HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis UseNCT07335289
PrEP4U: Assessing the Effectiveness of Integrated Same-Day Lenacapavir Initiation and Follow-up Choice on PrEP Persistence
A study testing Choice of follow up and Follow up via standard clinic in people with HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
PrEP4U is designed as a pragmatic, randomized implementation trial to test strategies that could directly inform real-world roll-out of lenacapavir. By integrating: Same-day initiation based on rapid HIV testing, and Choice of follow-up delivery location (home, community, or clinic) the study addresses two of the most… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use
- What is being tested?
- Choice of follow up and Follow up via standard clinic
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Jul 2026to 1 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HIV negative
- Eligible for HIV PrEP per CDC guidelines
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
- Willing to receive injectable lenacapavir and adhere to study procedures
- Residing inMassachusetts with expected availability for 6-month follow-up
Who cannot join
- Known HIV infection at baseline
- Contraindication to lenacapavir injection (e.g., hypersensitivity, significant drug interactions)
- Pregnancy at baseline (participants who become pregnant during the trial may remain enrolled if they choose)
- Participation in another interventional HIV prevention study
- Any condition judged by the investigator to compromise safety or study integrity
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Massachusetts General Hospital Sexual Health Clinic
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Kevin Ard, MD, 617 726 2748, kard@mgh.harvard.edu
Kevin Ard, MD
- Recruiting
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Jennifer Manne-Goehler, MD, 6177325500, jmanne@bwh.harvard.edu
Jennifer Manne-Goehler, MD
About this study
PrEP4U is designed as a pragmatic, randomized implementation trial to test strategies that could directly inform real-world roll-out of lenacapavir. By integrating:
- Same-day initiation based on rapid HIV testing, and
- Choice of follow-up delivery location (home, community, or clinic) the study addresses two of the most pressing implementation questions for long-acting injectable PrEP.
Read more
The primary hypothesis is that giving participants choice in follow-up location will improve PrEP persistence compared to a clinic-only model. Secondary analyses will evaluate safety of rapid testing, acceptability, and participant costs. Exploratory analyses will assess HIV incidence and resistance.
Findings from PrEP4U will provide essential evidence to guide scalable, equitable, person-centered delivery models for lenacapavir PrEP in the U.S. and globally.
Read the detailed description
Since the introduction of oral PrEP over a decade ago, more than 1.3 million HIV infections occur globally each year, far exceeding the UNAIDS 2030 target of < 335,000 cases. UNAIDS estimated that only 2.3 million people used PrEP in 2023, far below the target of 10 million by 2025. Oral PrEP persistence remains low, with many individuals discontinuing within 6-12 months. Factors contributing to low uptake and persistence include pill fatigue, stigma, access barriers, and medical mistrust. The gap is especially stark in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, where PrEP coverage lags behind epidemic burden.
The United States mirrors this global picture; despite broad access to healthcare, disparities in uptake and continuation persist along racial, ethnic, and gender lines. According to the CDC, in 2022 only 36% of individuals eligible for PrEP were prescribed it. Marked disparities exist: Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals and women represent a disproportionate share of new HIV diagnoses but a much smaller fraction of PrEP users. In Massachusetts, for example, Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals accounted for 35% and 31% of new HIV cases in 2022, yet only 7% and 12% of PrEP users in 2023, respectively. These disparities highlight ongoing barriers to access, stigma, and persistence.
Lenacapavir is a first-in-class HIV-1 capsid inhibitor with a novel mechanism of action and an exceptionally long half-life, enabling subcutaneous administration every 26 weeks. PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2, large multicenter randomized clinical trials, established lenacapavir's efficacy for HIV prevention. In PURPOSE 2, a Phase 3 randomized trial of over 3,000 participants at risk for HIV infection, HIV incidence with lenacapavir was 0.10 per 100 person-years, compared to 0.93 per 100 person-years in the oral F/TDF arm and 2.37 per 100 person-years in the background incidence cohort. Lenacapavir reduced HIV incidence by 96% compared with background incidence and by 89% compared with oral PrEP. No major safety concerns were identified, though 1.2% discontinued due to injection-site reactions. These findings, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2025, demonstrated that twice-yearly lenacapavir is a highly effective PrEP agent.
Lenacapavir addresses key limitations of oral PrEP:
- Persistence challenges with daily oral adherence.
- Barriers to clinic attendance for frequent refills or injections.
- Stigma associated with oral PrEP use, which may be mitigated by less frequent, more discreet dosing.
Thus, lenacapavir has the potential to transform HIV prevention - if delivery strategies are optimized.
While clinical trials demonstrate efficacy, implementation science questions remain:
- Same-day initiation: Oral PrEP initiation has successfully shifted to same-day models. However, injectable PrEP initiation has been complicated by requirements for multiple laboratory tests, delaying access. PURPOSE 1 and 2 used a combination of rapid HIV Ag/Ab, laboratory Ag/Ab, and quantitative RNA tests prior to injection. In real-world settings, RNA testing may be impractical and introduce delays. Rapid HIV testing, with confirmatory laboratory Ag/Ab tests pending, is a feasible approach aligned with WHO guidance. This balance enables timely initiation without undue barriers.
- Follow-up and persistence: Lenacapavir's twice-yearly dosing reduces pill burden but raises questions of where and how injections are delivered. Relying on centralized hospital clinics may perpetuate barriers (transportation, stigma, scheduling). In contrast, home-based and community-based PrEP delivery have shown promise for improving persistence and acceptability.
Suffolk County, Massachusetts - home to central Boston - is designated a high-burden HIV area in the U.S. "Ending the HIV Epidemic" initiative, reporting 118 new HIV diagnoses in 2022. Despite broad health insurance coverage and a state-sponsored PrEP assistance program, PrEP uptake and persistence remain insufficient among Black, Hispanic/Latino, and female populations. PrEP4U will specifically recruit participants from these priority populations through community partner organizations, mobile van services, and clinical sites. The trial is designed to address equity gaps by testing models of care that reduce stigma, bring services closer to people, and incorporate patient choice.
- Conditions
- HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use
- Being tested
- Choice of follow up, Follow up via standard clinic
- Keywords
- HIV PrEP, Injectable PrEP, Lenacapavir
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Choice of follow upOther
Randomization to either standard clinic follow up or choice of where follow up takes place
Follow up via standard clinicOther
Follow up will take place at the clinic where the first dose was administered.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PrEP Clinic | Active comparator | The PrEP Clinic arm will be randomized to receive follow up at the clinic Receives: Other: Follow up via standard clinic |
| PrEP Choice | Experimental | The PrEP Choice arm allows participants to choose where they receive their follow up Receives: Other: Choice of follow up |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PrEP persistence at 6 months
Proportion of participants in the PrEP Choice arm versus the PrEP Clinic arm who successfully receive the second on-time injection
Measured: 26 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Safety of same-day initiation based on rapid HIV testing
Proportion of individuals in whom rapid and laboratory Ag/Ab test results are consistent.
Measured: 26 weeks
Acceptability of same-day initiation and follow-up models
Participant acceptability scores measured using structured surveys
Measured: 26 weeks
Participant costs associated with PrEP delivery models
Average participant costs (financial and time) per injection visit in clinic versus community/home settings
Measured: 26 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2026
- Study start17 Jul 2026
- Primary completion1 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis UseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ruanne Barnabas, MBChB, MSc, DPhil., Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Ruanne V Barnabas, MBChB, PhD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07335289
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025P002691
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 23 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Interested parties may contact the central contact with requests for data. Data sets will be provided based on approval of request/concept by protocol team.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PrEP4U: Assessing the Effectiveness of Integrated Same-Day Lenacapavir Initiation and Follow-up Choice on PrEP Persistence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07335289
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2025P002691
- Conditions
- HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use
- Keywords
- HIV PrEP, Injectable PrEP, Lenacapavir
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Study start
- 17 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
PrEP4U is designed as a pragmatic, randomized implementation trial to test strategies that could directly inform real-world roll-out of lenacapavir. By integrating:
- Same-day initiation based on rapid HIV testing, and
- Choice of follow-up delivery location (home, community, or clinic) the study addresses two of the most pressing implementation questions for long-acting injectable PrEP.
The primary hypothesis is that giving participants choice in follow-up location will improve PrEP persistence compared to a clinic-only model. Secondary analyses will evaluate safety of rapid testing, acceptability, and participant costs. Exploratory analyses will assess HIV incidence and resistance.
Findings from PrEP4U will provide essential evidence to guide scalable, equitable, person-centered delivery models for lenacapavir PrEP in the U.S. and globally.
Detailed description
Since the introduction of oral PrEP over a decade ago, more than 1.3 million HIV infections occur globally each year, far exceeding the UNAIDS 2030 target of < 335,000 cases. UNAIDS estimated that only 2.3 million people used PrEP in 2023, far below the target of 10 million by 2025. Oral PrEP persistence remains low, with many individuals discontinuing within 6-12 months. Factors contributing to low uptake and persistence include pill fatigue, stigma, access barriers, and medical mistrust. The gap is especially stark in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, where PrEP coverage lags behind epidemic burden.
The United States mirrors this global picture; despite broad access to healthcare, disparities in uptake and continuation persist along racial, ethnic, and gender lines. According to the CDC, in 2022 only 36% of individuals eligible for PrEP were prescribed it. Marked disparities exist: Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals and women represent a disproportionate share of new HIV diagnoses but a much smaller fraction of PrEP users. In Massachusetts, for example, Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals accounted for 35% and 31% of new HIV cases in 2022, yet only 7% and 12% of PrEP users in 2023, respectively. These disparities highlight ongoing barriers to access, stigma, and persistence.
Lenacapavir is a first-in-class HIV-1 capsid inhibitor with a novel mechanism of action and an exceptionally long half-life, enabling subcutaneous administration every 26 weeks. PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2, large multicenter randomized clinical trials, established lenacapavir's efficacy for HIV prevention. In PURPOSE 2, a Phase 3 randomized trial of over 3,000 participants at risk for HIV infection, HIV incidence with lenacapavir was 0.10 per 100 person-years, compared to 0.93 per 100 person-years in the oral F/TDF arm and 2.37 per 100 person-years in the background incidence cohort. Lenacapavir reduced HIV incidence by 96% compared with background incidence and by 89% compared with oral PrEP. No major safety concerns were identified, though 1.2% discontinued due to injection-site reactions. These findings, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2025, demonstrated that twice-yearly lenacapavir is a highly effective PrEP agent.
Lenacapavir addresses key limitations of oral PrEP:
- Persistence challenges with daily oral adherence.
- Barriers to clinic attendance for frequent refills or injections.
- Stigma associated with oral PrEP use, which may be mitigated by less frequent, more discreet dosing.
Thus, lenacapavir has the potential to transform HIV prevention - if delivery strategies are optimized.
While clinical trials demonstrate efficacy, implementation science questions remain:
- Same-day initiation: Oral PrEP initiation has successfully shifted to same-day models. However, injectable PrEP initiation has been complicated by requirements for multiple laboratory tests, delaying access. PURPOSE 1 and 2 used a combination of rapid HIV Ag/Ab, laboratory Ag/Ab, and quantitative RNA tests prior to injection. In real-world settings, RNA testing may be impractical and introduce delays. Rapid HIV testing, with confirmatory laboratory Ag/Ab tests pending, is a feasible approach aligned with WHO guidance. This balance enables timely initiation without undue barriers.
- Follow-up and persistence: Lenacapavir's twice-yearly dosing reduces pill burden but raises questions of where and how injections are delivered. Relying on centralized hospital clinics may perpetuate barriers (transportation, stigma, scheduling). In contrast, home-based and community-based PrEP delivery have shown promise for improving persistence and acceptability.
Suffolk County, Massachusetts - home to central Boston - is designated a high-burden HIV area in the U.S. "Ending the HIV Epidemic" initiative, reporting 118 new HIV diagnoses in 2022. Despite broad health insurance coverage and a state-sponsored PrEP assistance program, PrEP uptake and persistence remain insufficient among Black, Hispanic/Latino, and female populations. PrEP4U will specifically recruit participants from these priority populations through community partner organizations, mobile van services, and clinical sites. The trial is designed to address equity gaps by testing models of care that reduce stigma, bring services closer to people, and incorporate patient choice.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PrEP Clinic | Active comparator | Other: Follow up via standard clinicThe PrEP Clinic arm will be randomized to receive follow up at the clinic |
| PrEP Choice | Experimental | Other: Choice of follow upThe PrEP Choice arm allows participants to choose where they receive their follow up |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- HIV negative
- Eligible for HIV PrEP per CDC guidelines
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
- Willing to receive injectable lenacapavir and adhere to study procedures
- Residing inMassachusetts with expected availability for 6-month follow-up
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Known HIV infection at baseline
- Contraindication to lenacapavir injection (e.g., hypersensitivity, significant drug interactions)
- Pregnancy at baseline (participants who become pregnant during the trial may remain enrolled if they choose)
- Participation in another interventional HIV prevention study
- Any condition judged by the investigator to compromise safety or study integrity
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Choice of follow upRandomization to either standard clinic follow up or choice of where follow up takes place | Other | PrEP Choice |
| Follow up via standard clinicFollow up will take place at the clinic where the first dose was administered. | Other | PrEP Clinic |
Primary outcome
PrEP persistence at 6 months
Time frame: 26 weeks
Proportion of participants in the PrEP Choice arm versus the PrEP Clinic arm who successfully receive the second on-time injection
3 secondary outcomes
Safety of same-day initiation based on rapid HIV testing
Time frame: 26 weeks
Acceptability of same-day initiation and follow-up models
Time frame: 26 weeks
Participant costs associated with PrEP delivery models
Time frame: 26 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Interested parties may contact the central contact with requests for data. Data sets will be provided based on approval of request/concept by protocol team.
Related trials for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Healthy Families PrEP Program for Women at Risk for HIV
HIV, Pregnancy
RecruitingPhase 4
Enhancing PrEP Uptake and Retention Among Latine TGW and GBM in the South Using Long-Acting Injectable PrEP
HIV Prevention, HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Headache and Hormone Use Among Transgender Population in Thailand: A Cross-Sectional Online Study
Headache, Migraine
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
NOTRE: Optimizing Long-Acting Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Interventions in Carceral Settings
HIV Infections, Opioid Use Disorder
Active, not recruiting
A Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach for Optimizing HIV Service Delivery in Syringe Services Programs
HIV Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ruanne V Barnabas, MBChB, PhD principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Choice of follow up and Follow up via standard clinic in people with HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Meighan Krows (617-726-2000, mkrows@mgb.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PrEP persistence at 6 months (time frame: 26 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Sep 2026.