Liver CancerNCT07325565
Impact of Emotional Disorders on Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Liver Cancer
An observational study of Liver Cancer and Emotional Disorder, run by Tongji Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries a poor prognosis, with limited efficacy from current therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Concurrently, emotional distress (ED) is highly prevalent in cancer patients and is implicated in tumor progression via neuroendocrine-immune axis dysregulation (e.g.… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Liver Cancer, Emotional Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Scale score
- How many people
- 651 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 20 Dec 2025to 31 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: This study will enroll adult patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve, unresectable HCC or ICC who are scheduled to receive guideline-recommended first-line immunotherapy-based regimens. Eligible participants must have at least one radiologically measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1 criteria, preserved liver function, and a good performance status. This population is designed to evaluate the impact of baseline emotional distress on immunotherapy outcomes in a representative cohort of patients with primary liver cancer initiating standard-of-care treatment.
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 and 75 years, inclusive, regardless of gender.
- Presence of at least one radiologically measurable lesion according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 (defined as a lesion with a longest diameter of ≥10 mm on CT scan).
- Newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).
- Child-Pugh liver function score ≤ 7.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
- Absence of severe organic diseases affecting the heart, lungs, brain, or other major organs.
Who cannot join
- History of other malignancies.
- Recurrent HCC.
- Prior systemic therapy for HCC.
- Hepatic decompensation.
- History of severe psychiatric disorders.
- Current use of antidepressant or anxiolytic medication.
- Inability to comprehend or complete the assessment questionnaires.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430000
Wanguang Zhang, 13886195965, wgzhang@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn
About this study
Official title: Impact of Emotional Disorders on Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Liver Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective, Multi-Cohort Study
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries a poor prognosis, with limited efficacy from current therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Concurrently, emotional distress (ED) is highly prevalent in cancer patients and is implicated in tumor progression via neuroendocrine-immune axis dysregulation (e.g., HPA axis activation, immunosuppressive TME). Emerging evidence, particularly from lung cancer, suggests ED may adversely impact ICI efficacy. However, its specific role and clinical significance in HCC, especially regarding ICI response, remain poorly understood.
To address this gap, we propose a large-scale, prospective, multicenter, multi-cohort study to systematically evaluate the impact of ED on treatment outcomes in HCC patients receiving immunotherapy.
Read the detailed description
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries a poor prognosis, with limited efficacy from current therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Concurrently, emotional distress (ED) is highly prevalent in cancer patients and is implicated in tumor progression via neuroendocrine-immune axis dysregulation (e.g., HPA axis activation, immunosuppressive TME). Emerging evidence, particularly from lung cancer, suggests ED may adversely impact ICI efficacy. However, its specific role and clinical significance in HCC, especially regarding ICI response, remain poorly understood.
To address this gap, we propose a large-scale, prospective, multicenter, multi-cohort study to systematically evaluate the impact of ED on treatment outcomes in HCC patients receiving immunotherapy.
This multi-cohort study comprises three independent cohorts:
Cohort 1: Impact of ED on first-line therapy for advanced, unresectable HCC (n=243).
In the recently published LEAP-012 study, the median progression-free survival (PFS) for advanced HCC receiving first-line transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy was 14.6 months. Based on an observed median PFS of 14.6 months for the overall population, a hazard ratio (HR) for tumor progression of approximately 1.7 for the ED group, and an estimated ED prevalence of 48.89%, we assumed exponential survival distributions for both groups. The overall survival function was constructed as:
S(t) = 0.4889 × exp(-1.7λ₀t) + 0.5111 × exp(-λ₀t) where λ₀ is the hazard rate for the non-ED group. Solving the key equation S(14.6)=0.5 numerically yields λ₀ ≈ 0.0357 per month. Consequently: Median PFS for the non-ED group = ln(2)/λ₀ ≈ 19.4 months Median PFS for the ED group = 19.4 / 1.7 ≈ 11.2 months With a two-sided alpha of 0.05, power (1-β) of 0.8, an accrual period of 12 months, and a maximum follow-up of 18 months, analysis using PASS 15 software indicated a required sample size of 194 subjects. Accounting for an estimated 20% dropout rate, a total of 243 participants will be enrolled.
Cohort 2: Impact of ED on first-line therapy for advanced, unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) (n=175).
In the TOPAZ-1 study, the median PFS for advanced biliary tract cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy combined with durvalumab was 12.9 months. Using the same calculation method as for Cohort 1, the estimated median PFS is approximately 9.8 months for the ED group and 17.0 months for the non-ED group. Considering the lower incidence of ICC, a longer accrual period is required. With a two-sided alpha of 0.05, power of 0.8, an accrual period of 24 months, and a maximum follow-up of 30 months, PASS 15 analysis indicated a required sample size of 140 subjects. Accounting for a 20% dropout rate, a total of 175 participants will be enrolled.
Cohort 3: Impact of ED on postoperative recurrence in resectable high-risk HCC (n=233).
In early-stage resectable HCC, patients with high-risk recurrence factors often experience early recurrence, with a reported median disease-free survival (DFS) of approximately 21.4 months. Using the same calculation method as for Cohort 1, the estimated median DFS is approximately 16.2 months for the ED group and 28.1 months for the non-ED group. With a two-sided alpha of 0.05, power of 0.8, an accrual period of 12 months, and a maximum follow-up of 24 months, PASS 15 analysis indicated a required sample size of 186 subjects. Accounting for a 20% dropout rate, a total of 233 participants will be enrolled.
- Conditions
- Liver Cancer, Emotional Disorder
- Being tested
- Scale score
- Medical subject headings
- Liver Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Scale scoreOther
- The PHQ-9 rating scale and GAD-7 rating scale were used to screen for depression and anxiety symptoms in cancer patients;
- The PSQI was used to assess the sleep quality index of cancer patients; ③ The PHQ-9 rating scale and GAD-7 rating scale were used to evaluate the depression and anxiety status of patient caregivers; ④ The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used to assess the quality of life of cancer patients.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced unresectable HCC cohort | Cohort 1: Impact of ED on first-line therapy for advanced, unresectable HCC (n=243) Receives: Other: Scale score | |
| Advanced unresectable ICC cohort | Cohort 2: Impact of ED on first-line therapy for advanced, unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) (n=175) Receives: Other: Scale score | |
| Resectable high-risk HCC cohort | Cohort 3: Impact of ED on postoperative recurrence in resectable high-risk HCC (n=233) Receives: Other: Scale score |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free survival(PFS)
In the three cohorts, PFS following immunotherapy was compared between primary liver cancer patients with and without emotional disorders.
Measured: From date of enrollment until the date of first progress or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Overall survival(OS)
In the three cohorts, OS following immunotherapy was compared between primary liver cancer patients with and without emotional disorders.
Measured: From date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 96 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jan 2026
- Study start20 Dec 2025
- Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Liver CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Tongji HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 651 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tongji Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Wan-Guang Zhang, Tongji Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07325565
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHALLENGE-03
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 24 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 8 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Emotional Disorders on Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Liver Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective, Multi-Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07325565
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHALLENGE-03
- Conditions
- Liver Cancer, Emotional Disorder
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 651 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tongji HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries a poor prognosis, with limited efficacy from current therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Concurrently, emotional distress (ED) is highly prevalent in cancer patients and is implicated in tumor progression via neuroendocrine-immune axis dysregulation (e.g., HPA axis activation, immunosuppressive TME). Emerging evidence, particularly from lung cancer, suggests ED may adversely impact ICI efficacy. However, its specific role and clinical significance in HCC, especially regarding ICI response, remain poorly understood.
To address this gap, we propose a large-scale, prospective, multicenter, multi-cohort study to systematically evaluate the impact of ED on treatment outcomes in HCC patients receiving immunotherapy.
Detailed description
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries a poor prognosis, with limited efficacy from current therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Concurrently, emotional distress (ED) is highly prevalent in cancer patients and is implicated in tumor progression via neuroendocrine-immune axis dysregulation (e.g., HPA axis activation, immunosuppressive TME). Emerging evidence, particularly from lung cancer, suggests ED may adversely impact ICI efficacy. However, its specific role and clinical significance in HCC, especially regarding ICI response, remain poorly understood.
To address this gap, we propose a large-scale, prospective, multicenter, multi-cohort study to systematically evaluate the impact of ED on treatment outcomes in HCC patients receiving immunotherapy.
This multi-cohort study comprises three independent cohorts:
Cohort 1: Impact of ED on first-line therapy for advanced, unresectable HCC (n=243).
In the recently published LEAP-012 study, the median progression-free survival (PFS) for advanced HCC receiving first-line transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy was 14.6 months. Based on an observed median PFS of 14.6 months for the overall population, a hazard ratio (HR) for tumor progression of approximately 1.7 for the ED group, and an estimated ED prevalence of 48.89%, we assumed exponential survival distributions for both groups. The overall survival function was constructed as:
S(t) = 0.4889 × exp(-1.7λ₀t) + 0.5111 × exp(-λ₀t) where λ₀ is the hazard rate for the non-ED group. Solving the key equation S(14.6)=0.5 numerically yields λ₀ ≈ 0.0357 per month. Consequently: Median PFS for the non-ED group = ln(2)/λ₀ ≈ 19.4 months Median PFS for the ED group = 19.4 / 1.7 ≈ 11.2 months With a two-sided alpha of 0.05, power (1-β) of 0.8, an accrual period of 12 months, and a maximum follow-up of 18 months, analysis using PASS 15 software indicated a required sample size of 194 subjects. Accounting for an estimated 20% dropout rate, a total of 243 participants will be enrolled.
Cohort 2: Impact of ED on first-line therapy for advanced, unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) (n=175).
In the TOPAZ-1 study, the median PFS for advanced biliary tract cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy combined with durvalumab was 12.9 months. Using the same calculation method as for Cohort 1, the estimated median PFS is approximately 9.8 months for the ED group and 17.0 months for the non-ED group. Considering the lower incidence of ICC, a longer accrual period is required. With a two-sided alpha of 0.05, power of 0.8, an accrual period of 24 months, and a maximum follow-up of 30 months, PASS 15 analysis indicated a required sample size of 140 subjects. Accounting for a 20% dropout rate, a total of 175 participants will be enrolled.
Cohort 3: Impact of ED on postoperative recurrence in resectable high-risk HCC (n=233).
In early-stage resectable HCC, patients with high-risk recurrence factors often experience early recurrence, with a reported median disease-free survival (DFS) of approximately 21.4 months. Using the same calculation method as for Cohort 1, the estimated median DFS is approximately 16.2 months for the ED group and 28.1 months for the non-ED group. With a two-sided alpha of 0.05, power of 0.8, an accrual period of 12 months, and a maximum follow-up of 24 months, PASS 15 analysis indicated a required sample size of 186 subjects. Accounting for a 20% dropout rate, a total of 233 participants will be enrolled.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced unresectable HCC cohort | – | Other: Scale scoreCohort 1: Impact of ED on first-line therapy for advanced, unresectable HCC (n=243) |
| Advanced unresectable ICC cohort | – | Other: Scale scoreCohort 2: Impact of ED on first-line therapy for advanced, unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) (n=175) |
| Resectable high-risk HCC cohort | – | Other: Scale scoreCohort 3: Impact of ED on postoperative recurrence in resectable high-risk HCC (n=233) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This study will enroll adult patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve, unresectable HCC or ICC who are scheduled to receive guideline-recommended first-line immunotherapy-based regimens. Eligible participants must have at least one radiologically measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1 criteria, preserved liver function, and a good performance status. This population is designed to evaluate the impact of baseline emotional distress on immunotherapy outcomes in a representative cohort of patients with primary liver cancer initiating standard-of-care treatment.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age between 18 and 75 years, inclusive, regardless of gender.
- Presence of at least one radiologically measurable lesion according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 (defined as a lesion with a longest diameter of ≥10 mm on CT scan).
- Newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).
- Child-Pugh liver function score ≤ 7.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- History of other malignancies.
- Recurrent HCC.
- Prior systemic therapy for HCC.
- Hepatic decompensation.
- History of severe psychiatric disorders.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Scale score* The PHQ-9 rating scale and GAD-7 rating scale were used to screen for depression and anxiety symptoms in cancer patients; * The PSQI was used to assess the sleep quality index of cancer patients; ③ The PHQ-9 rating scale and GAD-7 rating scale were used to evaluate the depression and anxiety status of patient caregivers; ④ The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. | Other | Advanced unresectable HCC cohort, Advanced unresectable ICC cohort, Resectable high-risk HCC cohort |
Primary outcome
Progression-free survival(PFS)
Time frame: From date of enrollment until the date of first progress or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months.
In the three cohorts, PFS following immunotherapy was compared between primary liver cancer patients with and without emotional disorders.
1 secondary outcome
Overall survival(OS)
Time frame: From date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 96 months.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jan 2026.
Related trials for Liver Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
SAMe in Prevention of Oxaliplatin-associated Liver Injury
Colorectal Cancer, Liver Metastases
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Liver Cancer and Emotional Disorder, run by Tongji Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Wanguang Zhang (13886195965, wgzhang@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free survival(PFS) (time frame: From date of enrollment until the date of first progress or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.