
  • Patient who has received verbal and written information as well as a patient booklet on the VCE-CM examination and has given their written informed consent.
  • Patient affiliated with a social security scheme
  • Effective contraception throughout the study for women of childbearing age

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have had or currently have the following (items from the TOGAS pilot study/specific to endoscope use) will not be included in the study:
  • An EOGD in a high-volume endoscopy centre within the last 3 years
  • Known gastric cancer
  • Known genetic cancer syndromes
  • Previous gastrectomy or bariatric gastric surgery
  • Known gastric precancerous condition (gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia)
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the last 4 weeks
  • A coagulation disorder or medication that prevents biopsy sampling
  • A risk associated with sedation or anaesthesia
  • Severe heart disease
  • An inability to actively consent to participation in the study, and patients under guardianship or legal protection.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients will not be included.
  • Patients with the following conditions (specific to VCE-CM examination) will not be included in the study:
  • Swallowing disorders or known gastroparesis
  • A history of digestive surgery
  • Clinical or radiological signs suggestive of narrowing of the digestive tract
  • An occlusive or sub-occlusive condition, a known or suspected history of stenosis or digestive fistula
  • Left heart failure with orthopnoea
  • Overweight (> 135 kg)
  • Reduced mobility (i.e. unable to transfer or move themselves)
  • Persons with pacemakers, defibrillators or metallic foreign bodies (with the exception of dental implants) will not be included in order to avoid interference with the robot.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Selma El Andaloussi, Project Manager contact

FRANCE +33 2 53 48 28 35

selma.elandaloussi@chu-nantes.fr

France1 site
  • Nantes University Hospital

    Nantes, 44000

    Emmanuel CORON, PU-PH, France +33 02 40 08 31 52, emmanuel.coron@chu-nantes.fr

Other trials in France

About this study

Gastric cancer remains a major public health concern, with approximately 6,600 new cases diagnosed each year in France. Despite therapeutic progress, its overall prognosis is still poor: the 5-year survival rate across all stages remains below 30%. This survival is closely linked to the stage at diagnosis. Early-stage gastric cancer has an excellent prognosis, with survival rates above 90%, while advanced-stage disease shows survival below 10%. This dramatic contrast underscores the critical need to develop and implement approaches that enable earlier and more reliable diagnosis. Early detection is therefore one of the most powerful strategies to reduce mortality from this severe and often silent disease.

Within this context, the overall ambition of the NEOTOGAS project is to contribute to lowering gastric-cancer mortality by improving the ability to diagnose the disease at an early, more treatable stage. The project positions itself within the broader field of prevention, targeting one of the leading and most challenging public health issues. Gastric cancer is often a potentially fatal condition that typically develops over many years, most commonly as a consequence of chronic infection with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Identifying precancerous gastric lesions before the appearance of invasive cancer thus represents a strategic priority for the healthcare system.

Read more

Our central hypothesis is that a non-invasive, robot-assisted endoscopic approach using a magnetic-guided capsule-the NEOMOM system-will prove effective for detecting precancerous gastric lesions. If validated, this technology could form the foundation of an organized, large-scale screening program. Such a screening strategy would represent a major innovation, particularly in populations at higher risk due to H. pylori infection or other predispositions. The ability to offer a less invasive, more accessible examination could significantly increase screening adherence and facilitate earlier diagnosis.

The NEOTOGAS study is based on an innovative combination of technologies: a magnetic-guided videocapsule steered inside the stomach using the NEOMOM robot, supported by artificial intelligence to assist image acquisition and interpretation. The study aims to assess the level of concordance between lesion detection through the current gold-standard procedure (conventional endoscopy) and this new capsule-based examination. Beyond diagnostic performance, the project also integrates several essential dimensions for future implementation: patient acceptability of the procedure, overall cost, duration of the examination, and the potential clinical and organizational benefits of this alternative approach.

A key component of the project is the creation of high-quality image banks. These will support the development of advanced AI models capable of enhancing lesion detection and ensuring the completeness of the stomach examination. Such resources will be instrumental in evaluating whether magnetic-guided capsule endoscopy could realistically be integrated into structured gastric cancer screening pathways in the future. The project therefore aims not only to evaluate a device, but also to explore its broader screening potential and its capacity to transform clinical practice.

The primary objective of the NEOTOGAS study is to rigorously assess the performance of this innovative medical device, which combines magnetic navigation with AI-assisted image interpretation, in detecting gastric lesions. The AI module plays a dual role: ensuring that the entire stomach is adequately explored and helping highlight images of interest for clinicians during analysis. By improving both completeness and accuracy, the technology could represent a significant advancement over existing non-invasive diagnostic tools.

To achieve these goals, the study plans to include a total of 100 patients over a 6-month period. This sample size will allow a robust comparison of diagnostic concordance while providing sufficient data to evaluate feasibility, patient experience, and operational parameters. The findings of NEOTOGAS will determine whether magnetic-guided capsule endoscopy can be considered a relevant and effective method for future organized gastric cancer screening programs.

Being tested
Magnetically controlled video capsule endoscopy (MC-VCE)
Keywords
stomach cancer
Medical subject headings
Stomach Neoplasms, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Magnetically controlled video capsule endoscopy (MC-VCE)Device

    -Intervention 1 description: Ingestion of the NEOMOM® magnetically controlled video capsule, guided by an external magnetic field and coupled with an artificial intelligence module to ensure completeness of gastric examination and assist in lesion detection.

    -Intervention 2 Description: Conventional oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy performed according to standard clinical practice.

Study groups in NCT07323186
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
magnetically controlled video capsule endoscope + Standard EGDExperimentalParticipants undergo both magnetically controlled video capsule endoscopy and standard oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy during the same visit, allowing intra-patient comparison of lesion detection.
Receives: Device: Magnetically controlled video capsule endoscopy (MC-VCE)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Lesion-level concordance in gastric lesion detection between magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy and standard oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy

    Lesion-level concordance between magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy (MC-VCE) and standard oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy (EGD) for the detection of gastric lesions.

    Concordance will be expressed as agreement between the two modalities based on paired lesion detection (presence/absence), using expert review of recorded examinations.

    In case of discordant findings, an independent adjudication committee composed of two expert clinicians blinded to the initial readings will determine the final classification.

    Measured: Periprocedural (during the study visit) through image review within 72 hours after the examination (up to Day 8 in case of delayed capsule excretion)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Completeness of gastric examination assessed by magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy compared with standard oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy

    Proportion of complete gastric examinations achieved with magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy, as assessed by expert clinicians and compared with standard oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy.

    Completeness is defined as visualization of all predefined gastric anatomical regions.

    Measured: Periprocedural (during the study visit) through image review within 72 hours after the examination

  2. Lesion-by-lesion diagnostic performance of magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy compared with standard oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy

    Lesion-by-lesion diagnostic performance of magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy compared with standard oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy, expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, using EGD as the reference standard.

    Measured: Periprocedural (during the study visit) through image review within 72 hours after the examination

  3. Diagnostic performance of magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy for major gastric lesions compared with standard oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy

    Diagnostic performance of magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy for predefined major gastric lesions (gastric tumors, gastric ulcers, gastric cancer), expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, using standard oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy as the reference standard.

    Measured: Periprocedural (during the study visit) through image review within 72 hours after the examination

  4. Concordance between expert reading and artificial intelligence-assisted reading of magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy images

    Lesion detection concordance between conventional expert clinician reading and automated reading using the artificial intelligence module (Vue Smart V7 software) applied to magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy images.

    Diagnostic performance will be expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of AI-assisted reading compared with expert clinician interpretation

    Measured: Image review within 72 hours after the examination

  5. Diagnostic concordance between non-invasive blood tests combined with magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy and biopsies combined with standard oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy

    Diagnostic concordance between magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy combined with predefined non-invasive blood tests and standard oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy combined with gastric biopsies, based on final diagnostic classification

    Measured: Periprocedural (during the study visit) through availability of histological results (up to Day 8)

  6. Patient-reported acceptability score of magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy

    Patient-reported acceptability of magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy measured using a structured questionnaire with an ordinal scale.

    Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better acceptability.

    Measured: Within 24 hours after completion of the magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jan 2026
  2. Study start15 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 May 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion7 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07323186
Sponsor's protocol ID
RC25_0258
Acronym
NEOTOGAS
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
4 Dec 2025
Last updated
7 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study of Stomach Cancer and Diagnosis, run by Nantes University Hospital at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Selma El Andaloussi, Project Manager (FRANCE +33 2 53 48 28 35, selma.elandaloussi@chu-nantes.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Lesion-level concordance in gastric lesion detection between magnetic-controlled video capsule endoscopy and standard oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy (time frame: Periprocedural (during the study visit) through image review within 72 hours after the examination (up to Day 8 in case of delayed capsule excretion)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in