RehabilitationNCT07333079
Rehabilitation With Biofeedback for People After Stroke
A study testing Biofeedback method using the Biometrics E-link (group I) and Stella Bio (group II) devices. in people with Rehabilitation and Stroke, run by University of Rzeszow at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
The aim of the research will be to evaluate rehabilitation using the biofeedback method in people after stroke. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Rehabilitation, Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Biofeedback method using the Biometrics E-link (group I) and Stella Bio (group II) devices.
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- 19 Jan 2026to 30 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- informed, voluntary consent of the patient
- age 45-80 years
- elementary (basic) gripping ability
- degree of paresis of the upper limb and hand 4 -5 on the Brunnström scale
- degree of disability on the Rankin scale 3
- spastic tension of the upper limb, paresis hand not more than 3 on the modified Ashworth scale - current health condition confirmed by a medical examination, allowing participation in tests and exercises
Who cannot join
- lack of informed, voluntary consent of the patient
- second or subsequent stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, stroke of the brainstem and cerebellum
- disorders of higher mental functions limiting comprehension and carrying out tasks during exercises
- visual field disturbances
- mechanical and thermal injuries that may limit the grasping function of the hand
- concomitant neurological, rheumatological and orthopedic diseases, including permanent - contractures that may affect the grasping ability and locomotion
- unstable medical condition
- failure to complete a 3-week rehabilitation stay
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Poland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Rzeszów
Rzeszów, 35-205
Justyna Leszczak, PhD, +48 721-581-801, leszczakjustyna.ur@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Biofeedback Rehabilitation in People After Stroke
The aim of the research will be to evaluate rehabilitation using the biofeedback method in people after stroke.
Read the detailed description
Study participants will be randomly assigned to a study group and a control group.
- Study group I - will complete a conventional rehabilitation program supplemented with biofeedback exercises using the Biometrics E-link device
- Study group II - will complete a conventional rehabilitation program supplemented with biofeedback exercises using the Stella Bio device
- Control group - will complete a standard spa rehabilitation program without biofeedback exercises.
The study participants will be patients admitted to the Spa and Rehabilitation Hospital in Iwonicz-Zdrój, Poland, after a late-stage stroke.
Patients will undergo continuous inpatient rehabilitation (3 weeks). The first examination will be conducted on the day of hospital admission, the second on the day of discharge, and the third (follow-up) 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit.
Prior to the study, a socio-demographic questionnaire will be administered, including questions about education, marital status, and place of residence.
Measurements will be performed three times for all participants:
- hand muscle strength assessment
- calculated body mass index (BMI)
- proprioceptive testing (mirror test, Thumb Location Test)
- rehabilitation outcome assessment
- functional capacity - Barthel Index, ADL
- Ashworth muscle tone (spasticity)
- hand dexterity using the Box and Blocks test
- hand grip function according to the Frenchay scale
- motor function of the hand and upper limb according to the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity
- Conditions
- Rehabilitation, Stroke
- Being tested
- Biofeedback method using the Biometrics E-link (group I) and Stella Bio (group II) devices.
- Keywords
- Rehabilitation, Late period in stroke, Health-resort based rehabilitation, Conventional (traditional) rehabilitation, Modern technologies, Biofeedback
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Biofeedback method using the Biometrics E-link (group I) and Stella Bio (group II) devices.Other
Patients in study groups I and II will also receive 30 minutes daily of hand biofeedback training using the Biometrics E-link device (group I) and hand biofeedback training using the Stella Bio device (group II).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group I-Biofeedback method using the Biometrics E-link device and Health-resort based rehabilitation | Experimental | The rehabilitation program will last three weeks, Monday through Friday. Patients will benefit from group and individual exercises (active and assisted exercises, manipulative exercises, PNF-based exercises, balance and breathing exercises), manual massage, and physical treatments such as laser therapy, jacuzzi, mud packs, carbonic acid therapy, TENS therapy, BIO-V lamp, and local cryotherapy. Additionally, patients will receive 30 minutes per day of hand biofeedback training using the Biometrics E-link device. Receives: Other: Biofeedback method using the Biometrics E-link (group I) and Stella Bio (group II) devices. |
| Group II -Biofeedback method using the Stella Bio device and Health-resort based rehabilitation. | Experimental | The rehabilitation program will last three weeks, Monday through Friday. Patients will benefit from group and individual exercises (active and assisted exercises, manipulative exercises, PNF-based exercises, balance and breathing exercises), manual massage, and physical treatments such as laser therapy, jacuzzi, mud packs, carbonic acid therapy, TENS therapy, BIO-V lamp, and local cryotherapy. Additionally, patients will receive 30 minutes per day of hand biofeedback training using the Stella Bio device. Receives: Other: Biofeedback method using the Biometrics E-link (group I) and Stella Bio (group II) devices. |
| Health-resort based rehabilitation. | No intervention | Health-resort based rehabilitation Control group - health-resort based treatments, without biofeedback training. Health-resort based rehabilitation The rehabilitation programme will last 3 weeks from Monday to Friday. Patients will receive: group and individual exercises (active and assisted exercises, manipulative exercises, PNF-based exercises, balance and breathing exercises), manual massage, physical treatments such as laser, whirlpool, mud packs, carbonic acid therapy , TENS therapy, BIO-V lamp, local cryotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
Secondary outcomes (18)
Hand grip strength
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg,
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Hand grip strength
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Hand grip strength
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg,
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Activities of daily living were assessed using Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
A maximum of 100 points can be obtained on the Barthel scale. There are three assessment ranges: getting from 0 to 20 points. means total dependence, from 20 to 80 points. means that to some extent the patient needs help from others, and the assessment in the border is 80 to 100 points. means that with a little help the patient can function alone.
0-20 points patient's condition "light" 21-85 points - "medium-heavy" patient condition 86-100 points - patient condition "very heavy"
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Activities of daily living were assessed using Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
A maximum of 100 points can be obtained on the Barthel scale. There are three assessment ranges: getting from 0 to 20 points. means total dependence, from 20 to 80 points. means that to some extent the patient needs help from others, and the assessment in the border is 80 to 100 points. means that with a little help the patient can function alone.
0-20 points patient's condition "light" 21-85 points - "medium-heavy" patient condition 86-100 points - patient condition "very heavy"
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Activities of daily living were assessed using Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
A maximum of 100 points can be obtained on the Barthel scale. There are three assessment ranges: getting from 0 to 20 points. means total dependence, from 20 to 80 points. means that to some extent the patient needs help from others, and the assessment in the border is 80 to 100 points. means that with a little help the patient can function alone.
0-20 points patient's condition "light" 21-85 points - "medium-heavy" patient condition 86-100 points - patient condition "very heavy"
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks. The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks. The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks. The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
. Thumb Localizing Test (TLT). (A) positioning of the paretic UE by the examiner. (B) four spaces in which the paretic UE is placed. Distal spaces are not far from the trunk because the reaching limb should be able to reach them without difficulty. (C) rating of positive results.
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
. Thumb Localizing Test (TLT). (A) positioning of the paretic UE by the examiner. (B) four spaces in which the paretic UE is placed. Distal spaces are not far from the trunk because the reaching limb should be able to reach them without difficulty. (C) rating of positive results.
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
. Thumb Localizing Test (TLT). (A) positioning of the paretic UE by the examiner. (B) four spaces in which the paretic UE is placed. Distal spaces are not far from the trunk because the reaching limb should be able to reach them without difficulty. (C) rating of positive results.
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
Proprioception was assessed using a mirror tester for elbow flexion and dorsal and palmar flexion of the radiocarpal joint
Assessments were performed with eyes closed. Proprioception of the elbow joint was assessed in the 60° elbow flexion position using a plastic Jamar goniometer. The initial fixed axis of the goniometer was set at the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, and the mobile axis was set parallel to the radius, in accordance with the methodology of the study of joint position sensation in the elbow
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Proprioception was assessed using a mirror tester for elbow flexion and dorsal and palmar flexion of the radiocarpal joint
Assessments were performed with eyes closed. Proprioception of the elbow joint was assessed in the 60° elbow flexion position using a plastic Jamar goniometer. The initial fixed axis of the goniometer was set at the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, and the mobile axis was set parallel to the radius, in accordance with the methodology of the study of joint position sensation in the elbow
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Proprioception was assessed using a mirror tester for elbow flexion and dorsal and palmar flexion of the radiocarpal joint
Assessments were performed with eyes closed. Proprioception of the elbow joint was assessed in the 60° elbow flexion position using a plastic Jamar goniometer. The initial fixed axis of the goniometer was set at the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, and the mobile axis was set parallel to the radius, in accordance with the methodology of the study of joint position sensation in the elbow
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
The scale consists of 7 tasks (pass/fail grading); the patient is awarded 1 point for each activity performed successfully, or 0 points for a failure to perform. The maximum score of seven points may be achieved for the performance of the tasks. Higher score corresponds to better manual skills. The scale measures the proximal control of the upper limb and the manual skills.
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
The scale consists of 7 tasks (pass/fail grading); the patient is awarded 1 point for each activity performed successfully, or 0 points for a failure to perform. The maximum score of seven points may be achieved for the performance of the tasks. Higher score corresponds to better manual skills. The scale measures the proximal control of the upper limb and the manual skills.
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
The scale consists of 7 tasks (pass/fail grading); the patient is awarded 1 point for each activity performed successfully, or 0 points for a failure to perform. The maximum score of seven points may be achieved for the performance of the tasks. Higher score corresponds to better manual skills. The scale measures the proximal control of the upper limb and the manual skills.
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jan 2026
- Study start19 Jan 2026
- Primary completion30 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for RehabilitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Random selection into groups (study group I, study group II and control group).
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Rzeszow
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Justyna Leszczak, University of Rzeszow
- Investigators
- Justyna Leszczak, PhD, Principal investigator, Univeristy of Rzeszów
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07333079
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Stroke rehabilitation
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 25 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Biofeedback Rehabilitation in People After Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07333079
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Stroke rehabilitation
- Conditions
- Rehabilitation, Stroke
- Keywords
- Rehabilitation, Late period in stroke, Health-resort based rehabilitation, Conventional (traditional) rehabilitation, Modern technologies, Biofeedback
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of RzeszowUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the research will be to evaluate rehabilitation using the biofeedback method in people after stroke.
Detailed description
Study participants will be randomly assigned to a study group and a control group.
- Study group I - will complete a conventional rehabilitation program supplemented with biofeedback exercises using the Biometrics E-link device
- Study group II - will complete a conventional rehabilitation program supplemented with biofeedback exercises using the Stella Bio device
- Control group - will complete a standard spa rehabilitation program without biofeedback exercises.
The study participants will be patients admitted to the Spa and Rehabilitation Hospital in Iwonicz-Zdrój, Poland, after a late-stage stroke.
Patients will undergo continuous inpatient rehabilitation (3 weeks). The first examination will be conducted on the day of hospital admission, the second on the day of discharge, and the third (follow-up) 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit.
Prior to the study, a socio-demographic questionnaire will be administered, including questions about education, marital status, and place of residence.
Measurements will be performed three times for all participants:
- hand muscle strength assessment
- calculated body mass index (BMI)
- proprioceptive testing (mirror test, Thumb Location Test)
- rehabilitation outcome assessment
- functional capacity - Barthel Index, ADL
- Ashworth muscle tone (spasticity)
- hand dexterity using the Box and Blocks test
- hand grip function according to the Frenchay scale
- motor function of the hand and upper limb according to the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Random selection into groups (study group I, study group II and control group).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group I-Biofeedback method using the Biometrics E-link device and Health-resort based rehabilitation | Experimental | Other: Biofeedback method using the Biometrics E-link (group I) and Stella Bio (group II) devices.The rehabilitation program will last three weeks, Monday through Friday. Patients will benefit from group and individual exercises (active and assisted exercises, manipulative exercises, PNF-based exercises, balance and breathing exercises), manual massage, and physical treatments such as laser therapy, jacuzzi, mud packs, carbonic acid therapy, TENS therapy, BIO-V lamp, and local cryotherapy. Additionally, patients will receive 30 minutes per day of hand biofeedback training using the Biometrics E-link device. |
| Group II -Biofeedback method using the Stella Bio device and Health-resort based rehabilitation. | Experimental | Other: Biofeedback method using the Biometrics E-link (group I) and Stella Bio (group II) devices.The rehabilitation program will last three weeks, Monday through Friday. Patients will benefit from group and individual exercises (active and assisted exercises, manipulative exercises, PNF-based exercises, balance and breathing exercises), manual massage, and physical treatments such as laser therapy, jacuzzi, mud packs, carbonic acid therapy, TENS therapy, BIO-V lamp, and local cryotherapy. Additionally, patients will receive 30 minutes per day of hand biofeedback training using the Stella Bio device. |
| Health-resort based rehabilitation. | No intervention | –Health-resort based rehabilitation Control group - health-resort based treatments, without biofeedback training. Health-resort based rehabilitation The rehabilitation programme will last 3 weeks from Monday to Friday. Patients will receive: group and individual exercises (active and assisted exercises, manipulative exercises, PNF-based exercises, balance and breathing exercises), manual massage, physical treatments such as laser, whirlpool, mud packs, carbonic acid therapy , TENS therapy, BIO-V lamp, local cryotherapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- informed, voluntary consent of the patient
- age 45-80 years
- elementary (basic) gripping ability
- degree of paresis of the upper limb and hand 4 -5 on the Brunnström scale
- degree of disability on the Rankin scale 3
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- lack of informed, voluntary consent of the patient
- second or subsequent stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, stroke of the brainstem and cerebellum
- disorders of higher mental functions limiting comprehension and carrying out tasks during exercises
- visual field disturbances
- mechanical and thermal injuries that may limit the grasping function of the hand
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Biofeedback method using the Biometrics E-link (group I) and Stella Bio (group II) devices.Patients in study groups I and II will also receive 30 minutes daily of hand biofeedback training using the Biometrics E-link device (group I) and hand biofeedback training using the Stella Bio device (group II). | Other | Group I-Biofeedback method using the Biometrics E-link device and Health-resort based rehabilitation, Group II -Biofeedback method using the Stella Bio device and Health-resort based rehabilitation. |
Primary outcome
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
18 secondary outcomes
Hand grip strength
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Hand grip strength
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Hand grip strength
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
Proprioception was assessed using a mirror tester for elbow flexion and dorsal and palmar flexion of the radiocarpal joint
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Proprioception was assessed using a mirror tester for elbow flexion and dorsal and palmar flexion of the radiocarpal joint
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Proprioception was assessed using a mirror tester for elbow flexion and dorsal and palmar flexion of the radiocarpal joint
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - 3 months after hospital discharge, during a follow-up visit
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Feb 2026.
Related trials for Rehabilitation
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Effects of Virtual Reality and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Stabilometric Platform to Improve Standing Balance in Patients With Friedreich's Ataxia
Friedreich Ataxia
Enrolling by invitation
Brief Prolonged Exposure Therapy Versus Clinical Standard to Reduce Posttraumatic Stress Post Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, PTSD
Not yet recruiting
The Effects of an Augmented Reality-Based Mirror Therapy System in Patients With Stroke
Stroke
Recruiting
Baduanjin Rehabilitation for Functional Restoration in ICI-Associated Myocarditis
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Related Myocarditis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Justyna Leszczak, PhD principal investigator
Univeristy of Rzeszów
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Biofeedback method using the Biometrics E-link (group I) and Stella Bio (group II) devices. in people with Rehabilitation and Stroke, run by University of Rzeszow at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Justyna Leszczak, PhD (+48721581801, jleszczak@ur.edu.pl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale (time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2026.